
KE's two-decade journey: a privatisation that delivered—II
In recent years, KE has been advised to off-take power from the national grid due to surplus available in the national grid —leading to the abandonment of KE's several planned power plants including the 700MW coal project.
Ironically, the same critics who urge KE to tap into central capacity often also call for greater self-generation by individual consumers, without acknowledging the inherent contradiction in these demands.
KE's two-decade journey: a privatisation that delivered—I
Misunderstandings further persist and KE's write-offs for unrecoverable bills often draw headlines about 'double benefits.' Yet the mechanism is neither novel nor opaque: regulated utilities the world over recognise prudent costs after exhaustive audits.
Any recoveries that later materialise are netted off in future filings. Similarly, in the case of alleged claw-back amounts that are currently before the court, KE disputes only the interpretation, not the formula nor the principle, and will comply with whatever the honorable court decides.
On matters of safety, it is important to clear facts. For FY2023, Nepra investigated 33 electrocution-related incidents in KE's jurisdiction.
What critics easily ignore is the fact that in 32 of these, the authority found no negligence on KE's part. Many of these incidents occurred within consumer premises or involved third-party encroachments, underscoring the shared nature of safety responsibility in dense, urban environments, most of which is outside KE's purview.
Talking about captive plants and RLNG imports, one must ask: where were these critics when the entire country had to rely on costlier fuel because of captive preference? Every power plant must be backed by a secure fuel supply, and in the absence of local gas, KE did what was necessary to keep the city running.
Now when the ministry has instructed captive to move back on the grid, concerns have been raised about KE charging a 'hefty fee' to convert captive plants to grid supply. It's important to understand that these costs are not arbitrary charges but are aligned with NEPRA-approved regulations and technical requirements.
When a captive generation facility transitions to grid supply, it often requires dedicated infrastructure; new metering, protection systems, reinforcement of the nearest grid point and in fact a new grid to be set up in some cases; all of which involve material costs. These investments are necessary to ensure grid stability, safety, and quality of supply for both the industry and surrounding consumers.
Moreover, KE does not profit from these charges. They are calculated based on actual technical scope and verified through internal and third-party checks.
Where complaints have been raised, KE has reviewed them and wherever required, streamlined the process, reduced costs through engineering alternatives, or offered installment-based facilitation. It's also worth noting that as fuel prices for captive plants have increased, many industries are now returning to grid power voluntarily, recognizing that stable, merit-order-based electricity is both more economical and less administratively burdensome in the long run.
What often gets overlooked in these debates is that privatization alone is not reform. The government may have privatized one utility, but it has not yet deregulated the power sector.
True transformation will only come when the entire ecosystem — generation, transmission, and distribution — is opened up to competition under a non-exclusive licensing regime. Until then, companies like KE are expected to deliver world-class service while operating in a regulated environment.
The push for CTBCM and market liberalization is the right direction, but it needs acceleration. The real innovation lies not in hardware-heavy prescriptions from the 1980s, but in building service-driven utilities that operate like customer-centric platforms, capable of adapting to how people live and consume electricity today.
That shift is already underway. From renewables and smart meters to apps like KE Live, the modern utility is no longer just a wire-and-pole provider—it's a digital service partner.
Customers today need electricity that adapts to their lifestyle—whether it's battery backup during unconventional hours, or real-time usage insights delivered through mobile platforms. KE has already laid the groundwork with its digitized network, underground infrastructure, and 24/7 digital engagement channels.
Globally, utilities are diversifying — delivering internet through fiber over power lines, offering flexible, time-based supply models, and using AI to manage load and service reliability. KE's model reflects that evolution.
Encouragingly, the Power Division and the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC), are actively driving reforms in this direction, and a future built around deregulation, customer choice, and smarter service is no longer a distant concept—it is within reach. And when it comes, K-Electric is ready—with the infrastructure, digital capability, and vision to thrive in a truly competitive, service-oriented power sector.—Concluded
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
FESCO launches ‘Apna Meter, Apna Reading' programme
FAISALBAD: On the special directives of the Federal Minister for Energy Awais Leghari and Chief Executive Officer FESCO Engr. Muhammad Aamer, Faisalabad Electric Supply Company (FESCO) has launched the 'Apna Meter, Apna Reading' program which is a practical embodiment of the Prime Minister of Pakistan's vision of 'Digital Pakistan', through which transparency, efficiency and accountability are being ensured. In this connection, FESCO spokesman said that "Apna Meter, Apna Reading" is an innovative and revolutionary initiative of the Government of Pakistan. The main objective of this program is to empower electricity consumers to submit their own meter readings. Under this initiative, consumers can submit their own electricity readings through the mobile application "Power Smart App", which will not only increase transparency but also be helpful to eliminate the overbilling, he added. He said that the Power Smart Mobile Application can be downloaded from the Google Play Store (Android) or the App Store (iOS). After registering on the app by entering their consumer ID and other required information, users can use its feature 'Apna Meter Apni Reading' to take a picture of their electricity meter on a specified date and upload it through the app. The image of the customer's meter reading submitted through this app will be given priority over the image of the reading taken in the same billing cycle by the concerned Distribution Company. While the reading sent by the consumers will be considered as final and on the basis of this reading uploaded by the consumers, his monthly electricity bill will be prepared and 'Apna Meter Apni Reading' will also be written on the bill along with a picture. The practical implementation of "Apna Meter Apni Reading" is also helping to reduce overbilling, reading errors, and delay in billing. He further added that this app is very useful for users who are in the protected category, as uploading a photo on their due date of reading will prevent them from being included in the non-protected category. The FESCO administration has appealed to electricity consumers to keep a proper distance from the meter and electricity wires while taking pictures of the meter readings for uploading on app and keep safety rules in mind because safety of consumers is FESCO's top priority. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Has Rs1.71/unit electricity relief vanished?
It was widely expected that the government would continue the Rs1.71 per unit electricity subsidy component—backed by the IMF staff-level agreement, which explicitly cited plans to fund the relief via additional Petroleum Levy collections. Yet, to the surprise of many, the subsidy appears to have quietly disappeared—if not formally withdrawn, then at least absent from the electricity bills issued for July 2025. Recall that the only component explicitly extended into FY26 was the Rs182 billion relief—equivalent to Rs1.71 per unit—for all non-lifeline consumers, financed through the enhanced Petroleum Levy. The government, in its communication with the IMF, had committed to maintaining this limited relief until June 30, 2026. Significant ambiguity now surrounds the fate of this relief and its continuity into FY26. The matter came up during Nepra's recent tariff hearing, but the Ministry of Energy's remarks did little to resolve the uncertainty. In its response, the Ministry noted that the 'average applicable consumer tariff in July 2025 would be lower by around seven rupees compared to July 2024.' While ostensibly reassuring, the phrasing raises more questions than it answers. No assumptions were disclosed, nor was it clarified whether the comparison referred to gross billing or adjustments embedded within the base tariff trajectory. With the Rs1.71 per unit subsidy now seemingly off the table, the month-on-month increase in tariffs for non-lifeline protected consumers—who account for the bulk of domestic electricity consumption—exceeds 30 percent. Previously, under the assumption of subsidy continuity, first and second protected slabs were projected to rise by 11 and 9 percent, respectively. They now stand to increase by 35 and 26 percent, respectively. Among non-protected slabs, effective tariffs for the first three categories are slated to rise by 12, 9, and 8 percent month-on-month. This development implies that effective tariffs in July may be materially higher than assumed—at odds with both prior policy signalling and the inflation projections built on that premise. Whether this reflects a temporary lapse awaiting formal notification, an oversight in tariff design, or a quiet policy reversal is yet to be clarified. What is clear, however, is that this shift—if sustained—has real implications that one hopes the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) appropriately incorporates any change in effective tariffs into its CPI computation, lest the official inflation trajectory miss a key price signal affecting millions.


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Discos' June FCA: FPCCI flags objections and regulatory queries
ISLAMABAD: The Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) has raised formal objections and regulatory queries on FCA of Discos for June 2025. In a letter to Registrar, Nepra, FPPCI said that while the proposed negative adjustment of Rs. 0.6541/kWh may appear consumer-friendly but it grossly under-represents the hidden inefficiencies, persistent opacity, and regulatory shortcomings plaguing the power sector. According to the FPCCI, the actual negative FCA, if inefficiencies were removed, would justifiably fall between Rs2.50/kWh to Rs3.00/kWh. Nepra's own Member (Technical) has consistently flagged major concerns across multiple FCA hearings. Drawing from these issues and recent disclosures-including the Rs. 244 billion overbilling scandal, system losses exceeding Rs. 267 billion, and long-standing unresolved outages- FPCCI has requested that NEPRA, while rejecting the current FCA proposal, seek direct and time-bound explanations from CPPA-G and the Power Division on the following points: (i) when will CPPA-G, ISMO, and NTDC be mandated to submit detailed, verifiable deviation and constraint logs before each FCA hearing, as required under principles of transparency? (ii) Why are completion timelines for key infrastructure-such as the Lahore North Grid, SCADAIII, and restoration of HVDC transmission-still unpublished despite repeated cost impacts due to underutilization and system constraints? (iii) What efforts have been made to resolve the Guddu ST-16 (747 MW) outage persisting since July 2022, and the Neelum-Jhelum Hydropower Plant (969 MW) shutdown since May 2024? What is the current status and who is accountable for the resulting losses exceeding Rs 150 billion? (iv) Why generic ISMO certificates are still being accepted as evidence during FCA hearings, especially when ISMO is not fully operational? Will Nepra now require these to be supported by publicly auditable dispatch data? (v) How does Nepra reconcile system losses at 17.55%-far above the allowed 11.43%-with recovery claims of 96.6%, especially when SEPCO and QESCO report recovery levels of only 25.8% and 38.7% respectively? Has Nepra verified the raw meter data? (vi) What enforcement action has Nepra taken against DISCOs involved in the 2024 and 2025 overbilling scandals? Why is there no public disclosure of disciplinary outcomes? (vii) Why were costly fuels like RLNG (Rs. 21.87/kWh) dispatched in June 2025 despite zero dispatch from HSD and large availability of hydel? Has Nepra reviewed the validity of PLAC claims made under such suboptimal dispatch? Why are Nepra's statutory obligations under Article 19A of the Constitution and Section 7(2)(f) of the NEPRA Act—to ensure public access to data-not being enforced rigorously? (ix) Why have the Service Level Agreements (SLAs) of K-Electric's plants been made publicly available for comments, while the Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) signed by CPPA-G which underpin uniform national tariffs-have never been published for public scrutiny. The FPCCI also asked why the Service Level Agreements (SLAs) of K-Electric's plants are made publicly available for comments, while the actual Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) signed by CPPA on which the entire nation's consumers are charged under the uniform tariff-are never subjected to public scrutiny? 'Is transparency only reserved for Karachi, or do the rest of the country's power contracts not deserve the same accountability?' FPCCI questioned. The association argues that power sector cannot be allowed to continue this selective opacity, systemic overbilling, and absence of accountability while the public pays for inefficiencies it did not cause. 'We urge Nepra to use this FCA proceeding to assert its independence, enforce disclosure, and direct corrective action through binding regulatory orders,' said the FPCCI. The Nepra will hold a public hearing on July 30, 2025 to be attended by the public and private sector. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025