I didn't realise how bad my hearing was until I had my ear wax removed
The process of restoring my hearing has taken a while. Three weeks ago, the Telegraph Health editor asked if I'd be willing to be videoed getting my ears cleaned out.
'What?' I responded, wondering why my editor might want a video of beer-weaned trout.
When I told my partner about this assignment, he was delighted, reeling off all the times I'd accused him of mumbling when, he claimed, his volume was normal. 'I'm sure it's not that bad,' I demurred. Later, as we ate our blackened dinner – I hadn't heard the oven timer going off – I conceded that he may have a point.
In 2019, earwax removal services, formerly free to access at GPs practices, were removed from the roster of 'core services' GPs were obliged to provide. Six years later, the Royal National Institute for Deaf People (RNID) says it's a postcode lottery as to whether those who need the treatment can get it.
According to the RNID, 2.3 million Britons suffer with excess wax requiring professional removal every year, leaving many people vulnerable to reduced hearing.
Just as in my case, hearing loss is often detected by family or friends rather than the person experiencing it, says Mitan Katelia, the pharmacist who first checked my ears. 'Our busiest time for hearing checks is after Christmas,' he explains. 'It becomes evident which forces people to act.'
It's partly down to the stigma around hearing, thinks Dr Krishan Ramdoo, a former ENT surgeon who founded TympaHealth, the UK's largest provider of hearing assessment technology. 'If you woke up and you couldn't see, you would seek medical attention,' he says. 'But when people experience hearing loss, they muddle on and find ways to get around it.'
That's me. I've always had intermittent hearing loss. If I ever go swimming, I'll be near-deaf in at least one ear for a week or so. Similarly if I get a cold I sometimes wake up with a blocked ear for a few days. It's annoying but I remind myself to say 'I beg your pardon?' instead of 'what?', and hope it'll sort itself out.
This is not the course of action recommended by Dr Ramdoo.
'Hearing is hugely important to our health. Hearing loss is the single biggest modifiable risk factor in the prevention of dementia,' he tells me. 'When you lose your hearing you automatically feel disengaged with your environment so it leads to social isolation. If you have untreated hearing loss you're also three times more likely to have a fall.'
I've seen all of these issues personally. My grandmother refused hearing aids and soon began complaining that she couldn't follow conversations. She became reclusive and, after a fall landed her in hospital, she was diagnosed with dementia.
But I'm 31, not 81, surely this shouldn't matter so much to me? 'Maybe not yet, but the World Health Organisation thinks that by 2030 hearing loss will overtake diabetes and cataracts in the top 10 burdens on global health,' says Dr Ramdoo. 'We're wearing headphones all the time, going to loud concerts, sitting beside busy roads – our ears didn't evolve to cope with these constant micro-traumas.'
Soon Katelia had his camera and suction tube in my ear. 'Hmm,' he said. 'You have a lot of wax in there.'
'What?' I replied.
'A lot of wax!' he bellowed.
My other ear was the same. Katelia showed me the videos he had taken (click to watch below). In each of my ear canals sat a hard ball of wax, both so old that they'd had lost their golden hue and morphed into a pair of pitch black clumps.
Part of the problem is that I have the tightest ear canals Katelia has ever seen among the thousands of patients he has worked on (I'm slightly proud of this superlative.)
I was dispatched with a bottle of olive oil and told to put a few drops into my dainty little ears every morning and night to help soften the wax.
Given that cotton buds are strictly forbidden (they just push the wax further back into the ear and can damage the ear drum which can lead to permanent deafness) olive oil is usually the first port of call for home remedies. For most people it'll soften the wax enough for it to come out on its own.
A week later I was back in his clinic; 'a lot has come out,' Katelia advised. But the black clumps were still firmly in post, if a little frayed around the edges. I was sent away again, this time with the next step up from olive oil: sodium bicarbonate drops to soften the lumps. I left thinking about a scene from Dreamworks's 2001 film Shrek where the ogre extracts a glob of wax from his ear so big he can make a candle from it.
The following week I was visited by Katelia's colleague, the Pearl Pharmacy Group's brightest talent when it comes to removing earwax.
After a quick inspection, we were off again: the microsuction machine at full whack. My pharmacist glaring into my ear with intense concentration, sweat beading across her brow. The machine was emitting a high pitched whine.
'Keep going,' I demanded. 'I can feel it moving.'
'I'm giving it all she's got, Captain!' the pharmacist snapped back.
For one brief, golden moment, it felt like she'd got it – my hearing suddenly clicked into high-definition. I could hear like never before. But then the microsuction hose retracted and it was blocked again. The pharmacist was able to open up a small hole between my ear drum and the canal, but the wax soon slipped back. It shifted, but remained unextractable.
'I really believe I can do it,' the pharmacist said with determination. 'I don't want to use too much force because your ear canals are so tight I can't see around the wax. For all I know it's adhered to your ear drum. If I turn the suction up too much it could rip a hole in it.'
When I returned in three days time it was the same story: a glimmer of success, but no cigar.
With nothing more to be done, I'm referred upwards. Dr Ramdoo's friend, a fellow ENT specialist, Joseph Manjaly sees me at his private clinic. When I arrive he's already seen my file and the videos that the pharmacy had sent.
'Are my ear canals the tightest you've seen?' I demand.
'Definitely in the top 10, I'd say,' Manjaly says. I am mollified. 'But it's not the worst case I've ever dealt with.'
The end being in sight now, I wonder how big a difference to my hearing I should expect. One thing I find most annoying is that when I'm in a noisy environment – a busy restaurant for instance – my ears tend to lock onto whatever the loudest sound is (invariably an American having a personal conversation) and then tune out everything else.
'That happens because your hearing isn't great and your brain gets worn out by trying to sort through all the different sounds, so it just fixates on whatever is easiest for it to hear,' Manjaly explains. 'Once the wax is out that shouldn't be a problem any more.'
Then we're away, there's the crackling as the last of the olive oil gets slurped out and then the pop of the wax plug springing forth. The globules of black grime aren't as big as I expected – each is about the size of my little fingertip – but are satisfyingly disgusting.
After he's finished, Manjaly gives me a hearing test. The results? 'Perfectly average.'
Since my ears have been cleaned, I no longer have to lean in close to hear someone in a crowded room, I can hear approaching cars, I've never missed the oven timer. The world suddenly feels crisp and defined; it's the equivalent of having spent the past few years watching a flickering old TV then upgrading to a high-definition 4K cinema screen.
What I'm surprised by is how much I'd been compensating. A few weeks ago, I'd have said my hearing was basically fine. I'm just discovering how much I couldn't hear.
For most of us, hearing gradually declines from the age of 35. Given we know how badly hearing loss affects us, it's worth a check up, isn't it? Take my experiences as proof that just because you think you can hear doesn't mean you can and if you're always complaining about your partner mumbling, maybe the problem lies in your ears.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
I didn't realise how bad my hearing was until I had my ear wax removed
There's a crackling, like someone tuning an old radio, then a violent pop as if a champagne cork exploded near my head. And all of a sudden I can hear. The hum of the air conditioning, a shout from the street outside, distant traffic; the world which had been a dull and distant fog to me comes rushing in. The process of restoring my hearing has taken a while. Three weeks ago, the Telegraph Health editor asked if I'd be willing to be videoed getting my ears cleaned out. 'What?' I responded, wondering why my editor might want a video of beer-weaned trout. When I told my partner about this assignment, he was delighted, reeling off all the times I'd accused him of mumbling when, he claimed, his volume was normal. 'I'm sure it's not that bad,' I demurred. Later, as we ate our blackened dinner – I hadn't heard the oven timer going off – I conceded that he may have a point. In 2019, earwax removal services, formerly free to access at GPs practices, were removed from the roster of 'core services' GPs were obliged to provide. Six years later, the Royal National Institute for Deaf People (RNID) says it's a postcode lottery as to whether those who need the treatment can get it. According to the RNID, 2.3 million Britons suffer with excess wax requiring professional removal every year, leaving many people vulnerable to reduced hearing. Just as in my case, hearing loss is often detected by family or friends rather than the person experiencing it, says Mitan Katelia, the pharmacist who first checked my ears. 'Our busiest time for hearing checks is after Christmas,' he explains. 'It becomes evident which forces people to act.' It's partly down to the stigma around hearing, thinks Dr Krishan Ramdoo, a former ENT surgeon who founded TympaHealth, the UK's largest provider of hearing assessment technology. 'If you woke up and you couldn't see, you would seek medical attention,' he says. 'But when people experience hearing loss, they muddle on and find ways to get around it.' That's me. I've always had intermittent hearing loss. If I ever go swimming, I'll be near-deaf in at least one ear for a week or so. Similarly if I get a cold I sometimes wake up with a blocked ear for a few days. It's annoying but I remind myself to say 'I beg your pardon?' instead of 'what?', and hope it'll sort itself out. This is not the course of action recommended by Dr Ramdoo. 'Hearing is hugely important to our health. Hearing loss is the single biggest modifiable risk factor in the prevention of dementia,' he tells me. 'When you lose your hearing you automatically feel disengaged with your environment so it leads to social isolation. If you have untreated hearing loss you're also three times more likely to have a fall.' I've seen all of these issues personally. My grandmother refused hearing aids and soon began complaining that she couldn't follow conversations. She became reclusive and, after a fall landed her in hospital, she was diagnosed with dementia. But I'm 31, not 81, surely this shouldn't matter so much to me? 'Maybe not yet, but the World Health Organisation thinks that by 2030 hearing loss will overtake diabetes and cataracts in the top 10 burdens on global health,' says Dr Ramdoo. 'We're wearing headphones all the time, going to loud concerts, sitting beside busy roads – our ears didn't evolve to cope with these constant micro-traumas.' Soon Katelia had his camera and suction tube in my ear. 'Hmm,' he said. 'You have a lot of wax in there.' 'What?' I replied. 'A lot of wax!' he bellowed. My other ear was the same. Katelia showed me the videos he had taken (click to watch below). In each of my ear canals sat a hard ball of wax, both so old that they'd had lost their golden hue and morphed into a pair of pitch black clumps. Part of the problem is that I have the tightest ear canals Katelia has ever seen among the thousands of patients he has worked on (I'm slightly proud of this superlative.) I was dispatched with a bottle of olive oil and told to put a few drops into my dainty little ears every morning and night to help soften the wax. Given that cotton buds are strictly forbidden (they just push the wax further back into the ear and can damage the ear drum which can lead to permanent deafness) olive oil is usually the first port of call for home remedies. For most people it'll soften the wax enough for it to come out on its own. A week later I was back in his clinic; 'a lot has come out,' Katelia advised. But the black clumps were still firmly in post, if a little frayed around the edges. I was sent away again, this time with the next step up from olive oil: sodium bicarbonate drops to soften the lumps. I left thinking about a scene from Dreamworks's 2001 film Shrek where the ogre extracts a glob of wax from his ear so big he can make a candle from it. The following week I was visited by Katelia's colleague, the Pearl Pharmacy Group's brightest talent when it comes to removing earwax. After a quick inspection, we were off again: the microsuction machine at full whack. My pharmacist glaring into my ear with intense concentration, sweat beading across her brow. The machine was emitting a high pitched whine. 'Keep going,' I demanded. 'I can feel it moving.' 'I'm giving it all she's got, Captain!' the pharmacist snapped back. For one brief, golden moment, it felt like she'd got it – my hearing suddenly clicked into high-definition. I could hear like never before. But then the microsuction hose retracted and it was blocked again. The pharmacist was able to open up a small hole between my ear drum and the canal, but the wax soon slipped back. It shifted, but remained unextractable. 'I really believe I can do it,' the pharmacist said with determination. 'I don't want to use too much force because your ear canals are so tight I can't see around the wax. For all I know it's adhered to your ear drum. If I turn the suction up too much it could rip a hole in it.' When I returned in three days time it was the same story: a glimmer of success, but no cigar. With nothing more to be done, I'm referred upwards. Dr Ramdoo's friend, a fellow ENT specialist, Joseph Manjaly sees me at his private clinic. When I arrive he's already seen my file and the videos that the pharmacy had sent. 'Are my ear canals the tightest you've seen?' I demand. 'Definitely in the top 10, I'd say,' Manjaly says. I am mollified. 'But it's not the worst case I've ever dealt with.' The end being in sight now, I wonder how big a difference to my hearing I should expect. One thing I find most annoying is that when I'm in a noisy environment – a busy restaurant for instance – my ears tend to lock onto whatever the loudest sound is (invariably an American having a personal conversation) and then tune out everything else. 'That happens because your hearing isn't great and your brain gets worn out by trying to sort through all the different sounds, so it just fixates on whatever is easiest for it to hear,' Manjaly explains. 'Once the wax is out that shouldn't be a problem any more.' Then we're away, there's the crackling as the last of the olive oil gets slurped out and then the pop of the wax plug springing forth. The globules of black grime aren't as big as I expected – each is about the size of my little fingertip – but are satisfyingly disgusting. After he's finished, Manjaly gives me a hearing test. The results? 'Perfectly average.' Since my ears have been cleaned, I no longer have to lean in close to hear someone in a crowded room, I can hear approaching cars, I've never missed the oven timer. The world suddenly feels crisp and defined; it's the equivalent of having spent the past few years watching a flickering old TV then upgrading to a high-definition 4K cinema screen. What I'm surprised by is how much I'd been compensating. A few weeks ago, I'd have said my hearing was basically fine. I'm just discovering how much I couldn't hear. For most of us, hearing gradually declines from the age of 35. Given we know how badly hearing loss affects us, it's worth a check up, isn't it? Take my experiences as proof that just because you think you can hear doesn't mean you can and if you're always complaining about your partner mumbling, maybe the problem lies in your ears. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.


NBC News
2 days ago
- NBC News
Why U.S. politicians are up in arms about new internet rules in Britain
A growing number of U.S. politicians are condemning a new British law that requires some websites and apps — including some based in the United States — to check the ages of users across the pond. A bipartisan group of members of Congress visited London recently to meet counterparts and air their concerns about the U.K.'s Online Safety Act, which went into effect July 25. Vice President JD Vance has been criticizing the law for months, as have privacy advocates who argue that the law infringes on free expression and disproportionately hurts vulnerable groups. Vance criticized the U.K. again on Friday, this time in person at the start of a visit to the country. Sitting alongside British Foreign Secretary David Lammy and speaking to reporters, Vance warned the U.K. against going down a 'very dark path' of online 'censorship' that he said was trod earlier by the Biden administration. The U.K. Online Safety Act is aimed at preventing children from accessing potentially harmful material online, and internet companies are now asking British users to verify their ages in a variety of ways, including with photos of their IDs, through a credit card provider or with selfies analyzed via age-check software. But the sweeping nature of the law has caught some Britons by surprise. They're being asked to prove their age not only for pornography websites but also before they can listen to songs with explicit lyrics or access message boards to discuss sensitive subjects. Reddit, for example, is restricting access to various pages including r/stopsmoking, r/STD and r/aljazeera. Reddit said in a post about its enforcement of the law that for people in the U.K., it was now verifying ages before they can 'view certain mature content.' A spokesperson for the company said r/STD — a message board focused on questions of sexual health — is restricted because of explicit images. They said r/stopsmoking is restricted because it deals with harmful substances and that r/aljazeera — which is not affiliated with the news organization of the same name but deals with similar topics — is restricted because it depicts serious injury or violence. To get around the new law, the use of virtual private network software that can mask a person's location, also known as VPNs, has surged in the U.K. The primary argument of U.S. politicians who oppose the law is that they don't want American tech companies to have to comply, even if they're serving British customers. House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said he raised his objections with U.K. government officials during meetings in London at the end of July. In a statement after his return, he said the law and other European regulations 'create a serious chilling effect on free expression and threaten the First Amendment rights of American citizens and companies.' 'We absolutely need to protect children and keep harmful, illegal content off these platforms — but when governments or bureaucracies suppress speech in the name of safety or regulation, it sets a dangerous precedent that threatens the core of Western democratic values,' Jordan said. The issue may come to a head in a couple of different venues. That could be the courts if any tech companies file lawsuits over the law, or it could come up in trade negotiations if President Donald Trump decides to press the issue with British politicians, although they say it's not open to debate in trade talks. Marc Andreessen, a venture capitalist and Meta board member with close ties to the Trump administration, recently called U.K. leaders to complain about the law, the Financial Times reported Friday. A spokesperson for Andreessen said the report was not true. The U.K.'s Online Safety Act is one of the most comprehensive national laws that any democracy has ever passed to try to curtail potentially harmful content online in the name of children. Parliament passed the law in 2023, and the government went through two years of writing detailed rules before putting the law into effect last month. The law is notable for a combination of reasons: the variety of content it applies to, the potential fines and the possible international reach. A wide array of content is at issue. While the 'primary' focus of the law is online material such as pornography and suicide, it also requires websites to age-gate content with bullying, serious violence, 'dangerous stunts' and 'exposure to harmful substances.' That has covered relatively mainstream services such as Spotify and Microsoft's Xbox gaming system. Companies that don't comply face potential fines of up to 10% of their global revenue, which for the biggest companies could be billions of dollars. The British regulator Ofcom, short for Office of Communications, says companies must use ' highly effective age assurance ' to restrict the riskiest types of content. And the U.K. has not been adamant that it won't allow international borders to stymie enforcement. Ofcom says it plans to apply the law to services with 'a significant number' of U.K. users, services where U.K. users 'are a target market' and services that are 'capable of being accessed' by U.K. users with a 'material risk of significant harm' to such users. The law appears to retain strong support among the British public. About 69% said they supported the new rules in a YouGov poll taken after implementation began, and 46% said they supported it 'strongly.' But 52% said they do not think the law will be very effective at preventing minors from accessing pornography. The law was passed during a previous, Conservative-led government and took effect under the current, Labour-led government. But the far-right party Reform U.K. is pushing for a repeal of the law. Party leader Nigel Farage, a former member of Parliament, has called it 'state suppression of genuine free speech,' and his party is running high in polls. 'Millions of people have noticed that what they're getting on their feeds is different to what it was,' Farage said at a recent news conference. Farage also met with visiting members of Congress last week, and the talks turned heated with Farage and Democrats exchanging insults, according to Politico, although the dispute appeared to be more about Trump's free speech restrictions than about the U.K. law. Most U.S.-based tech companies say they are complying with the new law. Microsoft said in a blog post that Xbox users in the U.K. would begin seeing notifications 'encouraging them to verify their age' as a 'one-time process,' with actual enforcement starting next year. If users don't comply, Microsoft warned, they'll lose access to social features of Xbox but will still be able to play games. Discord said it was implementing new default settings for all U.K. users, in effect treating everyone like a minor with heavy content filtering unless they verify that they're adults. Discord says users can choose to verify their age either with a face scan or an ID upload. Elon Musk's X has also restricted posts, including information about the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, according to the BBC. X and Musk did not respond to requests for comment. But a few services are not complying. The far-right social media site Gab, which allows white supremacist views and other extremist content, said in a notice on its website that it had received notices from Ofcom and, rather than comply, decided to block the entire U.K. from accessing its site. The company said in the notice: 'We refuse to comply with this tyranny.' Preston Byrne, a U.S. lawyer who specializes in technology issues, has said on X that he plans to file a lawsuit soon on behalf of an unnamed client seeking to quash possible enforcement of the British law within the United States. The subject has been simmering for months ahead of the law's implementation, and it came up in February when British Prime Minister Keir Starmer visited the White House. In an Oval Office meeting, a reporter asked Trump what he thought of the U.K. approach to free speech, and Trump tossed the question to Vance, who expressed concern. 'We do have, of course, a special relationship with our friends in the U.K. and also with some of our European allies. But we also know that there have been infringements on free speech that actually affect not just the British — of course, what the British do in their own country is up to them — but also affect American technology companies and, by extension, American citizens,' he said. Starmer defended his government's approach. 'We've had free speech for a very, very long time in the United Kingdom, and it will last for a very, very long time. Certainly, we wouldn't want to reach across U.S. systems and we don't, and that's absolutely right,' he said. British Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy later said the U.K. would not make any changes to the Online Safety Act as part of trade negotiations with the Trump administration. American privacy advocates are watching the debate play out with alarm, concerned that similar age verification laws — like new state laws targeting the Apple and Google app stores — would upend the internet closer to home. 'Young people should be able to access information, speak to each other and to the world, play games, and express themselves online without the government making decisions about what speech is permissible,' wrote Paige Collings, a senior speech and privacy activist at the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation, in a blog post Tuesday.
Yahoo
21-06-2025
- Yahoo
Weight loss pill set to rival injections after promising studies
A new daily weight loss pill has shown promising results in initial studies. Researchers say amycretin, which can be offered by injection or tablet, helped patients lose a significant amount of weight in the first trials. Those who received higher doses of amycretin as a weekly jab lost 24.3 per cent of their body weight after 36 weeks of treatment, while patients who took daily tablets lost an average of 13.1 per cent of their body weight after 12 weeks. While weight loss jabs have been hailed as transformative by NHS leaders, injections come with additional work for over-stretched health services, so tablet forms of medication may offer a new hope for the millions of people looking to lose weight. It has been estimated that around 1.5 million Britons are having weight loss jabs, which have been either prescribed through specialist weight loss services or private prescriptions. GPs will be able to dish out jabs from next week. Amycretin, made by Novo Nordisk, helps to control blood sugar and appetite by targeting two specific receptors in the body – GLP-1 and the amylin receptor. An early trial in 125 adults testing weekly injections of amycretin, which has been published in The Lancet, found that those taking the highest dosage (60mg) lost 24.3 per cent after 36 weeks of treatment. It also showed signs of improving blood sugar levels. Side effects included nausea and vomiting, and were mostly mild to moderate and resolved by the end of treatment. 'These phase 1b/2a data support the potential of once-weekly subcutaneous amycretin as a therapeutic for people living with overweight or obesity,' the authors wrote. 'Amycretin appeared safe and tolerable, and there were significant reductions in body weight after 36 weeks of treatment.' The second early trial, published in the same journal, assessed amycretin in tablet form in 144 people over 12 weeks. There were mild to moderate side effects including loss of appetite, nausea and vomiting. Researchers found that people taking the highest dose of 100mg per day, lost 13.1 per cent of their body weight over four months. The authors wrote: 'Amycretin effectively lowered body weight and improved metabolic and glycaemic parameters in people with overweight or obesity. 'Longer studies with more participants are warranted for evaluation of the safety and efficacy of amycretin in individuals living with obesity and type 2 diabetes, and to optimise the dosing regimen.' The studies were also presented at the American Diabetes Association's Scientific Sessions in Chicago, in the US. It comes as a separate study, which was published at the same meeting, examined the effects of weight loss jab Wegovy at higher doses. Researchers found that giving patients 7.2mg of Wegovy, also known as semaglutide, once a week led to an average weight loss of 20.7 per cent, with a third of participants losing 25 per cent or more of their body weight after 72 weeks.