Labour cannot be allowed to ‘pass the buck' on energy bills, SNP warn
THE UK Labour Government can't be allowed to "pass the buck on their broken energy bill promises," the SNP have warned.
It comes after confirmation that UK Energy Secretary, Ed Miliband, wrote to energy regulator Ofgem, urging them to act as Treasury estimates forecast energy bills could be set to soar by over £100 a year in April – the third rise since Labour came to power.
During the election, Labour pledged it would cut household energy bills by £300, but instead, customers have seen bills rise by £170 since last July.
The energy price cap rose by £149 in October and a further £21 in January. If the price cap rises again by as much as 6%, as predicted by energy companies and the Treasury, bills could go up by a further £109.
READ MORE: The National launches new investigation to mark McCrone anniversary
This would mean a £279 total increase since Labour came to power.
Last month, in his first major broadcast interview, GB energy boss Juergen Maier could not say when the Labour government's £300 energy bill pledge would be met.
When questioned by Sky, "you surely have an idea in your head of when that central pledge to the people, of reducing their bills by £300, will come into action?" Maier said "it's not in the remit of Great British Energy".
READ MORE: Martin Lewis issues 'bad news' as energy bills predicted to rise
SNP Westminster economy spokesperson Dave Doogan MP said: 'This is a blatant and cynical attempt by the UK Labour Government to pass the buck on their broken energy bill promises. Ofgem undoubtedly have a significant role in bringing down bills but the ultimate responsibility rests with the Labour party.
'Instead of writing letters, Ed Miliband and the Labour Party need to start living up to their promises. It was the Labour Party who promised that they would cut energy bills by £300 – it wasn't Ofgem. Instead of washing their hands of responsibility, the Labour government needs to step in, stop further rises and tell voters when their energy bills will be cut by the £300 they promised.
Doogan (above) added: "Scotland is an energy-rich country. Yet, under the Labour government, families are being forced to pay among the highest electricity prices in Europe – it is one more example of the price Scotland pays because of Westminster control over our energy.
"Public trust in Westminster is already at rock bottom due to the Labour government's litany of broken promises. Pensioners have had their winter fuel payments slashed, WASPI women have been denied compensation, and thousands of Scottish children are being pushed into poverty by the Labour government's two child benefit cap.
'If energy bills soar again by over £100 a year in April, that list of broken promises will grow even longer, and the only thing Labour will have delivered is a renewed cost of living crisis.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Britain's electricity grid is dangerously outdated
Built for a different era, Britain's electricity grid is now creaking under the weight of the energy transition, and no one is fully in charge of fixing it. Some of the equipment still in use dates from the 1950s. And the software that runs the grid? That was written before the current electricity market even existed. Both physical and digital infrastructure are suffering from decades of underinvestment as the connection of renewables has been prioritised above all else. Evidence shows substantial legacy equipment installed between 1955 and 1975, much of which remains in service. Last year, a report for energy regulator Ofgem by Cambridge Economic Policy Associates (CEPA) found that a third of transformers and 30pc of switch gear were built in the 1970s, as were just over half of all power cables. The transformer that blew up at North Hyde in March, causing the Heathrow blackout, dated back to the 1960s. More than a third of other grid equipment, from protection relays to communications systems to fire suppression, was built before the 1970s. The same CEPA report indicated that some of the grid's most important control systems typically only last 10 to 20 years before needing replacement, and that traditional network assets (overhead lines, underground cables, transformers, and switchgear) generally last between 41 and 70 years. This suggests a lot of grid assets are pushing the boundaries of their expected lives. The obsolescence risks associated with modern smart grid infrastructure are higher. The report notes these devices 'are often tightly integrated with software and specialised equipment that quickly become obsolete ... The typical software and equipment lifecycle of 10 to 15 years can limit the technical lives of these assets'. The fragility of the digital infrastructure was highlighted recently. May 29 was a day of high wind output, but there was a lot less wind than expected the day before, which is when most power trading takes place. Lots of exports on UK interconnector cables were booked, and not all could be reversed on the day. The problem was exacerbated by the fact that until 10am, the within-day wind forecast was significantly higher than the already inaccurate day-ahead forecast. At its height, the difference between actual wind output and the forecasts was 4.5 GW. This represented 28pc of wind output at the time and 17pc of demand, a huge discrepancy for the National Energy System Operator (Neso) to manage. That day, the Neso's control room had to implement almost 25,000 balancing actions, turning down wind and tweaking gas power stations' output in an effort to keep the grid running properly. All this was done on software built in the 1980s. A literal relic of the days of privatisation, this software pre-dates the current market structure, known as NETA (New Electricity Trading Arrangements), which replaced the original post-privatisation structure in 2001. There are increasingly frequent outages on the system that connects the Neso control room with the control systems of power stations. When this happens, Neso staff must revert to notifying their instructions by telephone. Some 25,000 balancing actions in one day represents 17 a minute – clearly not something the small control room team can do manually. Had the software gone down that day, keeping the lights on would have been a matter of prayers as control room staff would have had to revert to a simpler way of doing things: getting wind off the system, bringing up all available gas plants, and, if necessary, suspending exports. Doing this would have made balancing by phone feasible, and would have removed a major source of variability that challenges system balance: wind. Not only can wind output swing dramatically, Neso uses inadequate forecasting tools that are widely criticised within the industry for their poor accuracy. A major project to replace the ancient balancing system, begun in 2014, was cancelled last year after a decade of failure, with no visibility on when the new replacement will be operational. Neso recently launched an audit of its demand forecasting, indicating its models had not been reviewed in '10-20 years'. That is despite the significant changes represented by the introduction of renewables, many of which are connected to low-voltage grids over which Neso has little visibility (and which appear as negative demand in Neso's systems). Many parts of the grid still rely on control systems developed decades ago, well before the smart grid era. One such system is SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition), which allows operators to monitor and control grid equipment remotely. In some cases, these systems are running on obsolete software like Windows 3.1 or early versions of Windows XP, long out of support and riddled with known vulnerabilities. In power stations, these controls are sometimes used for synchronising generators with the grid, a safety-critical function. These outdated systems are far more susceptible to cyberattacks, hardware failure and compatibility issues with modern infrastructure. The Grid Code – the rulebook for the electricity system – says remarkably little about digital control systems. There's no mention of software integrity, cybersecurity or the use of obsolete platforms like Windows 3.1. As demand on the grid increases and the system becomes more complex, continuing to rely on decades-old physical and digital infrastructure represents a growing threat to resilience. Yet, shockingly, no one has responsibility for ensuring industry rules will guarantee a secure system, leaving us in the hands of the original architects of a grid that bears little resemblance to today's power market. The question is no longer if the system is fragile, but how long it can survive without a major failure. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Not A Serious Analysis': Reeves' 'Baffling' Spending Plan Slammed By Leading Economists
Rachel Reeves' spending review has been slammed by leading economists who said it was not a 'serious department analysis'. The chancellor unveiled her plans to spend an extra £300 billion over the next three years on Wednesday, divvying out huge sums of cash to the NHS, net zero and defence – while also squeezing other Whitehall budgets. The government has said this is all an investment in Britain's renewal, and insisted that these decisions are fully-financed after Labour hiked taxes in last year's Budget. However, the director of think tank the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) Paul Johnson tore into her announcement on Thursday. 'If you were baffled by the chancellor's speech yesterday, so were we,' he said during the IFS's analysis livestream on YouTube. 'It did not appear to be a serious effort to provide useful information to anybody.' He also seemed to criticise the premise that the economy is now in better place than it was a year ago, hence Labour's decision to spend again – and reverse some cuts. 'Despite some of the rather odd recent claims, neither the economic forecasts nor the public finances have improved relative to the genuinely difficult situation we knew about a year ago,' Johnson said. 'Rather the reverse. Hence some difficult choices.' Large council tax hikes have been included in the government expectations for the review, which also 'assumes that council tax bills will rise by 5% a year', according to the IFS chief. That means bills will rise at their fastest rate 'over any parliament since 2001-05.' Johnson laid into the cuts Reeves is imposing on other Whitehall departments in order to boost the NHS, defence and net zero, too. He said: 'Every department is facing the same administrative costs, 10% for all of them over the three years, and then another 5% in 2029-30. 'All of that is irrespective of how much they've grown, irrespective of planned spending increases, irrespective of anything at all. 'That is not the result of a serious department analysis. 'I hesitate to accuse the Treasury of making numbers up but…' He noted that total departmental spending is set to grow at 2.3% a year above economy-wide inflation. That's lower growth than was recorded over the 2019-2024 parliament, when it increased at 3.6% per year. 'This is a long period during which spending will be growing faster than the economy,' he said. Johnson even questioned the suggestion that the NHS had fared particularly well, noting: 'Health spending nearly always gets topped up. Growth of 3% a year is below the historic average.' Mounting pressures on spending, including the U-turn on winter fuel allowance for pensioners and the backlash against disability benefit cuts, means Reeves is expected to either introduce more cuts or hike taxes in the autumn Budget to pay for it all. Johnson noted: 'Nobody should be in any doubt that the chancellor has had some incredibly tough decisions to take. 'With spending plans set, and 'ironclad' fiscal rules being met by gnat's whisker, any move in the wrong direction will almost certainly spark more tax rises.' Nick Ferrari Calls Rachel Reeves 'The Klarna Chancellor' After She Splashed The Cash In Spending Review Blow For Rachel Reeves As UK Economy Shrank By 0.3% After Trump Tariffs Rachel Reeves Takes Axe To Whitehall Departments To Pay For Health And Defence Cash Splurge
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Badenoch urges business leaders to ‘get on the pitch' and support Tories
Businesses need to 'get on the pitch' to speak up against policies they think are damaging their prospects, Kemi Badenoch has said. The Conservative leader also appealed to business leaders to support her party, suggesting there was no credible alternative which would represent their interests. Speaking at the FTSE 250+ conference in central London, Mrs Badenoch said: 'My message to business is: I'm on your side, but I need you to be on mine too.' The Tory leader's appearance at the gathering came as the latest gross domestic product (GDP) figures showed the UK economy shrank more than expected, the day after the Government unveiled spending plans prioritising health and defence over the next few years. Speaking to an audience of business and investment chiefs, Mrs Badenoch hit out at Labour's tax rises, including the inheritance tax on family farms and national insurance employer contributions. She added: 'You need to support policies that back enterprise, and you need to challenge those who want more state control. 'Don't just wait for other politicians to do it. 'You need to get on the pitch too.' The Tory leader claimed the UK has 'forgot that business is a good in and of itself, and it pays for everything. It is the source of our prosperity'. Mrs Badenoch added: 'The challenge all of us in this room have now is that many people don't believe this anymore.' People instead believe 'business hoards wealth' and is 'greedy and needs to be taxed more', she said. Mrs Badenoch continued: 'This is a crisis. 'And the question before us is simple: Who has credible solutions? 'And I know many of you will be asking, 'Why should we trust the Conservative Party?' 'And I say because no-one is making the argument for business … except me and my party.' At PMQs I talked about Labour creating an economic spiral. A reminder we have 4 more years of this… — Kemi Badenoch (@KemiBadenoch) June 12, 2025 Labour offers only 'managed decline', she said, before taking aim at Nigel Farage's Reform UK party. Mrs Badenoch appealed to the audience, signalling voters cannot 'allow Farage, with no experience of legislating – he's never in Parliament, let alone government – to just come in'. She added: 'Can you imagine 360 random people suddenly taking over government saying they are going to fix everything? 'We were there for 14 years, sweating and labouring, it was unbelievably difficult. 'How many of you would allow your businesses to be run by people who have never been in that business and say 'Come on in, I'm sure you can fix it'? 'That's what he's offering, it's not real. 'It is a scam, and it's my job to expose that scam.' A Reform UK spokesman said: 'Kemi admits they had 14 years and yet all they achieved was sky high taxes, low growth and open borders. 'The only scam is her telling the British public that the Tories have changed. 'It's the same people and the same old failed ideas. 'Quite simply, the Tory party is irrelevant.'
