Redistricting experts to Sacramento: You can go it alone
Harris' decision leaves her open to pursue the presidency again in 2028. It also galvanizes the long-frozen campaigns of California gubernatorial candidates, whose race is now wide open.
'For now, my leadership — and public service — will not be in elected office,' Harris said in a statement. 'I look forward to getting back out and listening to the American people, helping elect Democrats across the nation who will fight fearlessly, and sharing more details in the months ahead about my own plans.'
Newsom, another possible 2028 presidential contender, shared an X post saying Harris has 'courageously served our state and country for her entire career.'
'Grateful for her service and friendship — and looking forward to continuing the fight in whatever the future might hold for her,' the governor said.
GERRYMANDERING 101: Call it the Fleetwood Mac option: California lawmakers could go their own way on a Democratic gerrymandering bid.
Redistricting experts have been briefing elections committee staff in the Legislature on a redraw strategy that would enlarge Democrats' House margin without voter approval, Playbook has learned. That would avert an expensive and uncertain special election — saving Newsom and allies money for other ballot battles — but it would push Democratic lawmakers into uncharted legal terrain.
Voters bequeathed California its independent House redistricting commission in 2010, and because only voters can substantially amend ballot initiatives once they've passed, they may need to sign off on Newsom's plan to redraw a few California House Republicans into oblivion.
Or they may not.
Newsom has argued there's another option: simply having the Legislature craft new maps. He's noted that California's constitution is silent on mid-decade redistricting (as opposed to the once-a-decade commission process linked to the Census). Now UCLA Voting Rights Project experts are bolstering that argument to the Legislature.
Their legal analysis, shared exclusively with POLITICO after it was presented to legislative staffers this week, argues the Legislature 'has the legal constitutional authority to draw new districts today' if it deems it 'appropriate' — as Newsom and other Democrats have argued.
None of this means the Legislature will decide to circumvent voters. Attorney General Rob Bonta suggested yesterday that the cleanest route would be lawmakers putting a new map on the ballot. That would give Democrats political cover and help inoculate them from the legal challenge that would inevitably follow if the Legislature simply goes it alone — a path that could end in an embarrassing court rebuke.
On the other hand, going to voters could end in an embarrassing (and costly) political rejection. Assuming Texas presses ahead with its gerrymander and California responds in kind, would Democrats roll their dice on a legal theory or take their chances with voters? Stay tuned.
IT'S WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON. This is California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check on California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to lholden@politico.com.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY
HOUSING HICCUP: Newsom's office confirmed today that he's expecting to roll back a state housing law for areas damaged by the January wildfires that tore through Los Angeles County, potentially blocking developers from using the law to increase density in single-family neighborhoods.
The move comes after Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and other city leaders have implored Newsom to block denser development, warning it could complicate fire evacuations and strain local infrastructure in the ravaged Pacific Palisades neighborhood. Conservative media influencers have seized on residents' fears that more duplexes could add to traffic snarls.
'I can confirm the governor will issue an executive order today providing local governments in high severity burn areas with discretion to limit SB 9 development,' said Tara Gallegos, a spokesperson for Newsom, in a statement. 'Stay tuned.'
The law in question, SB 9, was passed in 2021 as part of an effort to ease the state's housing shortage by requiring cities to allow duplexes or lot splits on land zoned for single-family homes. Under Newsom's order, those projects could be temporarily halted in parts of LA, Altadena and Malibu, where thousands of homes were destroyed. — Dustin Gardiner
IN OTHER NEWS
JUSTICE POLITICS: California Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff condemned the Trump administration's back-door move to give Bill Essayli 210 more days as acting U.S. attorney for the Central District of California just as his interim appointment was set to expire.
The administration has used the same maneuver — prolonging the tenure of his picks through acting U.S. attorney appointments — in New York, New Jersey and Nevada.
'The Trump Administration is again hijacking the U.S. Attorney appointment process in order to keep Bill Essayli in power without Senate confirmation votes,' Padilla and Schiff said in a joint statement today. 'One look at Essayli's record shows you why President Trump is worried about formally nominating him and instead, is choosing to circumvent the law and the Senate's power of advice and consent.'
The Los Angeles Times reported last week that Essayli has struggled to secure indictments against people who were arrested during demonstrations prompted by ICE raids across Los Angeles County.
Though Essayli has not been formally nominated by the president, it's not a stretch to say that Padilla and Schiff would likely oppose the firebrand Republican's nomination through a 'blue slip.' The Senate Judiciary Committee tradition dating back to 1917, which defers to home-state senators on such matters, would likely prevent Essayli's nomination from even being considered.
On Tuesday, however, Trump pushed the committee's chair — Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) — to essentially ignore any such objections and allow his nominations to be considered.
'He should do this, IMMEDIATELY, and not let the Democrats laugh at him and the Republican Party for being weak and ineffective,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'The Democrats have broken this ridiculous custom on us, it's time that we break it on them.'
Grassley later said he was 'offended' by the president's comments. — Nicole Norman
WAVE WATCH: Coastal California escaped mostly unscathed from tsunami threats after a large earthquake off the Russian coast on Tuesday night spurred warnings and advisories.
The National Weather Service this morning lifted its advisory for the Los Angeles coast, although Bass said city departments will be monitoring the situation throughout the day as dangerous currents persist.
The San Francisco Chronicle reported Crescent City on the state's far North Coast was hit the hardest, with waves hitting eight feet early this morning.
The tsunami also created an opportunity for the Trump administration to take another dig at Newsom over a natural disaster. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told the Associated Press she had been unable to reach him during the response.
A Newsom spokesperson refuted this to the Chronicle, saying the governor had no record of a call or text from the secretary.
WHAT WE'RE READING TODAY
— Prominent UCSF oncologist and Trump critic Dr. Vinay Prasad resigned from his senior post at the FDA. (San Francisco Chronicle)
— A tally of the plans by the more commonly known Silicon Valley startups shows they're spending $4 billion collectively over the next few years as dozens of industrial companies in the region are betting on the advancement of defense manufacturing. (Bloomberg)
— Court records show that federal authorities are using information the Los Angeles Police Department sends to national databases to find new targets. (Los Angeles Times)
AROUND THE STATE
— The San Diego City Council voted to turn an unusable office tower into rent-restricted apartments for low-income families. (San Diego Union-Tribune)
— The Sacramento City Council approved a change that will take effect next month banning people from sitting or laying down on the ground outside City Hall. (Sacramento Bee)
— compiled by Juliann Ventura
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
39 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
More Americans support path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants with no criminal background, UMass poll finds
But a strong majority, 69 percent, support deporting undocumented immigrants who have criminal records, according to the release. This is down from an Advertisement 'These results suggest that the Trump administration, if it desires to be in step with the public that they represent, should emphasize the detention and removal of undocumented immigrants with criminal records,' Tatishe Nteta, provost professor of political science at UMASS and the poll's director, said in the release. The Trump Administration has vowed to deport 11 million undocumented immigrants, and has authorized aggressive enforcement tactics, such as raiding schools, churches and other venues that have long been safe havens for immigrants. The poll also found that only 30 percent supported deporting undocumented immigrants who work full time and pay taxes. Around 37 percent of poll respondents supported deporting undocumented immigrants who had no criminal record outside of their immigration status and 33 percent of respondents supported deporting those whose children were born in the U.S. Advertisement The poll found that Americans support protections for legal immigrants as well. A majority of respondents said that immigrants on valid visas should be entitled to constitutional rights that citizens enjoy like freedom of speech. A minority of respondents thought legal immigrants, like international students involved in protests, should be deported for expressing opposition to American foreign policy. The poll also found bipartisan opposition to reducing federal spending on scientific research at universities and requiring colleges to consider ideological diversity in hiring and admissions, according to the release. The poll of 1000 national respondents was conducted by the website YouGov between July 25 and July 30 and the margin of error for the poll was 3.5 percent. A little over 50 percent of respondents oppose immigration enforcement in churches, schools and hospitals but public opinion is split when it comes to enforcement elsewhere. For example, around 43 percent of respondents supported immigration enforcement at home and 40 percent at workplaces, according to the results. There was a big partisan gap on the question of where immigration enforcement was acceptable with 65 percent of Republicans supporting immigration enforcement at churches and hospitals while support for enforcement at these venues among Democrats was in the single digits. Around 70 percent of poll respondents said that immigrants in the country on valid visas should be entitled to the constitutional rights that citizens have such as freedom of speech, the right to an attorney when accused of a crime and the right to a hearing before a judge before deportation, among others. Advertisement Around 22 percent of respondents opposed deporting legal immigrants on the basis of their opposition to American foreign policy, an objective the Trump administration has been pursuing when it comes to international students like Tufts University PhD candidate, Rümeysa Öztürk who expressed opposition to the war in Gaza. Support for these deportations was higher among Republicans, conservatives and Trump voters, but did not exceed 50 percent in those groups. Angela Mathew can be reached at
San Francisco Chronicle
39 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Man charged with killing a top Minnesota House Democrat is expected to plead not guilty
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — The man charged with killing the top Democrat in the Minnesota House and her husband, and wounding a state senator and his wife, is expected to plead not guilty when he's arraigned in federal court on Thursday, his attorney said. Vance Boelter, 58, of Green Isle, Minnesota, was indicted July 15 on six counts of murder, stalking and firearms violations. The murder charges could carry the federal death penalty, though prosecutors say that decision is several months away. As they announced the indictment, prosecutors released a rambling handwritten letter they say Boelter wrote to FBI Director Kash Patel in which he confessed to the June 14 shootings of Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark. However, the letter doesn't make clear why he targeted the Hortmans or Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, who survived. Boelter's federal defender, Manny Atwal, said at the time that the weighty charges did not come as a surprise, but she has not commented on the substance of the allegations or any defense strategies. The hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge Dulce Foster will also serve as a case management conference. She plans to issue a revised schedule with deadlines afterward, potentially including a trial date. Prosecutors have moved to designate the proceedings as a 'complex case' so that standard speedy trial requirements won't apply, saying both sides will need plenty of time to review the voluminous evidence. 'The investigation of this case arose out of the largest manhunt in Minnesota's history," they wrote. "Accordingly, the discovery to be produced by the government will include a substantial amount of investigative material and reports from more than a dozen different law enforcement agencies at the federal, state, and local levels.' They said the evidence will include potentially thousands of hours of video footage, tens of thousands of pages of responses to dozens of grand jury subpoenas, and data from numerous electronic devices seized during the investigation. Boelter's motivations remain murky. Friends have described him as an evangelical Christian with politically conservative views who had been struggling to find work. Authorities said Boelter made long lists of politicians in Minnesota and other states — all or mostly Democrats. In a series of cryptic notes to The New York Times through his jail's electronic messaging service, Boelter suggested his actions were partly rooted in the Christian commandment to love one's neighbor. 'Because I love my neighbors prior to June 14th I conducted a 2 year long undercover investigation,' he wrote. In messages published earlier by the New York Post, Boelter insisted the shootings had nothing to do with his opposition to abortion or his support for President Donald Trump, but he declined to elaborate. 'There is little evidence showing why he turned to political violence and extremism,' the acting U.S. attorney for Minnesota, Joe Thompson, told reporters last month. He also reiterated that prosecutors consider Hortman's killing a 'political assassination.' Prosecutors say Boelter was disguised as a police officer and driving a fake squad car early June 14 when he went to the Hoffmans' home in the Minneapolis suburb of Champlin. He shot the senator nine times, and his wife eight times, officials said. Boelter later went to the Hortmans' home in nearby Brooklyn Park and killed both of them, authorities said. Their dog was so gravely injured that he had to be euthanized. Boelter surrendered the next night.
San Francisco Chronicle
39 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's broad tariffs go into effect, just as economic pain is surfacing
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump was set to officially begin levying higher import taxes on dozens of countries Thursday, just as the economic fallout of his monthslong tariff threats has begun to create visible damage for the U.S. economy. The White House said that starting just after midnight that goods from more than 60 countries and the European Union would face tariff rates of 10% or higher. Products from the European Union, Japan and South Korea will be taxed at 15%, while imports from Taiwan, Vietnam and Bangladesh will be taxed at 20%. For places such as the EU, Japan and South Korea, Trump also expects them to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the U.S. 'I think the growth is going to be unprecedented,' Trump said Wednesday afternoon. He added that the U.S. was 'taking in hundreds of billions of dollars in tariffs,' but he couldn't provide a specific figure for revenues because 'we don't even know what the final number is' regarding tariff rates. Despite the uncertainty, the Trump White House is confident that the onset of his broad tariffs will provide clarity about the path of the world's largest economy. Now that companies understand the direction the U.S. is headed, the administration believes they can ramp up new investments and jump-start hiring in ways that can rebalance the U.S. economy as a manufacturing power. But so far, there are signs of self-inflicted wounds to America as companies and consumers alike brace for the impact of new taxes. What the data has shown is a U.S. economy that changed in April with Trump's initial rollout of tariffs, an event that led to market drama, a negotiating period and Trump's ultimate decision to start his universal tariffs on Thursday. After April, economic reports show that hiring began to stall, inflationary pressures crept upward and home values in key markets started to decline, said John Silvia, CEO of Dynamic Economic Strategy. 'A less productive economy requires fewer workers,' Silvia said in an analysis note. 'But there is more, the higher tariff prices lower workers' real wages. The economy has become less productive, and firms cannot pay the same real wages as before. Actions have consequences.' Even then, the ultimate transformations of the tariffs are unknown and could play out over months, if not years. Many economists say the risk is that the American economy is steadily eroded rather than collapsing instantly. 'We all want it to be made for television where it's this explosion — it's not like that,' said Brad Jensen, a professor at Georgetown University. 'It's going to be fine sand in the gears and slow things down.' Trump has promoted the tariffs as a way to reduce the persistent trade deficit. But importers sought to avoid the taxes by importing more goods before the taxes went into effect. As a result, the $582.7 billion trade imbalance for the first half of the year was 38% higher than in 2024. Total construction spending has dropped 2.9% over the past year, and the factory jobs promised by Trump have so far resulted in job losses. The lead-up to Thursday fit the slapdash nature of Trump's tariffs, which have been variously rolled out, walked back, delayed, increased, imposed by letter and frantically renegotiated. The process has been so muddled that officials for key trade partners were unclear at the start of the week whether the tariffs would begin Thursday or Friday. The language of the July 31 order to delay the start of tariffs from Aug. 1 said the higher tax rates would start in seven days. On Wednesday morning, Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, was asked if the new tariffs began at midnight Thursday, and he said reporters should check with the U.S. Trade Representative's Office. Trump on Wednesday announced additional 25% tariffs to be imposed on India for its buying of Russian oil, bringing their total import taxes to 50%. He has said that import taxes are still coming on pharmaceutical drugs and announced 100% tariffs on computer chips, meaning the U.S. economy could remain in a place of suspended animation as it awaits the impact. The president's use of a 1977 law to declare an economic emergency to impose the tariffs is also under challenge. The impending ruling from last week's hearing before a U.S. appeals court could cause Trump to find other legal justifications if judges say he exceeded his authority. Even people who worked with Trump during his first term are skeptical that things will go smoothly for the economy, such as Paul Ryan, the former Republican House speaker, who has emerged as a Trump critic. 'There's no sort of rationale for this other than the president wanting to raise tariffs based upon his whims, his opinions,' Ryan told CNBC on Wednesday. 'I think choppy waters are ahead because I think they're going to have some legal challenges.' Still, the stock market has been solid during the recent tariff drama, with the S&P 500 index climbing more than 25% from its April low. The market's rebound and the income tax cuts in Trump's tax and spending measures signed into law on July 4 have given the White House confidence that economic growth is bound to accelerate in the coming months. As of now, Trump still foresees an economic boom while the rest of the world and American voters wait nervously. 'There's one person who can afford to be cavalier about the uncertainty that he's creating, and that's Donald Trump,' said Rachel West, a senior fellow at The Century Foundation who worked in the Biden White House on labor policy. 'The rest of Americans are already paying the price for that uncertainty.'
