
Buttigieg: Approach to transgender rights ‘starts with compassion'
Buttigieg, who confirmed in May that he is weighing a bid for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination after passing on a Senate run in Michigan, was asked about his messaging on transgender rights in response to remarks from former Obama White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel that diminished trans identities.
Emanuel, a Democrat and former Chicago mayor, has also said he is considering a 2028 presidential bid.
'Your approach starts with compassion — compassion for transgender people, compassion for families, especially young people who are going through this, and also empathy for people who are not sure what all of this means for them,' Buttigieg, who ran unsuccessfully for the 2020 Democratic nomination, told host Steve Inskeep on Monday.
'And I think when you do that, that does call into question some of the past orthodoxies in my party, for example, around sports, where I think most reasonable people would recognize that there are serious fairness issues if you just treat this as not mattering when a trans athlete wants to compete in women's sports,' Buttigieg said.
'Meaning the parent who has complained about this has a case,' Inskeep interjected.
'Sure,' Buttigieg said. 'And that's why I think these decisions should be in the hands of sports leagues and school boards and not politicians. Least of all, politicians in Washington trying to use this as a political pawn.'
Buttigieg's stance on transgender athletes echoes that of other potential Democratic candidates for the 2028 presidential election. In May, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) said the party should be more open to hearing legitimate concerns about trans students participating in girls' and women's sports, similarly advocating for compassion and a hands-off approach from Washington.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), seen as a top contender for the 2028 nomination, said in March that he found transgender girls and women competing on female sports teams 'deeply unfair.' He later said he would be open to a conversation about limiting their participation in California if such a discussion were conducted 'in a way that's respectful and responsible and could find a kind of balance.'
Newsom applauded a pilot program announced last month by the California Interscholastic Federation, which governs high school sports in the state, allowing more girls to qualify for California's track-and-field championship in events where a transgender student-athlete also qualified.
The issue is likely to play out on the campaign trail. Roughly two-thirds of Americans said in a recent Gallup poll that they support policies preventing transgender people from participating on sports teams that match their gender identity.
On Monday, Buttigieg said he disagrees with the Trump administration's approach to transgender athletes, which includes a sweeping executive order stating that the U.S. opposes 'male competitive participation in women's sports' and more than two dozen federal investigations into states, universities, school districts and athletic associations that continue to allow trans women and girls to compete on teams that match their gender identity.
The U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee updated its eligibility rules last week to exclude transgender female athletes, citing Trump's order. The NCAA barred trans women from competition in February, shortly after Trump issued the order on trans athletes.
President Trump and administration officials have refused to use the word 'transgender' in orders and policies related to transgender Americans, routinely referring to trans women as 'biological males' and 'men.' An executive order Trump signed on his first day back in office proclaims the federal government recognizes only two unchangeable sexes, male and female.
'I think that chess is different from weightlifting, and weightlifting is different from volleyball, and, you know, middle school is different from the Olympics,' Buttigieg said on Monday. 'So, that's exactly why I think that we shouldn't be grandstanding on this as politicians. We should be empowering communities and organizations and schools to make the right decisions.'
Buttigieg, who is gay, has criticized other recent moves by the Trump administration that target transgender Americans, including a Department of Defense policy that took effect last month barring trans people from serving openly in the military.
'Deep down, I have to believe that most Americans get that whatever group happens to be disfavored at the moment, and it's always somebody, that the kinds of politicians — left, right or center — that get ahead by stepping on their faces, nothing good comes of that,' Buttigieg said at a VoteVets Action Fund town hall in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, in May, responding to a question about Democratic messaging on transgender rights.
In February, Iowa became the first state to remove anti-discrimination protections for a previously protected class when it struck safeguards for transgender people from its civil rights code.
'There's a perception that Democrats became so focused on identity that we no longer had a message that could actually speak to people across the board, or that we were only for you if you fit into a certain identity bucket,' Buttigieg said on Monday. 'And the tragedy of that is that I believe the right kind of Democratic vision is one that lifts everybody up — it pays specific attention to discrimination or mistreatment of people because they're Black or because they're women or LGBTQ or whatever reason that might be. But you don't have to be in this particular combination of categories to benefit from what we have to offer.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
26 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump closes key trade loophole, impacting Shein, Temu orders
President Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday, July 30, ending the de minimis trade loophole that allows for low-value goods to be shipped to the U.S. duty-free. Packages valued at $800 or less sent to the U.S. outside of the international postal network will now face "all applicable duties," the White House said. The order takes effect August 29. Shein and Temu are two popular fast fashion brands that have attracted American shoppers looking to place large orders at heavily discounted costs and often with free shipping. With the trade loophole ending, U.S. consumers are bracing to see rising prices, including in their once-cheap fast fashion orders. Here's what shoppers need to know about the trade loophole ending: What is de minimis and why will it impact Shein and Temu? Shein and Temu sell a range of products, including clothing, furniture and more that arrive quickly and cheaply. Over half of all packages with de minimis exemptions come from China, and more than 30% of all daily packages shipped under de minimis are from Temu and Shein, Reuters reported in February. A provision in the Tariff Act of 1930 allows for de minimis exemptions, which has become the primary route for e-commerce imports from China to enter the U.S. According to a congressional report from February, between 2018 and 2023, Chinese exports of low-value, single packages increased dramatically from $5.3 billion to $66 billion. Eliminating the loophole for China would have "far-reaching negative effects for Americans, particularly poorer consumers," according to libertarian think tank the Cato Institute. Republican U.S. Senator Jim Banks of Indiana hailed the executive order, saying "for too long, countries like China have flooded our markets with duty-free, cheap imports." Reuters contributed to the reporting of this article


USA Today
26 minutes ago
- USA Today
What whistleblowers said about just-confirmed Trump appeals court judge Emil Bove
Emil Bove, President Donald Trump's Senate-confirmed pick to a prestigious judicial role, overcame accusations of misconduct at the Justice Department. Here's what whistleblowers and Bove said. The U.S. Senate narrowly confirmed Emil Bove, President Donald Trump's controversial pick for a prestigious judicial role, in a 50-49 vote late July 29, dismissing multiple whistleblower complaints about Bove's conduct as a top Justice Department official. The vote unfolded almost entirely along party lines. Two Republicans, Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, joined all of the Senate's Democrats in opposition. Bove is now set to be sworn in to his new role on the Philadelphia-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which handles federal appeals for Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware. Bove, a former personal criminal defense lawyer for Trump, overcame multiple accusations from whistleblowers that he had suggested the Trump administration defy court orders if necessary and misled Congress while serving as a top official within Trump's Justice Department. Bove will now shift from that prosecutorial role to the appeals court. Bove defended his integrity at his Senate confirmation hearing, saying he has honored his oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and has a "deep respect for the rule of law." Here's what whistleblowers said ahead of Bove's confirmation: Whistleblower accusation #1: Ignoring court orders? Shortly before the Senate Judiciary Committee considered Bove's nomination June 25, a whistleblower – former Justice Department prosecutor Erez Reuveni – alleged that Bove advocated at a March 14 meeting for the department to ignore court orders if necessary to make sure deportation flights took off. "Bove stated that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'f--- you' and ignore any such court order," according to Reuveni's June 24 whistleblower disclosure. At his confirmation hearing, Bove said he "did not suggest that there would be any need to consider ignoring court orders," adding that there were no court orders in place at the time of the meeting. Bove said he couldn't remember if he instructed his subordinates to say "f--- you" to courts in some manner, but that he has "certainly said things encouraging litigators at the department to fight hard for valid positions." Reuveni was fired in April, after he raised concerns to his chain of command "for nearly three weeks regarding the government's compliance with court orders and candor to the courts," according to the disclosure. While Democrats sounded the alarm, Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, said June 25 that Reuveni's allegations weren't a cause for concern. "Even if we accept most of the claims as true, there's no scandal here," Grassley said. "Government lawyers aggressively litigating and interpreting court orders isn't misconduct. It's what lawyers do all the time." Another whistleblower later came forward to corroborate claims from Reuveni. The person, whose identity has remained shielded, provided internal Justice Department documents supporting Reuveni's allegations, according to Whistleblower Aid, a nonprofit that represents the whistleblower. Whistleblower accusation #2: Misleading Congress on Eric Adams case? Another whistleblower, whose identity hasn't been publicly disclosed, came forward to allege Bove misled Congress during his Senate confirmation, according to reports from the Washington Post and CNN. The testimony concerned the circumstances behind the Justice Department dropping its criminal bribery case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. Bove directed prosecutors to drop the case after Trump took office, saying the prosecution was restricting Adams' ability to focus on illegal immigration and violent crime. At his confirmation hearing, Bove denied allegations that he negotiated a "quid pro quo" – meaning an exchange of favors – with Adams' lawyers, under which the Justice Department would drop the charges. Bove also denied instructing a lawyer to stop taking notes when Adams' lawyers allegedly urged a quid-pro-quo deal, although Bove said at some point he did remark on a lawyer taking extensive notes. Several Justice Department prosecutors resigned rather than follow Bove's orders to drop the Adams case, which has nonetheless been dismissed. The Justice Department didn't immediately respond to USA TODAY's request for comment about whether Bove misled Congress. Gates McGavick, a department spokesperson, responded in the Washington Post's July 28 story that Bove has done "incredible work at the Department of Justice" and was going to be "an excellent judge." Justice Connection, an organization composed of Justice Department alumni concerned that their former colleagues are under attack in the Trump administration, put out a statement that was short on specifics, but said the whistleblower "has strong evidence that Emil Bove was not truthful" during his confirmation hearing. The whistleblower tried to share the information with Republican senators for weeks, according to the statement. Contributing: Erin Mansfield and Bart Jansen – USA TODAY; Reuters


New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
Senate Majority Leader John Thune readying Russia sanctions as deadline for Ukraine cease-fire shortens to 10 days
WASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) is ready to move on a bill sanctioning Russia if a cease-fire with Ukraine isn't reached by the end of next week — if President Trump gives him 'the green light.' Thune told The Post in an exclusive interview Wednesday that he's 'hopeful' the legislation — introduced by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and sponsored by more than 80 senators — would give Trump more leverage to wind down the 41-month-old war. Thune, 64, admitted that the commander-in-chief may decide to take 'unilateral action' to impose those sanctions, but the House and Senate were 'ready to move' if asked to apply harsher penalties. Advertisement 4 Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) stands ready to move on a bill sanctioning Russia if a cease-fire with Ukraine isn't reached in the next week — and if President Trump gives him 'the green light.' Mattie Neretin – CNP for NY Post 'He's somebody who is animated largely by trying to get to a peaceful solution,' the Republican leader said of Trump. 'I think the president genuinely believes in that. We want to be a good partner in that and so like I said, we've been, I made it clear we're available to move on that whenever they're ready to have us do it.' On Tuesday, Trump shortened a 50-day window before slapping sanctions on Vladimir Putin down to just 10 days, as the Russian strongman shows no signs of letting up on nightly bombings against Ukraine and merciless drone strikes on civilians. Advertisement 'I'm disappointed in him, I must be honest with you,' the president told Post columnist Miranda Devine of Putin on the newest episode of 'Pod Force One.' 4 'I'm disappointed in him, I must be honest with you,' the president told Post columnist Miranda Devine of Putin on the newest episode of 'Pod Force One.' AP 'We've had great conversations, but it hasn't been followed up with, you know, just some very bad things have happened. Very, very bad things have happened after we've had conversations. And I'd leave and I'd say, 'Well, I really thought we had it settled' three or four times.' Trump said Monday he hadn't determined whether to impose additional sanctions on Russia or slap secondary tariffs on buyers of Russian energy, while repeating that the US hasn't seen 'any progress being made' toward ending Europe's bloodiest conflict since World War II. Advertisement At least three summits have been held between Ukraine and Russia in Turkey in recent months with a cease-fire no closer, though there have been some prisoner swaps. 4 The Russian strongman shows no signs of letting up on nightly bombings against Ukraine and merciless drone strikes on civilians. REUTERS 'I'm not so interested in talking anymore,' Trump told reporters during a Monday press conference at his Turnberry club in Scotland while meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. 'Trump is going to impose tariffs on people that buy Russian oil. China, India and Brazil, those three countries buy about 80% of cheap Russian oil,' Graham said of the move over the weekend. 'That's what keeps Putin's war machine going.' Advertisement 4 'I'm hopeful at least that at some point he'll give us the green light,' Thune said. 'It gives him added credibility and added weight to his side of the negotiations if in fact he's got the entire United States Congress behind him.' UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS SERVICE/AFP via Getty Images The South Carolina Republican's bill would place a much higher 500% tariff on Russian oil, gas, uranium and other products. 'I'm hopeful at least that at some point he'll give us the green light,' Thune said. 'It gives him added credibility and added weight to his side of the negotiations if in fact he's got the entire United States Congress behind him. 'At least right now, they've been happy to have these discussions and negotiations independently without the threat of you know, a sanctions bill coming out of the Congress, but I think it strengthens their hand.'