logo
Court grants leave for Australian women to sue Qatar Airways over alleged invasive physical examinations

Court grants leave for Australian women to sue Qatar Airways over alleged invasive physical examinations

The Guardian24-07-2025
Five Australian women who allege they were forced off a Qatar Airways plane by armed guards before some were intimately examined at Doha airport will be able to sue the airline directly, the federal court has ruled.
The women launched an appeal in April last year hoping to overturn a ruling that the airline could not face trial for the October 2020 incident, when they were among more than a dozen women forcibly led from a Sydney-bound plane and escorted into ambulances.
Four of the women underwent bodily examinations – three of which were invasive – without consent as part of a local investigation to find the mother of a newborn baby found abandoned in a bathroom in Hamad international airport. The infant survived.
The episode sparked international outrage, with the women suing Qatar Airways Group, Qatar Civil Aviation Authority (QCAA) and Matar, the Qatari company responsible for airports operation and management, for negligence, assault, false imprisonment and battery.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
But the case against the airline, in which they sought damages over alleged 'unlawful physical contact', was dismissed, with Justice John Halley finding that Qatar Airways should not have to go to trial because its employees could not have influenced the actions of Qatari police, who boarded the planes to remove the women.
Halley also found that the QCAA was immune from the court's jurisdiction and determined that the five women could instead refile their claims for damages against Matar.
The women lodged an appeal against the judgment, hoping to pursue Qatar Airways and the QCAA directly.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
On Thursday morning the federal chief justice, Angus Stewart, said the court found that Halley had 'erred' when he summarily dismissed the airline's claims that the invasive examinations had not taken place in 'the course of any of the operations of embarking or disembarking' the aircraft.
'There is no sufficiently high degree of certainty that what happened to the appellants in the ambulance could not ultimately be found to have been in 'the course of any of the operations of embarking or disembarking',' Stewart told the court. The issue could 'only be decided at trial and not on a summary basis'.
He also found that Matar's application to set aside service should have been dismissed – and that its claim a nurse who had who performed the bodily examinations was not its employee was arguable.
It was an 'error to conclude at this stage of the proceeding that Matar's duty of care cannot possibly extend to the circumstances in and around the ambulance', he ruled.
He ordered Qatar Airways and Matar to pay the costs of the appeal.
But the judge dismissed the women's appeal against the QCAA, telling the court the evidence showed management activities of the government-run authority 'were in pursuit of public functions of the State of Qatar'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australian politician refuses to stand down despite being jailed for rape
Australian politician refuses to stand down despite being jailed for rape

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Australian politician refuses to stand down despite being jailed for rape

An Australian politician has refused to stand down despite being jailed for rape, sparking an urgent court battle to expel the sex offender from a state parliament. Gareth Ward, a New South Wales state politician, was found guilty last month of sexually abusing two young men, aged 18 and 24, between 2013 and 2015. The 44-year-old former Liberal Party member has refused to stand down from state parliament, despite sitting in prison while awaiting sentencing for his crimes. Chris Minns, the state premier, said Ward had 'no shame', pledging to move a motion that would expel him from parliament, saying it's the 'first and most obvious choice'. 'Unconscionable situation' Mr Minns said: 'It's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in jail in Silverwater, convicted of serious sexual offences, who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid.' But Ward has so far stymied these efforts, obtaining a temporary injunction late on Monday that prevented the Labour government from removing him. Mark Speakman, the opposition leader, joined calls for Ward to step aside. The leader of the NSW Liberals, which Ward was formerly a part of, said: 'Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive.' Ron Hoenig, the leader of the House, said the government would seek an urgent hearing this week to have the injunction lifted. He told reporters: 'The issue is, as you would appreciate, of considerable significance. 'The House needs to be able to make its judgment to protect itself. And we will be seeking a review of the judge's decision.' Ward said he planned to appeal his convictions, and should remain in parliament until this appeal is heard. He is due to be sentenced next month, for three counts of indecent assault and one count of rape.

Four-week-old baby is found with broken bones in sickening alleged case of child neglect
Four-week-old baby is found with broken bones in sickening alleged case of child neglect

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Four-week-old baby is found with broken bones in sickening alleged case of child neglect

A man and a woman have been charged after allegedly assaulting a four-week-old baby in Adelaide 's south, leaving the newborn with serious injuries. Police allege the newborn was taken to hospital with a swollen leg on May 3 where a medical examination identified injuries including bone fractures. Detectives from the Southern District Criminal Investigation Branch launched an investigation into the child's injuries. Following investigations, a woman, 34, and a man, 33, both from Reynella East, in Adelaide's south, were arrested on Tuesday. They were both charged with criminal neglect and recklessly causing serious harm. Police said the parties were known to one another. They were granted bail to appear at Christies Beach Magistrates Court in September.

Kmart is hit with bombshell claims it mislead customers about the horrific place it sourced clothing
Kmart is hit with bombshell claims it mislead customers about the horrific place it sourced clothing

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Kmart is hit with bombshell claims it mislead customers about the horrific place it sourced clothing

Retail giant Kmart is facing accusations it misled customers on its ethical credentials by sourcing clothing supplies from factories in China with links to slave labour. An Australian-based Uyghur group has filed a lawsuit against the outlet in the Federal Court, seeking to gain documents so they can see whether it knowingly sourced stock from suppliers who used forced labour from those in the ethnic group. In its ethical sourcing statement, Kmart said it aimed to provide products that respected human rights according to its ethical sourcing code which committed to abiding by international standards, including guidelines set out in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The lawsuit filed by the Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women's Association claims Kmart included on its 2024 and 2025 factory lists two suppliers with links to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. It said this region in China's west has been well- documented for 'systemic state-sponsored forced labour and other atrocities against Uyghur and other Turkic Muslim people '. The group wants proof from Kmart that it has abided by its ethical sourcing promises regarding these suppliers and whether its public statements have been misleading or deceptive. Kmart must ensure it is not profiting off forced labour in China, association president Ramila Chanisheff said. 'We're demanding answers from Kmart so we know whether its actions live up to its words about addressing forced labour risks in its supply chain,' she said. The retailer risks a legal claim that it breached Australian Consumer Law by misleading and deceptive conduct if documents show it had failed to monitor the risk of it using forced labour in its supply chain. Maurice Blackburn principal lawyer Jennifer Kanis said the firm was using this first-of-its-kind case to bring real accountability to Australian retailers. 'Kmart tells customers that it supports ethical sourcing and the protection of human rights - but we know there are credible links between two of its factories and suppliers and the use of Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang,' Ms Kanis said. Human Rights Law Centre associate legal director Freya Dinshaw said the case highlighted the weaknesses in Australia's laws when members of the public are left to take companies to court on suspicions of modern slavery. Unlike the United States, Australia has not banned imports of products made in the Xinjiang region, instead opting for a transparency approach which requires businesses to report annually on their actions to identify and address slavery risks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store