Seymour changing who decides how much ECE teachers can be paid
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
The Associate Education Minister is changing who decides how much new Early Childcare Education (ECE) teachers can be paid, leaving it up to individual centres to determine their starting salary - rather than be set by the government according to the pay parity scheme with primary school teachers.
David Seymour says it will help ECE centres stay "viable" and not pass on costs to parents.
The education union says the change scraps pay parity rates for new teachers, undermining the scheme which took decades to secure. The Greens are concerned it will drive down wages and Labour says it means new ECE teachers will be at the "whim of their employers".
The Ministry of Education website
explained
from 1 July this year, education and care centres that are part of the pay parity scheme will be able to set the initial salary step for a newly certified teacher or teachers new to the ECE sector. The centres will no longer need to take into account "higher qualification groups, previous relevant work experience, and recognised service".
Seymour said under the pay parity regime, to qualify for government funding, EC centres must pay people at certain rates and increase their pay at certain periods as determined by the government.
"This is putting enormous funding pressure on the centers.
"They can't absorb it anymore, but the parents and the government, who are the funders of early childhood are also under real pressure."
He said the change gave a "very light amount of relief," meaning new teachers can start at a pay step "negotiated with their employer like most workers in the economy, instead of one stipulated by the pay parity regime."
The pay parity regime in practice, he said, might allow for somebody who had a Master's degree in mathematics to start at a higher pay rate than someone who might be better at working at an ECE, and have more relevant skills. Under the new programme, Seymour said the person with a Master's degree might be negotiated to be paid less initially while they built up their skills, then their pay would increase.
"The question is not whether people are recognised for their qualifications, but who recognises them.
"I have a strong belief that the people who operate early childhood centers up and down this country, who are there looking the person in the eye, are best placed to judge what their starting pay rates should be."
Photo:
RNZ / Marika Khabazi
NZEI Te Riu Roa National Executive ECE representative Zane McCarthy said it was "simply another attack on teachers' pay." He said the change will mean new teachers won't need to be paid at a level that recognises their qualifications, skills or experience, leaving it to their employers to decide their beginning pay rate instead.
"It fundamentally undermines the pay parity rates we've fought for decades to achieve, and it disconnects a teacher's experience and qualifications from their pay rate."
He said it was being "touted as a cost saving for employers" when the change was actually "making up for a lack of government funding".
The union said the change will have far-reaching implications in a sector already experiencing a chronic teacher shortage.
"This will do nothing to attract people to the profession or retain them.
"It shows us how it plans to solve funding in early childhood education - not by investing in our youngest learners, but by cutting teacher pay to make up for the lack of funding provided to centres in the first place."
The Greens ECE spokesperson Benjamin Doyle said it was a "kick in the teeth". Doyle said the move would lead to a reduction in wages over time, which would lead to more teachers walking away.
"Make no mistake, this is a move by the government to ensure that pay increases for teachers stay low, while cutting costs to employers."
Labour also slammed the change, saying new ECE teachers would be at the whim of their employers who will choose what they're paid, regardless of any higher qualifications
Labour's ECE spokesperson Jan Tinetti said ECE centres will have a harder time attracting recent graduates, "a devastating blow for a sector already struggling with teacher numbers".
"We introduced pay parity to ensure we could build the ECE workforce back up and reduce turnover."
Seymour said there's no reason new teachers won't be paid the "going rate", it just won't be set by a "rigid government framework".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
16 minutes ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Ali Jones and Simon Pound Part 1
Tonight, on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Ali Jones and Simon Pound. First up, thousands of secondary school teachers walked off the job today in a dispute over pay. The Panel talks to Paul Stevens, a teacher at Auckland's Rangitoto College and a PPTA representative. Then they hear from independant Cameron Bagrie about the Reserve Banks decision to whack 25 points off the OCR - what does it mean for mortgage holders looking to refix? To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Government 'revising' pay offer to teachers but says union must compromise too
Teachers strike outside Parliament on Wednesday. Photo: JOHN GERRITSEN / RNZ The government is revising its pay offer for secondary teachers, following a nationwide strike, but the union would need to compromise too, Public Service Commissioner Sir Brian Roche said. Thousands of members of the Post Primary Teachers Association (PPTA) walked off the job to protest their pay talks , forcing the closure of many secondary schools. Teachers on picket lines told RNZ the government's offer of a one percent pay rise every year for three years was "despicable, insulting and terrible". The Public Service Commission, which was overseeing the government's side of the pay talks, had been at pains to note that teachers in the first 10 years of their career get annual pay rises of about 13 percent a year as they progress up the pay scale. But teachers said most of them were at the top of the scale and the one percent increases would be all they received. Roche told RNZ in a statement: "This was always going to be a difficult bargaining round - the strike is evidence of that. Now that has happened, we have to find a way forward - we owe that to the students, parents and teachers." "Our initial offer clearly hasn't hit the mark, and we are doing work on a revised offer." He said the union's claim was not realistic. "The PPTA's current set of claims would cost taxpayers $1.7 billion over four years. That's equivalent to an extra $67,000 for every full-time secondary teacher. It's unaffordable, unreasonable and unrealistic. Sir Brian Roche is the Public Service Commissioner. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone "Bargaining is about compromise and to date, and somewhat regrettably, the PPTA has refused to offer any real compromise on these claims. The government is committed to working with the PPTA to get a resolution." Education Minister, Erica Stanford, said the union should have called today's strike off because it had agreed to further talks. But PPTA president Chris Abercrombie said: "The government knew it had an opportunity yesterday to make a reasonable offer to us which could have encouraged us to reconsider our action. Unfortunately, no such offer was forthcoming." Meanwhile, on picket lines, teachers said they were frustrated that they had to strike to try to force a better offer from the government. Wellington teacher Catharine de Montalk said she and her colleagues would be losing money if they accepted the offer. "I don't particularly want to be here. I feel like since my career started 20 years ago that I've been doing this every single pay round and it does get tired, it does get old but one percent is actually the lowest... it is an insult," she said. A teacher outside Parliament during the strike. Photo: RNZ / John Gerritsen Outside Parliament, maths teacher Jennifer Crisp said the government's offer was not reasonable. "We think that's entirely incorrect. It's not a reasonable offer in this economy. Not when MPs have been given more than double that," she said. In Christchurch, teacher Richard Allen said the government's offer was never going to fly. "The knew that that wasn't going to be acceptable right from the start and so it's a shame that it's come to this. To be fair we all want to teach so give us something more reasonable that we can work towards," he said. Several Wellington commuters said they supported the striking teachers. Christian Shaw said the picket at Wellington Railway Station prompted him to do some online research which showed politicians were getting much better annual pay rises than what teachers were being offered. "They're willing to line their own pockets, more than happy, year after year, but they don't want to give our teachers, our nurses... they just cut pay equity which is so important to so many people and they're just taking the absolute piss," he said. His mate Jack Dyer said teachers were not paid enough - and he'd know, having abandoned the profession because of the pay rates for new teachers. "I studied to become a teacher. I got my diploma of teaching for secondary schools and the starting rate there is just atrocious. Like after four years of study, a bachelor's and a diploma, you're coming out and making less than the median wage in Wellington, which is just bizarre," he said. Meanwhile, primary school teachers, support staff and principals belonging to the Educational Institute, Te Riu Roa, were holding stop-work meetings this week and next to discuss their pay talks. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Saplings, stalking, and spying: Government bills this week
A harvesting site in the Waimata Valley near Gisborne. Photo: RNZ / Alexa Cook This week in Parliament is a Members' Week, with Wednesday evening dedicated to debating non-government legislation. Members' Days cut into government time for lawmaking, so they have now added Wednesday morning to the schedule (rather than the usual 2pm start time for a sitting day) to maintain momentum. This week's bills are a mixture of unfinished business from last week and other bills plucked from the Order Paper that area waiting their respective next stages. Of particular interest are; The Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Scheme-Forestry Conversion) Amendment Bill is back in the House after truncated consideration by the Environment Committee. The bill seeks to address growing concerns about the conversion of farms into "exotic" forestry land, under the auspices of the Emissions Trading Scheme. The word exotic may evoke visions of coconut palms or banana trees, but it is the mass planting of pine trees that has largely been at the centre of the issue. Obviously not all farmland is the same, and New Zealand employs the Land Use Capability (LUC) scale to distinguish highly productive, arable land (LUC class 1) from very unproductive land (LUC class 8). This bill would determine a farm's eligibility for ETS registration based on its LUC rating and restrict the amount of exotic forestry conversion on farmland with an LUC rating between 1 and 6. "The current settings in the emissions trading scheme have tipped the scales too far," said the minister in charge of the bill, Todd Mclay, during the first reading. "We're seeing entire farms converted into exotic forests under the ETS from Invercargill to Ruatōria. These are not marginal lands; these are productive farms supporting families, communities, and local economies. Once they are planted into exotic carbon forests, they are, effectively, lost to food production for decades, if not permanently so." In that same debate, Labour offered what they have called very cautious support for the bill, citing the need to carefully work through issues in select committee. Meanwhile, the Green Party, who are against the bill, have said the real issue is that the whole concept of carbon offsetting is inherently flawed. "The fiction of offsetting has the same practical impact as an alcoholic paying somebody to drink water and thinking that they have solved their drinking problem", said Steve Abel. "That is the distortion that we have in this country to this day, and what's more, the person who's drinking all the water's making a lot of money and thinking that they're doing something about alcoholism, but they're not at all." There have been a number of bills this parliament relating to infrastructure, consenting, and public works, and getting those things done fast. This week's bill aims to speed up the acquisition of private land that is desired for projects listed in the Fast Track Approvals law, or under the Roads of National Significance programme. The Public Works debate was one of the three (Government Bill) committee stages this week. In the committee stage, debate is not time-limited, so it took a while, but was eventually wrapped up by midday Wednesday, before the House moved onto the second committee stage - the Hauraki Gulf / Tikapa Moana Marine Protection Bill , which was interrupted part of the way through its third and final part. The third planned committee stage was for a new stalking law (though the slow pace of debating makes progress on this bill this week unlikely). The last time this bill was in the House was for its second reading, when it received unanimous support from all parties after a robust select committee stage, during which several amendments were adopted. "The committee recommended a broader definition for the pattern of behaviour," National's Erica Stanford explained. "The offence will now require two specified acts within two years, rather than three specified acts within one year. This broadens the pattern of behaviour by capturing fewer acts across a longer time frame. I agree that this change will better address strategies such as anniversary-based stalking. It will also make it harder for stalkers to work around the law." Ginny Andersen is Labour's spokesperson on this. She applauded the adopted amendments but was worried that a remaining aspect might make prosecution difficult - intent. "Currently, it must be proven that the stalker acted knowingly, that their behaviour is likely to cause fear or distress to their target, so it means that the stalker has to know that their behaviour is likely to cause fear or distress. Proving that intent of someone who is lying or is genuinely deluded about how another person feels about them may well be extremely difficult to prove in a court of law and this is concerning." Minister of Justice Paul Goldsmith has a second key bill up this week - The Crimes (Countering Foreign Interference) Amendment Bill , which may resume its second reading (interrupted last week), probably on Thursday afternoon (but only if the pace of debating is brisk). It intends to fill gaps in criminal law concerning clandestine actions made on behalf of foreign actors intending to harm New Zealand, which the Government has said there has been an increased risk of. This law change would introduce treason, inciting mutiny or espionage - all on behalf of foreign actors - as new offences. Only the Green Party voted against the Bill at its first reading, although Te Pāti Māori were absent for the vote. Finally, among Thursday's bills is a brand new government bill, the recently announced bill to prohibit mounting protests outside someone's private residence. You can listen to the audio version of this story by clicking the link near the top of the page. RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, its legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk.
