Tariff Tracker, July 23: Trump's 3 trade deals with Japan, Philippines, Indonesia
Tuesday (July 22) in particular was eventful, with President Donald Trump announcing that the US had concluded trade deals with two countries – Japan and the Philippines.
Thus far, the US has announced trade deals with the UK and Indonesia, and committed to a tariff de-escalation with China. Further details are awaited on the announced trade deal with Vietnam.
Donald Trump on Tuesday announced that he had reached a 'massive trade deal' with Japan, which will impose 15% tariffs on Japanese imports into the US and see Japan invest $550 billion in the US. Trump had announced 24% 'reciprocal' tariffs on Japan, in addition to the 10% baseline for all countries, on April 2, which he had called Liberation Day.
'I just signed the largest trade deal in history – I think maybe the largest deal in history – with Japan,' Trump said at an event at the White House on Tuesday after announcing the deal on social media. 'And that was done with Japan. They had their top people here and we worked on it long and hard and it's a great deal for everybody.'
Trump also said that Japan would 'open' its markets to American cars and rice, which had been a point of contention during the negotiations. According to a Bloomberg report, US trade negotiators had pressed upon trading partners, including Japan, to accept cars complying with US federal motor vehicle safety standards, instead of subjecting them to different requirements.
The Japanese delegation had long sought a reduction in tariffs from the 24% duty declared by Trump among his country-specific 'reciprocal' tariffs on Liberation Day, but the talks were derailed by the separate 25% duty on automobiles. According to Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Japan's auto tariffs – part of a separate tariff schedule – would also be reduced to 15% from 25%, without any import quota, the Financial Times reported.
US goods trade with Japan was valued at $227.9 billion in 2024, according to US Trade Representative data. Notably, the Japanese automotive sector has been a vital part of its $63 billion trade surplus with the US.
Trump also announced a US-Japan joint venture in Alaska on liquefied natural gas, which The New York Times has identified as a $44 billion plan called Alaska LNG, aiming to ship natural gas from Alaska to buyers in Asia.
Notably, the trade deal announcement came a day after Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party lost its majority in the upper house of the parliament. However, the Prime Minister told reporters on Wednesday (July 23) that he would remain in the post to prevent 'political instability' ahead of the August 1 tariff deadline.
Earlier in the day, Trump announced a trade deal with the Philippines after meeting its president, Ferdinand Marcos Jr.
'The Philippines is going OPEN MARKET with the United States, and ZERO Tariffs. The Philippines will pay a 19% Tariff. In addition, we will work together Militarily,' Trump wrote in a social media post.
Marcos reportedly confirmed the suspension of tariffs on American automobiles, as well as increased imports of soybeans, wheat and pharma products from the US, according to Filipino newspaper The Inquirer. However, it is presently unclear if the latter three are exempt from Filipino tariffs. Earlier, the Philippines had said that it would not be able to offer the US a zero tariff because it would hurt domestic businesses.
The 19% duty is higher than the 17% reciprocal tariffs Trump originally imposed on the country in April. Earlier this month, however, Trump threatened to raise this duty to 20% from August 1. Marcos sought to portray the 1% reduction in the tariff rate as a win for the country.
'When we arrived in Washington, tariff rates were 20%. So why they came up from 17% to 20% is an internal matter with the United States government,' he said. 'We tried very hard to see what we can do and we managed a 1 [percentage point] decrease in tariff rates.'
In 2024, the two countries had a total goods trade of $23.5 billion, according to USTR data, with the US trade deficit valued at $4.9 billion in 2024, a 21.8% increase ($873.3 million) over the previous year. Data from the Philippines Statistics Authority indicated that the US accounted for 16.6% of its exports in 2024.
While the US entered into a trade deal with Indonesia last week, the details of the agreement were revealed in a joint statement between the two nations published Tuesday.
'Indonesia will be Open Market to American Industrial and Tech Products, and Agricultural Goods, by eliminating 99% of their Tariff Barriers,' Trump wrote in a social media post.
Indonesia will remove 99% of its current tariffs on a range of industrial and agrifood products from the US, and eliminate all non-tariff barriers to US goods. Under the agreement, Indonesia would also stop taxing data flows that American tech companies rely on and eliminating taxes on digital service revenue, such as advertising on streaming and social media sites, and 'pre-shipment inspection or verification requirements' on American goods, CNN reported.
Indonesia has also agreed to accept US Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and remove export restrictions on critical minerals.
The US, on the other hand, will charge 19% tariffs on Indonesian imports, a decline from the 32% duty Trump had originally threatened. The agreement thus mirrors the deal with the Philippines, with the Trump administration anticipating that the lack of trade barriers would result in $50 billion in additional market access to US goods.
In 2024, the US-Indonesia goods trade was valued at $38.3 billion, with the US incurring a trade deficit of $17.9 billion, a 5.4% increase over the previous year.
The US will also identify those products which are not naturally available or cannot be domestically produced in the US for a further tariff rate cut.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
8 minutes ago
- First Post
'If her name or complexion bothers you...': Ohio SG Mathura Sridharan trolled, AG claps back to troll
Indian-origin jurist Mathura Sridharan received racist backlash from online trolls after she was appointed as Ohio's 12th solicitor general. Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost hits back at the troll by issuing a lengthy statement on the matter read more Mathura Sridharan was trolled for her Indian-origin after her name was announced as Ohio's Solicitor General. LinkedIn Indian-origin Mathura Sridharan was appointed as Ohio's 12th solicitor general. However, her feat garnered wrath online with trolls questioning why a 'non-US-origin' person was picked for the post. Soon after her appointment, Sridharan's LinkedIn went viral with critics questioning her credibility. All this prompted Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost to issue a clarification, slamming the troll for ignorance. Yost, who appointed Mathura for the post, said that she is wrongly being portrayed as a non-American. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'A few commenters have asserted incorrectly that Mathura is not American. She is a United States citizen, married to a US citizen, and the child of naturalised US citizens,' he said. 'If her name or her complexion bothers you, the problem is not with her or her appointment,' Yost said in a statement. 'Mathura is brilliant… she won her argument at SCOTUS last year. Both the SGs she worked under (Flowers & Gaiser) recommended her. I told her when I originally hired her that I needed her to argue with me. She does… All the time! Excited to promote her. She will serve Ohio well,' he added. Trolls question her religious identity However, Yost's take on the matter was also met with trolling as people pointed out that she is not 'American-American', with some even questioning her religious identity. 'Is she a Christian? That's the biggest factor that concerns me. Based on the bindi on her forehead, I worry she is not,' one user wrote online. 'Another American job… given away to foreigners,' another wrote. 'She's Indian. They all have a loyalty first to other Indians. Horrible pick. Un-American. The GOP is pathetic,' a third user exclaimed. When it comes to Mathura's career, before joining the Ohio Solicitor's Office, Mathura clerked for Judge Steven J. Menashi of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Judge Deborah A. Batts of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. She holds a Juris Doctorate from the New York University School of Law, a Master's Degree in Electrical Engineering & Computer Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, as well as a Bachelor's Degree in Economics and Electrical Engineering & Computer Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Time of India
8 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's America First biodiesel policy could cost US companies, consumers, trade groups warn
The Trump administration's push to discourage the use of foreign feedstocks in domestic biodiesel could lead to higher energy prices for US consumers and restricted domestic production, according to some refining and biofuel trade groups. The warning reflects ongoing friction between President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency and the administration's traditional allies in the energy and agriculture industries over biofuels policy. Trump has promised to slash consumer energy costs , but is also trying to advance his America First agenda to support domestic production through trade protectionism - which can often make costs go up instead. At issue is a proposal from the EPA in June that would for the first time allocate only half as many tradable renewable fuel credits to biodiesel that is either imported or made with foreign feedstocks. Under the Renewable Fuel Standard, refiners must blend large volumes of biofuels into the US fuel supply or purchase the credits, called RINs, from those that do. While meant to help domestic farmers and producers, the new proposal - set to be finalized this autumn - would place unprecedented demand on domestic raw materials needed to make biodiesel like soybean oil, used cooking oil, and animal fat, in a market that currently must look abroad to meet its needs. Meanwhile, restricting the number of RINs that can be generated through such imports will raise credit prices, with a potential spillover impact on diesel and home heating oil, according to the industry groups. "This credit restriction ... will jeopardize the economic viability of renewable fuel production assets and raise overall compliance costs for all obligated parties, which ultimately harms US consumers," Chet Thompson, head of the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers group representing refiners, said in a July 25 letter to top Republican lawmakers. The Advanced Biofuels Association also said the policy could mean ramped up consumer costs, by putting a $250 per metric ton premium on domestic versus imported feedstocks, according to a study it commissioned. "Economic analysis shows this would impose significant costs on US biorefineries, raise fuel prices for millions of Americans, and benefit only a narrow set of stakeholders," ABFA President Michael McAdams said in a statement. The White House and EPA declined to comment directly on the price concerns, saying the administration is still seeking public comment on the proposal until August 8. Others in the biofuel industry backed the proposal. "American farmers need all the demand they can get. We should be developing our capacity here, rather than relying on imported used cooking oil from China, or giving Brazilian feedstocks preferential treatment at the expense of US producers and their farm partners," said Emily Skor, CEO of Growth Energy. However, US companies such as ADM, Bunge and Cargill that have global assets and process US soy, as well as foreign companies with significant US operations, will likely see negative effects. That includes Australia's Nufarm , which contracts with farmers in South America to grow new oilseed crops. Uncertain numbers The biofuel industry had not been seeking the import shift in EPA's June proposal, according to multiple renewable fuel lobbyists and company officials. The White House has since held several meetings with industry officials to hear about potential unintended consequences of the changes, according to multiple sources. The EPA's proposal in June was meant to set out biofuel blending mandates for the next two years. It included a quota of 7.12 billion biomass-based diesel RINs for 2026 - a measurement of the number of tradable credits generated by blending the fuel - and projected that mandate would lead to the blending of 5.61 billion gallons. The biofuels industry and the American Petroleum Institute, an oil trade group, had banded together to lobby the administration to set biomass-based diesel mandates to at least 5.25 billion gallons. The mandate was just 3.35 billion gallons in 2025. Still, there are scenarios in the EPA's accounting that could lead to a lower volume outcome. If all the biodiesel and renewable diesel used in the US next year came from domestic feedstocks, for example, the RIN mandate would yield just 4.45 billion gallons, according to several industry analyses reviewed by Reuters. Ditching the penalty on imported feedstocks could help raise that number, according to the analyses. "That probably aligns with what the administration was trying to do in terms of supporting the agricultural side and farmers," said one industry analyst, who asked to remain anonymous to speak candidly.
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Guns, Jeans, and Republican: How Syndey Sweeney became MAGA's new muse – and a Conservative icon
In the first of the Republican National Conservative debates, when Trump steadfastly refused to participate to show Fox who was the man, his surrogate attack dog summed up the inflection point that was about to overshadow America: 'You want to be a rebel? You want to be a hippie? You want to 'stick it to the man'? Show up on your college campus and try calling yourself a conservative. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now ' It's true. Being liberal used to be an act of rebellion. But that rebellion became mainstream, corporatised, and institutionalised. It now lives on as HR slideshows, Twitter mobs, and avocado ad campaigns. Being young and Republican in 2025 is an act of defiance. And today's protestants become tomorrow's mainstream—evidenced by the fact that there are now more young people who identify as Republican than Democrat in America. It's not clear when the Left lost the youth. Perhaps it was the cascade of madness: the woke craze of pushing trans behaviour in grammar schools. Demanding biological males be allowed to play in women's sports. Saying illegal immigrants should have unfettered access to welfare. Shouting 'Defund the Police' while shoplifting turned into organised retail looting. Declaring obesity a form of body positivity. Telling working-class white kids that their skin colour was an inherited sin. Declaring that whiteness ought to be apologised for. Slowly, the country shifted. Not by campaign ads or policy briefings—but by exhaustion. And as America began tuning out the moral lectures from elites, late-night comedians, and Hollywood, a new icon quietly emerged. Not a pundit. Not a senator. Not a firebrand. A muse. . In an era where even a sneeze can be interpreted as a political statement, Sydney Sweeney has become the conservative darling of the year—without attending a single rally or issuing a single press release. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The star of Euphoria and The White Lotus has, quite by accident, become a MAGA icon. All it took was a leaked Republican voter registration, a denim ad campaign misread as a white supremacist dog whistle, and a shooting range video that could've doubled as NRA propaganda. Welcome to 2025, where political identity is crafted less by what you say, and more by which side claims you. The Republican Registration That Launched a Thousand Memes It recently emerged that That was it. She didn't make a political speech. She didn't wear a MAGA hat. She didn't retweet Ben Shapiro. All she did was file the correct paperwork, and the internet found it. Her name. Her address. Her party. Suddenly, the Right had its new pin-up girl. The Left had a meltdown. For conservatives, this was a cultural coup. A beautiful, talented Hollywood starlet—young, blonde, wildly popular—was officially red. Not pink. Not centrist. Red. And best of all? She wasn't saying sorry for it. The silence was glorious. No apology tour. No clarifying tweet. No 'I was hacked' statement. Liberals demanded answers. Progressives called it a betrayal. But Sydney Sweeney didn't flinch. And in an age where even Instagram captions are pored over for political subtext, saying nothing is a weapon. 'Great Jeans' and the Eugenics Panic of Summer 2025 Then came the American Eagle campaign. Sydney Sweeney, in tight denim and a tank top, staring into the camera under the caption: 'Great Genes.' That's it. That's the ad. Within hours, the internet exploded. Not because of the fashion. Not because of the cut. But because of the word: 'genes.' Not jeans. Genes. The Left read it as a eugenics dog whistle. A blonde-haired, blue-eyed woman fronting a brand with a tagline that sounded suspiciously like white supremacy. Satirical Twitter lit up: 'This is Leni Riefenstahl for Gen Z.' 'Are they selling pants or the master race?' But the Right? The Right cackled. This was proof. Proof that the outrage industry had gone too far. That even a pun could be labelled fascist. That Sydney Sweeney, just by existing in her natural body and not issuing trigger warnings, was now enemy number one. American Eagle didn't back down. Sales spiked. The controversy became the campaign. Sydney didn't write the tagline. She was just the face. But once again, the narrative moved around her. She became the accidental symbol of conservative resistance to liberal hysteria. Shooting Range Superstar: From HBO to the NRA And then the final seal was pressed: the shooting range video. Sydney, in casualwear and earmuffs, loading a Glock like she was born in Fort Benning. First-time shooter? Didn't look like it. Her stance, her focus, her shot grouping—it was enough to make half of Republican Twitter swoon. Clips went viral: 'Sydney Sweeney: America's New Annie Oakley .' .' 'She can shoot AND act? Wife me.' 'Meanwhile your favourite liberal thinks Nerf is a hate crime.' The symbolism was perfect. A young woman in Hollywood, not just pretending to shoot in a Netflix movie—but actually firing rounds at a paper target, calmly, confidently. No virtue signalling. No trembling hands. Just recoil and resolve. The Right didn't need words. The imagery was enough. Mainstream Republicans quickly rallied behind Sydney Sweeney. Vice President JD Vance criticised Democrats for 'calling everyone who thinks Sydney Sweeney beautiful a Nazi,' saying it showed how out of touch the party had become with young voters. Senator Ted Cruz also weighed in, posting on X: 'Wow. Now the crazy Left has come out against beautiful women. I'm sure that will poll well. ' Inside the White House, officials saw the controversy as a win, saying it helped highlight what they view as liberal overreach and cultural policing. For many Republicans, Sweeney's party registration wasn't just a detail—it was confirmation that the culture war was breaking their way. The Power of Saying Nothing What makes Sydney Sweeney such a potent figure is precisely her ambiguity. She doesn't tweet about taxes. She doesn't complain about feminism. She doesn't post 'I Voted' stickers or abortion fundraisers. She doesn't do red carpet activism. And in 2025, that absence speaks louder than any hashtag. Hollywood thrives on performative wokeness. Stars compete to signal their virtue—whether it's climate guilt on private jets or apologies for being cast as straight characters. Sydney Sweeney has opted out. That, to a large chunk of America, makes her radical. Because silence is now seen as alignment. Refusing to bend the knee is tantamount to opposition. And that's why both sides are fighting to frame her. To liberals, she's naive at best, complicit at worst. To conservatives, she's a unicorn: the apolitical star who still represents everything they believe in—beauty, freedom, guns, and denim. The Post-Woke Celebrity Archetype What Sydney Sweeney represents is something new: the post-woke Hollywood icon. Not a right-wing activist. Not a left-wing darling. But someone who has managed to float above the trench warfare. This new archetype is defined by: Ambiguity over affirmation Style over slogans Presence over preaching She's not talking about CRT, climate change, or colonialism. She's talking about her dog. Or her workout. Or her skincare routine. And yet, her silence makes her subversive. She isn't against the Left in any direct sense. She's just not of it. And that distinction matters. Why MAGA Can't Stop Posting Her There's a reason conservative media can't get enough of her: She's young. The GOP's problem has always been youth appeal. Sydney solves that. She's beautiful. Liberal feminists would call that 'problematic.' The Right calls it reality. She's talented. Awards, praise, and prestige roles, all without being preachy. She's silent. No need to cancel. No need to apologise. No moral panic. Just vibes. In other words, she's the anti-Lena Dunham. The anti-Alyssa Milano. The anti-everything that drove red-state Americans away from Hollywood. The Culture War's Most Valuable Pawn Sydney Sweeney didn't ask to be drafted into the culture war. She just voted. Then modelled. Then fired a gun. But in the content economy, you don't get to choose how you're used. She became a screen onto which America projected its anxieties and aspirations. And the fact that she never pushed back made her more powerful. The Right turned her into a meme. The Left turned her into a warning. And Sydney? Sydney went back to work. To movies. To photo shoots. To her life. That may be the most radical thing of all. The Mirror, Not the Mouthpiece Sydney Sweeney is not giving speeches. She's not asking for your vote. She's not applying to be the next Kayleigh McEnany. She is simply existing. But in 2025, that's all it takes. She is a mirror—reflecting everything America wants to believe, or fears to acknowledge. To the Right, she's the proof that Hollywood doesn't own the narrative. To the Left, she's a reminder that silence can be resistance too. And in a country where every movie, every tweet, every ad campaign becomes a battleground, Sydney Sweeney has done the unthinkable. She said nothing. And everyone heard it.
