logo
What can we learn from three great minds who retreated from the world?

What can we learn from three great minds who retreated from the world?

Times19-07-2025
The subtitle of this book sets a false trail. 'Why writers, artists and thinkers retreat,' it says, and Guy Stagg goes on to describe the withdrawal from the world of three mysticism-haunted greats: Ludwig Wittgenstein, David Jones and Simone Weil. Or, as he describes them, the saint, the hermit and the martyr.
Wittgenstein's retreat, Stagg suggests, was moral. The philosopher worked as a gardener at Klosterneuburg Abbey in Austria as part of his lifelong quest to become a better man. Jones's purpose was creative: he visited a religious community on Caldey Island to paint and write as well as pray. Weil was plagued by migraine. Listening to plainchant helped to relieve it. So she travelled to the Abbey Saint-Pierre de Solesmes in France. Her motivation was therapeutic, as Stagg describes it.
Three different motivations. Three dissimilar paths — although all three seem to have spent much of their lives wrestling with God. But Weil, Jones and Wittgenstein are linked by war, childlessness and suicide as well as genius and retreat. Jones fought at the Somme and, more than 20 years later, gave us In Parenthesis (1937), his epic work about a soldier's experience of the First World War.
During the same conflict, Wittgenstein volunteered to man an observation post, and was decorated for courage. Weil served with the International Brigades in the Spanish civil war. A coroner later found her to have starved herself to death. At least two of Wittgenstein's brothers killed themselves, and Wittgenstein himself repeatedly considered doing the same. Jones was so depressed when his lover broke off their engagement that, according to one account, 'he seemed close to suicide'.
Death, childlessness and war. Monks, nuns and friars live towards the first, embrace the second (at least in most cases) and pursue the last, at least metaphorically: spiritual battle is an ancient metaphor. But withdrawal from the world, undertaken for the wrong reasons, can be a kind of suicide, Stagg suggests. He sees through the vogue for retreat: 'Health spas and holiday rentals and summer festivals all advertise themselves as some kind of refuge.' These can degenerate into 'nothing more than a self-righteous holiday … no flight from the ego but sinking deeper into ourselves'.
Spoken by some, this judgment would sound harsh. Written by Stagg, it comes over as measured because it's done with self-knowledge. He says that the first half of his twenties was marred by 'heavy drinking and deep depression' before going on to suggest that the appeal of religious life can be 'a simple wager: forfeiting the chance of pleasure to protect yourself from pain'. Oscar Wilde wrote that experience is the name that men give to their mistakes. Stagg seems to have learnt from his, and this book shows him still learning.
• The 21 best history books of the past year to read next
Is Stagg a believer himself? This is his second book. His first, The Crossway, published in 2018, described a journey he took from Canterbury to Jerusalem. So at the least he's religion-curious. But he doesn't say.
His method is to alternate a chunk of writing about his subjects with another section about himself: he follows in Wittgenstein's footsteps to the ornate, operatic setting of Klosterneuburg, in Jones's to the modern community at Caldey, where there are sometimes no boats to the mainland, and in Weil's to Solesmes, 'hemmed in on one side by water, and by the high street on the other side'. The back and forth holds one's attention. If Weil begins to try one's patience, or Jones or Wittgenstein does, theauthor steps in. And the other way round.
Stagg writes masterfully. How plainchant was reconstituted, how Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus works or how stained glass is assembled are three subjects with little if anything in common. Stagg describes and makes sense of them all in a way that can hold the general reader. He can evoke a sense of place and give a sense of people: the three religious devotees who host him at the three monasteries he visits are utterly unlike each other: one once worked on Wall Street, a second joined his monastery in his twenties, another was a press photographer for Formula 1.
Stagg writes of Brother Titus, the petrolhead turned guest-master at the monastery on Caldey, that he does not spend his days thinking about God and Heaven and whether he is saved. 'It's what's down here that matters. It's what happens in this life that counts,' Titus says.
Amen to that, some would say — adding that retreat and withdrawal are escapism, an avoidance of dealing with reality, and that to live an exceptional life, or to try to, is self-delusion. 'Pick a quarrel, go to war,/ Leave the hero in the bar,' Auden wrote. 'Hunt the lion, climb the peak:/ No one guesses you are weak.' The verse suggests that the best life is the humdrum one.
• Read more book reviews and interviews — and see what's top of the Sunday Times Bestsellers List
Stagg argues that for the artist 'retreat can play a vital role in the early stages of an artistic career. When a writer is learning their craft, or a painter is searching for material, there is value in creating work without any audience.' In this version of events, one withdraws from the world so that one may later re-enter it.
But neither Wittgenstein nor Weil, as Stagg makes clear, retreated to further their philosophy or their writing. It's true that writers, artists and thinkers may improve their art or craft by retreating, but ultimately they withdraw for the same reason that any everyman or everywoman withdraws.
Believers say that one retreats to seek God. And perhaps that's as good an explanation as one is going to get — if one truly withdraws to do so, retreat may turn out well, but if one withdraws to run away from life outside, it may well not. The merit of this book is that it demonstrates how damaging that search can be if undertaken for the wrong reasons — because it can intensify loneliness, depression and suicidal impulses. At the same time it demonstrates how necessary that search is, because where there is no failure, there can be no learning and hence no progress.
'I glimpsed the hardness at the heart of the religious calling: in order to be saved, you must die to the world,' Stagg writes. 'Which may explain why over time my subjects' lives began resembling thesicknesses they were supposed to cure.'
The World Within: Why Writers, Artists and Thinkers Retreat by Guy Stagg (Scribner £20 pp320). To order a copy go to timesbookshop.co.uk. Free UK standard P&P on orders over £25. Special discount available for Times+ members
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

D-Day veteran's funeral celebrated life of 'hero'
D-Day veteran's funeral celebrated life of 'hero'

BBC News

time8 hours ago

  • BBC News

D-Day veteran's funeral celebrated life of 'hero'

One of the last surviving D-Day veterans has been described as a hero at his "Mac" McQuillin died last month, aged 102. He was well-known in his home village of Kemble, Gloucestershire, where he was thought to be Britain's oldest paperboy, delivering newspapers into his was also known for his role in the Normandy landings. At the age of 21, he took part in the famous battle, where he helped to establish and maintain forward airstrips under his funeral on Tuesday, held at Cotswold District Council's Cirencester offices, Mr McQuillin was described as a "hero in the truest sense of the word". Mr McQuillin was born on 5 June 1923 and joined the Royal Air Force at the age of to the BBC ahead of the 80th anniversary of D-Day in 2024, Mr McQuillin said: "I wanted to fly like most of us that age did but when I got to the recruiting officer, I had a medical and found out I couldn't fly because I was short-sighted."Instead, Mr McQuillin trained as a bomb armourer and was a servicing commando on D-Day."You did anything to help anybody," he said."You wanted help putting rockets on, I'll give you a hand. A squadron of spitfires or something that will land and needed petrol and ammunition, we could all do it in about 20 minutes and they'd be ready for take off again." On his 100th birthday in 2023, Mr McQuillin joked his secret to a long life was "a full English breakfast and malt whiskey".Major Austin Hind, one of Mr McQuillin's friends, said his death on 7 July had come as a shock to the local community."He died on the Monday but, on the Sunday, he'd actually taken part in a garden party just up the road in Kemble," he said."Apparently, he was in fine form. His death really has come out of the blue in that sense because he was fit as a fiddle and still really, really sharp of mind."Mr McQuillin's funeral was held on Tuesday afternoon at St Peter's Roman Catholic Church in Cirencester.

My ‘mankeeper' wife always wants me to share my feelings. Why can't she just leave me alone?
My ‘mankeeper' wife always wants me to share my feelings. Why can't she just leave me alone?

Telegraph

time12 hours ago

  • Telegraph

My ‘mankeeper' wife always wants me to share my feelings. Why can't she just leave me alone?

So it is called 'mankeeping' now, is it? Not 'nagging', or 'pestering', but a nice touchy-feely expression which gives every woman – especially my wife – the right to badger me multiple times a day about how I am 'feeling'? Last week my wife of 38 years, Diana, reported on this new psychotherapist term, 'mankeeping', in which couples are suffering a detrimental effect on their relationship because women are having to do all the 'emotional heavy-lifting'. 'Mankeepers' grumble that their male partners fail to share their innermost feelings and emotions with them, so they in turn feel shut out of their lives. This very much struck a chord with me as Diana asks me about 10 times a day if I am 'OK'. It drives me crazy – and I think most men will agree. I fear mankeeping will now become the word of the month in our household – and another stick to beat me with. Yet I do not need to be mankept by my wife or anyone else, thank you very much. We men want mainly to be left alone with our thoughts. We are not all emotional husks and we do have deeply felt emotions that do occasionally come out and, yes, need to be talked about. Just not 10 times a day. To avoid the never-ending 'How are you feeling? Are you sure you are alright?' series of enquiries about my health, both mental and physical (we're both now 64 years old), I have adopted a kind of rictus grin to allay any fears Diana might have about my state of mind. Sadly, I don't think it works. I spent 10 years as a TV war correspondent, reporting from Iraq, Kosovo, Sierra Leone and Albania, and, because some of my colleagues now have PTSD, Diana wants me to 'vocalise my fears'. Yes, the plight of civilians I witnessed – brutalised and trapped in these places – during my career did have a profound effect on me, and the memories are very deep-rooted. But that is where I want them to stay. If I opened that Pandora's box in my mind on a regular basis I very much doubt that our marriage – or even myself as a sane human being – would survive. Those memories need to be shared only by the camera operators and other journalists I have worked with over the years, not my wife and children. In other words, people who can relate to those things. When I get together with like-minded people – mostly men, but I also have female war-correspondent friends – we do share feelings and emotions, without the fear that we are burdening someone with them. Because that is how I feel – my emotions are mine. I don't want anyone else dabbling in my soul. Of course not many men have witnessed such trauma – but I think most do feel like me, that they'd rather trundle on from day to day not thinking about anything very deeply, just putting one foot in front of the other, getting jobs done and looking forward to a beer. I cannot understand why women need to take their emotional temperature seemingly 20 times each day and tell each other everything. It's as if they are constantly mentally patting themselves down, asking: 'Am I happy?' Men are not like this. We deal in facts and realities, and practical issues such as: 'Must get more AdBlue for the car.' When my wife looks at me with that annoying 'caring' expression and asks: 'What are you thinking?' I have to swiftly make something up on the spot that I think will please her, when the real answer is 'nothing whatsoever'. The term mankeeping was coined by postdoctoral fellow Angelica Ferrara, a postdoctoral scholar at America's Stanford University, and a visiting fellow at the London School of Economics. The term, she says, 'describes the unreciprocated work that women do to manage the emotional and social needs of the men in their lives, an under-recognised form of labour resulting from men's declining social networks'. Now hold on there! I have quite a few close friends, and we talk a lot. OK, mostly about cars and football and very little about our feelings – but that does not mean the closeness is not there. It is there, in an expression, in a nod, in a hand on the arm. We don't need to emotionally bleed all over each other to feel our support. I know they are there for me, and would go to the ends of the Earth if I needed them. But we deal with personal issues through jokes and light banter. I rely on them to cheer me up – not constantly mop up my spilt emotions. I can do that myself, thank you. If I really think about it, I don't want to be seen as weak by anyone, especially not my wife or children. That's my self-worth as a man. I remember an episode in the TV show Friends where one of the characters complains that her boyfriend has never cried. She pursues him until he breaks down and suddenly, he can't stop weeping. Soon after, she leaves him. Point proven! I hate crying in front of my wife. She says it is a 'strength' but to me, I have failed if I let go to that extent. That isn't my role. I would far rather unburden myself to people who really know what I am feeling inside – and this only very occasionally. In many ways this has been very helpful to us as a couple – I hope my wife now understands that emoting all over the place makes me feel much worse, not better. I don't enjoy it. I find it confusing and hurtful, and it stirs up way too much inside. Call me old-fashioned, but I believe in stoicism and presenting a brave face to the world. And, at the end of the day, I like to know I've kept my head down, worked hard and earned a drink. We really are that simple.

Inside the aid drops onto Gaza's torched ruins - with the starving too weak to fight for food
Inside the aid drops onto Gaza's torched ruins - with the starving too weak to fight for food

The Independent

timea day ago

  • The Independent

Inside the aid drops onto Gaza's torched ruins - with the starving too weak to fight for food

From the sky, the torched ruins of once-bustling cities simmer into view as the back of a Jordanian military plane yawns open. The ground beneath – Gaza – is ash and ruin: the bottom of a firepit stretching out to the horizon. It is as if giants have torn through anything that once lived here: monstrous teeth have ripped chunks out of the few buildings that still teeter above ground. Everything else appears stamped underfoot. In some corners, Israeli tank tracks have clawed up what is left of the soil in sickening scrawls. The only flicker of life is the families corralled into tents on scraps of beach in the punishing sunlight. From the ground looking up, these impossibly huge planes roar into view. It is absurd. Gaza is just 25 miles long and a few miles wide, and entirely accessible by land and sea. But because of Israel 's ongoing bombardment of the Strip and war with militant group Hamas, coupled with its crippling blockade, countries across the world are now dropping aid at enormous expense from the sky. Airdrops are always a last resort, a desperate measure. That is because it rarely gets to those who are most in need, UN officials have told The Independent – those dying of starvation are too weak to endure the hunger games to grab it. Sometimes it also lands in the sea. Sometimes it lands on the very people it is supposed to save. 'Like all the young men, Oday waited in the scorching sun for four hours. But when the planes arrived, he couldn't get out of the way in time,' said Moatasem Al-Quraan, 31, from central Gaza, about his cousin, nurse Oday Al-Quraan, who was crushed to death earlier on Monday. A pallet of aid being airdropped into central Gaza landed on him as he waited for food, his family and eyewitnesses told The Independent. 'He is married and has two children,' said Moatasem. 'He was like every citizen in Gaza. He has been hungry for four months. 'The plane which dropped the aid which killed Oday was carrying 12 boxes, inside each were 36 cartons of food. Where will we distribute them? The aid on the plane isn't enough for the 20,000 people who were waiting there.' Further north in Gaza, Muhammad Mansour, a 39-year-old father of six, said that when the aid drops, it is usually taken by armed gangs, as crippling hunger has exploded into lawlessness. A few times it falls in the sea. 'I don't know how to swim,' Muhammad said in desperation. 'Some went out in small fishing boats, but when they got it, the flour, sugar and rice were useless due to the seawater.' On Monday, the Jordan Armed Forces–Arab Army (JAF) conducted seven airdrop operations together with the UAE, Germany, France, Belgium and Canada - delivering 45 tonnes of humanitarian aid to Gaza as part of the Kingdom's ongoing efforts to support Palestinians in the enclave. In total, 289 airdrops have been conducted since Israel permitted them to restart two weeks ago, delivering 305 tonnes of aid. Meanwhile, officials in Jordan warned that they have had warehouses of aid for Gaza gathering dust since Israel reimposed a devastating blockade in March. Hussein Shebli, the head of the Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization (JHCO) that coordinates a lot of Jordan's aid response for Gaza, painted a damning picture of the nightmare of getting those supplies in by land. He said they face long distances, multiple checkpoints making transportation difficult, as well as frequent closures of the crossings into Gaza, and 'active prevention of aid entry by the occupying entity'. 'Deliberate inspection delays at checkpoints and crossings often hold shipments for extended periods, leading to spoilage and further disruption,' he said. Repeated attacks by Israeli settlers on aid convoys have caused serious delays and damage to shipments. The aid that does get to the crossing points can then be rejected on 'questionable grounds,' he added, referencing one load of dates which was turned back 'over the alleged presence of pits'. Israel continues to deny there are restrictions on aid or that there is even a hunger crisis in Gaza, despite the UN-backed global hunger monitor recently concluding that 'the worst-case scenario of famine' is playing out. Instead, the Israeli government blames Hamas for the suffering in Gaza and says it is taking steps for more aid to reach the population, including pausing fighting for part of the day in some areas, airdrops, and announcing protected routes for aid convoys. The main military unit coordinating aid – COGAT – has even blamed the UN for not picking up aid it has allowed in, although UN officials said they are faced with a slew of obstacles, including struggling to get permits to reach these pick up points. The Israeli military said on Monday that it will continue to work 'to improve the humanitarian response in the Gaza Strip… while refuting the false claims of deliberate starvation in Gaza'. But the reality is people are still dying of hunger: Gaza's health ministry said on Monday that five more people died of starvation or malnutrition over the past 24 hours. The new deaths raised the toll of those dying from hunger to 180, including 93 children, since the war began. Images are still pouring out of hospitals showing emaciated children, their bones pressing through paper-thin flesh. There are also deep concerns for the 20 remaining living Israeli hostages and captives still being held by Hamas, who during the 7 October bloody attacks on southern Israel seized over 250 hostages and killed over a 1000 more according to Israeli estimates. Late last week, the militant group released new galling videos of two emaciated Israeli hostages held in Gaza, which has horrified Israelis and added even more pressure on prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to reach a ceasefire with Hamas, even as his government considers another expansion of the nearly 22-month war. In one, a skeletal Evyatar David, who was taken from the Nova Music Festival, says he is digging his own grave and speaks of days without food. As global outrage over the rising famine in and bombardment of Gaza surges, UN agencies warn that the airdrops are insufficient and Israel must let in far more aid by land. Tamara al-Rifai, a spokesperson UN's Palestinian refugee agency, said airdrops are 100 times more expensive than their equivalent by land. Last year, the DC-based Centre for Strategic and International Studies estimated that one four-hour round trip by a C-130 military plane costs around $32,000 – while a trip by truck is estimated at around $970 from Cairo to Rafah in southern Gaza (when that route was still possible). Back in Gaza, local medics reported that at least 40 Palestinians were killed by Israeli gunfire and airstrikes on Gaza on Monday, including 10 seeking aid at aid distribution sites run by the controversial US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The UN says more than 1,000 people have been killed trying to receive aid in the enclave in just a few months, most of them shot by Israeli forces operating nearby. The Israeli military has repeatedly denied targeting aid seekers and has said it has previously only fired in the vicinities of aid distribution centres. As the war rages on, the families in ravaged Gaza are dying to trying to find food. 'We thank all the countries that have helped and are trying to help, but the only solution is to open the crossing and distribute supplies,' said Moatasem as he attended the funeral of his cousin Oday. 'My cousin went to bring a meal to feed his family and children but returned to them dead.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store