logo
Arizona Democrats will bypass struggling state party in midterms, with key races on ballot

Arizona Democrats will bypass struggling state party in midterms, with key races on ballot

Yahoo01-07-2025
PHOENIX (AP) — Top Arizona Democrats said Tuesday they will bypass the financially strained state party and its embattled new chairman in next year's midterms, as they looked to assure donors and activists that party dysfunction won't hamper their efforts to win in the battleground state.
Gov. Katie Hobbs, Secretary of State Adrian Fontes and Attorney General Kris Mayes — who all are seeking second terms next year — said grassroots organizing will be outsourced to a small county organization rather than the Arizona Democratic Party.
The workaround comes as party disarray threatens to complicate Democrats' efforts to hold on to a decade of successes in a state long dominated by Republicans. Arizona has no Senate contest next year but will have at least two battleground U.S. House races, and the campaigns for governor, other top state offices and legislature could dictate how Arizona handles the 2028 presidential election.
National Democratic committees, including the Democratic Governors Association, signed on to the move.
Conflict with Arizona Democratic state party
Arizona Democrats unexpectedly ousted former Chair Yolanda Bejarano after the party's disastrous showing in the 2024 election, when Donald Trump won the state after losing it to Joe Biden in 2020. New Chairman Robert Branscomb promptly fired most of the senior staff.
Behind-the-scenes tension exploded into public view in April. Branscromb sent a letter to members of the state Democratic committee blasting Sens. Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego, a highly unusual move against the state's top Democrats.
Kelly, Gallego, Hobbs, Fontes and Mayes responded with their own letter saying they'd lost trust in Branscomb.
Last month, the party's treasurer warned that Branscomb was spending more money than he was raising and the party was on track to run out of money by the end of the year. Meanwhile, the party is operating without a budget approved by the executive committee.
Allies of Branscomb, the party's first Black chair, have said the pressure on him is racially motivated. He faces a potential ouster later this month but has refused to step aside.
After Tuesday's announcement, Branscomb projected a united front with the officials who spurned him, predicting the split would not hold back Democrats.
'I think the people are ready to solidify our democracy, and democrats are in a position to win up and down the ticket,' he said. 'Because we're focused on different areas doesn't mean we're not together.'
Navajo County Democrats to run get-out-the-vote
The Arizona Democratic Party has traditionally housed the coordinated get-out-the-vote campaign designed to turn out voters for Democratic candidates up and down the ballot. Hobbs, Fontes and Mayes said Tuesday they'll run it instead through the Navajo County Democratic Party for 2026.
Democrats are well-organized in Navajo County, which is small by population but large geographically in rural northeastern Arizona. The party has long invested in organizing there among Native American voters.
The county party can do most everything the state party can do, with one major exception—only the state party can send mail at a discounted postal rate. Branscomb said that won't be an issue.
'We'll still cooperate and work together on this,' he said. 'We all have the same vision, we all have the same goal to get them all re-elected.'
Running a statewide campaign through a county party is not without precedent. Former Sen. John McCain leaned on the Yuma County GOP in his 2010 re-election campaign after a faction hostile to him took control of the Arizona Republican Party. In Nevada, Sen. Catherine Cortez-Masto ran her 2022 coordinated campaign through the Washoe County Democratic Party after progressives took control of the state party.
In this case, the rupture between the officials and the party is not driven by ideology but by concerns of mismanagement and financial constraints.
___
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Myanmar's acting President Myint Swe dies after a long illness
Myanmar's acting President Myint Swe dies after a long illness

The Hill

time3 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Myanmar's acting President Myint Swe dies after a long illness

BANGKOK (AP) — Myint Swe, who became Myanmar's acting president under controversial circumstances after the military seized power from the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi more than four years ago, died on Thursday, the military said. He was 74. He died at a military hospital in the capital, Naypyitaw, on Thursday morning, according to a statement from Myanmar's military information office. Myint Swe's death came more than a year after he stopped actively carrying out his presidential duties after he was publicly reported to be ailing. His funeral will be held at the state level but the date has not been disclosed, a separate statement from the military information office said. State media reported on Tuesday that he had been in critical condition and receiving intensive care since July 24 at a military hospital in Naypyitaw. State media announced in July last year that Myint Swe was suffering from neurological disorders and peripheral neuropathy disease, which left him unable to carry out normal daily activities, including eating. A few days later, he authorized Senior Gen. Min Aung Hlaing, the head of the military government, to assume his presidential duties while he was on medical leave, the reports said. Myint Swe became acting president on Feb. 1, 2021, after the military arrested former President Win Myint along with Myanmar's top leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, when the army seized power. Myint Swe, a member of a pro-military party, took over the presidency under the constitution because he held the post of first vice president. Legal experts questioned the legitimacy of the move because Win Myint neither stepped down from his post nor was incapacitated. As acting president, Myint Swe chaired the National Defense and Security Council, which is nominally a constitutional government body, but in practice is controlled by the military. The council operates as the country's top decision-making body related to national security, with the authority to declare a state of emergency and oversee military and defense affairs. Myint Swe's appointment and acquiescence to the army's demands allowed the council to be convened to declare a state of emergency and hand over power to Min Aung Hlaing, who led the army's takeover. During his time in office, Myint Swe could only perform the pro forma duties of his job, such as issuing decrees to renew the state of emergency, because Min Aung Hlaing controlled all government functions. Myint Swe, a former general, was a close ally of Than Shwe, who led a previous military government but stepped down to allow the transition to a quasi-civilian government beginning in 2011. Myint Swe was chief minister of Yangon, Myanmar's biggest city, under the quasi-civilian government between 2011 and 2016, and headed its regional military command for years under the previous military government, which stepped down in 2011. During Buddhist monk-led popular protests in 2007 known internationally as the Saffron Revolution, he took charge of restoring order after weeks of unrest in the city, overseeing a crackdown that killed dozens of people. Hundreds of others were arrested. Though he did not have a prominent international profile, Myint Swe played a key role in the military and politics. In 2002, he participated in the arrest of family members of former dictator Ne Win, according to accounts in Myanmar media. He also arrested former Gen. Khin Nyunt at Yangon Airport during a 2004 purge of the former prime minister and his supporters that involved a power struggle inside the military. Soon afterward, Myint Swe took command of the sprawling military intelligence apparatus that had been Khin Nyunt's power base. Myint Swe was among military leaders sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury Department following the military takeover and arrest of de facto leader Aung San Suu Kyi and other senior politicians in February 2021.

More Americans support path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants with no criminal background, UMass poll finds
More Americans support path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants with no criminal background, UMass poll finds

Boston Globe

time34 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

More Americans support path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants with no criminal background, UMass poll finds

But a strong majority, 69 percent, support deporting undocumented immigrants who have criminal records, according to the release. This is down from an Advertisement 'These results suggest that the Trump administration, if it desires to be in step with the public that they represent, should emphasize the detention and removal of undocumented immigrants with criminal records,' Tatishe Nteta, provost professor of political science at UMASS and the poll's director, said in the release. The Trump Administration has vowed to deport 11 million undocumented immigrants, and has authorized aggressive enforcement tactics, such as raiding schools, churches and other venues that have long been safe havens for immigrants. The poll also found that only 30 percent supported deporting undocumented immigrants who work full time and pay taxes. Around 37 percent of poll respondents supported deporting undocumented immigrants who had no criminal record outside of their immigration status and 33 percent of respondents supported deporting those whose children were born in the U.S. Advertisement The poll found that Americans support protections for legal immigrants as well. A majority of respondents said that immigrants on valid visas should be entitled to constitutional rights that citizens enjoy like freedom of speech. A minority of respondents thought legal immigrants, like international students involved in protests, should be deported for expressing opposition to American foreign policy. The poll also found bipartisan opposition to reducing federal spending on scientific research at universities and requiring colleges to consider ideological diversity in hiring and admissions, according to the release. The poll of 1000 national respondents was conducted by the website YouGov between July 25 and July 30 and the margin of error for the poll was 3.5 percent. A little over 50 percent of respondents oppose immigration enforcement in churches, schools and hospitals but public opinion is split when it comes to enforcement elsewhere. For example, around 43 percent of respondents supported immigration enforcement at home and 40 percent at workplaces, according to the results. There was a big partisan gap on the question of where immigration enforcement was acceptable with 65 percent of Republicans supporting immigration enforcement at churches and hospitals while support for enforcement at these venues among Democrats was in the single digits. Around 70 percent of poll respondents said that immigrants in the country on valid visas should be entitled to the constitutional rights that citizens have such as freedom of speech, the right to an attorney when accused of a crime and the right to a hearing before a judge before deportation, among others. Advertisement Around 22 percent of respondents opposed deporting legal immigrants on the basis of their opposition to American foreign policy, an objective the Trump administration has been pursuing when it comes to international students like Tufts University PhD candidate, Rümeysa Öztürk who expressed opposition to the war in Gaza. Support for these deportations was higher among Republicans, conservatives and Trump voters, but did not exceed 50 percent in those groups. Angela Mathew can be reached at

Man charged with killing a top Minnesota House Democrat is expected to plead not guilty
Man charged with killing a top Minnesota House Democrat is expected to plead not guilty

San Francisco Chronicle​

time34 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Man charged with killing a top Minnesota House Democrat is expected to plead not guilty

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — The man charged with killing the top Democrat in the Minnesota House and her husband, and wounding a state senator and his wife, is expected to plead not guilty when he's arraigned in federal court on Thursday, his attorney said. Vance Boelter, 58, of Green Isle, Minnesota, was indicted July 15 on six counts of murder, stalking and firearms violations. The murder charges could carry the federal death penalty, though prosecutors say that decision is several months away. As they announced the indictment, prosecutors released a rambling handwritten letter they say Boelter wrote to FBI Director Kash Patel in which he confessed to the June 14 shootings of Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark. However, the letter doesn't make clear why he targeted the Hortmans or Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, who survived. Boelter's federal defender, Manny Atwal, said at the time that the weighty charges did not come as a surprise, but she has not commented on the substance of the allegations or any defense strategies. The hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge Dulce Foster will also serve as a case management conference. She plans to issue a revised schedule with deadlines afterward, potentially including a trial date. Prosecutors have moved to designate the proceedings as a 'complex case' so that standard speedy trial requirements won't apply, saying both sides will need plenty of time to review the voluminous evidence. 'The investigation of this case arose out of the largest manhunt in Minnesota's history," they wrote. "Accordingly, the discovery to be produced by the government will include a substantial amount of investigative material and reports from more than a dozen different law enforcement agencies at the federal, state, and local levels.' They said the evidence will include potentially thousands of hours of video footage, tens of thousands of pages of responses to dozens of grand jury subpoenas, and data from numerous electronic devices seized during the investigation. Boelter's motivations remain murky. Friends have described him as an evangelical Christian with politically conservative views who had been struggling to find work. Authorities said Boelter made long lists of politicians in Minnesota and other states — all or mostly Democrats. In a series of cryptic notes to The New York Times through his jail's electronic messaging service, Boelter suggested his actions were partly rooted in the Christian commandment to love one's neighbor. 'Because I love my neighbors prior to June 14th I conducted a 2 year long undercover investigation,' he wrote. In messages published earlier by the New York Post, Boelter insisted the shootings had nothing to do with his opposition to abortion or his support for President Donald Trump, but he declined to elaborate. 'There is little evidence showing why he turned to political violence and extremism,' the acting U.S. attorney for Minnesota, Joe Thompson, told reporters last month. He also reiterated that prosecutors consider Hortman's killing a 'political assassination.' Prosecutors say Boelter was disguised as a police officer and driving a fake squad car early June 14 when he went to the Hoffmans' home in the Minneapolis suburb of Champlin. He shot the senator nine times, and his wife eight times, officials said. Boelter later went to the Hortmans' home in nearby Brooklyn Park and killed both of them, authorities said. Their dog was so gravely injured that he had to be euthanized. Boelter surrendered the next night.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store