Ray Dalio's Bridgewater Bets Big on ARM, Loses Faith in Chinese Stocks amid Trade Concerns
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Bridgewater's Key New Investments
Bridgewater acquired over 473,000 Arm shares, valued at nearly $76.6 million, during the second quarter. It is worth noting that ARM's chip architecture powers billions of devices globally, and its recent momentum in AI workloads has caught the attention of institutional investors.
Apart from ARM, Dalio also bought new stakes in business software company Intuit (INTU) and EQT Corp. (EQT), an energy company.
At the same time, he increased his stake in NVDA stock by a massive 154.37% to $1.14 billion. Also, the fund's exposure to Microsoft and Alphabet stocks were increased by 911,000 and 2.56 million shares, respectively.
These moves signal growing confidence in the tech sector, especially those set to gain from AI growth.
Dalio Exits Chinese Stocks
Just months after raising his Alibaba stake by more than 3,360%, Dalio has now sold all 5.66 million BABA shares, reflecting a 3.47% impact on Bridgewater's portfolio. The reversal comes amid rising U.S.-China tensions, tariff threats, and growing concerns over Chinese tech regulation.
Importantly, Bridgewater exited positions in 16 Chinese stocks in total, worth over $1.4 billion.
The move suggests Dalio is being cautious about the Chinese market due to concerns over regulation and global tensions. By pulling back, the fund is lowering risk and shifting money to areas with steadier growth.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
31 minutes ago
- USA Today
US will dodge recession, but Trump's policies will slow economic growth: Report
President Donald Trump's aggressive economic policies will likely significantly slow U.S. growth and push up inflation but stop short of causing a recession or 'stagflation' – the dire scenarios that forecasters envisioned before he took office, a report says. 'The totality of the policies does not push the economy to the brink of recession but it significantly diminishes growth' during Trump's four-year term, said economist Justin Begley of Moody's Analytics. He added, 'It's not yet stagflation but it's edging that way.' Stagflation is an economy characterized by high inflation, slow or stagnant growth and high unemployment – an unusual and toxic cocktail. Typically, a sluggish economy leads to low inflation, allowing the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates to stimulate more borrowing and activity. Will the Fed lower rates in September? The Fed, however, faces a dilemma because lowering rates to bolster a softening labor market could further drive up inflation. Consumer price increases generally have eased substantially after a pandemic-related spike but recently edged higher, in part because of Trump's sweeping import levies. His policies are imposing countervailing forces on the economy. Tax cuts and increased spending on border security and defense are set to juice growth. But those positive catalysts are expected to be more than offset by the tariffs, a historic immigration crackdown, layoffs of hundreds of thousands of federal workers and big cuts to social services programs such as Medicaid and food stamps, Begley said. During Trump's presidential race against former Vice President Kamala Harris last year, Moody's, among other research firms, predicted Trump's economic blueprint would spark a recession by mid-2025. Moody's has updated its forecast in part because the contours of his plan recently have become more clearly defined, Begley said. 'We have a better view where things are going,' he said. What tariffs has Trump imposed? For example, high double-digit tariffs are in place for steel and aluminum, foreign cars and Chinese imports. And the White House has reached deals with trading partners such as Japan, South Korea, Vietnam and the UK that set tariffs at 10% to 20%. Trump's deportations and constraints on Southern border crossings are well under way. And his huge budget bill, which he signed into law on July 4, expanded his 2017 tax cuts, beefed up military and border security outlays, and slashed some entitlement spending. How is the economy doing under Trump? All told, Moody's projects Trump's policies will reduce economic growth by an average 0.4 percentage points annually – nearly half a point – during his term. That would leave the economy expanding an average 1.7% annually over the four years, with growth bottoming at 1.4% next year and peaking at 2.2% in 2028. The economy grew at an annual rate of 1.2% the first half of 2025. It's projected to grow at slightly less than a 1% pace in the second half, according to economists surveyed by Wolters Kluwer Blue Chip Economic Indicators. By contrast, the economy averaged 2.3% growth the decade after the Great Recession of 2007-2009 and 3.5% during former president Joe Biden's term. The latter, however, included unusually strong gains as the nation emerged from the pandemic recession. In 2024, Biden's last year in office, the economy grew a healthy 2.8%. Growth had been expected to downshift no matter who won the 2024 election as a post-COVID-19 surge in consumer demand petered out, Americans depleted government pandemic aid and other government stimulus measures faded. But by the end of Trump's term in 2028, the economy will be 1.3% smaller than if his policies had not been enacted, Begley wrote in a report. Also, the unemployment rate is expected to peak at 4.7% in 2027 before falling to 4.4% by the time Trump leaves office. Without his policies, unemployment would broadly hold steady at about 4% and there would be about 885,000 additional jobs, Moody's said. Is inflation ever going to go down? Trump's policies similarly are poised to push up inflation by an average of nearly half a percentage point a year. That would leave annual inflation averaging 2.6% during Trump's term and peaking at 3.1% in 2026, based on the Commerce Department's personal consumption expenditures price index. Inflation then would decline and nearly reach the Fed's 2% goal in 2028, the last year of his term. Absent the president's policies, inflation would achieve the Fed's target next year, Begley's analysis shows. Are tariffs contributing to inflation? Tariffs, by far, represent both the biggest drag on growth and the largest contributor to inflation, Begley said. Companies are expected to pass most of the costs of the duties to consumers, driving up prices. And that's expected to sap their buying power and reduce consumption, which makes up 70% of economic activity. Without the tariffs, the net effects of Trump's policies on growth would be slightly positive, Begley said. The benefits of tax cuts and increased defense and border spending would outweigh the toll taken by the immigration crackdown, federal layoffs and cutbacks to Medicaid and food stamps, he said. What are the negative effects of deportations? Another big hit comes from the deportations. Like the tariffs, the immigration crackdown is projected to both curtail growth and boost inflation. A reduced supply of workers in industries such as construction, agriculture and hospitality is expected to drive up wages and prices. And a smaller population of immigrants means less consumer spending. Here's why Moody's forecast of the effects of Trump's policies is less dire than it was before he took office: Less retaliation from tariffs Although Trump's tariffs are higher than anticipated, Moody's expected more significant retaliation from foreign countries that would batter U.S. manufacturers' exports. At least so far, those nations have taken a more restrained approach. Fewer deportations than expected Moody's figured the Trump administration would seek to deport about 1 million immigrants who lack permanent legal status each year. But Begley said that has proven logistically challenging. Goldman Sachs estimates monthly deportations have averaged an annualized pace of about 600,000. Tax cuts give middle-class Americans more spending money Although Trump vowed during his campaign to eliminate taxes on tips and overtime, Moody's didn't necessarily expect him to follow through. The budget bill, however, scraps taxes on tips up to $25,000 a year and over time up to $12,500.
Fast Company
31 minutes ago
- Fast Company
From ‘AI washing' to ‘sloppers,' 5 AI slang terms you need to know
While Sam Altman, Elon Musk, and other AI industry leaders can't stop singing the praises of the technology, a growing number of average Americans are forming a different opinion. According to YouGov data from July, Americans are increasingly likely to believe that AI will be bad for humans. Specifically, 43% of Americans say they fear AI will end the human race (up 6% since March), and 47% believe that AI will have a net adverse effect on society (up 7% since March). With this rise in AI pessimism, there has been a surge in new slurs and slang terms that capture the negative connotations people increasingly associate with AI—and the individuals who use it. Here's a guide to the five terms you need to know: 'AI washing,' 'clanker,' 'Groksucker,' 'slop,' and 'slopper.' AI washing No, AI hasn't suddenly found a way to do your laundry while you do art. If you hear someone talking about 'AI washing,' they are referring to a deceptive marketing practice where companies exaggerate the role AI plays in their product or service. This deceptive marketing practice gets its name from ' green washing,' where a company falsely or misleadingly touts its environmentally friendly policies. Any company can be guilty of AI washing if it misstates the role AI plays in its products. Companies in industries that are more prone to doing this are those in the technology and finance sectors, which is why the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has publicly warned against the practice. 'AI washing, whether it's by financial intermediaries such as investment advisers and broker dealers, or by companies raising money from the public, that AI washing may violate the securities laws,' former chairman of the SEC Gary Gensler warned in 2024. The current Trump administration also seems to be cracking down on AI washing as well, according to Holland & Knight's SECond Opinions Blog. If someone is said to be an 'AI washer,' it means they are being accused of offering a product that doesn't rely on AI as much as they say it does. Clanker This is the newest AI slur on this list, and its use has exploded in recent months. As Fast Company previously reported, 'clanker' is a derogatory term for robots. The term comes from the fictional Star Wars universe, where droids are often treated as second-class citizens at best. But increasingly, the term is being adopted not just to describe our real-world AI-powered robots, but AI systems that threaten our jobs or remove human connections from our lives. One system often referred to as a 'clanker' is the AI chatbot that people are now forced to talk to when they call a customer support line. 'I called my bank to ask about my balance, but had to talk to a clanker instead of a human.' Groksucker While 'clanker' is a slur aimed at bots and AI systems, several slurs have arisen to define humans who are overly engaged with certain AI systems, particularly generative AI chatbots. Perhaps the most visceral one in this category is 'Groksucker' (you can figure out for yourself what other word the term mimics). The term gets its name from Elon Musk's xAI chatbot Grok. And Grok itself says the term describes 'people who frequently interact with me, Grok, in a way some find repetitive or annoying,' adding that the term is tied 'to concerns about AI overuse or privacy on X.' While 'Groksucker' is generally limited to describing a subsection of Grok users, another term exists for those who are overreliant on the most popular chatbot, ChatGPT. But more on that below. Slop If there is one term that has become synonymous with AI-generated content, it is ' slop.' Slop refers to low-quality, high-output content generated by AI tools that are increasingly overrunning our feeds. Slop is Shrimp Jesus proliferating on Facebook and Instagram. Slop is YouTube videos with completely AI-generated scripts, images, and thumbnails that crowd out high-quality human-made creators. Slop is articles written by a machine instead of a person. And slop is what is causing the dead internet theory to transition from fringe conspiracy to prophetic foresight. Slop is everywhere now, and it's only going to get worse. Sloppers This list wouldn't be complete without including a slang term that has recently been adopted to describe people who are overreliant on the world's most popular AI chatbot, ChatGPT. That word is 'sloppers.' The slur gained popularity after a TikTok posted by user intrnetbf went viral last month. In the video, the user said his friend came up with the term 'sloppers' to describe 'people who are using ChatGPT to do everything for them.' If someone is a 'slopper,' it means that they have offloaded most of their cognitive processes to ChatGPT. This cognitive offloading involves asking ChatGPT for guidance on various tasks a person should be mentally well-equipped to handle on their own, such as planning what to do for the evening, how to respond to a text message from a family member, or whether to make a significant life change, like quitting a job. Technological slurs can change how the public viewds a product While many reading this may find some of the above AI slang humorous (and even fitting), the fact that these terms are entering the public lexicon is likely to alarm some companies operating in the AI space. When the public adopts new derogatory names for products, technologies, and the people who use them, it usually signals that popular perception isn't heading in a positive direction. This can trigger a snowball effect, where people en masse reject the technology. The 'glasshole' backlash against Google Glass is a well-known example of this. Artificial intelligence is, of course, a much larger and more transformative force than Google Glass—and it's unlikely to disappear despite the increasing slurs directed at it. However, this emerging slang does indicate—as YouGov's polling also shows—that the public is increasingly wary of the technology, and isn't afraid to voice it.
New York Times
32 minutes ago
- New York Times
C.E.O.s Want Their Companies to Adopt A.I. But Do They Get It Themselves?
In March, Andy Katz-Mayfield, a co-founder of the razor brand Harry's, started inviting junior employees to monthly meetings usually reserved for his most senior leaders. The purpose was for lower-level workers to show off how they were using generative artificial intelligence to improve the supply chain, finance and marketing. But Mr. Katz-Mayfield had another purpose, too: getting the top executives comfortable with using A.I. themselves. 'Building familiarity with these tools opens people's eyes,' said Mr. Katz-Mayfield, who is also a chief executive of Harry's parent company, Mammoth Brands. 'Through demos and stuff, people are like: 'Oh, that's cool. I didn't think about that, but I now realize why this is important for my team.'' Executives refer to the promise of A.I. with grandiose comparisons: the dawn of the internet, the Industrial Revolution, Carl Friedrich Gauss's discovery of number theory. But while boards and top executives may mandate using A.I. to make their businesses more efficient and competitive, many of those leaders haven't fully integrated it into their own workdays. As with most technological advances, younger people have taken to A.I. more quickly than their elders. And the work that people do earlier in their careers — inserting data into spreadsheets, creating decks, coming up with designs — also lends itself to playing around with the technology. Top executives, on the other hand, are often several steps removed from the mechanics. Once they're in the C-suite, days are filled with meetings. Less doing, more approving. So to nudge high-level managers, chief executives who have fully embraced A.I. are trying new tactics. Some have told senior leaders to use Gemini, Google's A.I. assistant, before defaulting to Google search. Some are carving out time at corporate retreats to play around with generative A.I. tools like Creatify. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
