Cory Booker bill would protect Americans' right to sue pesticide makers for poisoning
The Pesticide Injury Accountability Act, which faces nearly insurmountable odds to passage, comes amid the collision of two major trends: the growing awareness of the danger of pesticides and a state-by-state push of chemical companies to head off the risk of legal liability from those allegedly harmed by them.
On one hand, pesticides are emerging in scientific research as a major risk of cancer — potentially a bigger risk than smoking. Endocrinologists argue there is no safe level of pesticide exposure.
On the other side is a campaign by chemical manufacturers to get state legislatures in agricultural states to shield pesticide makers from lawsuits.
In arguing for one such bill in Iowa this year, one state legislator said the bill would protect applicators from being sued for manufacturer's mistakes.
'It says that if you sell your glyphosate or your product and you follow federal law to the T, you can't be sued for having done the wrong thing in labeling your product,' Iowa state Sen. Mike Bousselot (R) said of the bill.
Local farmers pushed back, and the law narrowly failed.
'We're very worried. Our farmers feel that if they have injuries or illnesses due to their use of a pesticide they should have access to the courts,' Aaron Lehman, the head of the Iowa Farmers Union, told The Guardian during the fight this spring.
'We just don't think the playing field should be tilted,' Lehman added.
Booker's law would allow Americans in all states to target manufacturers directly, many of them foreign.
'Pesticide manufacturers should not have the power to silence the people who feed America, yet that's exactly what's happening — as these corporations are working to block those that their products have harmed from seeking justice in the courts,' Joe Maxwell, president of farmer advocacy group Farm Action, said in a statement.
Maxwell added that Farm Action 'applauds Senator Booker for this legislation and believe this is an issue that can unite both sides of the aisle.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
Vance claims ‘Trump has nothing to hide' in Epstein case, says Obama, Bush ‘didn't fully investigate' serial perv
Vice President JD Vance was adamant Monday that President Trump 'has nothing to hide' with respect to notorious sex predator Jeffrey Epstein, while ripping into the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations for their handling of the case. 'The president has been very clear. We're not shielding anything,' Vance told reporters at an event in Canton, Ohio meant to promote the newly-enacted One Big Beautiful Bill Act. 'The president has directed the attorney general to release all credible information and, frankly, to go and find additional credible information related to the Jeffrey Epstein case,' added the Ohio native. 'He's been incredibly transparent about that stuff. But some of that stuff takes time.' Advertisement Vance echoed other top officials in stressing the need to safeguard the names of victims in any additional disclosures about Epstein, who was found dead in his Manhattan jail cell Aug. 10, 2019, while awaiting federal trial on sex trafficking charges. 4 Vice President JD Vance insisted that President Trump has nothing to hide on the Epstein issue. POOL/AFP via Getty Images 4 Critics have alleged that the feds know significantly more about Jeffrey Epstein than what's been revealed. Advertisement Before ascending to public office, Vance suggested the government was not being transparent about the late pedophile or his purported network of associates. 'For 20 years, you had Obama and George W. Bush's Department of Justice go easy on this guy. They didn't fully investigate the case,' the 40-year-old charged Monday. 'They didn't show any curiosity about the case, and now Donald J. Trump is asking his Department of Justice to show full transparency.' 'If you want to criticize the people who aren't showing full transparency, you ought to go after the administrations that went easy on Jeffrey Epstein, the administrations that concealed this case for 20 years, and the administrations that failed to show full transparency.' 4 Jeffrey Epstein had been a fixture among American elites for decades. Getty Images Advertisement In 2007, then-Miami US Attorney Alex Acosta cut a deal with Epstein allowing him to plead guilty to Florida state charges of solicitation of prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution. Under the plea agreement, Epstein was only confined for 13 months, spending much of that period on work release. Acosta was named Labor Secretary by Trump at the beginning of the president's first term, but resigned in July 2019, days after Epstein's arrest by federal investigators, amid an outcry over the plea deal. 'Donald J. Trump, I'm telling you, he's got nothing to hide,' Vance insisted. 'His administration has got nothing to hide, and that's why he's been an advocate for full transparency in this case.' 4 President Trump has ripped into the MAGA firestorm over Jeffrey Epstein but simultaneously called for transparency. Getty Images Advertisement Trump has faced a firestorm in the wake of a Justice Department and FBI memo issued July 6 — exactly six years after Epstein's last arrest — that concluded the 66-year-old killed himself in his prison cell and did not possess a 'client list' of powerful associates who are claimed to have engaged in sex with girls as young as 14, contrary to widespread speculation. The president has lashed out at some of his supporters for believing what he calls the 'Jeffrey Epstein hoax' and accused the Democrats of pushing bad-faith claims about the case. Last week, a Florida federal judge rejected a DOJ request to release transcripts of grand jury testimony from the investigation into Epstein that preceded the 2007 plea deal. Meanwhile, in Tallahassee, Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell sat for two days of interviews with Justice Department officials, led by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche.
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Buttigieg: Approach to transgender rights ‘starts with compassion'
Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said Democrats should approach transgender rights, including eligibility requirements for trans athletes, 'with compassion' during an interview aired early Monday with NPR's 'Morning Edition.' Buttigieg, who confirmed in May that he is weighing a bid for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination after passing on a Senate run in Michigan, was asked about his messaging on transgender rights in response to remarks from former Obama White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel that diminished trans identities. Emanuel, a Democrat and former Chicago mayor, has also said he is considering a 2028 presidential bid. 'Your approach starts with compassion — compassion for transgender people, compassion for families, especially young people who are going through this, and also empathy for people who are not sure what all of this means for them,' Buttigieg, who ran unsuccessfully for the 2020 Democratic nomination, told host Steve Inskeep on Monday. 'And I think when you do that, that does call into question some of the past orthodoxies in my party, for example, around sports, where I think most reasonable people would recognize that there are serious fairness issues if you just treat this as not mattering when a trans athlete wants to compete in women's sports,' Buttigieg said. 'Meaning the parent who has complained about this has a case,' Inskeep interjected. 'Sure,' Buttigieg said. 'And that's why I think these decisions should be in the hands of sports leagues and school boards and not politicians. Least of all, politicians in Washington trying to use this as a political pawn.' Buttigieg's stance on transgender athletes echoes that of other potential Democratic candidates for the 2028 presidential election. In May, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) said the party should be more open to hearing legitimate concerns about trans students participating in girls' and women's sports, similarly advocating for compassion and a hands-off approach from Washington. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), seen as a top contender for the 2028 nomination, said in March that he found transgender girls and women competing on female sports teams 'deeply unfair.' He later said he would be open to a conversation about limiting their participation in California if such a discussion were conducted 'in a way that's respectful and responsible and could find a kind of balance.' Newsom applauded a pilot program announced last month by the California Interscholastic Federation, which governs high school sports in the state, allowing more girls to qualify for California's track-and-field championship in events where a transgender student-athlete also qualified. The issue is likely to play out on the campaign trail. Roughly two-thirds of Americans said in a recent Gallup poll that they support policies preventing transgender people from participating on sports teams that match their gender identity. On Monday, Buttigieg said he disagrees with the Trump administration's approach to transgender athletes, which includes a sweeping executive order stating that the U.S. opposes 'male competitive participation in women's sports' and more than two dozen federal investigations into states, universities, school districts and athletic associations that continue to allow trans women and girls to compete on teams that match their gender identity. The U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee updated its eligibility rules last week to exclude transgender female athletes, citing Trump's order. The NCAA barred trans women from competition in February, shortly after Trump issued the order on trans athletes. President Trump and administration officials have refused to use the word 'transgender' in orders and policies related to transgender Americans, routinely referring to trans women as 'biological males' and 'men.' An executive order Trump signed on his first day back in office proclaims the federal government recognizes only two unchangeable sexes, male and female. 'I think that chess is different from weightlifting, and weightlifting is different from volleyball, and, you know, middle school is different from the Olympics,' Buttigieg said on Monday. 'So, that's exactly why I think that we shouldn't be grandstanding on this as politicians. We should be empowering communities and organizations and schools to make the right decisions.' Buttigieg, who is gay, has criticized other recent moves by the Trump administration that target transgender Americans, including a Department of Defense policy that took effect last month barring trans people from serving openly in the military. 'Deep down, I have to believe that most Americans get that whatever group happens to be disfavored at the moment, and it's always somebody, that the kinds of politicians — left, right or center — that get ahead by stepping on their faces, nothing good comes of that,' Buttigieg said at a VoteVets Action Fund town hall in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, in May, responding to a question about Democratic messaging on transgender rights. In February, Iowa became the first state to remove anti-discrimination protections for a previously protected class when it struck safeguards for transgender people from its civil rights code. 'There's a perception that Democrats became so focused on identity that we no longer had a message that could actually speak to people across the board, or that we were only for you if you fit into a certain identity bucket,' Buttigieg said on Monday. 'And the tragedy of that is that I believe the right kind of Democratic vision is one that lifts everybody up — it pays specific attention to discrimination or mistreatment of people because they're Black or because they're women or LGBTQ or whatever reason that might be. But you don't have to be in this particular combination of categories to benefit from what we have to offer.'
Axios
19 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Sherrod Brown met with Schumer in Ohio amid 2026 Senate push
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and former Sen. Sherrod Brown met in Ohio this weekend, as Brown weighs a possible comeback bid to flip a GOP Senate seat in the state, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Schumer has lobbied Brown for months to run. Fresh off a major recruiting victory in North Carolina, he wants to expand that luck to Ohio. Brown, 72, lost re-election last year, and is considering both a Senate and gubernatorial bid in Ohio, according to sources familiar with his thinking. The former three-term Democratic senator is likely his party's best chance at running a competitive 2026 campaign in the state. Former Vice President Kamala Harris lost Ohio last year by over 10 points. Brown lost by just under four points. The big picture: Schumer has limited pickup opportunities in the Senate next year. Hitting recruitment home runs could help him expand that map. Former North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper (D) on Monday announced he would run for Senate. Axios scooped last week that Cooper was planning to enter the race, which was a priority for Schumer and co. Democrats are also hopeful that Maine Gov. Janet Mills will decide to run for Senate next year, challenging Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine.) for the seat. Zoom in: While party insiders see Ohio as a stretch target for Democrats, Brown's entrance would instantly shift those dynamics. He'd face Republican Jon Husted, who was appointed to fill the vacant seat created when JD Vance resigned from the Senate to serve as vice president. Between the lines: Since leaving office, Brown has launched a pro-workers organization that promotes understanding the lives of American workers. And since his loss last year, Brown has made the case in public columns that the Democratic Party must reconnect with the working class. "It is an electoral and a moral imperative, and it will be my mission for the rest of my life," Brown wrote in a March column for The New Republic. "To win the White House and governing majorities again, Democrats must reckon with how far our party has strayed from our New Deal roots, in terms of both our philosophy toward the economy, and the makeup of our coalition," he added.
