Investigation: Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources lawyer worked second job on state's dime
The Ohio Inspector General launched an investigation into ODNR Deputy Legal Counsel Matthew Westerman in June after receiving a referral from the Ohio Facilities Construction Commission.
The Inspector General's office issued a report Thursday that found Westerman worked on multiple occasions for a secondary job at MCS and Associates while also working for ODNR.
ODNR's legal department had approved Westerman's employment with the construction and project management firm, the report found. However, Westerman used state resources for his second job, which violated ODNR policies.
In November, ODNR told Westerman to stop all his work with MCS and Associates, and he agreed, the report said.
The investigation found that he made nearly 150 phone calls for MCS-related work while on the clock for ODNR, sent or received 70 emails using his state email account, and stored 29 MCS-related files on his state-issued computer or state cloud storage.
The investigation found this amounted to more than 26 hours of work over about two years being done for Westerman's secondary employer while on the clock for the state, totaling about $2,182 in pay and benefits from ODNR, a report issued Thursday said.
Westerman has worked as deputy legal counsel for ODNR since 2022. According to the Ohio Supreme Court's attorney registry, he remains employed there as of Thursday.
The Ohio Inspector General has sent the investigation and report to the Columbus City Attorney's office and the Franklin County Prosecutor's office for review. The investigation and report have also been sent to the Ohio Auditor of State's office and the Ohio Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
bbruner@gannett.com
This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: ODNR lawyer found working second job on state time, investigation shows
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Another judge denies the DOJ's effort to unseal Epstein-related grand jury transcripts
A federal judge on Wednesday denied the Trump Justice Department's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in Jeffrey Epstein's New York sex trafficking case, dealing the DOJ its latest loss on the subject, in a ruling that spotlights the government's bumbling legal effort and lack of transparency in the Epstein scandal. The ruling from U.S. District Judge Richard Berman follows an Aug. 11 decision from another judge in New York that rejected the DOJ's motion to unseal transcripts in the case of convicted Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as a July ruling from a judge in Florida rejecting DOJ's Epstein-related unsealing effort in that state. Ruling against the DOJ in the Maxwell case, U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer wrote that '[a] member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government's motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion — aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such.' Similarly rejecting the effort in Epstein's case specifically, Berman wrote Wednesday that the unsealing motion appeared to be a diversion from the full scope of Epstein-related files in the government's possession. He wrote that the grand jury testimony is just a 'hearsay snippet' of Epstein's alleged conduct, and that the information in the Epstein grand jury transcripts 'pales in comparison' with the information in the DOJ's hands. He also criticized the government for not properly notifying victims before filing the motion. Epstein died in 2019 while being held on trafficking charges in New York, with the medical examiner deeming his death a suicide. Maxwell was subsequently convicted and is appealing while simultaneously seeking a pardon from President Donald Trump. After she met with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal defense lawyer, the government moved Maxwell to a minimum-security facility. That raised speculation about what benefits the administration might grant her as the White House faces political backlash from its refusal to release all the Epstein-related information in its possession, as promised. This is a developing story. Check back for updates. Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in the Trump administration's legal cases. This article was originally published on
New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
DOJ to start handing over Jeffrey Epstein files to Congress
The Justice Department has agreed to hand over a cache of Jeffrey Epstein files to Congress within the next few days, a key congressional lawmaker has revealed. The first tranche of Epstein-related materials are to be given to the House Oversight Committee starting Friday, Rep. James Comer said. 'There are many records in DOJ's custody, and it will take the Department time to produce all the records and ensure the identification of victims and any child sexual abuse material are redacted,' Comer, the Republican committee chair, said in a statement. Advertisement 'I appreciate the Trump Administration's commitment to transparency and efforts to provide the American people with information about this matter.' The move comes just weeks after the committee subpoenaed the DOJ in a bid to demand access to any files tied to the late pedophile and his madam, Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year sentence for helping lure teenage girls for him to sexually abuse. In addition to the case files, the House committee's subpoena also sought records about any communications between President Joe Biden's administration and the DOJ regarding Epstein. With Post wires
Politico
2 days ago
- Politico
DOJ to start turning over Epstein files to Capitol Hill
'Officials with the Department of Justice have informed us that the Department will begin to provide Epstein-related records to the Oversight Committee this week on Friday,' he said. 'There are many records in DOJ's custody, and it will take the Department time to produce all the records and ensure the identification of victims and any child sexual abuse material are redacted.' Speaking with reporters earlier in the day on Capitol Hill, Comer said his committee was 'in constructive, productive conversations with the DOJ' about the release of further files in the Epstein case, ahead of the Aug. 19 deadline the committee included in its subpoena. Still, the possibility that any materials are now forthcoming comes at a critical juncture for Democrats in their efforts to play up the controversy over the secretive nature of the Epstein files to undermine Republicans, particularly as the weeks count down to the end of the August recess. Comer was compelled to issue the subpoena for the files last month when, during an otherwise routine Oversight subcommittee hearing, Democrats were able to get enough Republicans to take their side in a vote to force the action. It was a major victory for Democrats, who have been seeking to stoke divisions among the president's base over the matter, including by highlighting the administration's lack of transparency. Trump's allies and supporters have long peddled conspiracy theories about what happened to Epstein, who died by suicide behind bars and has a long history of ties to powerful people — including Trump. Yet now the president and his inner circle have largely been trying to keep documents related to the charges against Epstein under wraps. The issue has also roiled Republicans in Congress. GOP leadership has moved to quash efforts to force the release of materials in the Epstein matter and sent lawmakers back to their districts early amid mounting pressure to allow a vote on releasing the materials. Members of both parties have made clear they plan to pick up where they left off in this fight when the House returns early next month, starting with a forcing a vote on the House floor on a resolution from Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) calling for the files' unsealing.
