At least eight killed and hundreds hurt as Kenya protesters battle police
Police clashed with protesters in the capital Nairobi and other cities exactly a year on from the wave of deadly anti-government demonstrations that hit the nation in 2024.
Many of those demonstrating chanted "Ruto must go" and waved branches as a symbol of peaceful opposition to his rule.
The government banned live TV and radio coverage of the protests, but its decree was overturned by the High Court in the capital, Nairobi.
Ruto urged protesters not to threaten peace and stability, as crowds tried to reach his official residence but were pushed back by police.
"Protests should not be to destroy peace in Kenya. We do not have another country to go to when things go wrong. It is our responsibility to keep our country safe," he said.
The president was speaking at a burial ceremony in the coastal county of Kilifi.
His absence from State House, his official residence, was notable as young protesters threatened to storm it.
Police used barricades and razor wire to seal off major roads — especially those leading to State House and parliament.
The authorities have not yet given any casualty figures from Wednesday's protests, but the Kenya Medical Association, Law Society of Kenya and the Police Reforms Working Group said in a joint statement that at least eight protesters were killed.
Of the 400 injured, 83 required "specialised treatment" and eight had suffered gunshot wounds. The injured included three police officers, the statement added.
A human rights group — Amnesty Kenya — put the death toll as high as 16.
One demonstrator, Amina Mude, told the BBC she joined the protests "to fight for the future of my kids".
"I feel like as a country we're not going in the right direction, especially in education and everything happening.
"I feel like it's high time that the country and the leadership listens to us."
In Nairobi, video footage showed plumes of white tear gas drifting between buildings, sending protesters scrambling for cover, coughing, and shielding their eyes.
In the heart of the city, protesters marched pass shuttered shops and empty streets.
The fence around parliament was lined with wreaths and handwritten notes from grieving families and defiant youths — a reminder of last year's unrest at the site.
A young woman draped in a Kenyan flag clutched a poster bearing the names of those killed a year ago by the security forces as they tried to end the protests. — BBC
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
a day ago
- Saudi Gazette
Dozens dead in flash floods on popular Himalayas pilgrimage route
DELHI – Flash floods have killed 46 people in a village hosting Hindu pilgrims in Indian-administered Kashmir. The flooding took place in the remote village of Chositi in Kishtwar district, which is on a busy pilgrimage route to a famous shrine in the Himalayas. Videos shared online showed dramatic flood waters, vehicles being washed away and rescuers searching for survivors in damaged homes, as people cried in the streets – some caked in mud. Dozens of pilgrims have been evacuated to safety, but at least 50 people are feared missing, and a rescue operation is still under way. The floods were triggered by a cloudburst, officials said, with Federal Minister Jitendra Singh, who is also an MP from Jammu and Kashmir, saying it was on a "massive scale" and rescue teams were finding it difficult to reach the site. A road had been washed away, he said, and the weather was not safe enough for helicopters. He expects the incident to result in a substantial number of casualties. A resident of nearby Atholi village told news agency AFP he saw "at least 15 dead bodies" being brought into the local hospital. A large community kitchen where visiting pilgrims were eating lunch was completely washed away, an official told Reuters news agency. The region's Chief Minister Omar Abdullah described the situation as a "tragedy", announcing he was cancelling some of the cultural activities planned for Friday's Indian Independence Day celebrations. The news was "grim", he said, with accurate, verified information from the area "slow in arriving", but all available resources were being mobilised to manage the rescue operations. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi said "every possible assistance" would be available to those who need it. India's northern region has seen very heavy rainfall in recent days, triggering flash floods in several areas. Last week, nearly half of the village of Dharali, in Uttarakhand state, was submerged after it was hit by a massive flash flood. On Tuesday, officials said that 66 people were still missing and only one body had been recovered. – BBC
Saudi Gazette
2 days ago
- Saudi Gazette
Chemistry on trial: How a professor tried to convince a court she didn't kill her husband
DELHI — "Are you a chemistry professor?" the judge asked. "Yes," Mamta Pathak replied, clasping her hand in a respectful namaste. Draped in a white sari, glasses perched on her nose, the retired college teacher stood before two judges in a courtroom in the central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh, speaking as if delivering a forensic chemistry lecture. "In the post-mortem," she argued, her voice trembling but composed, "it is not possible to differentiate between a thermal burn and an electric burn mark without proper chemical analysis." Across the bench, Justice Vivek Agarwal reminded her, "The doctor who conducted the post-mortem said there were clear signs of electrocution." It was a rare, almost surreal moment — a 63-year-old woman, accused of murdering her husband by electrocution, explaining to the court how acids and tissue reactions revealed the nature of a burn. The exchange, caught on video during her April hearing, went viral in India and stunned the internet. But in the court, no amount of expert-like confidence could undo the prosecution's case — a spouse murdered and a motive rooted in suspicion and marital discord. Last month the High Court dismissed Mamta Pathak's appeal and upheld her life sentence for the April 2021 murder of her husband, Neeraj Pathak, a retired physician. While Pathak mounted a spirited, self-argued defence — invoking gaps in the autopsy, the insulation of the house, and even an electrochemical theory — the court found the circumstantial evidence conclusive: she had drugged her husband with sleeping pills and then electrocuted him. In court, Mamta, a mother of two, had peered over a stack of overflowing case files, leafing through them before she grew animated. "Sir, electric burn marks can't be distinguished as ante-mortem [before death] or post-mortem [after death]," she argued quoting from a forensics book. "How did they [doctors] write it was an electric burn mark in post-mortem [report]?". Microscopically, electrical burns look the same before and after death, making standard examination inconclusive, say experts. A close study of dermal changes may reveal whether a burn was ante — or post-mortem, according to one paper. An impromptu exchange on chemical reactions followed, with the judge probing her on laboratory processes. Mamta spoke about different acids, explaining that distinctions could be made using an electron microscope — something not possible in a post-mortem room. She tried to walk the judge through electron microscopy and different acids. Three women lawyers in the background smiled. Mamta ploughed on — she said she had been studying law in prison for a year. Flipping through her tabbed files with stickers and quoting from forensic medicine books, she pointed to alleged gaps in the investigation — from the unexamined crime scene to the absence of qualified electrical and forensic experts at the scene of the crime. "Our house was insured from 2017 to 2022, and inspections confirmed it was protected against electrical fire," she said. Mamta told the court that her husband had high blood pressure and heart disease. She stated the actual cause of death was narrowing and "calcification of his coronary arteries due to old age". She also suggested he may have slipped and sustained a hematoma, but no CT scan was conducted to confirm this. Neeraj Pathak, 65, had been found dead at the family home on 29 April 2021. The autopsy ruled electrocution as the cause of death. Days later, Mamta had been arrested and charged with murder. Police had seized an 11-meter electric wire with a two-pin plug, and CCTV footage from the couple's house. Six tablets of a sleeping pill were recovered in a strip of 10. The postmortem report cited cardiorespiratory shock from electrical current at multiple sites as the cause of death, occurring 36 to 72 hours before the autopsy conducted on 1 May. "But they didn't find my fingerprints on the strip of tablets," Mamta told the judges. But her arguments quickly unravelled, leaving Judges Agarwal and Devnarayan Sinha unconvinced. For nearly four decades, Mamta and Neeraj Pathak had lived a seemingly orderly middle-class life in Chhatarpur — a drought-prone district of Madhya Pradesh known for its farms, granite quarries, and small businesses. She taught chemistry at the local government college; he was the chief medical officer at the district hospital. They raised two sons — one settled abroad, the other, sharing a home with his mother. Neeraj retired voluntarily in 2019 after 39 years as a government doctor and then opened a private clinic at home. The incident happened during the pandemic. Neeraj was showing Covid symptoms and kept to the first floor. Mamta and her son, Nitish, stayed downstairs. Two staircases from the ground floor linked Neeraj's rooms to the open gallery and waiting hall of his private clinic, where half a dozen staff bustled between the lab and the medical store. The 97-page judgment stated that Mamta reported finding her husband Neeraj unresponsive in his bed on 29 April, but did not inform a doctor or the police until 1 May. Instead, she took her elder son to Jhansi — over 130km away — without clear reason, according to the driver, and returned the same evening. She claimed ignorance about how he died when she finally alerted the police. Beneath this silence lay a troubled marriage. The judges highlighted longstanding marital discord, with the couple living apart and Mamta suspecting her husband of infidelity. On the morning of the day he died,, Neeraj had called an associate, alleging that Mamta was "torturing him," locking him in a bathroom, withholding food for days, and causing physical injuries. He also accused her of taking cash, ATM cards, vehicle keys, and bank fixed deposit documents. Pleading for help, Neeraj's son contacted a friend who alerted the police, who then rescued the retired doctor from what was described as "Mamta's custody". The couple had even lived apart in recent times, adding weight to the court's doubts. Mamta had told the court she was the "best mother," presenting a birthday card from her children as proof. She also showed photos of herself feeding her husband and snapshots with family. Yet, the judges were unmoved. They noted that such tokens of affection didn't erase motive — after all, a "doting mother" can also be a "suspicious wife," they said. Fifty minutes into her deposition, after parrying questions and defending herself against the court's doubts, Mamta's composure faltered for the first time. "I know one thing... I did not kill him," she said, her voice trailing off. At another moment, she confessed, "I can't take this very much more." Trying to ease the tension, Judge Agarwal remarked, "You must be used to this... you must be taking classes for 50 minutes in college." "Forty minutes, sir. But they are small children," Mamta said. "Small children in college? But your designation is assistant professor," the judge pressed. "But they are kids, sir," she replied. "Don't tell us such stories," Judge Agarwal interrupted sharply. Mamta fought not just as a defendant, but as a teacher turning the courtroom into a chemistry lab — hoping to prove her innocence through science. Yet in the end, the cold facts proved stronger than her lessons. — BBC
Saudi Gazette
2 days ago
- Saudi Gazette
Australia and Vanuatu agree to $328m security and business deal
SYDNEY — Australia and Vanuatu have agreed to a 10-year deal, aimed at strengthening security and economic ties, worth A$500m ($328m; £241m). The so-called Nakamal agreement - the result of months of negotiations - will transform Australia's relationship with its Pacific neighbour, leaders from both countries said on Wednesday. "We are family," Australia's deputy prime minister Richard Marles said, adding, "Our future is very much bound together". Vanuatu's leader Jotham Napat described the deal as "win-win situation" for both nations. The deal, to be officially signed in September, comes as Australia tries to grow its influence in the region, to counter China's increased spending and power. While the Australian government did not provide further details of the deal, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) reports it will provide funds to build two large data centres in the capital, Port Vila, and Vanuatu's largest island, Santo. Millions will also be poured into helping the low-lying island to deal with the impacts of climate change, as well as building up its security. In earlier stages of the negotiations, visa-free travel for citizens of Vanuatu was also discussed and considered a key part of the deal. However, Napat told the media on Wednesday that this issue would be covered in a "subsidiary" agreement, yet to be confirmed. It is unclear what, if any, commitments Vanuatu has given Australia as part of the deal. A similar agreement fell through in 2022, after Vanuatu's previous prime minister pulled out at the last minute over security concerns, according to the ABC. At a press conference on the side of a volcano on Tanna island, one of 80 plus in the Vanuatu archipelago, Marles emphasised the "shared destiny" of the two countries. "[The deal] acknowledges that as neighbours, we have a shared security environment and a commitment to each other," he said. Australia's Foreign Minister added that the deal was about the long-term future. "The most important thing [about the deal] is where we will be [in] three and five and ten years," Penny Wong said. Vanuatu's prime minister Napat said the agreement will bring "a lot of great benefits between the two countries, whether it be the security agreement, economic transformation, with some specific focus on the mobile labour mobility and financial support". This week's Vanuatu deal comes after Australia signed similar pacts with several of its other Pacific neighbours in recent months. Canberra struck a new A$190m security deal with the Solomon Islands last December, with similar agreements also in place with Tuvalu and Papua New Guinea. — BBC
