Pauline Hanson loses it at Anthony Albanese - and claims he has committed a very dangerous act
The Prime Minister on Tuesday met with the Communist Party leader in Beijing where Chinese security guards in the authoritarian, one-party state also clashed with Australian journalists covering the diplomatic mission.
Senator Hanson said Albanese's visit to China, Australia's biggest trading partner, had jeopardised diplomatic relations with the United States, Australia's biggest defence ally since World War II.
'While Anthony Albanese tours China, our alliance with the United States, the one that keeps Australia safe, is being sidelined,' she said.
'The message? Labor's more comfortable in Beijing than standing shoulder to shoulder with our closest ally.'
Albanese's visit to China comes after Colby Elbridge, the US Undersecretary of Defence, this week asked if the likes of Australia would join the US in defending Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion of the island it considers part of China.
The Trump Administration is frustrated that Australia's defence spending languishes at just two per cent of gross domestic product, a level well short of the 3.5 per cent level Washington wants.
Elbridge wants US allies to match what the United States has spent on defence, as proportion of the economy since the 1990s, arguing countries like Australia needed to 'step up their defence spending and other efforts related to our collective defence'.
Senator Hanson said the Americans were right to be concerned about whether Australia would come to the US's aid in defending Taiwan, an autonomous democracy China wants to politically integrate with the mainland.
'The Americans are asking a simple, fair question: if China invades Taiwan, where does Australia stand? Albanese won't answer. That silence speaks volumes,' she said.
The Trump Administration is also reviewing the AUKUS submarine deal set to cost Australia $368billion, giving it access to American-designed Virginia Class submarines.
'Let's not forget we're in the middle of a $368billion AUKUS deal,' Senator Hanson said.
'They're offering us nuclear submarines. And Labor can't even show basic respect, let alone commitment.
'This isn't leadership. It's dangerous. It puts our security, sovereignty and future at risk.'
Albanese's chances of meeting with Trump have been diminished after it emerged that Australia's Ambassador to the United States, former Labor prime minister Kevin Rudd, had previously described the President as a 'village idiot'.
UK Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer has already met with President Trump and has also promised to increase defence spending to three per cent of GDP by 2029, rising to five per cent by 2035.
The UK is a member of NATO, a 32-member body that requires all its signatory nations, including the US, Germany, Canada and France, to react militarily if any of its members are invaded.
Ukraine, which Russia invaded in 2022, is not a NATO member.
But under the 1951 ANZUS treaty, the Americans are only required to consult Australia if another country attacks us, but not necessarily send in troops.
Australia has since joined the US-led campaigns in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan.
Albanese revealed that his government's buyback of the Port of Darwin, announced during the election campaign, was not raised during his visit.
'I cannot be clearer than to say it was not raised,' he said.
A former Northern Territory Country Liberal Party government led by former chief minister Adam Giles signed a 99-year lease with the Chinese Landbridge Group in October 2015.
Senator Hanson had accused Albanese of talking about 'green steel' instead of raising Taiwan or the Port of Darwin.'
'While Australians are being hit with soaring power bills and rising taxes, Anthony Albanese spent six days in China talking about "green steel",' she said.
'Not Taiwan. Not Chinese spy ships. Not the Port of Darwin, leased to a billionaire with ties to the Communist Party. Just vague platitudes and champagne toasts.
'He skipped meeting a key AUKUS ally in the US, but found time to wine and dine in Beijing. That's not leadership, it's dangerous neglect.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Taiwanese voters reject bid to oust opposition lawmakers in unprecedented recall election
Preliminary results of Taiwan's unprecedented polls reveal voters have rejected the bid to oust about one-fifth of its lawmakers with alleged close ties with Beijing. Early trends after one hour of poll counting point to a lead in favour of most of the 24 lawmakers from the opposition Nationalist Party KMT, Taiwan News reported. Thousands turned out to cast their votes in ballots across several schools, community centres and temples in Taiwan. The independence-leaning ruling Democratic Progressive Party won last year's presidential election, but the China-friendly Nationalists, also known as the KMT, and the smaller Taiwan People's Party have enough seats to form a majority bloc. Those who supported removing the 24 lawmakers were angry that the KMT and its allies blocked key legislation, especially the defence budget, and passed controversial changes that are seen as diminishing the power of the executive and favouring China, which considers the island its own territory. The opposition parties' actions sparked concerns among some Taiwanese about the island's democratic integrity and its ability to deter Chinese military threats, leading to the recall campaigns. The scale of the recall elections is unprecedented, with another seven KMT lawmakers facing similar votes on 23 Aug. But the KMT alleged the ruling party was resorting to political retaliation after it lost the legislative majority, saying the recalls were undermining and challenging Taiwan's democratic system. The KMT holds 52 seats, while the ruling DPP holds 51 seats. For the DPP to secure a legislative majority, at least six KMT lawmakers would need to be ousted, and the ruling party would need to win all by-elections, which would need to be held within three months following the announcement of results. For a recall, more than a quarter of eligible voters in the electoral district must have voted in favour of the recall, with the total number of supporters exceeding those against. The poll closed at 4 pm. local time. With vote counting still underway, the overall trend is against the recall. One closely fought campaign centred on KMT Caucus Whip Fu Kun-Chi, who served as Hualien County chief before being elected to the Taiwanese parliament. Early trends suggest he would survive the recall. The elections have intensified tensions between those backing the status quo and those favouring improved ties with Beijing. Critics accuse China-friendly politicians of compromising Taiwan and take issue with their meetings with mainland Chinese politicians. But these Taiwanese politicians claim their connections are vital for dialogue given Beijing's refusal to interact with the DPP. When asked about the recall election, China's Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian said in June that since the administration of Taiwan president Lai Ching-te came into power, it has sought to achieve "one-party dominance" and practiced "dictatorship" under the guise of "democracy", state broadcaster CCTV reported. She was quoted as saying that Mr Lai's government has spared no effort in suppressing opposition parties and those who supported the development of cross-strait relations. Taiwan's mainland affairs council said Wednesday that the Chinese authorities and state media had tried to blatantly interfere with the vote.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Who WAS Jeffrey Epstein's mate in Sydney? Blockbuster new phone data reveals shocking Australian link to vile paedophile's island hideaway
A mysterious new Australian link to Jeffrey Epstein has been exposed in a massive data leak that has revealed the movements of hundreds of visitors to the sex trafficker's island. Analyst Dhruv Mehrotra claims to have laid bare their trips to and from Epstein's Caribbean seedy resort on Little Saint James, in the United States Virgin Islands. Hidden data leaking from the mobile phones of more than 200 super-rich guests has revealed precise details of their movements - and where they originated from. A huge cache of metadata contained in a dark web database, which had specifically targeted the island, allowed him to pinpoint exact home addresses and workplaces. In among a string of addresses linked to wealthy areas of the US, Europe and the Middle East, was metadata from mystery locations within Sydney. The exact addresses have not yet been revealed, nor the identity of the phones' owner or owners. But the revelation of the claims have sparked fresh speculation over who in Australia had such close ties to the convicted paedophile's dark inner circle. Epstein died by suicide in a New York prison in 2019 after being charged with federal sex trafficking offences. He was accused of grooming young and underage women to be sexually abused by his powerful and wealthy contacts who remain shielded from public exposure. Epstein was a registered sex offender in Florida after pleading guilty to two felony prostitution-related charges in 2008. The White House has recently come under increasing pressure to release the full contents of the Epstein files, which allegedly name many well-known accomplices. In October last year, Mr Mehrotra, a journalist for tech site Wired, said he had uncovered mobile phone data from devices belonging to those jetting into the island. 'The data was so precise, we were able to map the paths of these visitors to within centimetres, including their neighbourhoods, buildings of origin and the paths they took to get to the island,' he said in a YouTube video outlining his analysis. 'These digital trails document the numerous trips of wealthy and influential individuals, seemingly undeterred by Epstein's status as a convicted sex offender.' Epstein purchased Little Saint James in 1998 for $7.95million and made the island his primary residence. An interactive map shows how Mehrotra plotted 11,279 coordinates from the exposed metadata, represented as red dots on the screen Ghislaine Maxwell (pictured with Epstein), former British socialite and Epstein's accomplice, was convicted in 2021 on five counts including sexual trafficking of children by force 'They were left exposed online by a location data broker with ties to the Defence Department, called Near Intelligence, between 2016 and Epstein's final arrest in 2019,' he said. 'Near collected data on more than 200 cell phones that visited the island. 'We don't know why they did that or which client or prospective client of Near decided to query the data in this way to produce the maps.' The firm, which had offices in Singapore and India, sourced its location data from advertising exchanges. Before a targeted advertisement appears on an app or phone, information about the owner is sent to bidding platforms and ad exchanges and often includes users' location data. The painstaking and detailed metadata reveals where visitors to Epstein Island spent most of their time, including the main house, beach and pool area, and when. But the information tracking on their phones wasn't limited to Little Saint James and the surveillance continued after the visitors left to return home or to their work. 'A lot of people were visiting the island, even after Epstein had pleaded guilty in 2008, and served jail time for procuring a minor for prostitution,' said Mehrotra. Maxwell was arrested in New Hampshire, tracked to a million-dollar home by federal agents using location data pulled from her mobile phone 'If we keep following the data trail and we widen our view, we'll see that the tracking of visitors continues once they have left the island, and presumably gone back home.' The Near Intelligence data pinpoints 166 locations throughout the United States, in 80 cities across 26 states. Topping the list were Florida, Texas, Michigan and New York and even included details of holiday homes. 'The data points are labelled as 'Common Evening Locations,' or 'Common Daytime Locations', typically, their home or work,' he said. Mehrotra zoomed out the map to reveal Australia had been picked up in the tracking, with specific points identified in Sydney. He noted that some of these points could also represent victims or employees who worked on the island. However, many of the coordinates captured by Near point to multimillion-dollar homes, in upmarket areas like Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts. Ghislaine Maxwell, former British socialite and an Epstein accomplice, was convicted in 2021 on five counts including sexual trafficking of children by force. Maxwell was arrested in New Hampshire, tracked to a million-dollar home by federal agents using location data pulled from her mobile phone.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
I moved from China to Australia in my 20s unable to speak English and started working as a receptionist. I now own multiple properties and never worry about money: Here's my advice to Aussies
A migrant who moved from China in his twenties unable to speak English says Australians need to have at least $5million worth of investment properties to enjoy a comfortable retirement and avoid being stuck in the middle class. Alex Shang, the founder of AusPropertyStrategy, told Daily Mail Australia the biggest mistake someone could make was aspiring only to own their own home as an owner-occupier. 'If their goal is to live like an everyday Joe, then they don't need to buy investment properties - they just own a home and that's it,' he said. 'They may forever stay in the middle class who pays the most taxes compared to lower class or the rich. 'Once they buy a home, their borrowing capacity is used up and there is no way for them to buy another property, so basically they're stuck or they can choose to go for rent-vesting; they rent a place where they work and then use the money to invest in another city.' With house prices rising in Australia over the long term, pushing Sydney's mid-point value to $1.5million, properties with a backyard are regarded as a better way to build wealth for the future, as surging population growth makes residential land more valuable. 'An apartment for $700,000 to $800,000 is a viable option in Sydney - the price will not increase much meaning they have a place to call home but their wealth will not increase,' he said. 'For the same amount of money, $800,000 can still buy you a standalone house in Brisbane, Perth or Adelaide with good capital growth and good rental yield.' With house prices rising in Australia, over the longer-term, properties with a backyard are regarded as great way to build wealth for the future, as surging population growth makes residential land more valuable (pictured is Oran Park in Sydney's outer south west) Mr Shang moved to Sydney from the Chinese city of Shenyang at age 24 in 2005, after completing a Bachelor of Economics majoring in share trading. 'I couldn't speak a word of English when I came,' he said. 'I did well in written English and listening, reading but not speaking.' He began his career in Australia working as a receptionist for a real estate company, before getting Masters degrees in accounting and business administration. The 44-year-old property investor admitted his first few Sydney apartment purchases weren't successful, leading him to now focus solely on buying houses, based on the scarcity of available land. 'I lost money on those - in the latter days I sold everything because I lost a lot of money; I need to sit down and think about what I did wrong,' he said. 'I found out that if I were going to invest in houses from the same time as I bought the first apartment, I would have made a lot of money, a lot. 'I sold all of the apartments and started buying houses and from there I always made money, never lost a cent.' After a slow start with a $400,000 two-bedroom unit in Kogarah in 2011, which made only modest capital gains - he learned from his mistakes and went on to buy houses across Sydney, Brisbane, Perth, and Melbourne, having previously also bought units in Wolli Creek and Arncliffe. He has also written a Mandarin-language book for Chinese buyers - Australian Property Strategy - on how to grow a property portfolio in Australia. 'Land is scarce and apartments, like building on top of each other, they can increase the supply by many times easily; they can't increase the supply of land,' he said. The best time for someone to start would be in their twenties, based on the idea of first chasing houses that would get strong capital growth followed by buying properties with higher rental yields, or income as a proportion of the home's value, Mr Shang explained. 'In the first 10 years, they buy high capital growth properties; the second 10 years, they buy high rental yield properties and then when they reach retirement, they need to sell a few of their properties and pay off the debt,' he said. Mr Shang declined to say how much his portfolio was worth or how many properties he owned, as the director of a membership-based company offering 20-year mortgage investment strategies. 'There are a few things I don't talk to anyone: that includes how much money I have, how many properties I own and my family because I think that's my privacy,' he said. 'If I tell people how much I have, everyone will want a piece of it; the taxman will want a piece of it.' But he said he continues to live modesty, driving a $20,000 Toyota Corolla occasionally but mostly getting around on a motorbike. 'I like to keep low key; I don't wear expensive clothes; no luxury cars; I ride a motorbike actually and it's cheap to maintain,' he said. 'I invested in some properties and then I don't need to worry about money anymore. 'But I've bought and sold properties pretty much in each capital city in Australia.' His rule for sound investment is to look at markets with population growth and a diversified economy. 'It depends on how you define value: I never buy properties just because it's cheap - I need to see the future of it,' he said. 'If I don't see the future, I don't buy. For property to increase in price, there are a few fundamental factors you need to consider: one, is population growth and then you need to have a lot of job opportunities.' When it came to having an investment strategy, he said it wasn't about the number of investment properties someone had that made them rich. 'It's not the number of properties, it's how much they're worth,' he said. 'If you ask me today, I would say $5million to $7million but in investment properties, excluding their owner-occupied property.' Mr Shang argued a property portfolio worth more than $5million was more likely to generate passive income of $350,000 a year that would enable someone to either retire early or have an income stream to have a comfortable retirement. He argued that someone with a $5million investment portfolio could invest the rental income in an exchange trade fund (ETF) on the Australian share market, and earn seven per cent returns every year. 'But if you have five properties, worth $5million, then you're really rich,' he said. 'If you want to, depend on yourself, then you need to have a net worth of about $7million to live comfortably. 'Holding properties with positive cashflow and use the cash to invest in ETF is good, as long as the yield is more than the mortgage interest rate.' The banks typically lend an owner-occupier five times their salary before tax. But if an individual or a couple are buying investment properties, they can borrow six times their pay. While that's considered to be in the mortgage stress territory, income from renters means a borrower can more easily service the home loan. 'Usually, you get a little bit more borrowing capacity if you buy an investment property because the investment property will generate some rental income,' he said. 'That rental income is considered part of your personal income and if your personal income jumps, your borrowing capacity jumps.' Passive income from rental properties also means someone has a better chance of retiring early, and an investor can also claim rental losses on tax through negative gearing. 'On retirement, one can choose to own a few debt free houses to enjoy future capital growth and current cashflow,' he said. 'If there is no debt, it's great for a stress free life but bad for investment in terms of cash on cash return.'
