I used the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and OnePlus 13 side-by-side; here's why this year is different
I'm an old-school Galaxy Note fan, and even though we're a long way from that era, the Galaxy Ultra phones do enough to keep me hooked. Samsung offers excellent devices with great software and powerful hardware to match. However, 2025 is turning out differently than in previous years, and OnePlus has stepped up its game with the OnePlus 13. Let's find out if it did enough to make me forget about the Galaxy S25 Ultra and keep my SIM exactly where it is.
The OnePlus mission statement always sounded good. The company offered the latest flagship processor and premium materials for less than the competition, allowing US customers to experience something different with a device featuring impressive power without the Samsung price tag. But something would always hold me back from thoroughly enjoying the phones.
That's not the case this year, as OnePlus did a fantastic job making the OnePlus 13 a complete flagship experience. I'll start with the design. When you pick up the OnePlus 13, you can immediately tell the engineers put time and effort into the device's feel. Despite the larger camera array, it's balanced, and I love the thin aluminum band around the edge. It's actually a thicker phone than the Galaxy S25 Ultra but feels thinner because of the design — it's a fantastic device to hold.
I also love that OnePlus gives us a 16GB RAM variant. You'll pay an additional $100, but it's still significantly cheaper than a base Galaxy S25 Ultra. It gives added peace of mind that my OnePlus 13 will be snappy for years, even with whatever AI advancements are in store. With the Snapdragon 8 Elite, my OnePlus 13 is a performance monster with a fantastic gaming experience. The Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset delivers as advertised, and I'm excited to see what powerful applications will eventually take full advantage of it.
OnePlus already had an advantage over Samsung regarding charging speeds, but the company took things further with the battery for 2025. You should believe everything you've heard about the OnePlus 13's 6,000mAh silicon-carbide battery — it's fantastic. I get a full two days of battery life, whereas, with the Galaxy S25 Ultra, I'm searching for a charger after lunchtime on the second day. You might not think that's a big deal, as you always remember to plug your phone in overnight. However, it's an excellent safety blanket when you don't, and whenever I forget, I don't worry about getting through my day.
Even if you forget, faster charging speeds ensure you can top off quickly. The OnePlus 13 supports 80 and 100W wired recharging with the proper adapters. Those are massive figures, considering Samsung is stuck at 45W again. OnePlus uses a dual-cell design to help with long-term battery health, which is a concern people have with faster charging speeds. All told, the OnePlus 13 comes out ahead on battery.
The hardware on OnePlus devices has always been fantastic, but the software has prevented me from truly enjoying them. I don't think OxygenOS 15 is better than One UI 7. However, OxygenOS 15 is in a much-improved position compared to previous years, and it's no longer a negative for OnePlus phones. It may not be a reason I'd buy a OnePlus 13, but it's not a reason I'd avoid picking one up.
OnePlus 13 camera samples
Camera performance is another reason I've previously avoided OnePlus phones. Photos appear a step below those of Samsung, Google, and Apple, and while I'm not a shutterbug, I want to know that my flagship phone will take a decent point-and-shoot image when needed. Whatever OnePlus and Hasselblad did for the OnePlus 13 is working, as the photos are excellent. Nighttime photography is improved, and while it's all a personal preference, there are instances when I prefer the output from my OnePlus 13 over the Galaxy S25 Ultra — something I wouldn't have been able to say in previous years.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra photo samples
I'm not going to rehash my misgivings about the Galaxy S25 Ultra. It didn't include the innovations I hoped for on the hardware side, as Samsung seems content appealing to previous Galaxy owners trading in older phones. If you're coming from a Galaxy S21 Ultra, you'll notice meaningful upgrades, and it's hard to say anything bad about the phone. It's an excellent performer in a sleek (albeit non-descript) package. If you're a long-time Samsung fan, and the newest battery and camera hardware don't excite you, the Galaxy S25 Ultra is fantastic.
However, I'd be fooling myself if I said Samsung still didn't hold significant advantages over OnePlus. One UI 7 is a phenomenal piece of software, and it's silky smooth on the Galaxy S25 Ultra. It's vital to differentiate One UI 7 from Galaxy AI, as the latter is in an awkward spot. Samsung touted AI as a reason you'd buy a Galaxy S25 Ultra, but the features aren't ready for primetime. It's not the transformative experience the company hoped for, but it doesn't mean all is lost. One UI 7 is solid, and Samsung offers 7 One UI version upgrades and 7 years of software support. There are plenty of reasons you'd choose a Galaxy S25 Ultra over a OnePlus 13; its software is at the top of the list.
Another reason you'd buy a Galaxy S25 Ultra is the display. I understand it's not the newest display technology, but it's a gorgeous panel — the best I've seen on a smartphone in a long time. I don't know how many phone screens I stare at yearly, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra's display dazzles me every time I pick it up. I'm glad Samsung moved away from the natural color tones on the Galaxy S24 Ultra, returning to the vibrant hues it's known for. You can still dial back the saturation if needed, but I love having the option. We stare at our smartphone displays for hours a day, so a good panel is essential. I understand some users will struggle with PWM dimming on the Galaxy S25 Ultra, but it's an incredible smartphone display that will please most of us.
I'm disappointed that Samsung removed some S pen functions, but I'm glad it's there. I use it to scroll through social media and scribble notes on documents. It's fantastic for cropping GIFs to send to friends and write down a number quickly. I hate to see the S pen's role diminished, and I hope it's not a sign that Samsung plans to remove it entirely.
I prefer the OnePlus 13 over the Galaxy S25 Ultra this year, but I understand it's difficult for most people to switch. There aren't OnePlus stores in the US you can walk into when something goes wrong, and you can't finance one through your carrier. A smartphone is a lifeline for people, and the thought of going without when something goes wrong frightens many consumers.
In most years, I wouldn't mention carrier store financing, but Samsung targeted upgrade cycles to sell new flagships, banking on users coming from an older Galaxy model. If you're an enthusiast like myself, pick up a OnePlus 13. If you've never removed a SIM card from a phone, buy the Galaxy S25 Ultra.
The OnePlus 13 is a beast of a phone. With a refreshed design, a mostly curveless display, and a massive 6,000mAh battery capable of getting you through a day without breaking a sweat, this could be the Snapdragon 8 Elite-powered smartphone to beat in 2025. And hey, it's got a pretty great camera system, too.
Samsung's Galaxy S25 Ultra leaves the Note-like design behind for the very first time. With flat edges, curved corners, and a massive 6.9-inch display, this is a modern flagship through and through — and yes, that S Pen is still here too.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Digital Trends
3 hours ago
- Digital Trends
I've tried many Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases. Here's what they're missing
The new Galaxy Z Fold 7 is impressively thin, and as I found in our Galaxy Z Fold 7 review, this hardware design makes it the best folding phone for most people. Yet, there's one key problem with it: the camera design. Samsung chose to keep the camera in its trademark vertical array on the left rear of the Galaxy Z Fold 7, and it's considerably thicker than the rest of the phone. It's surprisingly not that top-heavy, but an unfortunate side-effect of the design is a wobble when placed on its rear on a phone. A wobble would be an understatement; it wobbles considerably, which can be frustrating if you put your phone rear-first on a table, especially with vibrations enabled. Recommended Videos You may be thinking that a case would solve the problem, but it turns out that most won't. I've found one that will, but it misses the mark in one big way. I've tried many Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases, and here's the one thing that's still missing. Most Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases take the same approach Most Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases that I've tried have followed the same approach: protect the back of the phone and the camera primarily, and secondly, add any specific accessories for that case to the bottom half of the case. Samsung's official cases have all followed the same mold. Each one serves a specific, singular purpose, rather than trying to do too much like many of the best third-party options. The silicone case comes with a kickstand attached, but it doesn't solve the wobble issue. The carbon fiber case lacks any other purpose (other than being an ultra-thin and somewhat protective case), so the wobble is considerable with that case attached. The same applies to the clear case. Many of the best third-party cases also fail to solve this wobble problem, with most companies focusing on durability or thickness, or featuring accessories like kickstands. The official clear grip case almost solves the wobble Then there's the clear grip case, and since I first saw this alongside the Galaxy Z Fold 7 at Galaxy Unpacked, I've wondered if this case would solve the wobble. The key difference from the regular clear case is the added adjustable grip strap, and this is nearly identical in thickness to the camera surround. Hurrah, I hear you cry? Unfortunately, not quite: the grip is on the left rear like the camera bump, which means there's nothing counterbalancing it on the right rear side. The net result is that this clear case half-solves the wobble problem, but it feels counterintuitive considering the alternative would have also solved this. The grip case would have been the ideal contender to also solve this problem as the strap is adjustable to one of two positions. At its smaller setting, it's the same thickness as the camera bump (but this makes it quite hard to hold if you have larger hands like me). At the larger size, it's thicker than the camera bump. This is what Samsung should have done instead Despite this, it feels like a missed opportunity to provide a solution for customers. Instead, the solution feels obvious: build cases with the grip on the other side of the phone. Yes, it will impact how comfortable it is – E.g., when using the grip case, it may be too far to be completely comfortable – but this is a trade-off that's likely worth it. There's another possible approach as well: add a few small superfluous items to the case that happen to be in the right position and the right size to help solve the wobble. We've already seen some handy customers modify their Galaxy Z Fold 7 to solve this problem, so it's clear that there's demand for a solution. The real question is which case company will provide that solution. The best Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases so far After trying so many Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases, I realized that while I appreciate several cases, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 design is too good to cover it. Yes, I love the kickstand on the Silicon case, and the grip case is wonderful for keeping hold of the phone, but both somewhat take away from the phone's beauty. We're still finalizing our best Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases guide, but so far, I like Spigen's ultra-thin case for the best carbon fiber case, and Samsung's official grip case is the best I've tried for adding grip. If you're looking to add a kickstand, this is where it gets interesting: Samsung offers the best silicon kickstand case, while Thinborne provides protection for both the front and rear of your phone, is ultra-thin, and has a magnetic ring for MagSafe-like charging. As we reported previously, the official Galaxy Z Fold 7 cases come with the anti-reflecting screen protector included, so you'll want to keep this in mind.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
OnePlus Pad Lite hands-on: Great value Android tablet
The Lite name may suggest the OnePlus Pad Lite is a bit basic, but in reality, the best tablets don't always have to be big, serious powerhouses to be compelling. When you then consider the cost of OnePlus's latest slate, you probably won't care much about the specs for long. The OnePlus Pad Lite has only just landed on our desk, so here's a quick look at what to expect if you get in early with your pre-order. No lightweight But it feels really solid The OnePlus Pad Lite shares a similar design to the OnePlus Pad 2, with its camera module mounted at the top-center of the rear panel when it's looked at in landscape. The back has a two-tone effect and comes in a single Aero Blue color. The corners are all softly curved, and while the front glass is elevated above the 7.4mm thick chassis, you can't feel the edges against your palm, which should lessen any chance of fatigue when holding it for long periods. However, you are going to notice the weight. At 530 grams, it doesn't sound very heavy, but there's a solidity to the tablet that gives it some real heft. It's fairly well-balanced, but when you hold it from the bottom corners in landscape orientation, you'll feel the top of the OnePlus Pad Lite pulling down. You'll get used to it, and at least the OnePlus Pad Lite is lighter than the 675-gram OnePlus Pad 3. OnePlus chose an LCD screen for the Pad Lite, measuring 11 inches with a 1920 x 1200 resolution, a 90Hz refresh rate, and 500 nits peak brightness. It's bright enough for use indoors, and the viewing angles are acceptable. I've noticed the 90Hz refresh rate doesn't kick in as often as I'd like at this stage, and the tablet's construction means the screen appears to sit slightly "back" from the glass and bezel, which stops it looking as modern as some other tablets. What about performance? An audio treat Surrounding the screen are four speakers, all Hi-Res certified, and the tablet also includes support for codecs including AptX, AptX HD, and LDAC. Crank the volume up and the OnePlus Pad Lite's speakers have real presence. There's no distortion until you pass the 75% volume mark, but by that point, it's already pretty loud, so there won't be many reasons to do so. Driving the tablet is a MediaTek Helio G100 processor and 6GB of RAM. The chip has been out for about a year now, and is mostly found in mid-to-low range smartphones, so don't expect the OnePlus Pad Lite to be suitable for playing the very top games at their highest graphics settings. It's not really made for such activity, but in the short time I've tested the OnePlus Pad Lite, it has run Chrome and YouTube without any problem, but there may be a hint of heat buildup on the screen after a while. It's unlikely to be anything to worry about, but gamers may notice it at times. Inside the tablet is a 9,340mAh battery with support for 33W SuperVOOC fast charging, and OnePlus says a single charge will power the tablet for 11 hours of continuous video streaming. The Android 15 and OxygenOS 15 software brings over the excellent extended standby tweaks seen on the OnePlus Pad 3, where OnePlus claims the battery should last for 54 days without being switched off, so it'll be ready to use when you are. Seriously competitive price If you can buy one Sounds good, doesn't it? Unfortunately, the OnePlus Pad Lite is not currently available in the U.S., but it's up for pre-order now in the UK ready for release on August 14. The OnePlus Pad Lite has a retail price of £200, which converts to $266, and is available for pre-order in the UK for £170, or about $226. That's strong value for a well-made tablet from a big-name manufacturer, especially when the OnePlus Pad 3 costs £600 or $700. Considering tablets are often second or even third devices in a house, and can be used purely as media machines, this makes the OnePlus Pad Lite more tempting than tablets priced as laptop alternatives. I really like the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE, but even its £500/$500 price was needlessly high if you only want the basics. Equally, if you've been looking at the Amazon Fire Max 11 but have been put off by the lack of Google Play, the OnePlus Pad is shaping up to be a strong alternative without that particular downside. Ahead of our full review coming soon, the OnePlus Pad Lite looks to be the low-cost tablet we deserved to see after a spate of cool, but expensive and unnecessarily powerful tablets.
Tom's Guide
4 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE review: Not like this
The Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE has faded into the background compared to the much-upgraded Galaxy Z Flip 7, and the giant step forward for Samsung that was the Galaxy Z Fold 7. But as Samsung's cheapest folding phone to date, it shouldn't be ignored. I've been wanting a cheaper foldable from Samsung for years at this point, and I'm glad one has finally arrived. What I'm less happy about is Samsung's decision to use the Galaxy Z Flip 6 as a base, as that leads to a number of consequences for the quality of the new phone's features, and not all of them good. But with the Galaxy Z Flip 7 still starting at more than $1,000, and the standard Motorola Razr (2025) basically the only other choice at this price, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is still worth considering. It's a way of getting a foldable phone while still spending around the same amount of money as you would for a non-folding flagship phone. Just make sure you read through our testing results and my thoughts on this phone before you make any big decisions. While the Galaxy Z Flip series has never been as expensive as the Galaxy Z Fold, its $1,000 price tag could never really be called approachable. Starting at $899/£849/AU$1,499, the Z Flip 7 FE is on par with a Galaxy S25 or iPhone 16, making your buying decision a little easier. I still wish the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE price had gone lower, though. Samsung could have blown the foldables market wide open with a $600/700 model, making this technology affordable to even more potential users. Instead, the £200/$200/AU$300 difference between this phone and the more premium Flip is kind of small. What's worse is that the gap shrinks to $150/£140/AU$200 if you go for the Z Flip 7 FE's 256GB storage version (costing $959/£909/AU$1,599) to match the Z Flip 7's default capacity. Maybe 128GB is enough for your needs, but for future-proofing purposes, more on-board storage is my preference. Both of Samsung's latest flip foldables use the same combination of 50MP main, 12MP ultrawide and 10MP selfie cameras, identical right down to the sensors, lenses and available formats. But when you compare the photos from these phones side-by-side, there are still some differences. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. For instance, this main camera shot of a field and footpath has ended up brighter on the FE for some reason. It's the same in a different image across the Welsh countryside below too. Presumably there's some difference in how the two different chips in the Z Flip 7 and Z Flip 7 FE process their shots. Because with identical camera hardware and software, there's not much else that could cause this disparity. This shot of a bridge over a stream was taken at 50MP on both phones, rather than the default 12MP. Here we see the regular Z Flip 7 pull ahead as it's brighter without losing detail. At 2x zoom, pointing the phones down this path, we see the Z Flip 7 FE's shot is brighter again but loses color as a result. Both are still detailed though, using the 50MP sensor as a substitute for a proper telephoto camera. We now move to the ultrawide camera, the other main sensor on both the Z Flip 7 FE and Z Flip 7. This egg box looks more saturated in color in the Z Flip 7 FE image, which is beneficial given the dark wood the box is made from. It's the first of these images where I think the Z Flip 7 FE outright beats its more expensive sibling. Finally, we have a portrait mode selfie. The Z Flip 7 has given us the more saturated shot, but at the expense of texture detail in my skin and my shirt. The Z Flip 7 FE's portrait effect is much stronger for some reason, but has also blurred part of my glasses by accident. Many of Samsung's latest features are available here on the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE since it's running One UI 8, just like Samsung's other new foldables. That includes all the abilities built into Google Gemini, which works alongside Samsung's own Bixby assistant. Together, the two digital helpers are ready to answer questions, provide summaries, adjust your settings or enable Now Bar and Now Brief, available on both the inner and outer Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE screens for quickly referencing your daily schedule. For creative purposes, you can make generative edits and fixes to your images, or try the newly upgraded Audio Eraser to clean up the sound in your videos. Unfortunately, there is no DeX mode available here, despite Samsung having added support to the Galaxy Z Flip 7 for the first time. Not everyone cares about having a desktop mode built into their phone, but it can certainly be handy with the right accessories. Like Samsung's other recent flagship phones, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is promised to get seven years of Android updates and security patches. Even though the Z Flip 7 FE's hardware isn't as new as the other two foldables Samsung launched this year, its software will always be on par. And what's more, that's more than twice as long as the three years of support you get with the Razr 2025. Presumably as part of its cost-cutting strategy for the Z Flip 7 FE, Samsung gave its new cheaper foldable an Exynos 2400 chipset. This is a flagship-grade chip from the previous year, and a step behind both Samsung's latest, 3-nanometer Exynos 2500 used in the regular Z Flip 7 and the Snapdragon 8 Elite chip used in the Z Fold 7 and most flagship Android phones this year. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 Motorola Razr (2025) Chipset Exynos 2400 Exynos 2500 Dimensity 7400X Geekbench 6 score (single-core / multi-core) 2044 / 6761 2286 / 8079 1089 / 3075 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (score / fps) 3042 / 18.2 4325 / 25.9 1021 / 6.1 Adobe Premiere Rush time to transcode (mins:secs) 1:15 1:04 1:21 The Exynos 2400 does outperform the Motorola Razr's Dimensity 7400X chip on all key fronts, but lags behind the newer Exynos 2500, especially on the GPU front. But outside the lab, the Z Flip 7 FE runs into a problem — heat and performance throttling. There is a massive gap between the Z Flip 7 FE's full potential and what you get after a few minutes of activity. Playing Ex Astris at max graphics settings, the Z Fold 7 FE struggles to keep up at maximum graphics settings. This is a game that runs perfectly on a Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, but the Exynos 2400 struggles to keep a high, consistent frame rate. Similar to the chip downgrade, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE uses 8GB of RAM, instead of 12GB like Samsung's other foldables. Its available storage capacities are either 128GB or 256GB, a step down from the 256GB/512GB offered on the Z Flip 7. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE inherits the Galaxy Z Flip 6's oddly-shaped 3.4-inch, 60Hz cover display. The folder-shaped cutout works fine, but it's not as exciting or useful as the full top half of the phone being a 120Hz 4.1-inch display, as it is on the Z Flip 7. Equally, given Samsung is reluctant to give users proper access to apps on the outer screen, you don't miss out on too much compared to the more expensive flip foldable. That said, it's questionable if the extra space on the Z Flip 7 really makes a difference. Both of Samsung's new flip foldables are still focused on using widgets on the cover screen, rather than normal apps like its main rival, the Moto Razr 2025. It means the inner display is still where you'll spend the vast majority of your time, even if you can check notifications or appointments, alter quick settings or even take photos with the phone folded (at least without additional modifying apps downloaded). The whole Z Flip 7 FE feels unfortunately dated, even if it's a brand new phone based on a one-year-old design. Such is the leap Samsung made with the Galaxy Z Flip 7. I didn't notice how the inner screen of the Z Flip 7 FE is a smaller 6.7-inch panel rather than 6.9 inches as you get on the Z Flip 7, but I did notice the bezels being way thicker and more obtrusive on the FE. There is definitely a difference in the depth of the crease in the display too, but not one that spoils the experience on the FE. The most noticeable physical difference is the hinge. The Z Flip 7 FE's mechanism is way stiffer than the Z Flip 7, despite both phones having smooth folding actions, and being capable of holding their position at any point between open and closed. Samsung wasn't kidding about the advancements it made to the Z Fold 7's mechanism, but it's hard to understand without comparing it directly to what the old hinge feels like. On the brighter side, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 FE is actually a touch lighter than the Z Flip 7. The FE also has the same water and dust resistance rating (IP) as the Z Flip 7, the same Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protecting the back and cover display and the same Armor Aluminum frame. None of these will hopefully ever matter to you, but if there's ever an accidental drop or immersion, you'll be grateful for the durability. It's slightly disappointing that you only have black and white colors to choose from on the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE. The Z Flip 7 comes in black, blue and red (plus an online-exclusive mint green), which give users the option of a more exciting color if they want. Our lab testing of the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE's display revealed it has one advantage over its rivals — a higher peak brightness. It's behind on color gamut coverage though, although at least it has similar color accuracy to the regular Z Flip 7. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 Motorola Razr (2025) Peak brightness (nits) 2105 1989 1916 sRGB color gamut volume (%) 141.3 151.7 207.3 DCI-P3 color gamut volume (%) 100.1 107.4 146.8 Color accuracy (∆E, lower is better) 0.24 0.23 0.34 The Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE features the same battery capacity as previous Z Flip models: 4,000 mAh. Meanwhile, you get an upgraded 4,300 mAh cell in the standard Z Flip 7. Between that capacity difference and the power efficiency of the two different chips, it's no surprise that we found a big battery life gap in our testing. In our test, which sets phones to constantly open different sites on a web browser over cellular data until the battery gives out, it took 9 hours and 12 minutes at regular adaptive refresh rate mode for the Z Flip 7 FE to give up, below the average phone's result by more than an hour. The Z Flip 7 managed 12 hours and 24 minutes. And the Razr 2025 does even better, lasting 13 hours and 36 minutes. Charging is again a choice of 25W wired or 15W wireless, something that the regular Galaxy Z Flip 7 doesn't change either. A drained Z Flip 7 FE fills reaches 56% capacity after 30 minutes, at least making it a bit faster to power up than its rivals. The Razr 2025 makes it to 42% on the same charger, and the Z Flip 7 to 55% I fully swapped to the Galaxy Z Flip 7 after I finished testing the FE, and it's confusing to think that both of these phones came out at the same time. The regular Z Flip 7 is a brilliant device, and deservedly sits at the top of our best foldable phones guide. But whether the Z Flip 7 FE deserves similar praise is not so clear. If the Z Flip 7 FE was cheaper, or shared more of the Z Flip 7's upgrades, this would be an easy phone to recommend for foldable-curious users wanting to eke the most out of their phone-buying budget. But the phone we have is lower-powered, a lot less power efficient and uses outdated design elements, while dropping the cost by less than a fifth — not much of a discount considering what you lose out on. The ideal user for the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is someone craving the futuristic and convenient form-factor of a flip foldable, but also, counterintuitively, doesn't mind getting lesser and older hardware in its place. The software and camera experience is on par with the full-fat Galaxy Z Flip 7, so you don't have to worry about missing out on updates or image quality compared to the more expensive Samsung flip phone. But you'll have to accept you could have get more camera, performance and battery life potential for your money by settling for a non-folding flagship phone.
