logo
Why the Future of AI Isn't Faster — It's Fairer

Why the Future of AI Isn't Faster — It's Fairer

Entrepreneur3 days ago
AI should be used to reduce friction and give overworked teams the tools to focus on what matters most.
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
AI is showing up in every corner of the business world — but in high-stakes fields like finance and tax, its real value isn't speed for speed's sake. It's about reducing friction, increasing accuracy and giving overworked teams the tools to focus on what matters most.
At our company, we apply AI to interpret complex, unstructured tax documents — dozens or even hundreds of pages long — and turn them into clean, structured data that flows directly into tax software in a matter of seconds.
This kind of automation isn't about creativity. It's about getting the details right the first time — accurately, consistently and in full compliance. When AI is designed as infrastructure, it doesn't replace people; it supports them, earning trust while taking pressure off the teams who do the hardest work.
But speed alone isn't enough. In regulated industries, how you build is just as important as what you build. Our team treats AI governance the same way the IRS treats human preparers: with rigorous standards and complete traceability. By embedding guardrails from the start, we can move quickly and safely without sacrificing quality, compliance or user trust.
Related: These Are the 50 Best AI Tools Right Now
Design with guardrails, deliver with confidence
AI has been the core infrastructure at our company since day one. We engineer our patented tax-prep software to the same strict standards the IRS applies to human preparers because, in a regulated field, compliance and design are inseparable. We treat AI governance as a non-negotiable engineering requirement.
Here are some examples. Once our software update is in production, we maintain vigilance by logging all inputs, outputs, and model versions to monitor for drift. We also define thresholds for model performance conditions that instantly notify an on-call owner, and clearly designate who holds the "rollback switch" and the protocol for using it. Underpinning everything, a well-managed, structured model development life cycle must track data sources and training sets, model versions, evaluations, and incidents for a more transparent record of what changed and why.
This is how you maintain speed without spraying risk into production.
Related: 75% of Workers Say AI Is Hurting Productivity
Use AI to cut burnout, not corners
Our tax season data reveals that customers' usage of our product nearly disappears after 5 p.m. and on weekends. This doesn't mean a lack of work; it's a sign that customers are getting their evenings back because the work is now powered by AI that's designed to cut burnout, not corners. And when our customers have questions, AI helps resolve 73% of support inquiries on the first try, alleviating long queues and reducing the mental strain on everyone involved.
Your company can achieve similar results by being more deliberate. Start by mapping the biggest energy drains. Ask each team to name at least three tasks that consistently sap focus and morale. Commit to automating one pain point each quarter; even small wins like AI‑assisted inbox triage stack up quickly.
After implementation, track the hours you reclaim and make them visible in reviews and all‑hands. When people can see time coming back onto their calendars, skeptics become champions of your vision, and the momentum takes care of itself.
Make AI innovation everyone's responsibility
At my fintech company, we run 'Innovation Days' that bring fresh ideas to life in every corner of the organization. It's our team's chance to step away from the familiar and use their curiosity, creativity and collaboration to dream up not just product innovations, but also process optimizations, market expansion ideas, and, of course, superior customer experiences.
But we don't stop there. Our customers rely on our products to automate away the most tedious parts of tax preparation. So they naturally share their own ideas about where our products should go next. And we listen. Some months, nearly all of our product release updates are originally sourced as customer ideas via our website or our regular community check-ins.
This is exactly the kind of bottom-up creativity that helps us land in the top growth tier for SaaS companies our size, and achieve twice the revenue per employee compared to peers.
To make innovation part of your company's operating system, start by granting no-code tool access to every team, not just those with technical chops. Remove permission gates that stifle experimentation. Offer small micro-grants — $1,000 is often enough to get an idea off the ground.
Then, turn those ideas into real momentum with quarterly demo days that celebrate solutions that improve revenue, cut costs, or deliver better service. The best ideas don't always come from the top, but from the people closest to the pain points.
Related: We Will Inevitably Lose Skills to AI, But Do The Benefits Outweigh The Risks?
Stress-test your AI regularly
We approach model safety like a contact sport, where we scrimmage the trained models to ensure they can handle the plays we make with efficiency and accuracy. Make these scrimmages part of your AI lifecycle.
Fresh eyes, especially from other departments, surface hidden drift that routine tests might miss, surfacing feedback loops and other signals where your AI performs can be extremely beneficial. Recognize contributors who find bugs or edge cases with public shoutouts or small bonuses.
After each session, publish a brief post-mortem that details what broke, how it was fixed, and what was learned. These rituals don't slow you down; they sharpen your edge.
Scale smarter, not just faster
Speed gets the headlines. But if you want staying power, you have to build with intention. That means baking in ethical standards from the start, before anything ships, breaks, or backfires. Guardrails shouldn't be reactionary. They should be part of the design.
I believe we need to redefine what automation means. While it is a tool for efficiency, it must also serve to create space for in-depth thinking and empower teams to excel. The goal is not replacement but elevation. This leads to a healthier definition of scale.
The best companies out there build adaptive systems founded on feedback and ownership. They understand that real momentum isn't found in the frantic race to the next launch but in the deliberate act of building something that will endure.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI-powered stuffed animals are coming for your kids
AI-powered stuffed animals are coming for your kids

TechCrunch

time7 minutes ago

  • TechCrunch

AI-powered stuffed animals are coming for your kids

In Brief Do A.I. chatbots packaged inside cute-looking plushies offer a viable alternative to screen time for kids? That's how the companies selling these A.I.-powered kiddie companions are marketing them, but The New York Times' Amanda Hess has some reservations. She recounts a demonstration in which Grem, one of the offerings from startup Curio, tried to bond with her. (Curio also sells a plushie named Grok, with no apparent connection to the Elon Musk-owned chatbot.) Hess writes that this is when she knew, 'I would not be introducing Grem to my own children.' As she talked to the chatbot, she became convinced it was 'less an upgrade to the lifeless teddy bear' and instead 'more like a replacement for me.' She also argues that while these talking toys might keep kids away from a tablet or TV screen, what they're really communicating is that 'the natural endpoint for [children's] curiosity lies inside their phones.' Hess reports that she did, eventually, let her kids play with Grem — but only after she'd removed and hidden the voice box. They still talked to it and played games with it; then they were ready for some TV.

Are Browsers Key To An Agentic AI Future? Opera, Perplexity Think So
Are Browsers Key To An Agentic AI Future? Opera, Perplexity Think So

Forbes

time8 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Are Browsers Key To An Agentic AI Future? Opera, Perplexity Think So

AI-powered conversational search engine Perplexity is in the news for offering to buy Google's Chrome browser for $34.5 billion. But in December of 2024, Perplexity considered buying The Browser Co. And just months ago, Perplexity reportedly offered to buy Brave, the privacy-focused browser, for about $1 billion. Why does Perplexity want a web browser so badly? Possibly because a browser just might be key to our agentic AI future. I recently interviewed Opera senior product leader Henrik Lexow on my TechFirst podcast. Opera, the 30-year-old browser company that pioneered tabbed browsing, pop-up blocking, and ad blockers, has about 300 million active users globally. This year, Opera was the first to bring AI agents right into our browsers in a project called Opera Neon. 'The agentic browser … is that sort of the new operating system?' Lexow asked during the podcast. 'It's a big question.' Regardless of where the browser goes, Opera's pretty sure about the future of the internet itself. That's a huge shift, by the way. An agentic internet would be a massive and fundamental change from a user-driven internet to an agent-driven version. In a user-driven internet, you search, you see results, you make selections, you click links, you fill out forms, you book flights, and you buy products. In a sense, you are the agent. In an agentic internet, you tell something – maybe your agentic browser – to do those things for you. Except you don't say search, look, select, and buy; you say buy me more of the underwear I got six months ago. The agent then consults its memory, forms a plan, takes multiple steps, and handles it all: from which underwear you bought, and where you bought them, to finding the same ones online (and maybe checking around for better prices), to adding them to cart, to checking out … and reporting back to you with the results. The agent – in this case potentially an agentic browser – is therefore essentially a personal assistant, a force multiplier. But will an agentic browser be the main way we engage with agents? Perplexity seems to think it's pretty important, given the company's persistent and repeated but so far unfruitful attempt to buy a browser. Opera certainly thinks so, if only because Opera has a browser, and a very innovative one at that. Opera launched AI in a browser back in 2023 in a project called ARIA. ARIA enabled contextual interactions within web pages in a GPT-based chat interface. Over time, that's evolved to a tripartite strategy under the Opera Neon brand: The reality is that for many of us, most of our work happens in a browser. I'm writing this story in a browser. I recorded the interview in a browser. I've researched Opera and Perplexity in a browser. I made episode art for the podcast in a browser (thanks, Canva). Opera's thesis is that having agents embedded where you work makes them vastly more useful: they have access to your history, to your work, to your sites and apps. Important note: the Neon agentic browser's AI lives locally on your hardware, making it your agent, not Opera's, and not your employer's. This should boost your privacy, which is critical if you're going to give an agent access to very personal information including, likely, your credit card. Of course, this is just one vision of the future. Apple with Siri, as justly maligned as it is, would have another vision. Google, with Gemini and its own vast fleet of Android-enabled phones, would have another. Microsoft's Copilot is another. And OpenAI, which has ChatGPT apps for mobile devices as well as full computers, might have yet another vision of how we'll integrate AI into our lives and work. So whether the browser will be the locus of our agentic AI future or not is yet to be determined. Remember the old proverb: every problem looks like a nail to the person who only has a hammer. But it seems like a fairly good bet to me.

IROBOT ALERT: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Investors in IRobot (IRBT) of the Class Action Lawsuit and Encourages Investors to Inquire About Their Rights
IROBOT ALERT: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Investors in IRobot (IRBT) of the Class Action Lawsuit and Encourages Investors to Inquire About Their Rights

Business Upturn

time12 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

IROBOT ALERT: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Reminds Investors in IRobot (IRBT) of the Class Action Lawsuit and Encourages Investors to Inquire About Their Rights

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Litigation Attorneys Encourage Investors Who Suffered Losses IRobot (IRBT) To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options If you purchased or acquired securities in any of the above companies between January 29, 2024 and March 11, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Bragar Eagel & Squire partner Brandon Walker or Marion Passmore directly at (212) 355-4648 NEW YORK, Aug. 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized stockholder rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against iRobot Corporation ('iRobot' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ:IRBT) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired iRobot securities between January 29, 2024 and March 11, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'). Investors have until September 5, 2025 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit. Click here to participate in the action. The complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) iRobot overstated the extent to which the Restructuring Plan would help the Company maintain stability after the termination of the Amazon Acquisition; (ii) as a result, it was unlikely that iRobot would be able to profitably operate as a standalone company; (iii) accordingly, there was substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern; and (iv) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. On March 12, 2025, iRobot issued a press release reporting its fourth quarter and full year 2024 financial results. For the quarter, iRobot reported a loss of $2.06 per share on revenue of $172 million, representing a 44% year-over-year decline. iRobot also cautioned investors that 'there can be no assurance that [iRobot's] new product launches will be successful due to potential factors, including, but not limited to consumer demand, competition, macroeconomic conditions, and tariff policies.' Accordingly, 'given these uncertainties and the implication they may have on the Company's financials, there is substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least 12 months from the date of the issuance of its consolidated 2024 financial statements.' In addition, the press release stated that, in light of the foregoing developments, iRobot was cancelling its fourth-quarter and full-year 2024 results conference call and webcast, and that the Company would not be providing a 2025 outlook. Market analysts were quick to comment on iRobot's announcement. For example, on March 12, 2025, an analyst from Seeking Alpha downgraded iRobot to a sell rating from a hold rating 'due to [a] bleak outlook,' stating that 'iRobot's business prospects have deteriorated significantly since the Amazon acquisition fell through, leading to massive layoffs and growing losses,' 'Q4 earnings were disastrous, missing guidance and showing worsening gross margins due to excess inventory and lower sales volumes,' 'iRobot's future is uncertain, with substantial doubts about its viability within the next 12 months, despite ongoing discussions with its primary lender,' and that the Company's 'survival hinges on new Roombas being a hit, which seems unlikely.' That same day, in an article entitled 'Why iRobot Stock Is Crashing Today,' The Motley Fool stated, in relevant part, that 'iRobot's costly restructuring efforts — including a 50% workforce reduction — have yet to yield stability.' On this news, iRobot's stock price fell $3.255 per share, or 51.58%, over the following two trading sessions, to close at $3.055 per share on March 13, 2025. If you purchased or otherwise acquired iRobot shares and suffered a loss, are a long-term stockholder, have information, would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Brandon Walker or Marion Passmore by email at [email protected], telephone at (212) 355-4648, or by filling out this contact form. There is no cost or obligation to you. About Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm with offices in New York, California, and South Carolina. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in commercial, securities, derivative, and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country. For more information about the firm, please visit . Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, and Facebook, and keep up with other news by following Brandon Walker, Esq. on LinkedIn and X. Contact Information: Bragar Eagel & Squire, Walker, Passmore, Esq.(212) 355-4648 [email protected]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store