S&P, Nasdaq futures edge up amid earnings, UnitedHealth pressures Dow
At 06:50 a.m. ET, S&P 500 E-minis were up 17.75 points, or 0.28%, and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were up 110.75 points, or 0.47%.
Dow E-minis rose 0.04%, but the gains were capped as healthcare conglomerate UnitedHealth dropped 4.7% in premarket trading following a disappointing profit forecast.
Meanwhile, out of 168 S&P 500 companies that have reported, nearly 80% have beaten earnings expectations, according to Friday's LSEG data. But caution lingers, as some of Wall Street's giants feel the sting of U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs.
United Parcel Service became the latest victim of the tariffs, falling 4% after the delivery company reported lower-than-expected second-quarter profit.
On Monday, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq scored fresh record closes amid volatile trading, buoyed by a U.S.-EU trade deal that halved tariffs to 15% and stoked hopes of further global agreements ahead of Trump's looming August 1 deadline.
The President has also floated a potential "world tariff" of 15-20% for non-negotiating countries.
U.S. and Chinese officials on Tuesday kicked off a second day of high-stakes talks in Stockholm, aiming to cool tensions and avert a deepening trade war between the world's two largest economies. Negotiators are eyeing a possible 90-day extension to the fragile tariff truce brokered in May.
Earnings from tech heavyweights Meta, Microsoft , Amazon and Apple are scheduled for later this week, which could test Wall Street's record run.
"The easiest gains (on Wall St) have now happened, and any further rise is likely to happen much more slowly," said Thomas Mathews, head of Markets at Capital Economics.
"The narrowness of the rally means it may depend especially heavily on "big tech" profit results continuing to paint a positive picture."
Spotify tumbled 6.5% after the company forecast third-quarter profit below estimates.
The U.S. central bank is set to begin its two-day policy meeting later in the day. While the Fed is expected to leave rates unchanged on Wednesday, traders will closely analyze policymakers' remarks to gauge the timing of future moves.
According to the CME FedWatch tool, markets are pricing in a 61.7% chance of a rate cut in September.
The meetings come amid the White House's campaign on the central bank to lower borrowing costs, including Trump's persistent criticism of Fed Chair Jerome Powell and occasional suggestions to remove him from his position.
Investors are now focused on the latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) and consumer confidence reports for more clues on the U.S. economy, which continues to show signs of labor market strength—even as some inflationary pressures from tariffs begin to surface.
Analysts urge patience, as they await more data before sounding any alarms.
Among other earnings-related moves, Cadence Design jumped 7.7% in premarket trading after the chip design software provider raised its annual sales and profit forecast.
(Reporting by Nikhil Sharma and Pranav Kashyap in Bengaluru; Editing by Shinjini Ganguli)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
Narendra Modi's Moment Of Truth Has Arrived After Eleven Years Of Rule
By Nitya Chakraborty It is not a cliché to say that our powerful Prime Minister Narendra Modi's moment truth has arrived after 11 years of ruling the country as the unchallenged leader. The 25 per cent tariff hike on Indian exports announced by the United States President Donald Trump on Wednesday and taking effect from Friday, August 1 is not just a trade decision, it has much more to do with the maverick President's fresh approach to his once good friend Modi, his tariff being used as the driver of the geopolitics and the establishment of the Trump doctrine that those who are not with us are against us. For Narendra Modi, the state of India- US relations has never been at such a lower level during his PM tenure beginning 2014. Trump, known for his feisty ways, continuous changing stands and always exaggerating his role, has hurled maximum insult to India and to his dear friend Narendra Modi who did everything to please Trump during his first term as also in the second non-consecutive term beginning January 20 this year. Trump was adamant in insulting Modi after the Prime Minister without naming Trump declared in Lok Sabha during Operation Sindoor debate on Tuesday that no foreign leader played any role in the ceasefire between India and Pakistan decided by the two countries on May 10. The next day, Trump again repeated that He took the main role in precipitating ceasefire between India and Pakistan. This was the 30th time, he repeated the same thing. Before Trump, other US leaders also worked from behind in organizing the end of hostilities between the two countries. For instance, the then President Clinton made serious efforts in ending the Kargil war in 1999, but he never claimed any credit for this. Trump is different, He thinks that nothing in global diplomacy moves without him. The decision on India regarding the high tariff was a result of his personal ego also vis a vis Narendra Modi. The US President was looking for total surrender in trade talks, but Narendra Modi could not afford that on the agricultural products sector, especially milk and dairy. Here Modi's state interests are highly involved. The dairy and milk industry is the key to the growth of Gujarat and lakhs of farmers form the supporting base of BJP. Prime Minister as a BJP leader could not afford to compromise the economic interest of his party's supporting base.. The trade talks are still dragging on. Now after this 25 per cent tariff hike on Indian exports, if Indian officials at the instance of the PM change their stand agreeing to the diktat of the US, there might be a deal facilitating the process of lowering the tariff rate from 25 per cent. Further, Trump's threat to impose penalty as high as 100 per cent on India for imports from Russia poses a real threat to the balance of payment state of the country since in the last two years, the cheap crude imports from Russia saved a huge amount of foreign exchange helping the government to tame inflation. Now, it is to be seen whether the Prime Minister musters enough courage to continue with the cheap Russian crude oil imports or starts the process of diversifying the imports though the price will be higher and more foreign exchange will be required. In this Russian oil context, Trump has used the undiplomatic language by saying that let both the dead Russian and Indian economies go down. This comes from a sort of hate syndrome because this is untrue. India is not a dead economy. The economy is growing but there are problems of distributive justice and unemployment. Some of the policies are flawed needing course correction, but in global context, India stands out. Rahul Gandhi through his support to Trump on this dead economy issue has only brought disrepute to the Congress Party. Somebody senior with knowledge of economics must properly guide the Leader of the Opposition. Otherwise, he will not only create problems for the Congress but also harm the cause of INDIA bloc. Narendra Modi is certainly on a backfoot but if he is compelled by circumstances to defy Trump and fight him, the opposition should support him. Narendra Modi is not India, so supporting Indian cause does not mean strengthening Modi What is most discomforting for India is that India the Prime Minister of which country is considered as the closest among the heads of South Asian nations to the US President, has been charged the maximum tariff rate of 25 per cent. As against India, Pakistan has been charged 19 per cent, Sri Lanka 20 per cent, Bangladesh 20 per cent and Afghanistan 15 per cent. Bangladesh was originally charged 37 per cent, but in the final list, it was charged 20 per cent-17 per cent less. Similarly Pakistan's original rate was much higher compared to the present 20 percent. Another important development is to be noted. Trump concluded a deal with Pakistan in a hurry on oil exploration just to spite India. In Pak media, there was no indication of this, nobody knows where are such big reserves and whether those are really worthy of exploration and development. But Trump quipped by saying that perhaps Pakistan would one day sell oil to India. To be frank, India has not much leverage in the present trade negotiations with the US. US is very adamant on their access to Indian market in agri products, especially dairy. There are historical reasons. US farmers have a strong lobby in the Congress and the White House. The farmer organization leaders decide the fate of the government. This writer was present at the World Trade Organisation ministerial meeting in December 1999 at Seattle in US President was then Bill Clinton. The meeting collapsed without any declaration as the US and the European Union fought over farmers subsidy issue and no side was ready for a compromise. Clinton was virtually mobbed by the EU negotiators after his address to persuade the US team members to compromise. But Clinton did not listen. American journalists covering the WTO meeting told me at that time that no US President can win elections by antagonizing the farmers who are most subsidized in US through different schemes though the US government officially denies that in WTO which was active then. The US media people told me after the collapse that the US failed to get its proposal favouring the farmers passed. This will have big impact in the elections next year against the Democrats. Actually, in 2020 presidential elections, the Republican George Bush won and the Democratic Party lost. So Trump also is committed to help his supporting base among the farmers by getting them bigger access to the Indian market of agri products. Narendra Modi must have taken note of this but he has also the same stake in defending his own party base. Now, what is the emerging scenario? There are two possibilities.. First, through back channel discussions at the level of our PMO and the Trump office, a sort of compromise trade deal is concluded meeting a part of demands of the US side and the PM camp projecting it as a big victory. If that is not possible and the talks collapse, Prime Minister will be facing big choice. He will be attending the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meeting in China on August 31 and September 1.. President Xi Jinping and President Putin will be attending. PM can calibrate his foreign policy and take a more independent stand vis a vis USA. For the second option, Prime Minister will have to decide immediately on India's stand on QUAD which has four members USA, India, Australia and Japan. India is the host of the summit in 2025. Trump is scheduled to visit India during the summit later this year. If the India-US relations continue this way and Trump's hostile attitude remains, what will be the impact of this on Narendra Modi and his tackling of QUAD summit?- That is a major issue.. Trump has attacked BRICS members. India is a member of BRICS. How is our Prime Minister going to react to that? All these are relevant issues which the PM will have to deal with. For Narendra Modi and the BJP, the best possible scenario will be the first one. If back channel negotiations lead to an understanding between Trump and Modi, Indian Prime Minister will be back again trying to get back his old form and talking of strategic autonomy. Then they will cohabit again for some time at least. (IPA Service)
Zawya
5 hours ago
- Zawya
Ambassador Gao Wenqi Attends the Working Meeting between Leaders of Export-Import Bank of China and Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning of Rwanda
AFRICA On July 31, Ambassador Gao Wenqi attended the working meeting betweenYang Dongning, Vice Governor of Export-Import Bank of China and Hon. Yusuf MURANGWA, Minister of Finance and Economic Planning of Rwanda. Both sides exchanged views on promoting the trade, economic and financial cooperation between China and Rwanda. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Embassy of the People's Republic of China in the Republic of Rwanda. Disclaimer: The contents of this press release was provided from an external third party provider. This website is not responsible for, and does not control, such external content. This content is provided on an 'as is' and 'as available' basis and has not been edited in any way. Neither this website nor our affiliates guarantee the accuracy of or endorse the views or opinions expressed in this press release. The press release is provided for informational purposes only. The content does not provide tax, legal or investment advice or opinion regarding the suitability, value or profitability of any particular security, portfolio or investment strategy. Neither this website nor our affiliates shall be liable for any errors or inaccuracies in the content, or for any actions taken by you in reliance thereon. You expressly agree that your use of the information within this article is at your sole risk. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, this website, its parent company, its subsidiaries, its affiliates and the respective shareholders, directors, officers, employees, agents, advertisers, content providers and licensors will not be liable (jointly or severally) to you for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, incidental, punitive or exemplary damages, including without limitation, lost profits, lost savings and lost revenues, whether in negligence, tort, contract or any other theory of liability, even if the parties have been advised of the possibility or could have foreseen any such damages. © ZAWYA 2025
The National
5 hours ago
- The National
AI chip smuggling 'gets more airtime than it should', White House official says
The idea of high-performance AI chips being smuggled into potentially nefarious hands gets more attention than it should, a White House official has said. Michael Kratsios, who serves as director for the Trump administration's Office of Science and Technology Policy, said on Wednesday that there are a lot of misconceptions and misguided fears about the 'physical diffusion' of artificial intelligence technology developed by the US. 'We're not talking about like a bag of diamonds or something,' he said during a discussion at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies think tank about Mr Trump's recently announced AI Action Plan. Some politicians have expressed concerns about the potential for recently announced US AI partnerships overseas to be exploited by countries like China to try to acquire powerful American-made technology. 'These are like massive racks that are tonnes in weight and you're not going to put it on a forklift or back it into a truck, or something," he explained, adding that the idea of chip smuggling "probably gets more airtime than it should." Mr Kratsios also said the hypothetical scenario of the US partnerships with other countries leading to the misuse of data centres by countries like China for 'training runs' to access the centres was overblown. 'What you're most worried about is large-scale runs that are for training sophisticated models and those are actually pretty easy to flag,' he said, adding that the US will make sure to implement what's known in IT circles as Know Your Customer policies to prevent bad actors from gaining access to data centres powered by US technology. Mr Kratsios said that Mr Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, put too many chip export restrictions on allies, and that the export of US technology to countries with peaceful AI aspirations was critical to an overall AI strategy. During Mr Trump's visit to the Gulf in May, he announced the US-UAE AI Acceleration Partnership framework that will eventually lead to the construction of a 5GW UAE-US AI Campus in Abu Dhabi. 'The [Biden administration] limits made no sense at all,' he said, referring to President Biden's policies aimed at limiting the powerful CPUs and GPUs available to certain countries. Those policies were largely aimed at preventing the diffusion of US technology to China. It proved controversial, with companies like Microsoft and Nvidia claiming the policies hurt US efforts more than helping. Some US AI companies like Anthropic, however, have sought to keep the export controls. 'In some cases, smugglers have employed creative methods to circumvent export controls, including hiding processors in prosthetic baby bumps and packing GPUs [graphics processing units] alongside live lobsters,' read an April policy letter from Anthropic. That letter later came under criticism over what some called the oversimplification of how AI data centres work. Regardless, in keeping with that theme of reversing the Biden export policy, the Trump White House recently announced plans that would allow for Nvidia to resume sales of its H20 graphics processing unit to China. That decision, however, has come under criticism from several technology analysts and politicians. A group of Democratic senators this week sent a letter to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick urging him to reverse course. At the CSIS event, Mr Kratsios said the concerns from Democratic senators were oversimplified, adding that the H20 was designed to comply with US concerns about giving China too much computing power, among other things. 'It's not a free-for-all sale,' he said, referring to White House's H20 announcement. 'Any sale that Nvidia wants to make to China is one that's going to require an export licence.' Mr Kratsios added that the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security would be evaluating each of those licence applications and 'weight the costs' before giving Nvidia approval.
