The One Big Beautiful Bill Act Didn't Kill IRS Direct File But It Sure Feels Like It
Direct File is officially dead—at least that's the sense coming out of the IRS at the moment. A recent IRS press release reminds taxpayers who requested an extension that 'IRS Free File makes it easy.'
That feels… innocuous, right? But the mention of Free File in the (very) brief 123-word press release, without referencing Direct File, which also remains open through October 15, 2025, suggests that the IRS is already ready to turn the page on the program.
Free File is an existing program offered as part of a public-private partnership between the IRS and Free File Inc., formerly the Free File Alliance. Through this partnership, tax preparation and filing software providers make their online products available to eligible taxpayers (as compared to Direct File, an IRS program).
Free File debuted in 2003, but not without controversy. It was developed to provide free e-filing services to most taxpayers, with the goal of helping the IRS meet the 80% e-file target established by the Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998.
At the time, many wondered why the federal government partnered with the private tax prep industry instead of creating its own software. In 2002, Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill made it clear to then IRS Commissioner Charles Rossotti that the agency should partner with the private sector. As a result, the government entered into a memorandum of understanding pledging not to enter the tax return software and e-file services marketplace.
You'd assume taxpayers would flock to e-file for free. The e-file market did explode, but not necessarily for free services, leading to allegations that some providers were directing taxpayers to paid services. In 2019—the last year the Free File agreement was signed—up to 100 million taxpayers, or 70% of filers, were eligible to use Free File. The actual use was closer to 3%.
In 2016, then-Forbes staffer Sam Sharf wrote an account of how, despite qualifying to file for free, it cost her $118.64 to file her 2014 tax return with TurboTax. A few years later, ProPublica wrote a series of articles focusing on the lengths to which it claims tax software companies went—such as extensive lobbying and hiding free options—to get taxpayers to pay for services. In April 2019, ProPublica noted, "Intuit has changed the code on its Free File page so that the actually free version of TurboTax is no longer hidden from Google and other search engines." H&R Block was also accused of purposefully steering taxpayers away from free products.
The allegations created quite a stir—and resulted in litigation.
Today, tax preparation software companies are prohibited from hiding free filing services from Google or other search results pages. Additionally, if you can't file for free after visiting a company's Free File website, you must be able to return to the Free File website to find another offer. Each IRS Free File company must provide information when you don't qualify, with a link to the IRS.gov Free File site.
Following the changes, two traditional Free File participants, Intuit and H&R Block, opted out of the program. Eight private-sector Free File partners provided online guided tax software products in 2025: 1040.com, 1040Now, EzTaxReturn, FileYourTaxes.com, FreeTaxUSA, OnLine Taxes, TaxAct, and TaxSlayer. Direct File
The controversial Direct File program allows eligible taxpayers to file taxes directly with the IRS online for free. The word "controversial" is a nod to the fact that while the IRS touts the program as beneficial to taxpayers and says the initial feedback was overwhelmingly positive, some Republicans in Congress weren't happy with the program.
As part of the Inflation Reduction Act, Congress tasked the IRS with delivering a report on, among other things, the cost of developing and running a free direct e-file tax return system. The report was to include he costs to build and administer each release, with a focus on multi-lingual and mobile-friendly features and safeguards for taxpayer data. The IRS released the report to Congress in May 2023.
According to the report, most taxpayers surveyed by the agency had interest in using an IRS-provided tool to prepare and file their taxes. At the time, the IRS indicated it hoped to make that a reality for some taxpayers for the 2024 tax filing season.
When the tax filing season opened in January 2024, the IRS announced a limited-scope pilot of Direct File, which it claimed would allow the IRS to evaluate the costs, benefits, and operational challenges associated with providing the option to taxpayers. The pilot, the IRS claimed, was a success. The tax agency said that Direct File users reported a high degree of satisfaction and quick answers to their filing questions.
In a GSA Touchpoints survey of more than 11,000 Direct File users, 90% of respondents ranked their experience with Direct File as "Excellent" or "Above Average." Most survey respondents who filed taxes in the prior year reported having to pay to prepare their taxes last year. Among survey respondents, 47% of users paid to file their taxes last year, and 16% did not file last year at all. When asked what they particularly liked, respondents most commonly cited Direct File's ease of use, trustworthiness, and that it was free. According to the IRS, taxpayers filed—for free—to obtain more than $90 million in refunds and saved an estimated $5.6 million in filing costs.
(You can read what some taxpayers had to say to Forbes about their experiences here.)
After the first year, the Treasury Department declared that Direct File would be a permanent, free tax filing option. The IRS also expanded the program in 2025 to include more states and the ability to handle a wider range of income, credits, and deductions. 2025 Brought More Changes To Direct File
The free tax software program had been marked as safe for the 2025 season, with now-Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent committing to the program during his confirmation hearing. "I will commit that for this tax season … Direct File will be operative," Bessent said. However, less than 48 hours after the end of the regular tax filing season, reports flew that the program would be axed.
That was confirmed in May when the House version of what is now the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) included a provision to eliminate IRS Direct File. The original language directed Treasury to ensure that the IRS Direct File program has been "terminated" no later than 30 days after the bill became law. That bit didn't survive.
But OBBBA does include a provision creating a task force to deliver a report on the 'cost of enhancing and establishing public-private partnerships which provide for free tax filing for up to 70 percent of all taxpayers calculated by adjusted gross income, and to replace any direct e-file programs run by the Internal Revenue Service.' The task force is also tasked with taking the pulse of the public on 'opinions and preferences regarding a taxpayer-funded, government-run service or a free service provided by the private sector.' The amount of money earmarked is $15,000,000.
If you're feeling a bit of deja vu, you're not wrong. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2021—the law that led to the creation of Direct File—also established a task force to design a direct file tax return system. The task force was required to explore the "(I) the cost (including options for differential coverage based on taxpayer adjusted gross income and return complexity) of developing and running a free direct efile tax return system, including costs to build and administer each release, with a focus on multi-lingual and mobile-friendly features and safeguards for taxpayer data; (II) taxpayer opinions, expectations, and level of trust, based on surveys, for such a free direct efile system; and (III) the opinions of an independent third-party on the overall feasibility, approach, schedule, cost, organizational design, and Internal Revenue Service capacity to deliver such a direct efile tax return system." The cost? Also $15,000,000. Last Gasps From Congress
Not everyone is giving up on the program. U.S. Rep. Emilia Sykes (D-Ohio) has introduced legislation to not only save, but expand, the program. The legislation, called the 'Get Your Money Back Act,' would fully reinstate the Direct File program, while requiring states to opt in to the service.
'For many, the tax filing season can be time-consuming, expensive, and confusing, even though most taxpayers have relatively simple returns, which is why the Direct File program was both effective and popular,' said Sykes in a statement. 'Unfortunately, even before the Treasury Secretary ended the program, Ohioans weren't able to take advantage of this program because our state's government never opted in. My legislation would implement this successful program nationwide, improving everyone's experience with tax season.'
Sykes officially introduced the legislation on June 30, 2025. It has since been referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. There has been no additional action to date. Forbes Trump Administration Will Reportedly Nix IRS Direct File, Eliminating The Free Tax Filing Option By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes House Tax Plan Would Kill Direct File And Rescue Controversial Contingency Fees By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes IRS Announces Direct File Program Will Be Available In Twice As Many States In 2025 By Kelly Phillips Erb
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Connecticut town manager loses $210k-a-year job after officials discover her side hustle — 2,000 miles away in Wyoming
The chief financial officer in Wilton, Connecticut, resigned last week after town officials discovered she was simultaneously serving as a town administrator in a Wyoming town 2,000 miles away. However, Dawn Norton claims she fully complied with her employment terms when she took on the role of Town Administrator and Finance Director in Greybull, Wyoming, and says she kept Wilton's leadership fully informed about the arrangement. Norton began serving as Wilton's CFO in March 2022 and took on the Wyoming position in May, Wilton Town Administrator Matt Knickerbocker told CT Insider on Wednesday. Meanwhile, Norton told Good Morning Wilton that she had been working remotely for Wilton from Wyoming since February of this year while on Family Medical Leave, caring for her injured husband. In April, she applied to the Greybull job and was initially hired on a part-time trial basis before being offered a permanent full-time position. 'I gave him my retirement notice — I gave it to him when I went full-time,' Norton told the outlet. 'My notice said I'd give them full support, whatever it is, up to Nov. 3… when all department head contracts are … renewed. I said, 'I'll do 100 percent of everything. I will get the audit done. I will attend meetings. I will do whatever it is that you need me to do in my full capacity.' But Knickerbocker tells CT Insider, 'On Sunday night, our HR director … alerted me that Dawn was listed as the town administrator ... for Greybull, Wyoming.' 'On Monday morning, I called her to verify that and found that yes, she had" taken on the new role. Once HR confirmed with Norton that she held both positions, she resigned from Wilton. Both Knickerbocker and First Selectwoman Toni Boucher say Norton never told them about her confirmed job in Greybull. Norton disagrees, pointing to a written notice she sent on April 7, 2025, to Boucher and the HR director stating she was 'actively seeking employment elsewhere.' The Wilton officials say the town allows occasional part-time external roles only in limited, emergency situations, not another full-time public office, which would have prevented approval had they known. The Independent has contacted representatives for the Town of Wilton, the Town of Greybull, and Norton for comment. This controversy arose amid a recent Town Hall review triggered by concerns over Wilton's Finance Department, including auditor findings of 'material weakness,' chronic understaffing, unauthorized tax credits, and a difficult budget process. Town officials had focused on the department being overworked, unaware Norton was also employed elsewhere. Norton said these ongoing issues at Town Hall motivated her decision to leave Wilton. '[It] is one of the reasons why I was actively seeking to get the heck out of dodge because I can't handle the work that was being dumped on me, and I was not getting any support whatsoever in hiring positions in my office. For a year, I did accounts payable — I paid the bills, I filed the invoices, and that is not my responsibility, that is a clerk's responsibility,' she said. She said that 'negativity' surrounding the audit's material weakness and the senior tax credit issue added to the stress of her job. 'I want out. I'm tired of the negative that I keep getting pushed on me. People aren't listening to the situation,' she told Good Morning Wilton. 'I can't do it all, and there's no help in my office, and there's no help and support from Toni or from Matt.' 'Everybody keeps saying, 'Well, the assessor and the [tax] collector report to the finance director.' No, they don't. They report to Matt. I have nothing to do with tax collection and assessment. The only thing I review is what gets posted to the ledger. And as for the material weakness, the material weakness is because we don't have the staff in my office to get all the work done that we need to get done,' she continued. Wilton's Board of Selectmen swiftly posted the CFO vacancy upon Norton's resignation, setting a revised salary range of $160,000 to $200,000, down from Norton's $210,108 in 2024, removing Board of Education responsibilities from the role, and creating a search committee to appoint an interim CFO immediately. In Greybull, council meeting minutes show Norton was officially appointed as Town Administrator on May 12, and she has since participated in municipal meetings, delivered financial reports, and signed official resolutions. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Where Will Nvidia Stock Be in 1 Year?
Key Points Nvidia stock has been in fine form over the past year, thanks to healthy demand for its AI chips. A closer look at the capital spending estimates of big tech companies suggests that Nvidia has room to deliver more upside over the next 12 months. The company should also get a nice shot in the arm by resuming its chip sales to Chinese customers, as it expects to be given permission to do. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) is the world's largest company, with a market cap around $4.4 trillion. It has reached this place thanks to its dominant position in the market for artificial intelligence (AI) chips that handle training and inference workloads in data centers. The booming demand for AI chips has helped Nvidia deliver outstanding growth over the past several quarters. Its terrific growth has led to healthy market gains of 68% in the past year as of market close Aug. 4, despite a difficult start to 2025. In fact, Nvidia stock's returns have easily outpaced the 18% gains clocked by the S&P 500 index during this same period. Investors, however, may be wondering whether Nvidia has the ability to sustain its momentum in the coming year, especially considering its huge market cap and high valuation. In this article, I will take a closer look at Nvidia's catalysts and see where the stock could be after a year. These developments suggest Nvidia has room for more upside Massive spending by cloud computing giants and governments around the globe has played a central role in driving Nvidia's outstanding revenue and earnings growth in recent quarters. The good part is that Nvidia can continue counting on these avenues for growth. For instance, the capital expenses of big tech players Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and Meta Platforms are expected to hit $364 billion this year, up from an earlier estimate of $325 billion. All these companies are investing substantially in AI data center infrastructure to bring more AI-focused cloud solutions to customers. The updated capital spending forecast points toward a 63% increase from last year's outlay. A nice chunk of this spending can be expected to be directed toward chips that power AI infrastructure. McKinsey estimates that 60% of AI infrastructure spending is likely to be directed toward chips and computing hardware. Nvidia's addressable market, therefore, is likely to expand. Importantly, the company is the leading player in the AI chip market, with an estimated share of more than 90% at the end of last year. Another factor that's going to give Nvidia stock a nice boost is its access to the Chinese market. The company was frozen out of China in April of this year following export restrictions on the sales of its AI chips to that country. However, Nvidia recently pointed out that it has received assurances it will be able to sell its AI chips to Chinese customers once again. The company has reportedly placed orders for 300,000 China-specific AI chips with its foundry partner Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC). That's in addition to the stockpile of 600,000 to 700,000 existing H20 AI processors that Nvidia is currently sitting on. Nvidia is expected to generate an estimated $15 billion in revenue from sales to Chinese customers in the second half of the year. It is worth noting that Nvidia incurred a $4.5 billion charge in the first quarter of fiscal 2026 on account of restrictions on shipments to Chinese customers. The company also highlighted that its fiscal Q2 revenue would take an $8 billion hit because of those export restrictions. Meanwhile, the aggressive spending on AI infrastructure by governments across the globe is expected to boost Nvidia's annual revenue by $10 billion to $15 billion. As such, don't be surprised to see Nvidia's revenue in the current fiscal year (which will end in January 2026) coast past Wall Street's expectations of $201 billion, which would translate into an increase of 54% from last year. But what about the valuation? Nvidia stock's recent rally has brought its price-to-sales (P/S) multiple to 29 and the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio to 56. The company needs to keep growing at a faster pace than the market's expectations to justify its rich valuation. The potential growth outlined above suggest it is indeed capable of doing so. The company's planned re-entry into the Chinese market, along with the substantial increase in AI-related spending by big tech companies that have been buying Nvidia's data center processors, could easily help it eclipse consensus expectations in the coming year. The impressive growth Nvidia is expected to deliver is the reason its forward earnings multiples are much lower than the trailing ones. So, growth investors should still consider buying this AI stock, which the most optimistic analyst gives a price target of $250 for the next 12 months. That points toward potential gains of 39% from current levels, and there is a good chance that Nvidia could end up hitting that mark thanks to the healthy spending on AI infrastructure in the coming year. Should you buy stock in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Harsh Chauhan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Where Will Nvidia Stock Be in 1 Year? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) Will Benefit From The Football Season, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . DraftKings Inc. (NASDAQ:DKNG) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. DraftKings Inc. (NASDAQ:DKNG) is a technology company that primarily provides sports betting services. Its shares have gained 19.5% year-to-date as the firm has benefited from multiple strong quarterly earnings reports and strong annual guidance figures. For instance, DraftKings Inc. (NASDAQ:DKNG)'s jumped in February after the firm increased the low end of its full year guidance to $6.3 billion from an earlier $6.2 billion. In August, the firm reported that its revenue grew by 37% to $1.51 billion. Cramer believes that DraftKings Inc. (NASDAQ:DKNG) will benefit from the football season: 'And then Jason Robins, DraftKings, I mean coming into the football season, coming in hot as opposed to, no I came in cool, I'm sorry.' He discussed DraftKings Inc. (NASDAQ:DKNG) in detail later during the day in Mad Money: 'As we approach football season, things are already looking pretty darn good for DraftKings, one of the nation's largest online sportsbooks. I've been steadfastly bull on this one, you know, just the whole way. After the close, DraftKings reported an impressive quarter, revenue growth accelerating to 37%, better-than-expected earnings, higher-than-expected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. These results were driven by what DraftKings calls sportsbook-friendly outcomes in the quarter, and the company only reiterated its full-year forecast. But management did say that it now expects to see revenue near the high end of its guidance range. That was good enough to send the stock flying in after-hours trading.' While we acknowledge the potential of DKNG as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
