
Everything You Need to Know About Taylor Jenkins Reid
After writing five best-selling novels about women reaching astronomic heights of fame, it seems only natural that Taylor Jenkins Reid would turn to the stars — literally — for her next work. Her new novel, 'Atmosphere: A Love Story,' coming out on Tuesday, follows a female astronaut in the 1980s as she navigates her high-pressure career and a blossoming romance.
As a mainstay of best-seller lists and book clubs, with two screen adaptations of her work already out and several more underway (including 'Atmosphere'), Reid is among the most popular writers publishing now. She has sold over 21 million books across print, e-book and audiobook formats, according to one of her publicists, and Time reported this month that she recently signed a five-book deal for a total of $40 million.
If you're new to her work or need a refresher, here's where to start.
The Hallmarks of a Taylor Jenkins Reid Novel
Including 'Atmosphere,' Reid has published nine books over the last 12 years.
She began by writing about ordinary-seeming heterosexual couples, often living in Los Angeles, who face extraordinary obstacles: a woman widowed days into her marriage, an estranged couple on a romantic walkabout, a presumed widow who discovers her missing husband is alive. 'The emotions just jumped off the page,' said the author and former book editor Greer Hendricks, who acquired and worked on Reid's earliest work.
Reid's first four books — 'Forever, Interrupted,' 'After I Do,' 'Maybe In Another Life' and 'One True Loves' — found middling success among readers, and in retrospect form an unofficial quartet, in which romance is the focus and comparatively little attention is paid to other aspects of the characters' lives.
Her fifth novel, 'The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo,' was a distinct departure in terms of theme, style and scope. The story of a Hollywood icon who offers her dishy life story to a young journalist, it established the framework for the novels that would vault Reid to fame. These later books zero in on women who are exceptional in their fields (acting, music, sports, science) but nonetheless grapple with all-too-mortal problems: heartbreak, addiction, infidelity, grief.
Reid has spoken of how her own drive helped shift her literary preoccupations. 'I wanted to be a bigger name, and I wanted to be aggressive about that,' she told The New York Times in 2021. Her focus became the 'type of woman who I want to talk about, a woman who has naked ambition.'
Her Writing Style
Reid's first four books are told in a relatively straightforward style, with occasional flashbacks to the early days of a character's romantic relationship. But there are commonalities with her later books, including an ear for snappy conversation. 'When you're not painting on as broad a canvas, dialogue is even more important,' said Sarah Cantin, who edited several of Reid's novels, including 'The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo.'
Her later novels are elaborately constructed, often toggling between time periods and perspectives. The most dramatic example of her experimentation with form is 'Daisy Jones and the Six,' which is presented as an oral history.
'She is so gifted in how she portrays humanity,' said the Today show co-host and publisher Jenna Bush Hager, who selected 'Malibu Rising' for her book club. 'Her books are so easy to fall into,' she continued, 'they gave me the same feeling that Sweet Valley High or The Babysitters Club did when I was young and wanted to stay up all night under the covers reading them. Taylor is a 'flashlight under your covers' writer.'
Through her female characters in particular, Reid explores 'different ways of moving through the world and behaving in ways that aren't always likable,' said Cantin. 'There's something in their vulnerability and wild ambition and aspiration that people are drawn to.'
Reid, who recently announced she is bisexual, has garnered praise for her books' queer characters, whose rich lives aren't defined by their sexuality. But she has gotten pushback to her handling of nonwhite characters; the heroines of 'The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo' and 'Carrie Soto Is Back' are Latina and their portrayals, including the way they use Spanish, rankled some readers as perniciously stereotypical.
A TL;DR Guide to Her Books
After a whirlwind romance and elopement, Elsie is sure she's found her soul mate. Nine days into married life, her husband is killed in a bike accident, forcing Elsie to grieve for the life she had just begun while locking horns with her mother-in-law, who didn't even know she existed.
After many happy years together, starting in college, Lauren and Ryan's marriage has stagnated and they are on the precipice of divorce. In an effort to save their relationship, they agree to a year of trial separation, with no communication allowed.
Nearing 30 and utterly adrift, Hannah returns to her hometown, Los Angeles, to plot her next move. In this 'Sliding Doors' story, told in alternating chapters, Hannah goes down two parallel tracks: one in which she reconnects with her high school boyfriend, and one where she blazes a new path on her own.
Emma and her husband, Jesse, built a thrilling life together. But after Jesse goes missing during an ill-fated helicopter trip, she cobbles together a world without him — including a new fiancé. When Jesse is found alive, Emma must choose between the men she loves. (A movie adaptation was released in 2023.)
A Hollywood icon nearing the end of her life contacts a young journalist and offers to share her life story. The novel, a BookTok favorite, is narrated partially by the star, Evelyn Hugo, as she reflects on her upbringing in Hell's Kitchen, relationships and career — and partially by the young journalist, who is connected to Evelyn in a manner she couldn't have expected.
Structured as an oral history, this novel tells the story of a wildly popular 1970s rock band (that feels a lot like Fleetwood Mac) as its members navigate sudden celebrity, family life, heartbreak and addiction. A popular TV adaptation stars Riley Keough as Daisy.
Over one night in 1983, four famous siblings — children of Mick Riva, a legendary singer — convene at the elder sister Nina's annual end-of-summer party. Each is wrestling demons that evening, and that's all before Nina's house goes up in flames.
A tennis champion comes out of retirement in her late 30s to face off against a younger challenger, and reflects on how her single-minded athletic focus came at the expense of personal fulfillment off the court. (The real-life tennis GOAT Serena Williams is producing a series adaptation.)
In 1980, Joan was selected as one of the first women to train as a NASA astronaut. We meet her four years later, as the steadying voice on the ground guiding her comrades through a flight gone terribly awry. Chapters leap between the edge-of-your-seat mission and Joan's past, showing how she grows into a top-flight astronaut, aunt and love interest.
The Easter Eggs
Reid's characters frequently make cameos in multiple books, and connecting her universes is often part of the fun for her fans.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
20 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Scottie Scheffler joins Tiger Woods as only repeat winners at Memorial
DUBLIN, Ohio — Scottie Scheffler is winning with such alarming regularity that describing his dominance is not a comfortable topic. So when he won the Memorial on Sunday for the second straight year, he at least had tournament host Jack Nicklaus at his side. Nicklaus is a great authority when it comes to Scheffler because the Golden Bear sees so much of himself in the world's No. 1 player.


Medscape
21 minutes ago
- Medscape
ADA Issues New MASLD Guidelines
A new consensus report from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) provides a practice-oriented framework for screening and managing metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in people with diabetes and prediabetes. Published online on May 28, 2025, in Diabetes Care, the report is a comprehensive update to the recommendations the ADA released in 2023. It is intended for clinicians treating patients with diabetes — primarily type 2 diabetes (T2D) — but also type 1 diabetes with obesity and prediabetes. Topics covered include the rationale for the recent change in terminology, epidemiology, fibrosis risk stratification, monitoring, treatment, and referral guidance, with interprofessional team management emphasized throughout. 'This will provide primary care doctors and anyone taking care of people with diabetes the tools to diagnose [MASLD] early and guide therapy…to prevent cirrhosis, and refer to the hepatologist as needed for additional therapy and monitoring,' lead author Kenneth Cusi, MD, professor of medicine at the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism in the Department of Medicine at the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, told Medscape Medical News . The guidelines recommend that clinicians routinely screen people with T2D or prediabetes for MASLD. 'We explain that the liver should be incorporated into our management in the same way we do for chronic kidney disease, eye disease, and nerve disease as an end-organ damage that is particularly affected by diabetes,' Cusi said. In the United States, at least 70% of people with T2D have MASLD, about half of whom have the more progressive form termed metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH). About 1 in 5 with T2D have advanced liver fibrosis. The presence of MASH increases the risks for complications including cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and overall mortality, according to the new consensus report. Liver disease has not been a focus of diabetes management until recently, Cusi noted. 'We didn't think about it. The epidemic of obesity, and with that, of diabetes, is driving this liver disease. The obesity epidemic has had a big worsening since the 1990s, so this damage in the past 20 or 30 years is just now becoming evident in the liver.' Terminology Change: Highlighting Insulin Resistance, Reducing Stigma The document reviews the current nomenclature for SLD, which was officially changed in 2023 to remove the words 'fatty' and 'alcoholic.' Now, MASLD is defined as the presence of SLD with at least one metabolic risk factor such as obesity, hypertension, prediabetes, high triglycerides, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or T2D, with minimal or no alcohol consumption (< 20 g/d for women; < 30 g/d for men). The term 'MetALD' is used for those with MASLD who also have increased alcohol consumption (20-50 g/d for women; 30-60 g/day for men). Steatosis in the setting of alcohol consumption above those levels is termed 'alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD).' The term MASH is defined as steatohepatitis with at least one metabolic risk factor and minimal alcohol consumption. 'At-risk MASH' refers to steatohepatitis with clinically significant fibrosis (stage F2 or higher). Diagnosis: Staged Screening for Fibrosis The document recommends routine screening of people with T2D, prediabetes, and/or obesity with cardiovascular risk factors, with the goal of identifying those with high-risk MASH. Intervention is then aimed at preventing fibrosis progression and cirrhosis. A graphic diagnostic algorithm advises initial use of the noninvasive Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) tool, which risk stratifies based on age, liver enzymes, and platelet count. 'The FIB-4 is composed of very simple things that are already in the electronic medical record of all patients. We also discuss the role of electronic medical records to improve implementation,' Cusi said. Those with a FIB-4 < 1.3 have a low risk for future cirrhosis and can be managed in primary or team care with optimized lifestyle and repeated FIB-4 every 1-2 years. If the FIB-4 is > 2.67, direct referral to a liver specialist is advised. If FIB-4 is between 1.3 and 2.67, a second risk-stratification test is recommended. Ideally, this would be a liver stiffness measurement (LSM), most commonly with transient elastography. If that is unavailable, an alternative is the noninvasive enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test. If the LSM is < 8.0 kPa or ELF is < 7.7, the fibrosis risk is low and routine management can continue with repeat testing in 1-2 years. But if higher, hepatology referral is recommended. Treatment: Lifestyle, Plus Old and New Drugs The report details lifestyle modification for MASLD, including nutrition plans; physical activity; behavioral health; and the role of diabetes self-management, education and support. The role of obesity treatment in people with MASLD, both metabolic surgery and pharmacotherapy, is also discussed at length. No current pharmacologic treatments have been approved for MASLD, but both semaglutide and tirzepatide have demonstrated benefit in treating MASH and are approved for treating T2D, obesity, and other related comorbidities. A thyroid hormone receptor beta agonist, resmetirom, was approved in early 2024 for the treatment of MASH with fibrosis stages F2 and F3, but is extremely expensive at about $50,000 a year, Cusi noted. An older, generic glucose-lowering drug, pioglitazone, has also shown benefit in reducing fibrosis and may be a lower-cost alternative. The document also includes a section on alcohol intake, which complicates the MASLD picture, Cusi noted. 'We think that this is going to help doctors to consider alcohol, which is often overlooked and under-reported. If patients have moderate fibrosis, they should completely quit alcohol.' Cusi has received research support (to his institution) from Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Inventiva, Labcorp, and Perspectum, and has served as a consultant for Aligos Therapeutics, Arrowhead, AstraZeneca, 89bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Novo Nordisk, ProSciento, Sagimet Biosciences, Siemens USA, Zealand Pharma, and Terns Pharmaceuticals.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BarEhud Barak: Israel Must Back Trump's Gaza Deal
U.S. President Donald Trump greets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as he arrives at the White House on April 7, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Credit - Alex Wong—Getty Images In the coming few days, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will face a defining choice between a politically motivated "war of deception" in Gaza and a deal to release all hostages while ending the war. He must choose between his extreme-right ministers—Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—or aligning with Donald Trump. There is no symmetry here. Accepting a hostage deal, ending the war, and working with Trump and free world leaders, won't be effortless. Any choice requires detailed negotiations and compromises. But this path is far superior to any realistic alternative. Based on the achievements of the Israel Defense Forces—including damage to Hamas, weakening Hezbollah, destroying Syria's military arsenal during Assad's collapse, and demonstrating Israel's capability to strike deep into Iran—Israeli leadership could, from a position of strength, pursue releasing all hostages simultaneously, halt this senseless war, end the humanitarian crisis, and uproot Hamas from power. This would enable Israel, though belatedly, to join Trump's vision of a New Middle East, including normalization with Saudi Arabia, regional deployment to tackle the Iranian challenge, and participation in the trade corridor project from India through the Gulf to Europe. Choosing a "war of deception" instead—where misleading propaganda presents political warfare as serving Israel's security—would be a grave mistake. It's highly doubtful that continuing the war could produce results different from previous Gaza rounds over the past 20 months. But it would certainly constitute a death sentence for some or most living hostages and deepen the diplomatic tsunami and International Criminal Court claims Israel already faces. This approach might make sense if it could achieve "total victory" over Hamas, but that won't happen. When this new war inevitably halts—under diplomatic pressure, humanitarian crisis, battlefield events, or domestic political developments—we would find ourselves in precisely the same situation as today. To understand, examine recent history. The October 7th barbaric attack created a compelling imperative for Israel to ensure Hamas could never again reign over Gaza or threaten Israel from there. The question was how to achieve this goal. Since Ben-Gurion, Israel has followed four strategic maxims: wars should be aggressive, fought on enemy territory, ended quickly to translate battlefield results into diplomatic and political realities while maintaining international legitimacy, and—extremely important—never lose the moral high ground. That's how we won in 1967 in six days and 1973 in three weeks. Netanyahu has betrayed almost all these principles. Read More: The Israel-Hamas Ceasefire Was Never Going to Last Another strategic maxim, from Clausewitz to Kissinger, holds that war must have a clearly defined, operationally feasible political purpose. As the Roman saying goes: "If you don't know which port you want to reach, no wind will take you there." This maxim was deliberately ignored. Netanyahu has blocked any discussion of this issue since October 7th, 2023. It was clear to any serious observer that Hamas suffered major military blows daily, losing most weapons systems and leadership figures since October 7th. However, since any Hamas group or individual can easily "disappear" within minutes, hiding among the Strip's 2 million civilians and emerging from tunnels or building windows to attack Israelis, their absolute elimination remains a Sisyphean task. Even after 58 years in the West Bank, we never fully eliminated Hamas' presence in Jenin or Tulkarm. The only way to ensure Hamas cannot reign over Gaza and threaten Israel is by replacing it with another governing entity legitimate to the international community, Arab neighbors like Egypt, UAE, and Saudi Arabia, and Palestinians themselves. Practically, this means a temporary inter-Arab force backed by the Arab League, potentially supported by UN Security Council resolution, funded by Saudi Arabia and UAE, with a technocratic government overseeing Palestinian bureaucracy and a new, non-Hamas security body trained by the inter-Arab force under U.S. supervision. Israel would present only two conditions: no Hamas military branch member could participate in the new entity's organs, and the IDF, initially deployed to the Strip's perimeter, would withdraw to the border only after all pre-agreed security benchmarks are met. This plan, easily implementable a year ago, and appearing to save Gaza and Gazans from further destruction, is harder now, because it could be interpreted as saving Israel from sinking into Gazan mud. But the plan remains viable despite the Israeli government's refusal to consider it. Since this is the only practical "day after" plan, there's no sense sacrificing hostages' lives or endangering Israeli troops in pointless warfare. Who can look into the eyes of future bereaved parents, newly widowed spouses, new orphans, disabled and traumatized soldiers, and claim with clear conscience that everything was done to prevent loss, or that it had justification? As long as Israel rejects hostage release and war's end, the risk increases of international initiatives, including Arab neighbors calling for Israel boycotts and steps toward recognition of a Palestinian state by European countries—many of them stable friends of Israel. Read More: I Am a Former Hamas Hostage. Here's My Message to Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu Permanent occupation of the Gaza Strip, population transfer of 2 million Palestinians, and Israeli resettlement on the that land are base and delusional visions that would backfire and accelerate confrontation with the world. Why is Netanyahu, an intelligent, experienced, savvy politician, failing? The answer isn't simple. Netanyahu has ruled since 2015 through an alliance with ultra-Orthodox parties who don't serve in the army and care only about sectoral needs, and since January 2023 added ultra-right zealots believing Gaza resettlement and Palestinian transfer are heavenly orders. He's caught in a dilemma: 80% of the public sees him as primarily responsible for the country's worst day, 60% believe he should resign. A heavy majority perceives his judicial reform, initiated immediately after January 2023 elections, as a "judicial coup d'état"—an attempt to castrate the legislative branch and demolish Supreme Court independence. Many believe the aim of his blatant attack on democracy is to escape his bribery, fraud, and breach of trust court case. For him, any pause in the war—even 60 days, certainly longer—would immediately bring reckoning and accountability: accelerated court proceedings; demands for national inquiry committee investigating October 7th, and events before, during and after; coalition meltdown; and probable disgraced ejection from public life. I believe Netanyahu genuinely wants all hostages home. But when this clashes with immediate threats to his political survival, he prefers leaving them in Gaza. He has already torpedoed several hostage deal opportunities, and seems to be doing it once again over the weekend, by resisting U.S. guarantee to Hamas for an end to the war in exchange for release of all hostages and entering, together with the Trump Administration, into Trump's New Middle East Order (to include the replacement of Hamas, described above). Netanyahu sticks to his eternal war in order to avoid a pause in fighting, which might lead to the end of his political career. This behavior is unacceptable to Israel and Israelis. We are, as former Supreme Court President Aharon Barak wrote years ago, 'defending democracy' that "should be capable of defending itself against those who try to use the very freedoms and tools it provides to destroy it from within." We're led by someone who lost his strategic and moral compass, dragging the nation into war motivated by personal political interests against our security and common future. Israel urgently needs new, sober leadership with clear realistic vision and self-confidence—leadership capable of reading our people's soul, understanding partners' and rivals' minds, and above all, having courage to make decisions and power to implement them. The world will pass judgment. But the burden of bringing Israel back on track is ours—Israeli citizens. I believe we will overcome. This war will end soon, and Israel's worst ever government will be replaced by a responsible, effective one. A long path of repair must follow. Contact us at letters@