
EU Renewables surge, but millions still struggle to heat homes
According to Eurostat data for 2023, the EU used 4.1 per cent less energy compared to 2022, and nearly 12 per cent less than in 2013 – a clear reflection of the bloc's long-term downward trend in energy use.
Oil remains the dominant source, followed by natural gas.
While oil consumption edged up slightly, natural gas usage dropped significantly, largely as a result of the war in Ukraine and efforts to diversify supply.
Solid fossil fuel use also declined, while renewables continued to expand steadily. Nuclear power and waste played a comparatively smaller role in the energy mix. STATISTIC 1
In its 2023 analysis of the EU electricity sector, global energy think tank Ember confirmed that wind, hydro and solar have become the most prominent energy sources, ahead of bioenergy and others. STATISTIC 2
The bloc's four largest economies – Germany (19 per cent), France (17 per cent), Italy (12 per cent) and Spain (9.5 per cent) – together accounted for 58 per cent of electricity demand, Ember noted. STATISTIC 3
On a per capita basis, Finland and Sweden led the top ten consumers, a trend attributed to colder climates, high levels of development and greater electrification. STATISTIC 4
Less is more
Since 2005, the EU has made greater progress in cutting primary energy consumption than final energy use, thanks to renewables uptake, energy-efficient technologies, shifts away from energy-intensive industries, and warmer winters linked to climate change.
Data from the European Environment Agency show most member states reduced energy use between 2005 and 2023. Greece recorded the steepest decline in both primary and final energy use, while Poland and Malta saw increases.
Between 2022 and 2023, Bulgaria and Estonia posted the largest drops in primary energy consumption, with Slovenia and Austria leading reductions in final energy use. STATISTIC 5
Reducing energy consumption not only lowers emissions and pollution but also improves public health and reduces the bloc's dependence on energy imports.
The EU has set binding energy consumption targets for 2030: 992.5 million tonnes of oil equivalent for primary energy, and 763 million tonnes for final energy.
Although long-term projections suggest the bloc is not yet on track, the consistent reductions over the past three years are encouraging.
Energy poverty deepens
In 2023, transport accounted for the largest share of final energy use (32 per cent), followed by households and industry. While household and industrial consumption has generally declined, transport usage remains volatile. STATISTIC 6
Despite its falling share, the household sector continues to reflect stark inequality. In 2023, the number of Europeans unable to adequately heat their homes reached its highest level since 2021 – a troubling signal of rising energy poverty. STATISTIC 7
Eurostat data for 2024 show that 32 per cent of households in Greece reported being in arrears on utility bills due to financial difficulties, well above the EU average of 6.9 per cent. The Netherlands recorded the lowest share at 1.9 per cent. STATISTIC 8
The 'high share of energy expenditure in income' (2M) – which flags households spending over twice the median share of income on energy – also reveals uneven levels of hardship.
While countries like Estonia and Hungary report figures slightly above 10 per cent, Greece stands out again with a rate exceeding 28 per cent. The EU average is 8.2 per cent.
These disparities expose the disproportionate burden placed on low-income households, particularly homeowners, and highlight the need for targeted policy interventions sensitive to national contexts and price dynamics. STATISTIC 9
Poor housing conditions further compound the issue. In 2023, 15.5 per cent of the EU population lived in homes affected by structural problems such as leaking roofs or damp walls – the highest rates were found in Cyprus (31.6 per cent), Portugal (29 per cent), and Spain (23 per cent), compared to just 4.8 per cent in Sweden. STATISTIC 10 Towards a fairer future
As EU energy policies evolve, fairness and equity are gaining prominence. In a recent ECPR article, researcher Morgiane Noel highlights reforms aimed at addressing energy poverty through legislative and financial mechanisms.
Updates to the Energy Efficiency Directive mandate that a proportion of energy savings must directly benefit low-income households. These changes are expected to enhance data collection, target building renovations, and deliver financial support for energy efficiency improvements.
Meanwhile, the Social Climate Fund, launched in 2021, is designed to offer direct financial assistance – such as bill subsidies – and promote green jobs for workers transitioning from fossil fuel sectors.
But the expert warns that without a cohesive EU strategy, these efforts risk falling short. This means greater coordination, increased investment, and support for innovative initiatives such as community energy projects, smart grid technologies, and new financing instruments.
Ensuring universal access to clean, affordable energy is not only a matter of policy – it is a question of justice. If implemented effectively, current measures could significantly reduce poverty and inequality while putting Europe firmly on the path to a greener, fairer energy future.
[Edited By Brian Maguire | Euractiv's Advocacy Lab ]

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
The Brief – Danish presidency ditches ‘Borgen' for boring
Today's edition is powered by NetworkNature Choose Nature: NetworkNature Annual Event 2025 Choose Nature on 16 September in Brussels to explore how Nature-based Solutions can align biodiversity and the economy in times of urgency. Engage with diverse stakeholders and discover pathways toward a resilient future for people and the planet. Learn more. Register. Aarhus, Denmark's second-largest city and the capital of the Jutland peninsula, is buzzing with journalists, politicians, and thousands of police men and women for the official kick-off of the Danish Presidency in the EU Council. But once the local government, the EU Commission, and President Zelenskyy have departed, the buzz will turn to muffled frustration. Other member countries have seized the six-month tenure as an opportunity to put their country – and their leadership – centre stage. In the second half of 2023, Pedro Sánchez used the Spanish presidency to cast himself as the next European statesman (not that it worked). And Orbán's Hungary launched a mission to 'Make Europe Great Again' – a grand game plan that was disrupted by the European elections in 2024. Denmark, by contrast, prefers to pretend the rotating office isn't really a thing. Even the unveiling of Copenhagen's priorities for its term, usually a celebratory affair for a country, was a downer. The event was even shunned by Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and led instead by the relatively junior minister for European affairs. The message: This isn't really that important. The last Danish presidency in 2012 was known as the "tap water-presidency", a reference to the cardboard bottles served at ministerials. Expect more of the same. In a blunt briefing with national media, Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen said that expectations should be dialled back. A director of one of the more important ministries told their civil servants: 'The goal is not to be remembered.' 'Let's keep it well-conducted and neat – Scandinavian,' another Danish official told Euractiv. The Roundup Identity and Democracy (and fraud?) – Identity and Democracy, the now-defunct far-right EU group which included Marine Le Pen's Rassemblement National party, has been accused of misusing €4.3 million of EU funds between 2019 and 2024 in a Parliament report. Cheap eats across the Atlantic – The European Free Trade Association clinched a trade agreement with Mercosur, scrapping duties on many agricultural imports. Mercosur-EU negotiations have been slow, with Brussels focused instead on the US and China. Padding Putin's pockets – More than three years since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the EU has yet to cut the flow of fossil fuel cash to Moscow, casting doubt on its promise to end its addiction to Russian energy by 2027. Across Europe A shocking reversal – Berlin has reneged on its promise to bring down electricity taxation rates from one of Europe's highest to the minimum allowed under EU law, lacking current 'fiscal leeway' to make tax cuts. Nawrocki swearing in – Poland's president-elect Karol Nawrocki will be sworn in after the Supreme Court validated his win Tuesday. This is despite continued legal challenges and allegations of voting irregularities. Italy breaks ground on mineral exploration – Italy is launching its first major public geological research push in over 30 years, aiming to uncover critical and strategic raw materials amid Europe's shifting supply chain priorities with a focus on materials crucial to the EU's economy and security. Corrigenda: Yesterday's Brief had the leader of the Dutch Freedom Party as 'Kurt Wilders'. This has been corrected.


Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
Five things to know about the EU's next farm fund
The European Commission's planned revamp of the EU's long-term budget is stirring uncertainty across many sectors, but especially among farmers, who remain the biggest recipients of EU money. Here's what we know so far about how the budget, known as the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), will influence the next Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), with an announcement expected on 16 July. The two-pillar structure Early drafts of the EU budget reform explored merging CAP funds into a flexible "Single National Plan" alongside cohesion instruments. But EU Agriculture Commissioner Hansen said on Wednesday that the Commission's intention to maintain income support for farmers – the policy's first pillar – remains very clear. Farmers' main concern has been that rural development money – the second pillar – would be forced to compete with cohesion funds. According to Jan Olbrycht, a special adviser to EU Budget Commissioner Piotr Serafin, that risk now appears off the table. 'We have the CAP, which probably will be separated with the two pillars… The plot that the rural development can go to cohesion policy is over, is finished,' he said at the Committee of the Regions last week. The real uncertainty now is how much money will go into the second pillar and whether it will be ring-fenced or remain vulnerable to reallocation. Hansen has repeatedly defended preserving the current two-pillar structure. At a meeting with EU agriculture ministers in Warsaw and again this week at the Committee of the Regions, he made it clear that scrapping the two-pillar setup would be a mistake. 'It would be unwise to throw overboard this toolbox,' he said. More power to the capitals Since the last CAP reform, national governments have taken on a bigger role in shaping farm policy through their own strategic plans – a role that's expected to grow after 2027. Speaking at an event this week, Gijs Schilthuis, director for sustainability at the Commission's Directorate-General for Agriculture (DG AGRI), said the Commission wanted to give member states more flexibility to tailor green rules and incentives to local realities. The Commission's May simplification package already proposed giving national governments more room to revise their CAP national plans. Dedicated but decimated? While the overall MFF remains under pressure, the CAP is still expected to receive a 'dedicated budget,' Hansen told Euractiv on Wednesday. According to Olbrycht , the CAP budget will "for sure not be bigger," and farming policy is unlikely to be spared from cuts. Sources consulted by Euractiv suggest that CAP funding could fall by 15-20%, depending on how the budget reallocation is handled. With limited options – raising national contributions, creating new EU own resources, or cutting programmes – some pressure on agricultural funding seems inevitable. Timing There's also uncertainty around timing. The current CAP is implemented through three regulations: the national strategic plans, the Common Market Organisation (CMO), and the horizontal regulation. Last year, Hansen proposed targeted changes to the CMO to boost farmers' bargaining power in the food chain. Work on the file is still ongoing. Meanwhile, the recently proposed CAP simplification package includes amendments to both the national strategic plans and the horizontal regulation – and these, too, are still being discussed. It remains unclear how the Commission intends to launch a broader CAP reform while parts of the existing legislation are being negotiated. According to multiple sources, the 16 July MFF package will likely include a regulation on the single fund, with a CAP chapter outlining basic new elements in the national strategic plans and horizontal regulation. CMO amendments could follow later in autumn. In that case, a full-blown overhaul of the CAP looks increasingly unlikely. From sticks to carrots With the Green Deal and Farm to Fork effectively buried, environmental conditions are no longer expected to be central to the post-2027 CAP. Many of the eco-requirements once placed on farmers were scaled back or scrapped in 2024 in an effort to reduce red tape. Hansen has made no secret of the shift. The next CAP, he said, will focus on incentives rather than penalties – a pivot from stick to carrot. It's not a revolution, he said at the Committee of the Regions, but an "evolution" – likely building on the May simplification package. In his view, CAP funds should target 'those most in need' – namely young, new, and small farmers. But shifting more money toward these groups would require cuts elsewhere, he added. The solution, he argues, would be to cap payments to the largest farms and introduce stronger 'degressivity' – where payouts decrease as the amount of farm aid increases. His proposal is already dividing the EU's main farming groups. Jeremias Lin contributed reporting. (adm, de)


Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
Airlines scramble as dogfight with EU over baggage rules looms
What should have been a straightforward update to passenger rights rules has hit turbulence in Brussels, as European airlines manoeuvre to keep free suitcases out of cabins before EU lawmakers decide their final approach. On Wednesday, airlines announced they had agreed on a standard size for personal bags that passengers will be able to carry on board for free, claiming alignment with an agreement by EU countries. The "guaranteed dimensions" of 40x30x15cm would be in place "by the end of the 2025 summer season," the trade association Airlines for Europe said on Wednesday. 'Carriers will continue to permit larger personal items at their discretion.' This modestly sized "personal item" – actually smaller than what no-frills carrier Ryanair currently allows for free – is what national governments have agreed should be the bare minimum. Last month, the European Parliament's transport committee decided that passengers should be allowed an additional small suitcase of up to 7kg, also free of charge. However, final talks with the European Parliament have yet to begin, and a source close to the negotiations told Euractiv they are unlikely to start before October. Steven Berger, of Brussels-based consumer rights group BEUC, is sceptical of the airlines' sudden show of flexibility. 'By stating they will comply with the Council proposal, they want to show 'good will' from their side to avoid having a regulation on this, especially to avoid the rules proposed by the European Parliament,' he told Euractiv. The size proposed by EU governments is 'ridiculously small' and setting it as a formal EU standard would be 'detrimental' to consumers, Berger added, voicing support for the Parliament's approach. The Council's one-handbag rule, he warned, would legitimise airlines that force travellers to choose between bringing their laptop or a change of clothes. The bag-plus-suitcase allowance backed by MEPs reflects 'the basic expectations of consumers', he said. Beyond cabin baggage, BEUC also wants lawmakers to reject the Council's position on compensation rights. Governments have proposed limiting compensation to delays between four and six hours, instead of the current three-hour threshold. (rh, de)