logo
Top UK Special Forces general oversaw blocking of Afghan 'war-crime' witnesses to Britain

Top UK Special Forces general oversaw blocking of Afghan 'war-crime' witnesses to Britain

Yahoo12-05-2025

A top general who failed to report evidence of alleged SAS war crimes in Afghanistan later oversaw the rejection of hundreds of UK resettlement applications from Afghan commandos who served with the elite regiment, BBC Panorama can reveal.
Gen Sir Gwyn Jenkins led UK Special Forces (UKSF) in Afghanistan at a time when alleged war crimes were committed. He later appointed a UKSF officer under his command, who had also served in Afghanistan, to assess the Afghan commando applications after special forces headquarters was given a controversial veto over them.
Thousands of applications from individuals with credible evidence of service with Afghan Special Forces, including the units known as the Triples, were then rejected, leaving many of the former commandos at the mercy of the Taliban.
The rejections are controversial because they came at a time when a judge-led public inquiry in the UK had begun investigating the SAS for alleged war crimes on operations on which the Triples were present.
If the Afghan commandos were in the UK, they could be called as witnesses - but the inquiry has no power to compel testimony from foreign nationals who are overseas.
Some of those denied visas were subsequently tortured and killed by the Taliban, according to former colleagues, family members and lawyers.
According to internal emails and testimony from within the Ministry of Defence (MoD), obtained by Panorama, the UK Special Forces officer appointed by Gen Jenkins stood over civil service caseworkers from the resettlement scheme and instructed them to reject the Triples applications, one after another, on what sources described as spurious grounds.
A senior government source close to the process told the BBC that the UK Special Forces officer "would never have acted without direction", adding that "everything would have gone through Gwyn Jenkins".
At the time, in 2021-22, Gen Jenkins was the head of all UK Special Forces. He is now the chief strategic adviser to the Defence Secretary John Healey and is tipped to take over as First Sea Lord - the head of the Royal Navy.
Gen Jenkins was made aware of allegations that the SAS was committing extrajudicial killings in Afghanistan, but he failed to report the allegations to military police - Panorama has previously revealed - despite a legal obligation to do so. The suspected unlawful killings continued.
Panorama has now heard eyewitness testimony from veterans who served in UK Special Forces detailing alleged war crimes stretching over more than a decade and involving the SBS as well as the SAS.
Gen Jenkins did not respond to the BBC's request for comment on this story. The MoD responded on his behalf. It said in a statement that there is no evidence it has tried to prevent former Afghan troops giving evidence to the Inquiry and that "anyone can provide evidence… no matter where in the world they are".
The MoD added that it was "fully committed to delivering on our pledge to relocate and resettle eligible Afghans and their families to the UK".
"Each resettlement application is decided on its own merits against the criteria outlined in the ARAP [Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy] and immigration rules," the statement said.
The rejections of the Triples applications left caseworkers from the ARAP scheme questioning the validity of the process, given that many of the applications contained compelling evidence of service alongside British special forces.
Hundreds of rejections have since been overturned following a government review.
A letter obtained by Panorama shows that concerns were raised among cabinet ministers in January 2024 over the existence of the UK Special Forces' veto over the Triples applications.
The then Veterans Minister Johnny Mercer wrote to senior Conservatives to say the role of UKSF in denying the applications was "deeply inappropriate" and "a significant conflict of interest, that should be obvious to all".
He had been compelled to write, he added, because he had been shown evidence "that 5 members of these units have been killed having been rejected for resettlement".
Mr Mercer, who served alongside the SBS in Afghanistan before becoming an MP, went on to warn that the role of UKSF in the process had a "very high chance of being exposed by the Afghan Inquiry", which could "lead to serious questions of all those Ministers involved in the process".
The Triples units - so-called because their designations were CF 333 and ATF 444 - were set up, trained, and paid by UK Special Forces and supported the SAS and SBS on operations targeting Taliban leaders in Afghanistan.
When the country fell to the Taliban in 2021, they were judged to be in grave danger of reprisal and were entitled to apply for resettlement to the UK.
But, according to MoD documents obtained by Panorama, thousands of ARAP applications containing credible evidence of service alongside UK Special Forces were subsequently rejected.
BBC Panorama first revealed last year that it had been UK Special Forces - the very force that trained and served with the Triples - that rejected them.
"We heard some of our Triples were already killed by the Taliban," said Jumakhan Joya, a former Afghan special forces commanding officer. "Some of them are in jail in a Taliban prison. Some of them have already been disabled by the Taliban. They're breaking their hands, their legs, their head," he said.
Mr Joya told the BBC he believed that the existence of the public inquiry was the "only reason" their applications had been vetoed.
The rejections and reported reprisals have outraged some former members of British special forces. "What's happened is horrendous. It is a betrayal and it shames us all," one former UK Special Forces officer told Panorama.
Asked by Panorama about the government's rejection of Triples' applications, Bruce Houlder KC, who as a former director of service prosecutions was responsible for bringing charges against members of the armed forces, said the government must have known the Triples would have "highly relevant" evidence that would be "much easier to obtain" if they were in the UK.
"I can't think of any fair reason why we should exclude people from their right to live in this country, which is extended to others, simply because they might be in possession of information which would embarrass special forces," Mr Houlder said.
"If that is the reason, it's disreputable and it can't be supported in any way."
Do you have information about this story that you want to share?
Get in touch using SecureDrop, a highly anonymous and secure way of whistleblowing to the BBC which uses the TOR network.
Or by using the Signal messaging app, an end-to-end encrypted message service designed to protect your data.
SecureDrop or Signal: 0044 7714 956 936
Please note that the SecureDrop link will only work in a Tor browser. For information on keeping secure and anonymous, here's some advice on how to use SecureDrop.
It's proved a really important way for people to get in touch with us in the past.
Ex-UK Special Forces break silence on 'war crimes' by colleagues

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Taliban urges Afghans to ‘come home' after Trump travel ban
Taliban urges Afghans to ‘come home' after Trump travel ban

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Taliban urges Afghans to ‘come home' after Trump travel ban

The Taliban has urged Afghans hoping to emigrate to the US to return home after Donald Trump banned its citizens from entering the country. This week, the US president signed a sweeping travel ban targeting citizens from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, to stop 'foreign terrorists'. Responding to the ban on Saturday, Mohammad Hassan Akhund, the Afghan prime minister, urged citizens to return to their country, saying they would be protected even if they worked with US-led forces in the two-decade fight against the Taliban insurgency. 'For those who are worried that America has closed its doors to Afghans... I want to tell them, 'return to your country, even if you have served the Americans for 20 or 30 years for their ends, and ruined the Islamic system',' he said in a speech broadcast by state media. 'Come back to your ancestral land and live in an atmosphere of peace,' he added. The Taliban returned to power in 2021 after the withdrawal of US and UK troops. It led to a chaotic evacuation effort and forced millions to flee amid fears of reprisal for working with Washington. Although Taliban authorities declared a 'general amnesty' for those who worked with the Western-backed forces, the UN has since recorded hundreds of reports of extrajudicial killings, detentions and abuses. An investigation by the international body last year found that authorities were responsible for 218 extrajudicial killings of former government officials and Afghan forces, 14 enforced disappearances, over 144 instances of torture and ill treatment, and 424 arbitrary arrests and detentions between Aug 15 2021 and June 30 2023. Over the past four years, the Taliban government has also imposed harsh restrictions on women and girls which the UN says amount to 'gender apartheid'. In most provinces, women have been banned from travelling or leaving their houses without a man, prohibited from working, while girls are no longer allowed to attend secondary school or higher education. The US has not had a working embassy in Afghanistan since 2021 and Afghans must apply for visas in third countries, principally Pakistan, which has recently ramped up campaigns to expel Afghans. The Trump administration said the measure was meant to protect US citizens from 'aliens who intend to commit terrorist attacks, threaten our national security, espouse hateful ideology, or otherwise exploit the immigration laws for malevolent purposes'. The move, which comes into effect on Monday, follows a terror attack in Colorado that authorities blamed on a man they said was in the country illegally. 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted,' Mr Trump said in a video message from the Oval Office posted on X. 'We don't want them.' Credit: The White House His administration added that Afghanistan lacks a competent central authority for issuing passports or civil documents, lacks appropriate screening and vetting measures, and claimed that Afghans who visit the US have a high visa-overstay rate. In January, Mr Trump also suspended a core refugee programme, all but ending support for Afghans who had allied with the US and leaving tens of thousands of them stranded. On Saturday, Hibatullah Akhundzada, a leading Taliban figure, also weighed in, calling Mr Trump an 'oppressor'. He blamed the US for the deaths of Palestinian women and children in Gaza and linked this allegation to the travel ban. 'You are committing acts that are beyond tolerance,' he said. The US president also barred nationals of Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from entering the country. The ban is the latest move in Mr Trump's crackdown on immigration after he ended access to asylum at the US's southern border, ordered extensive immigration raids across the country and banned foreign students from Harvard. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Taliban leader slams Trump's travel ban on Afghans, calls U.S. an ‘oppressor'
Taliban leader slams Trump's travel ban on Afghans, calls U.S. an ‘oppressor'

Los Angeles Times

time2 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Taliban leader slams Trump's travel ban on Afghans, calls U.S. an ‘oppressor'

The top Taliban leader on Saturday slammed President Trump's travel ban on Afghans, calling the United States an oppressor, as Afghanistan's rulers seek greater engagement with the international community. The comments from Hibatullah Akhundzada marked the first public reaction from the Taliban since the Trump administration in recent days moved to bar citizens from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, from entering the U.S. Trump's executive order largely applies to Afghans hoping to resettle in the U.S. permanently, as well as those hoping to go to America temporarily, including for university studies. Since returning to power in Afghanistan in 2021, the Taliban have imposed harsh measures, including banning women from public places and education for women and girls beyond the sixth grade. Although they have so far failed to gain recognition as the country's official government, the Taliban have diplomatic relations with several countries, including China and Russia. Akhundzada released his message on the Islamic holiday of Eid al-Adha, also known as the 'Feast of Sacrifice,' from the southern city of Kandahar, where he has set up base but is rarely seen in public. In a 45-minute audio recording shared by Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid on X, Akhundzada denounced the Trump administration for imposing 'restrictions on people.' 'Citizens from 12 countries are barred from entering their land — and Afghans are not allowed either,' he said. 'Why? Because they claim the Afghan government has no control over its people and that people are leaving the country. So, oppressor! Is this what you call friendship with humanity?' He blamed the U.S. for the deaths of Palestinian women and children in Gaza, linking this allegation to the travel ban. 'You are committing acts that are beyond tolerance,' he added. The Trump administration says the measure is meant to protect U.S. citizens from 'aliens who intend to commit terrorist attacks, threaten our national security, espouse hateful ideology, or otherwise exploit the immigration laws for malevolent purposes.' It argues that Afghanistan lacks a competent central authority for issuing passports or civil documents and lacks appropriate screening and vetting measures. It also says Afghans who visit the U.S. have a high visa overstay rate. Trump also suspended a core refugee program in January, all but ending support for Afghans who had allied with the U.S. and leaving tens of thousands of them stranded. Also on Saturday, the Taliban prime minister said that all Afghans who fled the country after the collapse of the former Western-backed government are free to return home, promising they would be safe. 'Afghans who have left the country should return to their homeland,' Mohammad Hassan Akhund said. 'Nobody will harm them.' 'Come back to your ancestral land and live in an atmosphere of peace,' the Taliban prime minister said in a message on X, instructing officials to ensure returning refugees were given shelter and support. He also used the occasion to criticize the media for making what he said were 'false judgments' about Afghanistan's Taliban rulers and their policies. 'We must not allow the torch of the Islamic system to be extinguished,' he said. 'The media should avoid false judgments and should not minimize the accomplishments of the system. While challenges exist, we must remain vigilant.' The Taliban swept into the capital of Kabul and seized most of Afghanistan in a blitz in mid-August 2021 as the U.S. and NATO forces were in the last weeks of their pullout from the country after 20 years of war. The offensive prompted a mass exodus, with tens of thousands of Afghans thronging the airport in chaotic scenes, hoping for a flight out on the U.S. military airlift. People also fled across the border, to neighboring Iran and Pakistan. Among those escaping the new Taliban rulers were former government officials, journalists, activists and those who had helped the U.S. during its campaign against the Taliban. Separately, Afghans in neighboring Pakistan who are awaiting resettlement are also dealing with a deportation drive by the Islamabad government to get them out of the country. Almost a million have left Pakistan since October 2023 to avoid arrest and expulsion. Press writes for the Associated Press.

Portland to pay $1.66 million to family of Afghan refugee girl who drowned at city pool
Portland to pay $1.66 million to family of Afghan refugee girl who drowned at city pool

American Military News

time6 hours ago

  • American Military News

Portland to pay $1.66 million to family of Afghan refugee girl who drowned at city pool

Portland City Council on Wednesday unanimously approved a $1.66 million settlement with the family of a 12-year-old girl who drowned in 2023 at a city-run pool — the first fatal swimming accident at a public city pool in nearly four decades. The girl was found unresponsive in the water at Montavilla Pool on Aug. 25, 2023. Temperatures that day had topped 90 degrees. She was taken to a hospital, where she died three days later, on Aug. 28. The girl 'was a bright shining star in our lives,' her family said in a tribute shared shortly after her death by the Afghan Support Network, a nonprofit formed to help Afghan refugees. 'She aspired to become a doctor and had a strong determination to make a positive impact on the world.' The girl's family had arrived in Oregon as part of a wave of Afghan refugees following the U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Taliban's return to power. ___ © 2025 Advance Local Media LLC. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store