Labor to introduce student debt-slashing bill into parliament
Education Minister Jason Clare introduced the bill on Wednesday - the first of the new parliament.
The proposed relief would cut HECS by 20 per cent for some 3 million graduates, or wipe off $5500 from the average student debt.
The changes would also raise the repayment threshold for student loans from $54,000 to $67,000.
It was central to the Albanese government's youth-focused re-election pitch.
But asked if the Coalition would back it given Labor's federal election landslide, the Opposition Leader on Wednesday would not confirm.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has not confirmed if the Coalition will back Labor's signature student debt-slashing bill. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman
'It's an area where we can be constructive,' Ms Ley told Sky News.
'And I've said we will be constructive where we can.
'That doesn't mean a blank cheque of goodwill for everything that comes across the table from the Labor Party.'
She went on to say it is important not to 'forget that this reduction in HECS debt came for students and young people who are really struggling with rising cost of living'.
'And when I talk to young people now, the first thing they tell me is how they are losing hope of ever getting into a home, and how their rents are skyrocketing,' Ms Ley said.
'I'm really hearing that pain in terms of their escalating bills.
'What we know is that when young people are struggling, that's bad for society, and it's really tough.
'Now the HECS debt, as I said, was a point in time to provide some of that relief, but what we want to do is help young Australians.'
Ms Ley's comments seemed at odds with what her education spokesman Jonno Duniam said just a day earlier.
He said it was 'one of the centrepieces of the government's agenda at the last election and obviously we had a view that was not supported by Australians, so we'll work with them'.
'We have our concerns, they remain,' Senator Duniam said on Tuesday, also speaking to Sky.
'We'll talk about those, but I expect them to pass parliament.'
NewsWire understands the government is confident the opposition will support it.
Labor is about to introduce its signature student debt-slashing bill. Picture: Martin Ollman / NewsWire
Mr Clare introduced the legislation in the House of Representatives, where Labor commands a massive 94-seat majority.
But the Senate is another matter.
With the Greens holding the balance of power, they can effectively pump the brakes on key legislation – something members of the minor party have already said they would do to negotiate their own agenda.
The Greens have said the changes do not go far enough.
'While every bit of student debt relief is good, what the government is doing by wiping some student debt doesn't even touch the sides of the issue,' Greens education spokeswoman Mehreen Faruqi said on Tuesday.
'The core of the problem is indexation.
'Unless indexation is removed, students will be in this hamster wheel always chasing their debts, which keep getting bigger and bigger.'
Greens education spokeswoman Mehreen Faruqi says her party will push for amendments. Picture: Martin Ollman / NewsWire
Before introducing the bill, Mr Clare said on Wednesday there was 'a lot at stake'.
'This was one of the big promises that we made in the election campaign that we would cut the student debt of 3 million Australians by 20 per cent,' he told the ABC.
'This will take the weight off the shoulders of a lot of young people right across the country in particular – at elections young people don't often see themselves on the ballot paper, but they did at this election.
'And they voted for it, in the millions.
'For the average person with a student debt today, this will cut their debt with about ($5500) and so there is a lot at stake there, and I'm hoping that politicians across the parliament will vote for this.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
4 minutes ago
- ABC News
Government backflip on YouTube social media ban is one of Olympic proportions
As any gymnast will tell you, it's not easy landing a backflip, and as any politician will tell you, a political backflip is harder again. It's also less likely that people will applaud you when you land, even if you nail it. The government's announcement this week that YouTube would be included in the teen social media ban is a political backflip of Olympic proportions, and its first since the election. In late April, the then-minister for communications, Michelle Rowland, was still doubling down on her commitment to the company's CEO to do the exact opposite, citing YouTube's educational benefits and community expectations, but little else. A spokesperson for Ms Rowland told the ABC in April the decision "was made in November last year, publicly stated in a media release and reflected in the second reading of the legislation". "That decision has been made and there has been zero reconsideration or communication to suggest otherwise," the spokesperson said. Three months on, the new minister, Annika Wells, is just as resolute that YouTube will in fact be part of the ban, citing strongly worded advice from the eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant in late June. "The eSafety Commissioner's advice was clear," Ms Wells told Question Time in Parliament on Wednesday. "Four out of 10 Australian kids have had their most recent or most harmful experience on YouTube," she said. "On top of that, YouTube uses the same persuasive design features as other social media platforms like infinite scroll… auto-play and algorithmic feeds." Despite the famed difficulty of publicly changing your mind in politics, the government seems to have pulled off the manoeuvre with a surprising amount of grace. It could have been a more awkward landing if their final position was less well supported by the eSafety Commissioner, policy experts, and the well-documented harm being visited upon younger YouTube users. Additionally, the fact Ms Rowland had said so little about her reasons for promising YouTube a carve out in the first place means Labor now finds itself with relatively few words to eat. But no landing is perfect. At their media conference on Wednesday morning, Ms Wells and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese were asked what might be the biggest question of all on social media policy, by a somewhat frustrated Mark Riley from Seven News: "Parents will be hearing this and thinking it's a great thing to limit kids' access to this harmful content, but they'll also be asking, 'why is that harmful content there in the first place?' If any of us in our media organisations were to publish or broadcast this stuff, we'd be straight up in front of ACMA or the courts, justifiably. When will the day come when governments can stop these organisations allowing this stuff to be posted in the first place?" "That's a great question, Mark," Ms Wells began, displaying immaculate technique for the judges. "… and ultimately one for the social media platforms to answer," she continued. Usually, thrusting responsibility solely back into the hands of social media giants is not a bad political instinct. But to do so at a press conference otherwise devoted to "cracking down" on those same companies is a different kind of gymnastics — it's contortion. After all, the teen social media ban depends on the assumption that the government can force social media companies to change their dealings with Australians, and that asking nicely won't achieve the desired result. So when faced with the question: "Why is the harmful content there at all and when will governments intervene?", it was arguably the perfect moment for the new minister to mention the government's own plan, announced in November last year, to implement a Digital Duty of Care on social media companies. The Digital Duty of Care is designed to place an obligation on social media companies themselves to actively prevent foreseeable harms to Australian users of all ages. Launching the policy eight months ago, Ms Rowland described it as "a shift away from reacting to harms…. and moving towards systems-based prevention". It was one of more than 60 recommendations made by Delia Rickard after a year-long statutory review of the Online Safety Act. But unlike the teen social media ban, it has rarely been mentioned in public since it was first announced. The government's reticence on the proposal this year has prompted quiet speculation among policy experts that it would never materialise, but Ms Wells told the ABC the government was still committed to legislating the change. "I'm looking forward to doing more work on it," Ms Wells told 7:30 this week, before adding: "I'm still a new minister". Neither Ms Wells nor her predecessor have given a timeline for implementing the change. The government is also yet to reveal when it will respond to the rest of Delia Rickard's recommendations. As for why the minister opted not to mention the government's own policy when the opportunity came on Wednesday morning, it's worth remembering how tricky these political backflips can be. Bringing up an eight-month-old plan that hasn't visibly progressed since it was first announced comes with its own risks. With a new minister in the portfolio and less than three months before the teen social media ban comes into effect, it might be a while still before the government is eager to broach the topic unprompted.
ABC News
4 minutes ago
- ABC News
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers candidate Carlo Di Falco elected to Tasmanian parliament
Shooters Fishers and Farmers (SFF) party candidate Carlo Di Falco has won the final seat in the Tasmanian electorate of Lyons and will join the state's 35-seat lower house. As the distribution of preferences continued on Friday, ABC chief elections analyst Casey Briggs declared Mr Di Falco had secured the seat. Mr Di Falco, an SFF candidate for Lyons at the last three state elections, is the first from the party to be elected to Tasmanian parliament. The party described its campaign as being "run on the smell of an oily rag", with no paid staff and limited funds. Tasmania's latest election is the fourth in seven years, and happened only 16 months after the last one. It resulted in another hung parliament. The Liberals have won 14 seats, Labor 10, the Greens five, and four independents have been elected, while one seat in the electorate of Bass remains in doubt. Regardless of which major party forms government, they will need support from some or most of the crossbench to form minority government.
News.com.au
4 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Australia escapes Trump tariff hike, secures lowest rate
Australia has escaped a tariff hike to the baseline rate of 10 per cent amid fears that President Trump could double the levy to 20 per cent. President Trump issued an executive order on Thursday night confirming new tariff rates for countries under special deals with world leaders and revised tariffs for other countries. Australia was not on the list of changes, and the executive order states that countries not on the new list would remain at 10 per cent. Australia is one of only a handful of countries in the world that will secure the lowest possible tariff rate of 10 per cent including Britain and Brazil. By contrast, even New Zealand was hit with a surprise hit in the executive order on Friday morning. The White House has revised its list of tariffs for particular countries and New Zealand has been put on a 15 percent base rate, up from the original 10 per cent announced earlier. In a fact sheet released by the White House outlining the decision, officials confirmed that Mr Trump had signed an Executive Order modifying the reciprocal tariff rates for 'certain countries to further address our exploding, annual U.S. goods trade deficits.' 'This decisive action reflects the President's continued efforts to protect the United States against foreign threats to the national security and economy of the United States by securing fair, balanced, and reciprocal trade relationships to benefit American workers, farmers, and manufacturers and to strengthen the United States' defence industrial base,'' the statement says. 'On April 2, President Trump announced an additional 10% tariff on all countries, and for countries with which the United States has large trade deficits, he announced higher additional tariffs individualised to each country, effective April 9. A lot has happened since then. For example: 'Several countries have agreed to, or are on the verge of agreeing to, meaningful trade deals and security agreements with the United States. Some countries, through negotiations, have offered terms that, in the President's judgment, do not sufficiently address the national emergency he declared on April 2. 'Some countries have not negotiated at all with the United States. Based on this additional information and recommendations from senior officials, among other things, the President has determined that it is necessary and appropriate to modify the reciprocal tariff rates for certain countries.' Crucially however, the statement includes the following information with regard to Australia: 'Countries not listed in Annex I will be subject to a 10% tariff.' Australia is not in the Annex I list and as such will retain a 10 per cent tariff - the lowest possible under the new regime. 'President Trump has reset decades of failed trade policy,'' the White House said. 'Today's Order underscores President Trump's commitment to take back America's economic sovereignty by addressing the many non-reciprocal trade relationships that impact foreign relations, threaten our economic and national security, and disadvantage American workers. 'President Trump's bold trade strategy has yielded historic agreements with major trading partners, unlocking unprecedented investments in the United States and expanding market access for American goods. These deals strengthen America's economic and security positions and create opportunities for American workers, farmers, and businesses. 'In a massive deal with the European Union, the EU has agreed to purchase $750 billion in U.S. energy and make new investments of $600 billion in the United States, all by 2028, while accepting a 15% tariff rate. 'Japan has agreed to invest $550 billion in the United States to rebuild and expand core American industries, as well as to further open its own market to U.S. exports, all while paying a baseline 15% tariff rate. 'The United States-United Kingdom trade deal includes billions of dollars of increased market access for American exports. Additional trade deals with Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea, Vietnam, and others will protect our industries, open foreign markets, and encourage foreign investment in American industries. 'President Trump is using tariffs as a necessary and powerful tool to put America First after many years of unsustainable trade deficits that threaten our economy and national security.' Nations strike deals White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt earlier on Friday confirmed that some countries may yet strike a trade agreement before the US deadline. 'We promised that the president would negotiate with countries all around the world to cut tailor-made trade deals depending on those countries' challenges, how badly they've ripped off the United States of America and our manufacturing industry and our workforce in the past,'' Ms Leavitt said. 'And he has done that. Of our 18 major trading partners, two-thirds of those trading partners have a deal. 'I do know foreign leaders are ringing his phone, realising this deadline is a real thing for them tomorrow and they're bringing offers to the table.' Official US data shows that in June 2025 tariff revenues were $US28 billion. That's $43 billion in US dollars and triple the monthly revenues seen in 2024. 'Those revenues will skyrocket even further starting tomorrow when new reciprocal tariff rates take effect,'' Ms Leavitt said. But Australia doesn't pay any of the tariffs. Instead, the new levy is paid by US importers when buying Australian exports. In theory, the tariffs could hurt Australian exports by increasing the price although in practice the trade of beef and aluminium remains strong for now. That could change if the tariff was doubled. 'What we are watching is President Trump rebuilding the greatest economy in the history of the world and turning it – and simultaneously proving the so-called economic experts wrong at every turn,'' White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said. US President slams 'lunatics' Earlier, Mr Trump defended his use of tariffs during his first term in office lauding the tariffs as bringing in significant revenue for the United States. 'In my first term I was fighting lunatics like you who were trying to do things incorrectly. We did do tariffs in the first term and took in billions of dollars but when Covid came, the last thing I was going to do was hit France and Spain and other countries with tariffs,' Mr Trump said. When the tariffs were first announced in April, Australia only received the baseline 10 per cent rate, largely because it buys more from the US than it sells. Some US officials even privately told Australian political leaders that given it was such a good deal that the Prime Minister may not wish to rush a meeting with the US President that could prove volatile and deliver a worse outcome. But while Australian officials had taken solace from the fact Australia was on the lowest possible tariff, Mr Trump then flagged plans to lift the base rate to 'somewhere in the 15 to 20 per cent range'. Mr Trump spruiked the radical trade policy shift on social media, maintaining the huge new taxes on US importers was making the country 'rich.' 'Tariffs are making America GREAT & RICH Again,'' he wrote. 'They were successfully used against the USA for decades and, coupled with really dumb, pathetic, and crooked politicians, we're having a devastating impact on the future, and even the survival, of our country. 'Now the tide has completely turned, and America has successfully countered this onslaught of Tariffs used against it. 'ONE YEAR AGO, AMERICA WAS A DEAD COUNTRY, NOW IT IS THE 'HOTTEST 'COUNTRY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD. CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL! Japan, EU and Thailand strike last minute deals The Trump administration has struck trade agreements with Japan, the European Union, South Korea, Thailand, Pakistan and Cambodia over the last week. Mr Trump set a 10 per cent universal tariff on all countries on April 2. But he's also signalled he's considering a baseline tariff between 15 per cent and 20 per cent for roughly 150 countries, suggesting the initial universal tariff may increase for some or all of those nations. The new retaliatory tariff regime will come into play on August 1. Australia itself does not apply any tariffs on US imports. Tariffs an act of economic self-harm Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the Albanese government had not 'heard differently from the 10 per cent baseline that's been levied on Australia'. 'Obviously, we continue to engage with the Americans on this,' he said. 'These tariff announcements are a moving feast, but our understanding, our expectation is we get the baseline,' Mr Chalmers said. 'We think that the best outcome is zero because these tariffs are an act of economic self-harm. 'We see inflation is going up in the US.'
