Egypt and Sudan push back as Ethiopia finishes Nile dam
The GERD began construction in 2011 with a $4 billion (about R73.6 billion) budget.
It is the largest hydroelectric project in Africa, measuring 1.8 km in width and 145 metres in height.
Furthermore, the Nile dam is expected to generate more than 5 000 megawatts of electricity when it opens in September, according to Abiy.
In February 2022, electricity generation began, and two turbines are now producing electricity.
The dam is located 30 kilometres from Sudan's border, in Ethiopia's northwest region.
Sudan and Egypt reiterated their opposition to the GERD's unilateral completion without a formal agreement.
As a result of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), 97% of Egypt's water comes from the Nile, and the country is concerned about its access being reduced.
Moreover, Sudan voiced concerns about the security of its dams and water infrastructure downstream.
More than a decade of intense negotiations has not yielded a trilateral agreement.
Sudan's Sovereign Council General Chairman Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi both denounced unilateral actions in the Blue Nile Basin on 30 June.
Both leaders reaffirmed their commitment to regional legal frameworks and water security.
'The GERD is a collective opportunity, not a threat to neighbouring countries,' Abiy Ahmed emphasised.
He declared that Ethiopia is willing to discuss water-related issues with Egypt and Sudan in a positive manner.
Ethiopia's advancement would not come at the expense of others, Abiy reaffirmed.
Across the Nile basin, he promoted 'collective advancement, collective energy, and collective water'.
Ethiopia claims that economic growth and electrification depend on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam.
Half of Ethiopia's population does not have access to electricity, according to World Bank data.
Egypt announced the cessation of negotiations in December 2023 as a result of Ethiopia's unilateral acts.
Sudan continues to be unstable due to persistent civil strife and fluctuating political alignments.
The African Union (AU) has advocated for fresh engagement; nevertheless, official mediation has not recommenced.
International experts caution about rising tensions in the absence of a formal water-sharing mechanism.
Ethiopia asserts that it does not need external approval to construct infrastructure within its borders.
The GERD symbolises national pride and regional conflict in East Africa.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
National dialogue: Ramaphosa slams DA ‘hypocrisy', says party will miss out on ‘biggest show in SA'
The president also questioned the DA's decision to remain in the GNU. President Cyril Ramaphosa has strongly criticised the Democratic Alliance (DA), accusing the party of hypocrisy after it pulled out of the much-anticipated national dialogue. The DA's decision followed Ramaphosa's removal of Andrew Whitfield as Deputy Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition. The party has opted to remain within the government of national unity (GNU) despite harsh criticism of the president's actions and threats to table a motion of no confidence. Ramaphosa on DA's withdrawal from national dialogue Addressing the matter at a press conference held at the Union Buildings in Pretoria alongside Austrian President Alexander Van der Bellen, Ramaphosa described the DA's withdrawal from the dialogue as both 'unfortunate' and a 'real shock to me'. He reminded the DA that all participating parties had agreed to the dialogue process when signing the GNU statement of intent. 'Every party signed to that, and it is rather surprising to hear a leader of the Democratic Alliance saying they never agreed to that in the first place.' 'That is the worst form of hypocrisy that I've ever heard,' the president said, in the presence of DA leader John Steenhuisen. ALSO READ: DA threats 'irresponsible': Ramaphosa 'amazed' at Steenhuisen's reaction over Whitfield dismissal Ramaphosa reiterated that the national dialogue was not a 'party political platform', but rather a collective initiative. He confirmed that the dialogue would proceed regardless of the DA's involvement. 'What is wrong with the dialogue? Nothing is wrong with the dialogue. It's about people getting together. 'So what I can say is that the national dialogue will continue without the participation of the Democratic Alliance, and we will probably have a very, very successful dialogue without diversionary inputs or interference from a party that does not have the interests of South Africans at heart.' 'The National Dialogue is a platform for all South Africans to craft a shared vision of the kind of a society we seek to build and agree on the actions we need to take to realise that vision. The dialogue will proceed as planned.' ~President @CyrilRamaphosa #AustriaInSA — The Presidency 🇿🇦 (@PresidencyZA) July 4, 2025 The president added that by refusing to participate, the DA was going to 'miss the biggest show in South Africa' that would discuss various issues. 'What a great pity,' Ramaphosa remarked. Ramaphosa insists national dialogue will proceed Former president Thabo Mbeki has also criticised the DA's stance in an open letter. Mbeki described the party's actions as both misguided and disrespectful to the South African public, dismissing the DA's claim that the dialogue was merely an ANC election campaign platform. Ramaphosa reacted to Mbeki's sentiments. 'He's also appalled, as many South Africans are appalled at the behaviour of the Democratic Alliance.' READ MORE: 'Bring all to dialogue': Experts insist national dialogue must be people-driven He further questioned the logic behind the DA's continued presence in the GNU while opposing the national dialogue. 'It's the strangest behaviour I've ever seen. And when they met, we thought that they were going to withdraw from the government of national unity. What did they come with? 'They come with saying no, no, no, no; we want to stay in the government of national unity, but we're boycotting the people of South Africa. 'What a contradiction. It makes no sense. So national dialogue will go on,' Ramaphosa concluded. Steenhuisen pushes back Meanwhile, Steenhuisen questioned the timing and setting of Ramaphosa's remarks. 'I don't think that intemperate attacks on a public platform when you have a visiting head of state next to you is the appropriate forum to do that,' he told the media. The DA leader said he intended to discuss with the president his appointment to the inter-ministerial committee (IMC) overseeing the national dialogue. 'I never asked to be on the IMC.' Responding to Mbeki's letter, Steenhuisen claimed the dialogue was 'an inside closed shop deal with the ANC.' 'Clearly, there's been a free flow of information, meetings, discussions around budgets and etc. that have not even taken place with members of the government of national unity. 'The first I found out that there was a R700 million price tag on this thing was when I read it in the media.' Steenhuisen maintained the dialogue was an ANC strategy to rebuild political support ahead of the 2026 local elections. He further contended that the matters set for discussion in the dialogue would not be effectively implemented by ministers linked to corruption scandals. 'A dialogue isn't going to feed anybody. It's not going to build a single house. 'It's not going to create a single other job and nothing we do or say is going to do that unless we get out there and vigorously implement the medium-term development plan, which is the adopted program of government,' Steenhuisen added. NOW READ: 'Hijacked' by the ANC? Maimane issues National Dialogue warning
The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
Weekly economic wrap: politics dominate, lower inflation expectations
Between fears of how the economy will react to the DA-ANC tensions and the US' new bill and tariffs, inflation expectations decreased. Politics dominated the economic news this week, with local and global politics taking centre stage, while a South African survey on inflation expectations had good news for consumers from all the groups surveyed. Lisette IJssel de Schepper, chief economist at the Bureau for Economic Research (BER) points out that while tensions persisted in South Africa between the DA and ANC, international headlines were dominated by the passage of the 'Big Beautiful Bill' in the US and the fast-approaching US tariff deadline. Bianca Botes, director at Citadel Global, says gold gained, while oil slipped as fiscal and trade risks weigh on commodities. 'Gold advanced to around $3,330/ounce, maintaining a solid position due to lingering uncertainty, even in an improved-sentiment environment. 'The US Tax-and-Spending bill's anticipated $3.3 trillion-plus impact on the deficit, along with the risk of new tariffs, bolstered gold's appeal.' ALSO READ: Policy Uncertainty Index drops slightly while global and local uncertainty remain Oil markets and the rand trending lower She says oil markets, on the other hand, are trending lower, with Brent Crude falling to approximately $68.50/barrel. 'Market sentiment was shaped by speculation that the expanded Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC+) may increase output at its upcoming meeting, adding to downward pressure. 'Nonetheless, medium-term forecasts remain positive, with some analysts expecting higher average prices in 2025 due to persistent supply constraints outside OPEC and steady demand growth. However, geopolitical factors remain in play, particularly US sanctions on Iran, which added a layer of uncertainty to the global supply picture.' The rand kept surprising economists, strengthening to around R17.50/$, its strongest level since late 2024, supported by a declining dollar, elevated gold prices and improving local political sentiment. 'While the rally has been encouraging, the rand's outlook remains sensitive to both domestic developments and broader commodity market dynamics.' Busisiwe Nkonki and Isaac Matshego, economists at the Nedbank Group Economic Unit, say the rand was buoyed by higher global risk appetite this week, firming to its strongest level since the second week of November, trading at R17.60 on Friday afternoon. ALSO READ: Inflation expectations almost at four-year low Inflation expectations looking good De Schepper says according to the BER's inflation expectations survey, expectations declined across the board in the second quarter, with the inflation expectations of all three social groups, (businesspeople, trade union representatives and analysts) decreasing, with the downward adjustment extending across the forecast horizon. On average, the respondents expect that headline consumer inflation will be 3.9% during 2025, then rise gradually to 4.3% in 2026 and 4.5% in 2027. The inflation expectations of households for the next 12 months decreased to 5.4%, from 5.7% before. This is the lowest rate since the fourth quarter of 2021. 'The moderation in expectations not only firms up the likelihood of a 25 basis points rate cut in July but should also support the South African Reserve Bank's (Sarb) desire to shift to a lower inflation target. Mamello Matikinca-Ngwenya, Siphamandla Mkhwanazi, Thanda Sithole and Koketso Mano, economists at FNB, say the household experience of inflation is determined by spending patterns. 'While lower-income households will be more affected by food, higher-income households will be more sensitive to transport and insurance costs. That said, higher household expectations reflect the nuances beyond headline inflation readings. 'This is a dynamic that will also affect how quickly the Sarb is able to efficiently and sustainably achieve a lower inflation objective. High administered inflation may need to be compensated for by further non-admin core disinflation, which suggests less monetary policy easing. That said, the efficacy gains from a credible central bank and effective communication cannot be overlooked.' ALSO READ: Absa PMI increases but in contractionary territory for eighth consecutive month PMIs a mixed bag again The Absa Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) increased by 5.4 points in June to reach 48.5, the second-highest reading this year and the largest monthly increase since September 2024, although it remains below the neutral 50 points. The S&P Global PMI, on the other hand, decreased by 0.7 points to 50.1 in June. While it remains in expansionary terrain, the underlying data showed output and new business declines, De Schepper points out. Furthermore, she says, the forward-looking confidence index slipped to its lowest level in four years. 'The divergence between this index and the Absa PMI could reflect survey timing: the Absa survey was conducted after the end of the 12-day war between Isreal and Iran and amid a lull in global tariff news, while the S&P survey was fielded during the final two weeks of the month and likely captured more of the lingering uncertainty.' Matikinca-Ngwenya, Mkhwanazi, Sithole and Mano say the good news in the Absa PMI is that new sales orders surged by 7.8 points, driven mainly by domestic demand. 'Despite stronger demand, production declined slightly, and supplier delivery times lengthened, likely due to increased activity rather than supply issues.' ALSO READ: New vehicle sales finish first half of 2025 on a noteworthy high New car sales keep increasing Naamsa reported that new vehicle sales increased by 18.7%, slightly down from 22% in May, with sales increasing for a fourth consecutive quarter. Exports also bounced back with 7.9% growth from a 14.6% contraction in May. Nkonki and Matshego say new vehicle sales surprised on the upside in June, much higher than their forecast of 14.3%. They noted that imported models outperformed those produced by local OEM's, reflecting heightened price sensitivity among consumers given still-tight household budgets. 'The broader recovery in vehicle sales is supported by subdued inflation, better credit conditions and the 100-bps drop in interest rates. However, the outlook is tempered by soft business confidence and lingering uncertainty around trade policy. Still, the industry should benefit from a more supportive macroeconomic backdrop heading into the second half of the year.'
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
US Congress proposes sanctions against South Africa over Israel case
US President Donald Trump hands papers to President Cyril Ramaphosa during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington. Image: AFP A controversial bill introduced in the United States Congress aims to cut off direct aid to South Africa and impose targeted sanctions on its political leaders, citing the country's legal action against Israel at the International Court of Justice and its growing diplomatic ties with Iran and Hamas. Republican Representative Greg Steube on Friday tabled the Addressing Hostile and Antisemitic Conduct by the Republic of South Africa Act of 2025 in the US House of Representatives. The proposed legislation accuses the South African government of using international institutions to wage 'lawfare' against Israel, advancing what it calls an 'antisemitic narrative under the guise of international law'. 'It is clear as day that the Government of South Africa is unfairly targeting the State of Israel and inciting hostility towards the United States and our allies,' Steube said in a statement dated June 17. 'America has no business engaging with a corrupt government that weaponises its political system against the Jewish people while jeopardising our national security interests by indulging terrorist organisations and their sponsors.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Steube said the bill is a direct response to South Africa's 'genocide' case against Israel at the ICJ, its hosting of Hamas delegations following the October 7 attacks, and the signing of an economic cooperation deal with Iran involving oil refinery projects. Under the bill, the US would suspend all direct assistance to South Africa, excluding humanitarian and public health aid, unless the government ceases all formal support for international legal actions 'that unfairly target the State of Israel', implements institutional reforms to combat corruption, and improves diplomatic cooperation with the United States. It also authorises the US president to impose sanctions, under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, on any South African official deemed to have promoted antisemitic policies or misused international courts to attack Israel. Political analyst Siseko Maposa, director at Surgetower Associates, said while the bill's passage is uncertain, its symbolic and diplomatic weight should not be underestimated. 'This bill exemplifies President Trump and the Republican faction's continued efforts to punish South Africa for its principled positions on international justice – particularly regarding Israel,' said Maposa. 'What distinguishes this initiative from prior attempts, however, is its heavy enforcement mechanisms, which would inflict tangible consequences for South Africa if enacted.' He noted that from 2012 to 2021, South Africa received an estimated $6 billion in direct US foreign direct investment, and a significant portion of development assistance has flowed through US government and affiliated aid programmes. 'While passage remains uncertain, a narrow legislative pathway exists. Republicans hold a slim majority in both chambers, but recent infighting, such as the collapse of the 'Big Beautiful Bill' vote, shows that internal dissent could derail it. South Africa's best chance may lie in lobbying moderate Republicans to oppose this draconian overreach,' he said. Maposa also warned that the bill could face legal challenges in the US if its conflation of criticism of Israel with antisemitism is seen as infringing on constitutional free speech protections. At the time of publication, the South African government had not issued a formal response. However, senior ANC leaders have previously defended the country's application to the ICJ as a legal obligation under the Genocide Convention, following Israel's military campaign in Gaza that has resulted in tens of thousands of Palestinian deaths and widespread humanitarian destruction. Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor has been a vocal advocate for Palestinian rights and last year described the ICJ case as a stand for 'international justice and accountability'. Steube's bill frames these actions differently, alleging that South Africa has 'repeatedly turned a blind eye to the atrocities committed by Hamas and Iran against Israel and the United States,' while 'aligning itself with authoritarian regimes hostile to United States national interests'. The bill further accuses the ANC of giving legitimacy to terrorist actors, pointing to its meetings with Hamas officials and Tehran's diplomatic engagement with Pretoria. The Democratic Alliance, the country's main opposition party, is expected to weigh in on the diplomatic fallout. The DA has previously criticised the ANC government's foreign policy as isolating South Africa from key Western partners. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation will likely be called on to explain whether any formal communication has been received from US officials regarding the bill and what diplomatic channels, if any, are being pursued to address it. Should the bill pass, it could result in South African officials being barred from travelling to the US or having assets frozen under US jurisdiction. It could also signal further deteriorating relations between the two countries, which have clashed in recent years over BRICS alignment, Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and military cooperation exercises with China. For now, Pretoria's best hope appears to rest on political divisions within the US Republican Party. Maposa said: 'This internal Republican division may be its sole reprieve – one Pretoria must seize by urgently lobbying moderate Republican legislators to oppose the bill outright.' Presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) was best suited to respond to the bill. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation confirmed that it is monitoring the proposed legislation through diplomatic channels. Spokesperson Chrispin Phiri said: 'As you may know, an act or bill is proposed and passed by a country's legislative body, such as the Parliament in South Africa or the Congress and Senate in the USA. These bodies operate within their sovereign territories, and their primary function is to create or implement policy through legislation, typically without the need for consultation with other nations. We recognise that this principle underscores the autonomy of states in their legislative processes. Legislative processes by their nature are publicly accessible, as such our Embassy in Washington D.C. will be able to monitor relevant developments.' On political lobbying within the US, Phiri said: 'We have noted the information regarding the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and its financial contributions to American politicians. We understand that AIPAC openly ties its contributions to candidates' support for the US-Israel relationship, thereby creating a significant incentive for politicians to align with this stance. There is public information indicating that some House Representatives who have introduced bills may fall within this category of politicians.' Phiri added that South Africa's foreign policy remains non-aligned. 'Minister Lamola consistently asserts that South Africa's foreign policy is independent and non-aligned, rooted in its constitutional principles and national interests, rather than hostility towards any nation.' Regarding Iran, he said: 'South Africa upholds its dedication to international initiatives to curtail the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and supports the right to develop nuclear capability for peaceful purposes. South Africa's engagement with Iran is consistent with its broader foreign policy of engaging with all countries.' He said South Africa's approach to foreign policy was based on constitutional values and international legal principles. 'We reemphasise that our foreign policy is based on principles such as human rights, self-determination, anti-colonialism, multilateralism, peaceful resolution of conflicts, and the pursuit of a just and equitable world order. These are universal values, not ideological preferences. Our non-aligned stance enables us to pursue an independent foreign policy that serves our national interests and contributes to global peace and stability. This means engaging with all countries, regardless of their geopolitical alignment.' Phiri added: 'We wish to reiterate that South Africa's genocide case against Israel in the International Court of Justice is fundamentally driven by our commitment to upholding a rules-based international order anchored in international law, with the aim of protecting vulnerable populations and ensuring that all actors, including powerful states, are bound by these principles. It is not, as you suggest, driven by ideological alignment, but by a consistent pursuit of justice and the reinforcement of international legal frameworks.' Attempts to get comments from the ANC and the DA were unsuccessful at the time of publication.
