Blue Jays set MLB record with $1.6975 million contract for speedy shortstop
They signed him. It just took an MLB record to do so.
The bonus the Blue Jays paid to Blaine Bullard is the highest for any 12th-round pick in league history. Bullard will get $1,697,500 to sign with Toronto.
Bullard was ranked No. 120 in the class by MLB.com, but he didn't go until pick 362 because teams seemed to think his commitment to Texas A&M would stick.
"Bullard raised his stock more than any high school position prospect in Texas this spring," MLB.com wrote. "Teams have differing opinions about his offensive upside, but enough clubs like him that he could fit in the top three rounds if he's signable. He has a strong commitment to Texas A&M and could wind up in College Station. Scouts who believe in Bullard like his bat-to-ball skills from both sides of the plate. Others have questions about his hitting ability and worry that he hasn't faced much in the way of quality competition. He employs more of a gap-to-gap approach right now and makes a lot of groundball contact, but he also has bat speed and a projectable 6-foot-2 frame that could translate into 15 homers per season as he continues to get stronger. Bullard owns plus speed and knows how to use it on the bases and in the outfield. He displays good instincts in center field and should be able to remain there in college or pro ball. He has average arm strength and could handle all three outfield spots if needed."
MORE: Former Yankees, Astros slugger reaches 500 career home runs far from home
Bullard is out of Klein Cain High School.
His speed makes him a bit of a safer pick, because it'll allow him to be flexible defensively, and it can play no matter how much power ends up developing.
And now, Bullard will have to try and live up to his record-setting bonus.
MORE MLB NEWS:
Trevor Bauer has the worst ERA in Japan's NPB
Blue Jays' Addison Barger could hit from the wrong side of plate and be a star
Deion Sanders, Bo Jackson once had the most legendary clash at Yankee Stadium
Cal Raleigh, aka Big Dumper, signs the perfect endorsement deal
Aaron Judge reveals how long he plans to play in MLB
Quinn Priester did the unthinkable against the Dodgers
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
11 minutes ago
- New York Times
Are you worried about the Brewers? The Cubs aren't … yet
CHICAGO — It's July 21, less than two weeks from the trade deadline, and you know exactly where the Cubs are: At the top. But you also know it's crowded up there and it's a long way down. The Cubs (59-40) are a half-game out from the best record in baseball and tied for the lead in the NL Central. They came into Sunday's game with sole possession of the best record and a chance to sweep the Red Sox out of Wrigley Field, but Boston scored six runs on three homers in the seventh and eighth innings to score a 6-1 getaway day victory. Alex Bregman comes up CLUTCH with a pinch-hit 3-run homer 😮 — MLB (@MLB) July 20, 2025 Meanwhile, in Los Angeles, the Milwaukee Brewers (59-40) finished off another three-game sweep of the Dodgers with a 6-5 win. They have won 10 in a row, with six coming against the injury-riddled 'best team in baseball.' So, to sum it up, the Cubs, who had sole possession of first place in the division since April 12, are now tied with Milwaukee. Advertisement Cubs fans are probably either mildly perturbed or in full panic mode. But Chicago's players and coaches do this for a living, and they know how to read a calendar. 'I mean, look, the Brewers are a good baseball team,' former Brewers and current Cubs manager Craig Counsell said before the Boston series started. 'I'm not sure there's anything we can do, other than when we play them, to prevent them from winning. We have a lot to do with whether we win or not. So it's really easy. … That's just what you focus on.' As you can tell from his regular hangdog expressions in news conferences, Counsell is a worrier by nature. But it's not just cliché time when he talks like this. They play every day, after all. This isn't the NFL. Eventually, it's time to watch the old manual scoreboard in center field, but we're about six weeks before the players start really paying attention to division races. 'I think you're, like, aware of when other teams are playing well,' Cubs outfielder Ian Happ said before Sunday's game, 'but we're pretty focused on just our day to day and we've been playing really good baseball on a daily basis, and that's all you can control.' The @Brewers hold on against the Dodgers and are now tied with the Cubs atop the NL Central! — MLB (@MLB) July 20, 2025 Happ mentioned that the players were well aware they were chasing the Brewers the last two Septembers. The team's 2023 collapse down the stretch cost them a wild-card berth and manager David Ross his job. Counsell left Milwaukee for greener pastures (i.e. more money) and the Cubs are paying him to guide this team through the next 2 1/2 months and into October. He's done a pretty good job this year. This was the 15th time the Cubs have 'Meatloaf'd it,' which is Joe Maddon parlance for winning two of three (or three of four) in a series. They also have five sweeps. Advertisement As long as this lineup stays healthy, I feel confident the Cubs won't fall out of a playoff spot this time around, but winning the division and getting the first-round bye is certainly a carrot to chase. Not including the 2020 sham of a season, the Cubs haven't won the division since 2017. Since 2018, Milwaukee has won it four times. Winning the division is important. Cubs president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer didn't trade for Kyle Tucker in their respective walk years just to win the division, but it's the first step. 'It hasn't played out that way in some years, but I would say there's no question that the value of a one or two seed is immense,' Hoyer said before Friday's game. 'I mean, just taking a two-out-of-three series against a very good team off the table. Mathematically, it's a no-brainer that it's a huge advantage.' There are eight games remaining (including a make-up one) between the Cubs and Brewers, starting with the July 28-30 series in Milwaukee that happens to fall on the trade deadline. You couldn't schedule it any better. Counsell better bring his earplugs. Before then, the Cubs have six games against the Royals at home and the White Sox on the South Side. Milwaukee is at Seattle and home against the Marlins. I'm guessing they'll be within a game of each other come next Monday. 'They're a really good team,' Hoyer said. 'I don't think they're going to go away. They're really good. They played really well, especially over the last 30 games or so. They played excellent baseball. It might have changed the calculus, but certainly, I don't expect the race to change. I expect us to play well. I expect them to play well.' Could a tight division race benefit the Cubs? 'I think there's something to that, yeah,' Hoyer said. 'I think that there's something to that, a sense of urgency. I don't think this group lacks for urgency ever, but I do think there is something potentially good about that, that you have someone at your heels.' Advertisement The last series, which will be the rare five-gamer because of a rain-induced doubleheader, is in late August, which could make that September scoreboard watching extra tense and late September even more urgent. That's in the future. In the present, the presence of the Brewers puts even more pressure on Hoyer to make additions at the deadline. The needs remain the same: bullpen, third base, starting rotation. He might not be able to land stars — the array of sellers isn't melting his phone just yet — but he needs players who can help get the Cubs to October and contribute when the postseason begins. 'We're not overhauling that group,' Hoyer said. 'It's about this group right here, and we're going to try to supplement that group as much as possible.' Sunday's loss showed how precarious a bullpen can be as Ryan Pressly, Drew Pomeranz and Ethan Roberts each gave up a home run. It was Boston third baseman Alex Bregman who hit the dagger three-run shot in the eighth to make it 5-1. I'm sure Hoyer wasn't thinking at all about that time he almost signed him. (It was this spring.) Both Hoyer and Counsell answered a series of questions about rookie Matt Shaw's tenuous status as the starting third baseman. He plays the only position where the Cubs could add a starter, and he's hitting .210. On Monday, the Cubs will start Ryan Brasier, one of their many late-30s relievers, in a bullpen game against the Royals. That's not ideal, but the good news for the Cubs is that no team in baseball is better after a loss. 'It feels like if we lose a game, we've done a great job of coming back the next day and getting a win,' Happ said Sunday. He's not wrong. The Cubs are 29-10 after a defeat. It's the most impressive factoid about their season. They've lost two in a row six times and three in a row just twice. Advertisement And get this, the Cubs are the only team in baseball that hasn't lost at least four games in a row this season. Of course, Milwaukee is one of the few that hasn't lost more than four. They did it once and it was the first four games of the season. The Brewers were 25-28 on May 24 and they're 34-12 ever since. So, yeah, don't expect them to fall apart anytime soon. But as they said, the Cubs don't need to worry about them just yet. They just need to go about their business, winning two of three, four of six, eight of 12, just as they've done all season. (Photo of Dansby Swanson high-fiving Nico Hoerner after scoring in the second inning on Sunday: Matt Marton / Imagn Images)
New York Times
11 minutes ago
- New York Times
Can Anthony Richardson reclaim QB1? Five big questions facing the Colts at camp
For the first time in nearly 30 years, the Indianapolis Colts will enter training camp without Jim Irsay guiding the franchise as principal owner. Irsay died in May and passed the team onto his daughters, Carlie Irsay-Gordon, Casey Foyt and Kalen Jackson. The trio take over at a trying time for the franchise, as the Colts have not reached the playoffs since the 2020 season and haven't won a playoff game since 2018. Advertisement The lack of success calls plenty into question about the future of the Colts, most prominently whether Chris Ballard will remain the team's general manager beyond this season. There are, of course, many more questions that must be answered about the Colts, and we've compiled five of the biggest ahead of training camp. The answers to these questions will play out in time and will largely determine the future of the franchise. Before we get to the front office or even the roster, we have to start at the top. Irsay was one of the most outspoken team owners in North American sports. This was a man who'd regularly call local reporters to vent about his team. He even announced practice squad signings on social media. It's a safe guess that his daughters won't take the same in-your-face approach as the team's new owners. But I am curious just how public-facing they'll be. Irsay conducted a yearly media scrum during training camp and annually joined the local TV broadcast during the Colts' third preseason game to field questions about the upcoming season. Will principal owner Irsay-Gordon do the same? And will she be as candid and bullish as her father? No question was off limits for Irsay, as he'd discuss that offseason's firings, signings and position battles, all while maintaining an unparalleled level of optimism about the future. Irsay-Gordon, the eldest of Irsay's three daughters, has been preparing for more than a decade to take the reins of football operations. So, although all three daughters are co-owners, if one of them were to speak regularly and publicly on the direction of the team, whether in training camp or elsewhere, it would likely be Irsay-Gordon. 'We come from a family that didn't start a hedge fund or some other business and do this, especially the generation we're in,' Irsay-Gordon said in June. 'This is our business, and we take it very seriously.' Advertisement Ballard's job security has become a yearly talking point, but his seat may be hotter than ever with Irsay's daughters now overseeing the team. It's no secret that Irsay had a strong affinity for Ballard, whom he once compared to Michael Jordan during the Colts' abysmal 2022 season, which ended with a 4-12-1 record. It's fair to say that many other NFL owners would've fired Ballard by now — he has a 62-69-1 record, one playoff win and zero AFC South titles in eight seasons — and the Irsay daughters may not express the same level of patience as their father. Ballard said Irsay told him to 'fix it' this offseason after he retained Ballard for another year, and Irsay-Gordon amplified that message last month. Unlike her father, who almost always praised Ballard and coach Shane Steichen publicly, Irsay-Gordon was more measured and direct about the team's lack of success during their tenures. She expects more from her coach and GM, whom she publicly backed while also indicating that no one should feel safe amid a four-year playoff drought. 'Chris and Shane know that they have things they need to fix,' Irsay-Gordon said. 'We talked about not micromanaging people, but also, we have a standard here, and it hasn't been good enough. Winning is great, but I would even take it a step further in saying we're really committed to being the best. And if we're the best, we will win games. I think Chris and Shane are totally capable of doing that, and we're confident that they can.' At this point in his career, Richardson was supposed to be the unquestioned face of the Colts franchise. That's how his draft-mate, C.J. Stroud, is viewed in Houston. But as Richardson gears up for Year 3 in Indianapolis, his future with the team is as cloudy as ever. The 2023 No. 4 pick has missed 17 games due to injury through his first two seasons, and he was benched for another two for what Steichen cited as a lack of proper game preparation. It gets worse. Advertisement When he has been on the field, Richardson has struggled mightily with his accuracy, posting a league-low 47.7 completion percentage last year. Between his issues on and off the field, the Colts knew they couldn't bank on Richardson alone heading into the 2025 season, so they signed Daniel Jones in free agency. The ex-Giants starter was brought in to challenge Richardson in an open QB competition, and so far, it's fair to say Jones has the lead since Richardson was shut down May 29 due to soreness in his surgically repaired throwing shoulder. Jones took all the starting reps to close spring practice, and Steichen commended his early grasp of the offense. Richardson has resumed throwing and is expected to be cleared to participate in training camp, so assuming he's back in action this week, he has a chance to make up some ground on Jones. As for Richardson being the Week 1 starter, it's still possible. But he'll have to do two things to win the job and, more importantly, keep the job: stay healthy and be accurate. He hasn't proven he's capable of either, and although Jones would never admit it publicly, Richardson's struggles in those areas is exactly why Jones chose Indy as the place he'd try and resurrect his career. With everything that's happened this offseason, it seems like the Colts' new-look offensive line has flown under the radar. Indy lost two starting offensive linemen in free agency in center Ryan Kelly and right guard Will Fries, both of whom joined the Minnesota Vikings, and their departures can't be overlooked. The writing was on the wall for Kelly, previously the longest tenured Colt, since the team didn't offer to extend his contract during his ninth season with the franchise. Still, when healthy, he remains one of the better centers in the NFL. Kelly will be replaced by 2024 fourth-round pick Tanor Bortolini or 2020 fifth-round pick Danny Pinter. The Colts probably want Bortolini to win the position battle since he's younger and has more upside than Pinter, but Bortolini will have to beat Pinter in training camp for the job. Bortolini started five games last year, while Pinter started two. Fries was having a breakout 2024 before he suffered a season-ending broken right tibia in the fifth game. Despite his abbreviated campaign, he still secured a five-year, $88 million contract from the Vikings, which essentially priced him out of the Colts' market. He'll be replaced by 2024 third-round pick Matt Goncalves, Colts offensive line coach Tony Sparano Jr. announced during spring practice. Goncalves started eight games last year at both tackle spots, but he did not start at right guard. The 24-year-old has spent this offseason transitioning to the interior offensive line, and Sparano said he intends for Goncalves to remain there. How Goncalves and Bortolini/Pinter adjust to their new roles as full-time starters could be vital toward the Colts' offensive success. If one or both new starters struggle, then it would only exacerbate Indy's already questionable QB play and make life harder on the running backs, headlined by Jonathan Taylor. Aside from Jones, Indianapolis' biggest investments this offseason were on defense. The Colts replaced Gus Bradley with Lou Anarumo as their new defensive coordinator, and then they gave him more playmakers. The team signed cornerback Charvarius Ward and free safety Cam Bynum to three- and four-year, $60 million deals, respectively, which was a noticeable shift from its typically conservative free agency approach. Bynum started 51 straight games for the Vikings over the last three years and has notched seven interceptions and 25 pass breakups during that span. Ward is coming off a down 2024 campaign during which he dealt with a family tragedy. The 29-year-old said during spring practice that he's in a much better head space now, and he's eager to prove that his second-team All-Pro nod in 2023 wasn't a fluke. Advertisement Anarumo, formerly the Bengals' DC, is known for his chameleon-like defensive schemes, and paired with Bynum and Ward's experience and high IQ, the Colts should be poised to take a step forward. The good news, depending on your perspective, is that Indianapolis' defense has been so porous in recent years that it almost has no other option but to improve. During Bradley's three-year tenure, in which he implemented his bend-but-don't-break style that conceded a lot of underneath passes, the Colts ranked 28th, 24th and 24th in points allowed per game in 2022 (25.1), 2023 (24.4) and 2024 (25.1), respectively. With the injection of talent in the secondary and expected growth from their younger starters, it's fair to feel optimistic about the direction of the Colts' defense.
New York Times
11 minutes ago
- New York Times
NHL prospects I was wrong about, 2025 edition: Lian Bichsel, Brad Lambert and more
Be honest, you won't hurt my feelings: this is your favorite article of mine every year. You enjoy it when I have to take my lumps. It's OK, I can take it. The 2025-26 season will be my 10th hockey season working for The Athletic, and I've learned, over the years, that many of our readers enjoy reading about how we do our work on the prospects side as much as the actual work itself. To that end, I try to pull back the curtain on my work, acknowledging that if you're going to spend money to subscribe to our coverage, you deserve to know exactly what you're getting. I want my work to be authoritative and more well-sourced and well-researched than you can find anywhere else. In order to accomplish that goal, it needs to be trustworthy. And transparency breeds trust. Advertisement In an effort to build that trust and get better at the work I do, I regularly review old lists, highlight my mistakes and check my biases. My guide to scouting, updated annually, details how I do my job, from my process to how I watch games, the things I look for in players, potential blind spots and everything in between. My annual ranking reviews (my 2022 review will be out later this week) measure my track record relative to the actual draft and are meant to hold me accountable. And this piece looks back at the why and how behind the players I've gotten wrong over the years in an effort to better understand what I missed or over-/under-emphasized in my evaluations. As you can imagine, after a dozen years of doing this work, there's a long list to choose from. Here are five more players I was either too high or too low on. Just try not to enjoy it too much. Previous editions: 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 Drafted: No. 94 My final ranking: No. 29 Perron is a smaller winger, and smaller wingers need to have a defining quality that can carry them. I thought his hockey IQ piece and the high level at which he thought the game inside the offensive zone were that for him. But he has looked much more like the mid-round pick he was than the late-first/early-second I viewed him as in the two years since, and after pedestrian freshman and sophomore years at North Dakota, he has now transferred to Michigan for his junior season. I think there's a path at Michigan for him to become a point-per-game player there as an upperclassman under that coaching staff and in the top-six usage he's going to get, but I don't see more than an AHL offensive zone navigator at this point/future AAAA type. He's still just 20, too. But because of the way the Steel played and what he could get away with at the USHL level, I don't think I gave enough attention or weight to some of the predictable struggles he'd face up levels as an average athlete who is a little soft. He looked like he was checked out in some games at North Dakota last year, and he needs to play much more competitively if he wants to become a successful pro player with his profile. The sense, feel and problem-solving remain assets, but he hasn't taken enough steps with the rest. Advertisement I think this is one where I let what people in the USHL thought about him have a little too much sway on me as well. They thought he was an elite thinker with the Steel, and while I'm always careful when it's a player's own team that's saying those things, several other prospects from opposing teams also told me during my survey that year that he was the most purely talented player they'd played against and there was probably a little confirmation bias for me when his peers echoed the Steel staff. His type has a tougher time than I accounted for on this one. Drafted: No. 30 My final ranking: No. 8 This is one where I didn't get the player wrong, but more the risk-reward calculus on the slotting. I knew exactly what Lambert was, and my actual evaluation and scouting report on him at the time was bang on. I knew the work he had to do, the warts he had, the top-six-or-bust potential and the complicated, mercurial player and person. I'd sat down and talked with him about it all. I talked to a ton of people who'd been around him. I knew and reported that he was going to go in the late first. But I also didn't like the draft class, and I felt a lot of its other first-round forwards had flaws or projection issues, and so I decided to bet on his skating-skill combination to win out and for him to become a productive second-line forward. He still might become that, too. But I should have set the threshold for when I was going to be comfortable making that bet and taking on that risk lower than I did because his development was always going to come with some ups-and-downs and require the right roster spot being available with the right coach at the right time (after making some important development progress in a few areas, some of which he made real progress on and some of which he's still working toward). Advertisement There have been plenty of times over the years when I would have stuck my neck out for guys I liked at draft tables and been right. But I wouldn't have even done that with Lambert, where I had him ranked at the time. I outsmarted myself with the placement at No. 8. Drafted: No. 18 My final ranking: No. 51 Bichsel is another player whose scouting report I got right, but whose slotting I got wrong. I worried about his weight and heaviness and what it would mean for him as he got older, and while that's still a concern and something he's going to have to stay on top of as he ages, he was always going to become a strong and unique NHL defender because of it and his strong mobility underneath it. I still think he has some limitations, and he's still a player I probably wouldn't have taken at No. 18, even with the hindsight I now have and some of the adjustments I've made to what I value, but No. 51 should have been pretty clearly too low as well. There are guys in the 20s-40s who I can live with having ahead of him at the time, but there are at least 10 in there that wouldn't be palatable to me as an evaluator now and shouldn't have been ranked higher even then. Drafted: No. 51 My final ranking: No. 29 Hughes was the youngest player in college hockey in his draft year and had a respectable freshman year for a 17- and 18-year-old, registering 16 points in 39 games to finish fourth among the 14 under-19 forwards who played college hockey that year (behind Chaz Lucius, Jack Devine and Dylan Duke). I saw a player with a respectable statistical track record who seemed to make his linemates better, had legit hands and played center. I felt that profiled as late-first/early-second and kind of just assumed that he'd take a step as a sophomore. But I think how early he entered college (he was through his four years by 21) worked against him ever getting to that next level, even after a transfer from Northeastern to BU for his junior year. He was also of average size and lacked hardness. The result is a player who didn't get an entry-level deal out of college and will have to start his pro career in the fall on an AHL contract with the Ontario Reign. I think he probably becomes a middle-six AHL contributor now, but I don't see a clear identity or role for him at the next level. Drafted: No. 71 My final ranking: No. 30 There is a difference between a good junior player or a good mid-tier pro and a good NHL player, and every scout will tell you about players they've liked over the years who looked really solid in their age group, or even played up levels earlier than some of their peers, but they should have known didn't have that next level in them. Robertsson is one of those players. He played and scored in the SHL the year before his draft year and was a solid player pre-draft for Sweden's 2003 age group, wearing a letter at U18 worlds. But if you look at his stats page, you'll also see that he then bounced between Sweden's junior level and its two top pro rungs in the HockeyAllsvenskan and SHL for four years, remaining a solid young player but struggling to take a step. He was signed as a third-round pick, which in and of itself is a win for the Blues, and played last season in the AHL as a solid player there as a 21-year-old rookie as well. Advertisement But he was always going to have a pro career, and that doesn't mean you give him a late-first/early-second rating necessarily. He's also the classic average-sized, average-skating, average-skill, decently versatile, decent play-driving winger who wasn't a clear power play or penalty kill option, or a clear skill guy or checker, and was naturally going to likely settle in as more of a potential call-up or organizational depth than a full-time NHLer with a clear role. I even knew it at the time, too, I just didn't move him accordingly. Those ones hurt. This was in my report: 'Recent viewings (both before and into U18s) did leave me feeling like he was missing the defining skill.' That there are three players ranked 29-30 on three different lists included here has me wondering if I'm being too cute with the last couple of spots in the first round on my lists as well (though I think it's also probably indicative of where lists generally begin to teeter off into a tier of prospects who by and large don't become full-time NHLers). (Photos of Lian Bichsel and Brad Lambert: Michael Reaves / Getty Images and Darcy Finley / NHLI via Getty Images)
