logo
Mbeki's intervention in TRC damages litigation criticised as 'absurd' and 'muddying the waters'

Mbeki's intervention in TRC damages litigation criticised as 'absurd' and 'muddying the waters'

The Star25-07-2025
The Foundation for Human Rights (FHR) has described former president Thabo Mbeki's application to intervene in the constitutional damages litigation by survivors and families of apartheid-era crime victims as unreasonable and 'muddying the waters'.
The application by Mbeki and his former justice minister, Brigitte Mabandla, is set to be heard on Monday, July 28, in the Pretoria High Court.
The families of victims who were forcibly disappeared or killed during apartheid, supported by the foundation, filed an application against President Cyril Ramaphosa and the government early this year, seeking R167-million in constitutional damages for the state's 'gross failure'. They say there was 'a gross violation of their human rights as the state failed to investigate and/or prosecute the cases referred by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission to the National Prosecutions Authority'.
They alleged that there was some political interference in the cases, leading to delays of about 15 years.
Speaking to eNCA on Thursday, FHR executive director Zaid Kimmie said they were not gunning for any individual or 'alleging that any particular individual was responsible'. He said they were seeking justice and the R167 million damages, and wanted to know 'potentially how this interference happened'.
Those seeking to clear their names or 'cast aspersions on others' would have their opportunity in the upcoming commission of inquiry set up by Ramaphosa, said Kimmie. He said they believed that the commission was 'the correct avenue' that Mbeki and Mabandla should follow. He said the two politicians' intervention in the damages case was 'absurd' and posed a danger of muddying the waters.
'It's clear to us and all families that there was some form of interference in these cases. You don't simply have a 15-year delay in investigations and prosecutions because someone forgot to do their job. It's very clear that there was some sort of interference, and what we've asked for was that, to get to the bottom of that interference we need a commission of inquiry,' said Kimmie.
He explained that the R167 million the families were seeking was carefully calculated based on the money used in supporting some of the families during inquests, investigations, prosecutions, and generally providing justice to them.
'Just to make it clear, the money that we're asking for is going to be held in trust. It will be available to any family who's in the same situation (as those in the damages case),' he said.
Responding to a question about the 'unfinished business of the TRC' and whether, in his view, the state dealt with the issues adequately, Kimmie said: 'It's clear that there has been a gross violation of the human rights of these families. The state didn't do its job, did not live up to its obligations. And when the state does not live up to its obligations, then it's incumbent upon the people involved to call them to account …
'It's simply not enough to say 'well, bad things happened, these things happen', and everyone walks away.'
The state had 'constitutional, legal obligations' and had officials paid to do their jobs, to investigate and prosecute cases. He said it was 'absurd' for them to 'simply decide' that a certain set of cases was 'not worthy' to be prosecuted.
There have been allegations in the past that interference by the government under Mbeki during former national director of public prosecutions Vusi Pikoli led to work on the case being stopped. There have not been any proper explanation as to why the TRC cases where amnesty was not granted were not pursued.
These cases include the killing of the Cradock Four — Matthew Goniwe, Fort Calata, Sparrow Mkonto, and Sicelo Mhlauli — members of the United Democratic Front and other community organisations fighting apartheid whose killings shocked the nation in 1985.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tebogo Malaka ‘sting' – here's why Daily Maverick did it and what's next
Tebogo Malaka ‘sting' – here's why Daily Maverick did it and what's next

Daily Maverick

time7 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Tebogo Malaka ‘sting' – here's why Daily Maverick did it and what's next

The action of the Independent Development Trust's CEO and her spokesperson is an assault on the fourth estate, a vital pillar of a functioning democracy, and on freedom of expression. It's been more than three years since the State Capture commission wrapped up its work. Precious little has been done in the way of prosecuting those responsible for pillaging this country's coffers. So woeful is this lethargy that even former Chief Justice Raymond Zondo recently lambasted President Cyril Ramaphosa 's government, a highly unusual step for someone in Zondo's position. Failing to act on past State Capture crimes is one thing. Sadly, though, it is starting to dawn on South Africans that our ongoing corruption crisis is as grievous as it had been when the Zuma-Gupta syndicate ruled the roost. Whistle-blowers and forensic investigators are being gunned down. Shady contractors with no real business bona fides still clinch huge government contracts. Our President, for some reason, keeps cash in his couches. The deputy president and his family sit on vast assets that they can't quite explain. Two of Ramaphosa's 'post-capture' ministers have been caught in huge graft scandals. One of them resigned from the Cabinet, but still ended up as a Member of Parliament. The other was simply reshuffled to a new portfolio. Recent allegations regarding our police service read like a horror story. Entire pockets of the police, along with the organisation's political custodians, may very well be in the clutches of criminals. It is in this unsettling milieu that Daily Maverick decided to investigate the Independent Development Trust (IDT), a lesser-known yet important state body that spends billions of rands on social infrastructure projects. Our investigation into the IDT's R836-million oxygen plants debacle led us ever deeper into the IDT and its CEO's affairs. Somewhere along this research journey, we must have triggered a very sensitive nerve. The IDT's spokesperson got in touch with our journalist. He said he had 'very sensitive' business to discuss. A first meeting ensued, one in which promises of tenders and cash payments dominated the conversation. The spokesperson, Phasha Makgolane, wanted to set up another meeting to seal the deal. Makgolane's boss, Tebogo Malaka, would avail herself for this second gathering, the spokesperson promised. This left Daily Maverick with a crucial decision to make: spurn whatever advances Makgolane had made up to that point, or string them along with the hope of documenting a most compelling instance of alleged bribery. We went for the latter option. It was a tack that was always guaranteed to spark some debate, even if it achieved its goal of exposing high-level malfeasance. Journalistic 'stings' aren't exactly unheard of, but they're certainly unusual. They involve deceit and covert tactics, plus a level of planning and resources that nowadays aren't readily available to newsrooms. But we strongly believe it was more than justified. In a normal world, it would not fall to journalists to conduct sting operations, complete with hidden cameras and surveillance. But these are not normal times. In normal times, action would be swift off the back of the evidence presented. In normal times, the systems which should hold power to account would react. An arrest warrant issued. But, these are not normal times. The action of the IDT's CEO and her spokesperson is an assault on the fourth estate, a vital pillar of a functioning democracy, and on freedom of expression. Corruption, particularly within state entities such as the IDT, diverts public funds, undermines service delivery and erodes trust in governance. Journalists are not merely reporters; they are conduits of information essential for citizens to hold their leaders accountable. But these are not normal times. To accept a bribe, or to simply walk away from such an offer without exposing it, would be a betrayal of this fundamental responsibility. It would also be a betrayal if we stopped there. Good journalism plays the role of a watchdog – shining a light on abuse of power, corruption and injustice – not enforcing the law. But in these abnormal times, it falls to us to act in self defence and hold the line. To risk our lives to expose the truth. In another time, when the other three pillars of a democracy are functioning at strength, our job would be done. But history has shown that exposure is not enough. So while we strive against becoming political actors or activists, we cannot maintain a passive role when journalism is the target of bad actors intent on snuffing out our torches. To safeguard our independence, freedom of expression and to fight against this tendency to bribe journalists, Daily Maverick will be taking legal steps in the form of criminal charges against our would-be bribers. Anything less is a dereliction of our duty. DM Jillian Green is the Editor-in-Chief of Daily Maverick and Pieter-Louis Myburgh Daily Maverick's senior investigative journalist.

Letter to Mahlamba Ndlopfu: Comrades dip hands daily in the Dettol of plausible deniability
Letter to Mahlamba Ndlopfu: Comrades dip hands daily in the Dettol of plausible deniability

Daily Maverick

time11 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Letter to Mahlamba Ndlopfu: Comrades dip hands daily in the Dettol of plausible deniability

Ah, Chief Dwasaho! I write to you from the edge of my last nerve. The South African people don't know what they want or what's good for them. One minute, they're screaming for transparency. The next, they're foaming at the mouth when His Would-be Majesty, King Paul of Mashatile, godfather to the Alex Mafia, declares his 'family homes'. Now there's a brouhaha in the streets and gnashing of teeth on Twitter. To declare or not to declare, that is the question? But rewind the cassette, Comrade Leadership. A year ago, News24 let the cat out of the Gucci handbag, revealing that His Deputyship was staying (or was it squatting?) in palatial properties not registered in his name. At the time, Peter — and his dog — cried foul, howling that King Paul was living a life more golden than his declared income. There were whispers of corruption by proxy, and finger-pointing at the son-in-law, that dashing man who married Palesa. My leader, I don't mean to implicate myself, but I, too, may or may not have had a Palesa once. If only I had married her, I too could be R65-million to the good, lounging in Constantia with my feet up and my conscience asleep. Eish, my leader, perhaps Palesa was a moniker in one of Kwaito's hits. But I digress. Frankly, I don't understand the kerfuffle. The Honourable King Paul — yes, the same one with the Alex Mafia credentials and a GPS permanently set to Waterfall and Constantia — has declared the so-called 'offending' properties. He never said, 'I bought them.' He said — read slowly, Comrades — 'they are family homes'. We should understand this concept unless we've all suddenly developed amnesia about African communal living. In Africa, we don't own houses; we share them. That's how we roll. One house, six cousins, four uncles, and the occasional tenderpreneur son-in-law named Nceba. CR17, Colgate smiles, and the gospel according to Mkhwebane This, my leader, reminds me of the CR17 bonanza. Remember that? A few short years ago, you were showered with manna from Stellenbosch heaven — friends and funders alike backed you to take a calculated swipe at the ANC's Top Six, and voilà, you emerged Number One with a Colgate smile. Then came the legally illiterate, now impeached Public Protector Advocate Busisiwe Mkhwebane who accused you of failing to declare a benefit. Nonsense! It was a private matter between you and your billionaire buddies. But let's be honest, all politicians are double agents by design. They are not the Holy Trinity. They're at best two-in-one shampoo: one part public servant, two parts private businessperson with a dodgy connection to the cartels. I mean, take Phala Phala. You stashed foreign currency in your couch. Why? The first time you banked it, everyone wanted disclosure of depositors. You kept it at home; now everyone wants to know why it wasn't banked. Can't a man enjoy his loot in peace? I digress, again. My leader, if I may… I, too, have family homes. One in Waterkloof. Yes, read slowly, Waterkloof — the high-altitude sanctuary where the powerful play golf with tenderpreneurs and the streetlights never flicker. It's a gated utopia where politicians, shady businessmen (always men), and underworld figures reside in comfort under circumstances known only to the Department of Public Works — or perhaps the Mexican Sinaloa Cartel. Of course, I also have family homes in Ulundi and Eshowe, KwaZulu-Natal — by birthright, bloodline and braai. Don't you dare ask me about the European concept of ownership. These are African family homes, not title deeds from the Queen's Registry. Think of them as Holiday Club benefits — I use them on demand. Just like King Paul, I too am a true son of the soil. Frankly, I'm surprised King Paul hasn't joined uBaba in howling against the Constitution and its liberal concoctions. I mean, what rubbish is Section 25? The idea of property ownership for Africans died in 1913 with the Land Act. Now we're being lectured about 'disclosure' and 'conflicts of interest' by people who've never sat in a tribal council where five brothers, six cousins, and an uncle all claim the same kraal. Please. Family homes aren't corrupt — they're African culture. Chicken feet, cold beer and the tender-less comrade This self-made confusion by liberals — frothing at the mouth about 'our values' and demanding asset registers as if this were Geneva — reminds me of a time a comrade-friend visited me at my erstwhile 'family home' in Durban. Now, don't get it twisted, my leader. While I'd love to say the steak was sizzling on the Weber, tjoo, I'm embellishing. It was chicken feet on the braai — marinated in a secret sauce of rural village dreams deferred and already stinking like rotten meat. Mid-braai, my dearest friend fixed me with the kind of stare usually reserved for enemies of the revolution. He looked me dead in the eye and said, 'Stalin,' — my Struggle name— 'Stalin, you've disappointed me. After all these years of working in government circles, writing speeches for ministers and fetching wine glasses at political funerals, you're still poor. ' I was winded, my leader. It felt like a punch from a side pocket prophet. I steadied myself against my cooler box, exhaled, and after a complete three-minute silence — punctuated only by the sound of chicken feet crackling — took a majestic sip of beer, lit a cigarette, and responded: 'Ukukhuluma nami?' (' Are you talking to me?') He nodded. I nodded back. Silence lingered. Then I slowly explained that, unlike others, I had not yet discovered the tender route to prosperity. I, too, was a man of 'family homes' — no title deeds, but many memories. And yes, I may be materially poor, but I am rich. Don't ask for details; you just don't get it. I digress — apologies for my scatterbrain. Ribbons, Range Rovers and wives' revolutionary procurement Speaking of the route to tenders, the bloody liberals are now flinging accusations like confetti at a Zuma wedding — claiming all and sundry (read: ANC leaders) are neck deep in tender fraud. Njani? Take the case of a so-called KwaZulu-Natal ANC 'heavyweight' as reported by News24. Heavyweight? On whose Richter scale? Are we measuring influence or just belly circumference? If that's the metric, what would happen to Jeff Radebe and S'bu Ndebele, current head honchos? Anyway, this time the spotlight falls on Comrade Thanduxolo Sabelo — yes, the same one who, last I checked, was still recovering from being a has-been councillor at the eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality. According to media reports, his two wives stand to benefit from a National School Nutrition Programme tender worth R2.9-billion. Two point nine billion, my leader. That's not a tender; that's a feast for generations. Oh, excuse me, and now their cats are crying foul. Why? Because a man with two family homes to feed is expected to survive on a councillor's stipend? Are you even serious? How can an ordinary councillor — whose power barely extends beyond cutting ribbons at a Pakistani tuck shop — influence a provincial tender committee in the Department of Education? Eye of the needle Let me spell it out. ANC leaders went through the eye of the needle, my leader. They've seen nothing. They know nothing. Ask them about the bid adjudication committee — you'll get blank stares and a Freedom Charter quote. As for the wives? They're hustling to keep the fires burning and the Range Rovers running. They didn't join the ANC to bake scones — they're in procurement for the National Democratic Revolution! The same logic applies to KwaZulu-Natal MEC for Education Sipho Hlomuka. Turns out, his wife, too, is an entrepreneur, which now seems to be a prerequisite for marriage in comrade circles — business-minded, politically adjacent, and tender-ready. She, too, is in line for a slice of the R2.9-billion school nutrition feast. Hlomuka's wife won the tender fair and square — the MEC was unaware of his wife's burgeoning empire. Have you ever seen or heard of an MEC sitting on tender committees? But now, what did you expect? That a whole wife of an MEC must spend her days hopping from nail bar to eyelash salon, sipping iced coffee and gossiping about non-aligned delegates? Clean hands Not to be outdone, Deputy Minister of Labour and Unemployment (sic) Jomo Sibiya's wife is also on the take. I can confirm the deputy minister knew nothing about this tender award. He saw nothing. He heard nothing. Like all seasoned Comrades, his hands remain impeccably clean, dipped daily in the Dettol of plausible deniability.

Government under fire for splashing on employees' salaries
Government under fire for splashing on employees' salaries

The Citizen

time17 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Government under fire for splashing on employees' salaries

'For us to effectively compete with the Chinese, our salary structure must be similar.' Critics slam the South African government for allowing many of its employees to take home millions in salaries, while most of the ordinary citizens struggle to make ends meet. Public servants' salary increases are being implemented while most cities are collapsing right in the eyes of the world. This raises the question about the government's priorities. Many have suggested that instead of increasing public servants' salaries, the money can be used to repair or replace collapsing infrastructure. ALSO READ: More than R140 million in salaries paid to suspended government employees Increase salaries or fix the city? Moeletsi Mbeki, political economist, criticised the government on the State of the Nation podcast for the high salaries of employees. He highlighted that the money can be used to fix railway tracks, towns, roads, and water infrastructure. 'They are not building new railway tracks; they are destroying them. Instead of creating new towns. They are allowing the road, water, and electricity infrastructure to collapse while they tax the rest of the economy to pay themselves phenomenal salaries.' Mbeki was referring to the National Treasury's 2023 Medium Term Budget Policy, which outlined that 55 000 government employees take home more than R1 million per year in salaries. Government employees salaries breakdown The government employees that are being referred to include teachers, healthcare workers, police officers, military personnel, employees in national, provincial, and local government, as well as public entities and state-owned companies. National Treasury's 2023 Medium Term Budget Policy showed that most of the public servants moved into higher-earning categories, because of the higher cost-of-living adjustment. The number of employees who earn more than R1 million per year increased from 10 000 to over 55 000 in ten years. While 48% of employees earn between R350 000 and R600 000 per year. ALSO READ: Here's what some of South Africa's SOE bosses earn Salaries must be cut Mbeki in the podcast said the salaries of South Africa's government employees must be cut to align with those of key competitors. 'For us to effectively compete with the Chinese, our salary structure must be similar.' In the interview, he rejects the need for transformation, and calls for urgent, practical development — from green energy and infrastructure renewal to education reform and economic reindustrialisation. He argues the ANC's legacy has been one of mismanagement and elite enrichment, with South Africa's African middle-class prioritising 'eating' over nation-building. However, Mbeki remains hopeful, believing that new leadership and vehicles for progress will emerge. Public servants earn more than doctors Jacques van Wyk, CEO of JGL Forensic Services, argued in a post that most public servants earn more than qualified doctors. JGL Forensic Services is an internationally recognised forensic services company helping businesses and government departments develop ethical, sustainable practices. He said the public servants' salaries have put massive pressure on government finances. Rewarding a job well done 'I'm all for rewarding a job well done, but you don't have to look very far to see that South Africa's civil service is not doing its job very well at all,' said van Wyk. He made reference to Dawie Roodt, Chief Economist of the Efficient Group, on his view about how public servants are paid. 'We have approximately 1.3 million civil servants in South Africa, and they are mostly overpaid and underworked. The big question is, what can be done to improve government efficiency? We spend a huge amount of money on the whole state machinery, and this economy simply cannot keep on carrying this massive burden.' Van Wyk agrees with Roodt that 'the solution is not to suck more money out of the system, but rather to put policies in place to spend less.' NOW READ: Godongwana cuts government spending to offset VAT shortfall

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store