Pope signs decree making José Gregorio Hernández, 'doctor of the poor,' Venezuela's first saint
A date for the canonization of Dr. José Gregorio Hernández, who died in 1919, has not been set. The Vatican in a statement said Francis also decided to convene a formal meeting of cardinals to set the dates for future canonizations, but it was not immediately scheduled.
'This historic event, long awaited by the Venezuelan people, is a recognition of the exemplary life and heroic virtues of a man who dedicated his existence to alleviating human suffering and transmitting a message of love and hope,' the Archdiocese of Caracas said in a statement. 'The Catholic Church recognizes his life of holiness, accompanied by a universal devotion, which today allows him to be elevated to the altar.'
Hernández was beatified in April 2021 after the church certified a miracle in the case of a girl who completely recovered after being shot in the head in 2017.
Hernández, born on Oct. 26, 1864, in the western Venezuela town of Isnotu, never married and graduated as a doctor in Caracas, Venezuela's capital, in 1888. He was convinced that science was one of the main ways to get the South American country out of misery and went on to establish two research institutions as well as teach several classes at the Central University of Venezuela, the nation's oldest and largest.
He traveled to Europe to study and then to become a Catholic monk, but his fragile health was affected by Italy's cold and humid weather. He returned to Venezuela to recover and stayed permanently.
On June 29, 1919, Hernández was hit by a car while crossing a street shortly after picking up medicine at a pharmacy to take to an impoverished woman. His death was caused when his head hit the edge of a sidewalk. An estimated 20,000 people participated in his funeral procession, about a quarter of the population of Caracas at the time.
In 1986, the Vatican declared Hernández 'venerable,' which means that he led an exemplary Christian life. But to achieve sanctity, teams of doctors, theologians and cardinals must approve miracles attributed to him.
When Pope John Paul II, now a saint, visited Venezuela in 1996, he received a petition signed by 5 million people — at the time, almost one in four Venezuelans — asking him to declare Hernández a saint.
____
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
05-08-2025
- Metro
Man who died for 6 minutes says he ‘can't imagine anything worse' than what he saw
Hiyah Zaidi Published August 4, 2025 3:44pm Updated August 4, 2025 3:44pm Link is copied Comments Some people think that when you die you get sent to either heaven or hell. But according to some people who were clinically pronounced dead for a certain amount of time, that's not always the case. One man, who was pronounced dead for six minutes before being brought back to life, claims that the afterlife is a truly terrible place. So, what did he see? (Picture: Getty) Although it is hard to measure, there have been a few studies looking into near death experiences. In general, people tend to describe sensations of seeing their life being replayed, having out-of-body experiences, dreaming and meditative states. The research of one psychiatrist, Dr Raymond Moody, reveals that hundreds of people described pleasant experiences in which they left their body, viewed themselves from above, and passed down a tunnel toward a light that helped them to evaluate their life before returning back to life (Picture: Getty) But writing on Reddit, a man describes the situation which occurred when he was just 15 years old. After an episode of ventricular fibrillation, which is a type of irregular heart rhythm, he collapsed. He was told after that the emergency medical service arrived to the scene and discovered that his heart had stopped beating - and although this state of 'death' lasted six minutes, the man claims he went on quite a journey in the viral post (Picture: Getty) The man said things began with a white light. The light initially calmed him, and he had a feeling that he was ascending. As he was doing so, he passed several gates, before arriving to a place he describes as 'beyond reality'. He thought he was not alone, and says that several 'life forces' came towards him. He wrote: 'At first, because of my Christian upbringing, I believed them to be angels. In my incorporeal form, I made the spiritually-equivalent gesture of opening my arms, anticipating their embrace.' However, it was not what he thought it was (Picture: Getty) The man goes on to explain that he felt himself to be shackled by the lifeform's powers, and feelings of humiliation and terror came over him. He realised that these beings were 'cruel, unsympathetic overlords' that laughed at him in a manner described as 'cold' and 'mocking'. And he said that the beings revealed some 'horrifying truths about existence' which he shared in the post (Picture: Getty) He wrote: 'Our universe, like many others running parallel to it, contains a pittance of the total energy in existence. It is a farm, used to produce souls, which only arise in the precise conditions found in our cosmos. When you hear scientists talk about the improbability of the existence of our goldilocks universe, it's because they don't actually come into being spontaneously. They're designed. And the hands that craft them are not benevolent gods, but rapacious beings with little care for the creatures they create. Our ultimate purpose, I learned in the custody of the spirits that shackled me, was to ripen until we were ready to serve them on their higher plane' (Picture: Getty) He added: 'I can't imagine anything worse than what I experienced, subsumed beneath an ineffable grief and torment.' The man writes in the post that he was warned not to reveal their existence, but when he was revived, he tried to explain to anyone who would listen about what he experienced. However, he said he was brushed off, and was told he had suffered a very serious and traumatic experience for a young man. Eventually, he said he convinced himself it was all a dream. Until he met someone else (Picture: Getty) He says he met the author of a book who had claimed to meet God in the afterlife, and told him that 'he knew the truth, that slavery awaits us all'. He continued: 'A flicker in his gaze betrayed his knowledge of the fact. He really had died and visited the afterlife, but lied about it in his book. Because he knew.' So, why did the man tell his story? He wrote: 'During my visit, I learned things about our universe that I wish I hadn't. Perhaps in sharing my story, I might help our species prepare for what comes after we expire' (Picture: Getty) Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Metro
01-08-2025
- Metro
Couple welcome 'world's oldest baby' born from embryo frozen 31 years ago
A newborn has been named the world's oldest baby after being born from an embryo frozen in 1994. Lindsey Pierce, 35 and her husband Tim, 34, welcomed baby Thaddeus on July 26 after adopting the embryo. The couple from Ohio in the US had struggled to conceive for almost eight years when Lindsey became pregnant with Thaddeus. The embryo was one of four created in 31 years ago when Linda Archerd, now 62, and her husband underwent in vitro fertilisation (IVF) after they also had problems conceiving. Out of the four, one led to the birth of their daughter, who is now 30. The other three embryos remained frozen in case the couple wanted more children. Linda said: 'I called them my three little hopes. I always wanted another baby desperately.' She and her husband, however, divorced and although Linda got custody of the embryos she never used them. When she reached menopause she decided to put them up for adoption with Snowflakes, a Christian embryo adoption organisation. 'I always thought it was the right thing to do,' she said. As they had been frozen for such a long period of time, they were put undera programme called Open Hearts, a 'hard to place' scheme for embryos that are less likely to result in a healthy birth. Several years later Lindsey and Tim signed up for the scheme and were given Linda's embryo, which led to a successful pregnancy. Lindsey told MIT Technology Review: 'We are in awe that we have this precious baby.' She described the actual birth as 'rough' but said she and Thaddeus are doing well. 'We didn't go into it thinking we would break any records,' she added. 'We just wanted to have a baby.' IVF stands for 'in vitro fertilization,' a Latin phrase meaning ''n glass fertilization.' Unlike natural conception, where fertilization occurs within the body, IVF brings together eggs and sperm outside the body in a laboratory dish to achieve fertilization. The resulting embryo(s) are then transferred into the uterus, where they will hopefully implant and grow, leading to pregnancy. IVF was initially designed to help women with blocked or damaged fallopian tubes, but its now used to treat a range of fertility issues. Women under 35 have an average live birth rate per IVF cycle of about 40-45%. Success rates decrease significantly with increasing age, especially after age 40. Advancements such as embryo selection, time-lapse imaging, and genetic testing have improved outcomes. The first successful birth through IVF took place in 1978, when Louise Brown was born in Oldham, Greater Manchester. Lindsey said the whole experience was 'surreal' and 'hard to even believe'. Linda, meanwhile, said she was struck by how much Thaddeus resembles her own child as an infant. 'The first thing that I noticed when Lindsey sent me his pictures is how much he looks like my daughter when she was a baby,' she said. Before Thaddeus's birth, the oldest embryos to lead to successful births were twins born from 30-year-old embryos in Oregon in 2022. More Trending However, cases such as these are rare as few organisations will take old embryos, due to the higher risk of failing. The facility that helped the Pierces conceive, Rejoice Fertility Clinic, was set up by reformed Presbyterian Dr John Gordon, to cut down the number of embryos held in storage. He said: 'Every embryo deserves a chance at life and the only embryo that cannot result in a healthy baby is the embryo not given the opportunity to be transferred into a patient.' It's believed millions of embryos leftover from IVF procedures are being kept in freezers around the world. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: 'Panama Playlists' leak exposes JD Vance's favourite boy bands MORE: Trump tearing down parts of White House to build £150,000,000 ballroom MORE: Infant dies in hot car after being left by dad who 'forgot about him'
Reuters
25-07-2025
- Reuters
Religious freedom laws apply in drug injection site case, court says
CHICAGO, July 24 (Reuters) - An organization doesn't have to be founded with a religious purpose to claim protection under the country's laws governing the free exercise of religion, a U.S. appeals court said on Thursday in a ruling that applies the protections to nearly any group claiming to be practicing religion. A unanimous three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued the decision in a dispute involving a Philadelphia non-profit that has sought to open a supervised drug-injection site in the city. The court gave Safehouse another chance to argue that it has a religious right to do its work after reversing a lower judge's ruling holding that Safehouse, which has said its work is informed by Judeo-Christian beliefs about the need to preserve life and care for the sick, is not protected by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the free exercise clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Safehouse is fighting a long-running U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit seeking to bar it from opening the injection site. The 3rd Circuit panel sent the case back to the district court, directing it to reconsider Safehouse's claims after finding that it does qualify for the protection. Representatives for the Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Ronda Goldfein, an attorney for Safehouse, called the decision "an important milestone for all community-based organizations that save lives by evidence-based, compassionate harm-reduction strategies." The fight between Safehouse and the federal government began in 2019, during Republican President Donald Trump's first administration. At the time, Safehouse was poised to open what would have been the first such safe-injection site in the country, where drug users under supervision by medically trained professionals could obtain clean syringes and inject themselves with heroin, fentanyl or other drugs. New York City instead in 2021 became the location of the first-safe injection sites, and the Justice Department has not pursued an action to close them. Safehouse has said it will open when it has legal permission. The Justice Department argued Safehouse's plans would violate the Controlled Substances Act by maintaining a place that would facilitate illegal drug use. U.S. District Judge Gerald McHugh rejected that argument in 2020, but the 3rd Circuit reversed it a year later, saying that while the U.S. opioid epidemic "may call for innovative solutions, local innovations may not break federal law." The case came back to the 3rd Circuit after McHugh dismissed Safehouse's claims that the threat of prosecution by the DOJ for violating federal drug laws was unconstitutionally chilling its ability to exercise its religious rights. McHugh said Safehouse's articles of incorporation and tax filings said nothing about any religious activity, and while its website mentioned a religious motivation, it did not describe any apparent religious practices or behavior in its activities. But whether Safehouse is a religious entity isn't the right question, the panel said. Under the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark religious rights ruling in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, laws protecting the free expression of religion can apply to any corporations that claim to exercise religion, the court said. The case is U.S. v. Safehouse, case number 24-2027 in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. For Safehouse: Ronda Goldfein and Adrian Lowe of the AIDS Law Project of Pennsylvania, Ilana Eisenstein and Ben Fabens-Lassen of DLA Piper, Peter Goldberger of the Law Office of Peter Goldberger and Seth Kreimer of the University of Pennsylvania School of Law For the U.S.: Sarah Carroll and Lowell Sturgill, Jr. of the U.S. Department of Justice
