Democrats' 2024 postmortems keep neglecting the effects of voter suppression
Politicians and pundits haven't exactly been shy about offering up their diagnoses for what truly ailed Democrats last year. The list includes those who think Democrats didn't go hard enough in their efforts to woo young men along with those — like attendees at Wednesday's so-called WelcomeFest for Democratic centrists — who would like to argue that Democrats placated progressives too much.
Some of these arguments are very reductive, and some of them are downright ridiculous. Given the premise that Democrats should try to win as many voters as possible, I don't think we have to dismiss all of these theories out of hand. But at the same time, these discussions feel a bit like rearranging deck chairs on the proverbial Titanic, because it's hard for me to foresee a scenario in which Democrats achieve lasting victories in an environment of widespread voter suppression, no matter how many hypermasculine podcasts they visit or rhetorical punches they throw at progressives.
And make no mistake: We are in an environment of widespread voter suppression, as evidenced by this Democracy Docket report from last summer that highlights the various laws nationwide that made it harder to vote in 2024 than it was in 2020. At times, it seems like liberals are overcomplicating things with these postmortems, but I think mapping out a rather simple sequence of events can help explain how last year played out:
Democrats win the presidency in 2020 with help from some states' expanding ballot access and contributing to the largest pool of voters in U.S. history. (Note that Joe Biden won without cozying up to 'manosphere' podcasters or abandoning progressive principles like racial justice to win.)
Republicans introduce hundreds of voter suppression measures, many of which are enacted and make it harder for Americans to vote.
With fewer people voting in 2024 than voted in 2020, Donald Trump wins.
So it seems logical to look to Trump's efforts to leverage the executive branch to suppress the vote and to House Republicans' legislating to similar ends for obvious clues as to the biggest threats to future Democratic electoral victories.
I've seen no evidence to suggest that the number of people who sat out in 2024 or who voted for Trump because of anti-liberal sentiment exceeds the number of people who were dissuaded from voting by newly enacted restrictions. And without that evidence, Democrats may be overlooking a critical element for future electoral failure by accepting the narrative that it was their own campaign rhetoric or bullying by online leftists that cost them the election.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's when the economic data may start showing the tariff impact
The US economy will undoubtedly feel the impact of President Trump's tariffs. But when might it start showing up in the data? Morgan Stanley chief global economist Seth Carpenter took a closer look to get a rough idea. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts. You, of course, along with everybody else has been following the effects of tariffs here in the US and globally. Um, we know that there is a lag, uh, because of when and how the tariffs have been instituted. This is something that Chair Powell has been talking about. What's your view on the question of when we will start to see it more and whether that effect is going to be sustained? Yeah, I know. It's a key, key question here, and so we tried to do a bunch of work looking at what happened in 2018, for example, looking at everything we can scrounge from, uh, looking at changes in prices for supply chains. Looks like, uh, in a macro sense, it's about three, four months after tariffs get implemented that you start to see it in the inflation data, and then it's probably two, maybe three quarters until you start to see the effects of tariffs pushing down economic growth. If you remember back in 2018, uh, when President Trump was president before, tariffs on China were imposed the second half of 2018. We saw some disruption to manufacturing because two-thirds of what we import from China are either capital goods or intermediate goods that go into manufacturing in the US. So the tariffs are just taxes on US manufacturing. We saw manufacturing and industrial production start to fall in the second half of 2018 and keep falling for 2019. So where are we this time around? Well, we know that we just got some inflation data for the month of June, and it looks like the most of the tariff-sensitive categories started to show that pickup. So that's kind of that three or four month lag that we had in mind. So we expect, uh, the inflation data to keep showing increases in tariff-sensitive, uh, categories for the next several months, really, uh, pushing up inflation for the third quarter quite notably. And then, you know, the fourth quarter, we're probably going to see a big drag on the economy coming in from tariffs, augmented by the drag that the immigration restriction is doing. So we're seeing everything play out in the data now as we had anticipated. And so Seth, that implies that people on the street who were waiting for the Fed to cut rates, they might be disappointed for a while, not to mention the president himself. Yeah, I think that's right. Our base case, once we had the announcement of tariffs coming in faster, bigger, sooner than we had originally thought, they all came in really aggressively in the beginning of the year, we changed our forecast. We said if that's the way it's going to work out, the Fed probably won't cut rates at all this year in 2025. The logic being, and it's very consistent with what, uh, Chair Powell said yesterday, inflation is still above target, and the labor market for now is just fine. And so there's no reason for the Fed to cut in that circumstance. If inflation goes higher from here, well, that gives them all the more reason to stay where they are with policy slightly restrictive. And even if and when we start to see some degradation in the economy, some slowdown in the labor market, if inflation is still now high and rising at that point, the bar for them to cut rates has got to get worse, uh, as long as inflation is rising. So that's how we get to the idea that they're probably not going to cut rates this year. Uh, the market was in a very different place from us, uh, a month ago, two months ago, uh, judging from where things are now, the market's putting a little bit less than even odds on a cut in September, reducing the expectation for cuts this year. Uh, so I'd say the market is coming to the same view that we have. Um Seth, sort of looking at it as a case study, I know you're looking at autos and auto pricing, which has not seen sort of the effect of tariffs. Um, so could you walk us through that just as an example to sort of illustrate how they you get these these lags and the effect? Absolutely. Now, the auto industry is very much the the exception that proves the rule in this case. Uh, it's a industry very, very large, and yet dominated by a much smaller number of firms. And what we think we're hearing anecdotally and possibly seeing in the data is that for now, some of the larger firms are are waiting. They're absorbing some of the costs in their margin until they get a better sense of exactly where these tariffs are going to end up. There's also a sense that they can wait and see if, you know, maybe they can take some market share, uh, because, um, you know, other other firms are facing higher costs. And if you can keep your prices down for a while and take some market share while the rest of the industry is is suffering, then that's another possibility. So I do think the auto industry is about a bit of pain now in terms of absorbing the costs in the margin, that can't last forever. And so we expect those prices and autos to start to come up in the next few months as well, maybe a bit more of a delay than the rest of the economy. Related Videos US GDP Grows by 3% in Second Quarter IMF's Gourinchas Says Tariffs Causing Tepid Growth Job openings data falls short of estimates Goldman's Kaplan Says Fed Should Ready for September Cut Sign in to access your portfolio
USA Today
26 minutes ago
- USA Today
America understaffed
Welcome to August!😎 I'm Nicole Fallert. This grandma received a well-deserved vacation. July jobs report may show growing impact of Trump's immigration crackdown The Trump administration's immigration crackdown is taking a growing toll on a weakening labor market, economists say. The numbers: Forecasters estimate the Labor Department on Friday will report the U.S. gained 109,000 jobs in July, down from 147,000 in June and a monthly average of 130,000 this year. Trump signs order imposing sweeping new tariffs President Trump signed an executive order Thursday imposing sweeping new tariffs on imports from trading partners across the world, escalating an aggressive trade policy aimed at spurring domestic manufacturing in the U.S. In addition, Trump took separate action to raise tariffs on goods from Canada from 25% to 35%. The new reciprocal tariff rates, which will go into effect in seven days, come before an Aug. 1 deadline Trump gave about 180 countries to either reach trade deals with the Trump administration or face higher reciprocal tariffs assigned by the U.S. USA TODAY made it simple with a full list of new tariff rates. More news to know now What's the weather today? Check your local forecast here. US officials head to Gaza to inspect food distribution centers President Trump is sending two top White House officials to Gaza on Friday to inspect food distribution centers and meet with Gazans amid intensifying global scrutiny over the hunger crisis in the territory. Steven Witkoff, Trump's Middle East envoy, and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee will 'secure a plan to deliver more food and meet with local Gazans to hear firsthand about this dire situation" during the rare trip. Following their visit, Witkoff and Huckabee are expected to meet with Trump to approve the administration's final plan for food and aid distribution in the region amid Israel's ongoing war with Hamas in Gaza. NFL commissioner Roger Goodell speaks out following NYC shooting ~ NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell in an emotional interview since a gunman killed four people Monday in a targeted attack on the NFL's Manhattan office. Goodell opted not to attend the NFL's Hall of Fame Game in Canton, Ohio, instead attended the funeral of slain NYPD officer Didarul Islam. Today's talkers How the Dallas Stars monopolized Texas youth hockey Unlike the NFL, NBA and MLB, a handful of NHL teams are intimately involved in running the youth levels of their sports in their regions – perhaps none more than the Dallas Stars. The Stars spent decades turning what was once seen as a community good into a lucrative arm of their for-profit enterprise. USA TODAY spoke to more than 100 hockey parents, coaches, players, business owners and current and former Stars employees and reviewed hundreds of pages of property records, business filings, contracts, tax returns, court records, emails and internal documents. USA TODAY's exclusive investigation reveals how the Stars bullied a community to profit off a youth sport. Photo of the day: Freakier Friday One of the most memorable scenes from "Freaky Friday" is when Anna (played by Lindsay Lohan) performs a musical number for her mother and new stepfather at their nuptials, donning a lavender wrap dress to sing the sweet pop-rock banger "Ultimate." Lohan referenced the dress at the "Freakier Friday" U.K. premiere Thursday in what was yet another nod to her iconic outfits from past roles. Nicole Fallert is a newsletter writer at USA TODAY, sign up for the email here. Want to send Nicole a note? Shoot her an email at NFallert@
Axios
26 minutes ago
- Axios
How many journalists cover Philly
Whenever I think about reporting, two edicts come to mind: Journalism is a daily crisis memorialized, and it's about doing the best for the most. That's a mashup of what one of my Daily Lobo colleagues told me early on in my career, and I've carried it with me as a guiding star. Why it matters: There are fewer reporters across the country doing the best for the most. And that makes every day we continue to churn out newspapers, newsletters, Substacks, whatever your medium, even more of a daily crisis memorialized. Driving the news: The U.S. now has 8.2 "local journalist equivalents" (LJEs) for every 100,000 people, down 75% from 2002 on average, Axios' Alex Fitzpatrick reports. That's according to the Local Journalist Index 2025 from Muck Rack and Rebuild Local News, a local journalism nonprofit. The big picture: About two-thirds of U.S. counties have a below-average number of local journalists, per the index, an ambitious project aiming to illustrate "the stunning collapse in local reporting." To crib Biggie: Less journalism, more problems. You can draw a pretty strong line between the lack of local reporting and our country's biggest problems: more polarization, less civic engagement, and not enough fact-driven gatekeepers to watchdog corruptible public officials and help us sift through the absolute tsunami of information we have available at the click of a mouse. Threat level: Americans could once dutifully rely on the Big Three — ABC, NBC and CBS — to set the agenda on what was important. Now with the saturation of social media, it's turning into Big Me — opinion makers and slant artists delivering hot takes for clicks rather than community good. Yes, but: Philly's lucky that we're bucking the trend. We have about 13 journalists per every 100,000 people, or about 201 total. And our collar counties — Bucks (6.5), Montgomery (8.2) and Delaware (7.9) — are toughing it out. The latest: It doesn't help when local public media outlets like WHYY must scrap to plug holes after Congress clawed back $1.1 billion in federal funding. State of play: Sometimes the absence of sunlight makes you realize how much you miss those muckrakers doing the disinfecting. Our scrappy team at Axios Philly does our best to bring you the most. Sometimes that's being a check on the local media ecosystem, while feeding you a steady diet of the biggest news in our region — from the garbage strike to the inner workings of the Parker administration to SEPTA's existential crisis. Mom and Dad always said you have to eat your vegetables (that's those stories you need to be a healthy, engaged citizen), but we also can't go without a little dessert and a brewski or two to make it all go down.
