PSM backs SIS ahead of apex court ruling on 'deviant' fatwa
PSM has voiced its support for Sisters in Islam (SIS) ahead of a landmark Federal Court decision tomorrow (June 19), saying the ruling will have far-reaching implications on civil society at large.
The apex court is set to determine the legality of a fatwa by the Selangor Islamic Religious Department (Jais), gazetted on July 31, 2014, which declared SIS and other organisations that subscribe to 'liberalism and religious pluralism' as deviant from Islamic teachings.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Trump on Iran strikes: 'I may do it, I may not do it'
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said he was considering whether the United States will join Israeli strikes on Iran Wednesday, as he said that Tehran had reached out to seek negotiations. Speaking as he watched installation of a new flagpole at the White House, Trump added that his patience "had already run out" with Iran and repeated his call for the Islamic republic's "unconditional surrender." "I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do," Trump told reporters on the South Lawn when asked if he had decided whether to launch US air strikes. "I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate." Trump said Iran had even suggested sending officials to the White House to negotiate on Tehran's nuclear programme to end Israel's air assault, but added that it was "very late." "I said it's very late to be talking. We may meet. There's a big difference between now and a week ago, right? Big difference," Trump added. "They've suggested that they come to the White House. That's, you know, courageous, but it's, like, not easy for them to do." Asked what he meant when he called in a social media post on Tuesday for Iran's "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!", Trump again suggested that his patience had run out with Iran. "It's very simple -- unconditional surrender. That means I've had it, okay? I've had it. I give up, no more, we go and blow up all the nuclear stuff that's all over the place," Trump said. Trump compared Iran to "schoolyard bullies", adding: "And now they're not bullies any more, but we'll see what happens." When asked if it was too late for negotiations, he said: "Nothing is too late." - AFP
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Outcome of Iran-Israel conflict uncertain
Israel has inflicted damage on strategic sites and killed key figures within Iran's military leadership in aerial attacks that show no signs of abating. But the ultimate outcome is unclear, analysts say. Israel says its offensive aims to eliminate Iran's nuclear programme and ballistic missile production capabilities. The Israeli government has not ruled out triggering a wholesale removal of Iran's theocratic system set up after the 1979 revolution that has remained opposed to Israel's existence. Yet, even if Israel succeeds in ousting Ayatollah Ali Khamenei or killing him, the supreme leader will not necessarily be replaced by more moderate forces and the risk exists of further escalation, analysts warn. Diplomacy, meanwhile, remains at a standstill as Israel pounds Iranian targets and Iran hits back with its own strikes on its foe, heightening fears of a wider and prolonged conflict. In television interviews, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has not ruled out killing Khamenei, although a United States official said President Donald Trump had vetoed assassinating the supreme leader. Israel, whose intelligence service is widely acknowledged to have deeply penetrated Iran, has killed a host of key figures, including the heads of the Revolutionary Guards and armed forces, which is a huge blow. "This is existential, the most profound of all the crises the Islamic republic has faced," said Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa programme at the London-based Chatham House think tank. "This is designed to decapitate the leadership of the Islamic republic and degrade the nuclear and broader capabilities of the regime," she said. Rather than an immediate turnaround, what could result is "an unravelling over time", with the Israeli action putting an "accelerant" on a process of change already happening within Iran due to dissatisfaction with the authorities, she said. For Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia Non-proliferation Program at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, Israel's military operation "is about regime change and not eliminating the nuclear programme". "If the regime falls, then it will be an enormous success," he said of the operation Israel dubbed "Rising Lion" — a likely reference to the beast which adorned the pre-revolutionary Iranian flag. Even in the event of a change in leadership, Gregory Brew, senior analyst for Iran and energy at risk analysis firm Eurasia Group, said Khamenei could be replaced with a figure who may be even more hardline and pose a greater danger to Israel. "Kill Khamenei, make him a martyr to the hardliners and empower a new supreme leader who may be much less risk averse. "Or leave him to die or resign in likely disgrace after the war, his credibility in ruins. Which move produces a government better suited to Israel's interests?" Brew said. Iran's ability to cause regional mayhem through its proxies, Hizbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Gaza Strip, has been severely degraded by Israeli operations since October 2023. But Teheran still backs the Houthi rebels in Yemen, who have attacked Gulf shipping, while Iran can strike energy facilities or mount cyberattacks. "It remains to be seen if Iran will seek to engage in gray zone activities, including cyberattacks," said analysts at US-based think tank Soufan Center. Israel's airstrikes have put an end, for now, to the latest track of talks seeking to end the stand-off over the Iranian nuclear programme. Analysts say the future of any diplomatic progress lies with the US and Trump. "Netanyahu's goal is to bring Trump into the war," said David Khalfa, co-founder of the Atlantic Middle East Forum think tank. Israel has hit the Natanz nuclear site, but has not been able to strike the Fordo enrichment facility, which is deep underground. Analysts believe Israel could damage it only with American bunker-busting bombs. Ali Vaez, Iran analyst at the International Crisis Group, argued in an article for Foreign Affairs that Israel would be unable to wipe out the Iranian nuclear programme even in a prolonged conflict. "A diplomatic settlement represents the best and most sustainable way for Trump to avoid both a nuclear Iran and a protracted military entanglement," Vaez said.
Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Final verdict nears in SIS's legal battle to annul ‘deviant' fatwa
The Federal Court is set to rule on the constitutionality of a fatwa issued by the Selangor religious authorities declaring the organisation 'deviant' for subscribing to 'liberalism' and 'religious pluralism'. PETALING JAYA : The Federal Court is set to rule on Thursday in a high-profile case involving a fatwa by the Selangor religious authorities that labelled women's rights group Sisters in Islam Forum (Malaysia) (SIS) a 'deviant' organisation. SIS is appealing a 2023 Court of Appeal ruling that dismissed its challenge against a fatwa issued by the Selangor Islamic religious council (Mais) 11 years ago. In 2014, Mais had decreed that SIS had deviated from the teachings of Islam by purportedly subscribing to 'liberalism' and 'religious pluralism'. Case history and contentions In October 2014, SIS, a company limited by guarantee established under the Companies Act 1965, filed for judicial review. It contended that the fatwa was unconstitutional and could not be imposed on a corporate entity governed by civil law. The case has since evolved into a constitutional battle over whether religious edicts can be enforced against non-religious organisations, and whether the civil courts have jurisdiction to review them. In its court filings, SIS also argued that certain terms used in the fatwa, such as 'liberalism' and 'pluralism', were vague and undefined, making enforcement arbitrary and open to abuse. The group questioned whether state religious authorities could direct federal bodies like the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) to enforce such orders, raising concerns over the overlap of power between state religious authorities and federal jurisdiction. In 2016, the High Court dismissed SIS's leave application on jurisdictional grounds, but the Court of Appeal later reversed that decision, allowing the inter partes hearing to take place. In 2019, the High Court heard the case on its merits and dismissed it, holding that the fatwa was not a final decision and, therefore, was not amenable to a judicial review. In 2022, the Federal Court, on an application by SIS, declared Section 66A of the Administration of the Religion of Islam (State of Selangor) Enactment 2003 to be unconstitutional. The provision had attempted to grant shariah courts the power to hear and decide judicial reviews against decisions made by the state's religious councils or committees. In March 2023, the Court of Appeal in a 2-1 decision, upheld the High Court's 2019 ruling. However, the dissenting judge on the panel ruled that a fatwa cannot be enforced on a company, as the shariah jurisdiction is only meant to attach to individuals who profess the Islamic faith. Arguments in the Federal Court In the Federal Court, SIS argued that the fatwa violated its constitutional rights to freedom of expression, association and religion. It also said the fatwa was issued without due process, as the organisation was not given the opportunity to defend itself. Mais and the state fatwa committee, for their part, argue that they had the necessary jurisdiction to issue the fatwa. They claim the fatwa is consistent with Islamic teachings, and that SIS was merely seeking to undermine their religious authority.
