Flowers, Cake & Gift of Knowing Inheritance Rights for Mom
Many mothers lose their rightful share in property and wealth because of sheer ignorance about succession laws for women. So, as you celebrate Mother's Day with flowers and gifts, make sure to inform her about her inheritance and legal rights.
#Operation Sindoor
India-Pakistan Clash Live Updates| Pak moving troops to border areas? All that's happening
Why India chose to abstain instead of 'No Vote' against IMF billion-dollar funding to Pakistan
How Pak's jihadi general Munir became trapped in his own vice
As with men, women's inheritance rights are governed by succession and personal laws if the deceased does not leave a will.
As per the
Hindu Succession Act
, 1956 (for Hindus, Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs), the mother is classified as a Class I heir. 'This means that if a Hindu son dies intestate (without leaving a will), the mother is entitled to an equal share in his estate alongside the other surviving Class I heirs, if any,' said Raj Lakhotia, managing partner at professional services firm LABH & Associates. If an unmarried Hindu woman dies intestate, her mother is entitled to a share in her estate.
'Among Muslims, as per Sharia Law (subject to Sunni and Shia variations), mother is a primary heir and is entitled to a fixed share. If the deceased son has children (or grandchildren), she gets one-sixth share of the property, and if he has no kids (or grandkids), the mother's share increases to one-third of the estate,' said Neha Pathak, head of Trust & Estate Planning at Motilal Oswal Private Wealth.
A Christian mother's right to inheritance is governed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
'If the deceased is survived by a spouse and children, the entire estate is divided among them. The mother does not automatically receive a share,' said Sneha Makhija, head of Wealth Planning at Sanctum Wealth.
If there are no surviving spouse or kids, the mother can inherit a large portion of the estate.
Among Parsis, the mother is entitled to a share of the estate under Section 51 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 'If the deceased leaves a spouse and children, each parent receives a share equal to half of each child. In the absence of a spouse or kids, the parents, individually or jointly, inherit the entire estate,' said Lakhotia.
A woman's property is passed on to her heirs depending on whether she has made a will or not. If she has made a will, her property, whether self-acquired or inherited, will be distributed according to the terms of the will. She can bequeath it to anyone she chooses, including individuals outside the family.
If she hasn't made a will,
intestate succession
laws apply, and these vary based on her religion. For Hindus, it is governed by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, wherein the estate is passed on to the legal heirs in order of preference, with the first being husband, children and children of predeceased children. Then comes the legal heirs of her husband; followed by her mother and father, then the legal heirs of her father and, finally, the legal heirs of her mother. 'The Act also ensures that daughters have the same rights of inheritance as sons, regardless of their marital status,' said Rajat Dutta, founder & initiator at Inheritance Needs Services.
For Muslims, the devolution is governed by the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, wherein legal heirs are divided into sharers and residuaries. While sharers get the first share, residuaries get the remaining portion. If she inherits property from a relative, be it husband, son or parent, she is the absolute owner and can dispose of at will. If she makes a will, she can't give away more than one-third of the property, and if the husband is the only heir, she can give two-thirds of her share.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
16 minutes ago
- Hans India
From Trust to Turmoil: The WazirX Saga and the Imperative for Accountability in Crypto Exchanges
By Vikram Subburaj, CEO, Giottus Crypto Platform In the annals of crypto history, the WazirX debacle stands as a stark reminder of the perils inherent in centralized exchanges operating without stringent oversight. The July 2024 hack, mostly attributed to the notorious Lazarus Group, resulted in the loss of approximately $230 million. It left over 4.4 million users in a dire situation. The subsequent legal proceedings have been protracted and the court is also reviewing a user-backed plan to recover 85% of the stolen funds. While this plan has garnered support from 93% of users, the remaining 15% of assets remain unresolved. As such, we do not know of any timeline for full restitution. Accountability: A Non-Negotiable Mandate Exchanges must be held to the highest standards of accountability, especially in an emerging sector like crypto. The WazirX incident underscores the necessity for exchanges to have robust security protocols, transparent operations, and contingency plans to protect user assets. The lack of timely communication also accentuated the problem and eroded user trust and highlighted systemic vulnerabilities. Regulatory Clarity: The Need of the Hour The absence of clear regulatory frameworks exacerbates the challenges faced during such crises. India's much-awaited crypto regulations are expected to draw from global standards set by the IMF and FSB. The Union Ministry of Economic Affairs is also working on a crucial concept paper. The regulations will aim to establish a more secure and transparent environment for digital assets trading. As of now, all worthy exchanges in India mandate stringent KYC/AML procedures and regular audits. The regulations may also look at capital adequacy norms to ensure exchanges can withstand financial shocks, like in case of WazirX. Proactive Measures for Users: Navigating Future Crises In light of such incidents, users must adopt a proactive stance to safeguard their investments: Due Diligence: Before engaging with an exchange, assess its security infrastructure, regulatory compliance, and historical performance. Self-Custody: Utilize hardware wallets or other secure storage solutions to maintain control over your assets. Stay Informed: Regularly monitor official communications from exchanges and regulatory bodies to stay abreast of developments. Legal Recourse: In the event of fund loss, promptly consult legal experts to explore avenues for restitution. Community Engagement: Join user groups and forums to share information, coordinate actions, and amplify collective concerns. However, be wary of alarmist social media messages that could drive users to panic. Rely on respected and reliable sources before you act. Diversification: Avoid concentrating assets in a single platform or asset class to mitigate risk exposure. The WazirX episode serves as a cautionary tale, and it emphasises the critical need for accountability, regulatory clarity, and user vigilance in the crypto ecosystem. As the industry matures, stakeholders must collaborate to build a resilient infrastructure that prioritises the security and trust of its users.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
IMF warns 2030 sustainable development goals at risk as funding gaps widen
New Delhi: The International Monetary Fund has warned that the world is increasingly unlikely to meet the sustainable development goals (SDGs) by 2030 as financing needs far exceed what many countries can realistically manage—raising the risk of broader macroeconomic imbalances. The warning came after the IMF executive board reviewed a staff paper evaluating the fund's role in supporting international development financing. The review precedes the Fourth Financing for Development Conference (FfD4), scheduled to be held in Sevilla, Spain, from 30 June 30 to 3 July. The IMF paper flags a deteriorating development outlook, reassesses the feasibility of the SDGs, and outlines measures to accelerate progress amid mounting financial and economic pressures. 'A series of shocks since 2020 has compounded longstanding structural challenges, hitting low-income and fragile states the hardest,' the IMF said in a statement on Friday. 'Debt vulnerabilities deserve attention, particularly for low-income countries,' it added. While debt remains broadly sustainable, the IMF noted that many countries face steep interest costs and rising refinancing needs, constraining their ability to invest in critical development spending. 'Against this background, achieving the sustainable development goals by 2030 appears increasingly unlikely,' it said. Adopted in 2015, the SDGs comprise 17 goals and 169 targets designed to eliminate poverty, tackle climate change, reduce inequality, and promote prosperity. But with the deadline fast approaching, global progress is faltering amid growing financing gaps, economic headwinds and geopolitical uncertainty. 'Accelerating development progress will require a major collective effort,' the IMF said, 'including strong domestic reforms, adequate international support, and proactive debt management.' It also called for tailored approaches, warning that rising divergence among developing countries demands more nuanced reform agendas and support frameworks. Meanwhile, IMF directors have stressed the need for a 'major collective effort' combining ambitious domestic reforms with robust international support. This includes advancing sound macroeconomic policies, improving public spending efficiency, strengthening governance, mobilising domestic resources, and boosting private-sector-led growth and job creation. International backing—through well-coordinated capacity development and additional public and private finance—will be critical, the IMF said. The IMF directors have also endorsed efforts to improve debt restructuring mechanisms for countries with unsustainable debt, including deeper relief under the Common Framework and the Global Sovereign Debt Roundtable's new 'restructuring playbook'. They also supported a 'three-pillar approach' to help countries where debt is sustainable but constrains productive spending, the IMF added. The IMF's role, though not developmental by design, remains vital in preserving macroeconomic and financial stability—a prerequisite for sustainable development, it said.
Indian Express
14 hours ago
- Indian Express
Rapid uptake of crypto in developing economies raises concerns, says IMF's Gita Gopinath: Here's why
The International Monetary Fund's (IMF) first deputy managing director Gita Gopinath on Thursday flagged concerns about the rise of crypto uptake in developing economies saying that though nascent, it poses a risk in terms of currency substitution. In an interview with the Financial Times, Gopinath said 'we are seeing some pretty rapid growth of uptake of crypto in some emerging markets.' Emerging markets faced risks from crypto uptake, especially stablecoins, in terms of 'disintermediation of their financial institutions,' she said. 'In terms of currency substitution, those risks are rising,' Gopinath added. Gopinath's comments came against the backdrop of US President Donald Trump's push for a strategic crypto reserve and backing to the issuance of stablecoins to make America the 'crypto capital of the world'. In the Indian subcontinent, Pakistan has recently struck a deal with US-based World Liberty Financial Inc (WLFI) a firm backed by the Trump family, for that country to emerge as a crypto hub while promoting the use of blockchain technology and the use of stablecoins for payments and remittances. Amid a spate of activity in the crypto space, experts echo Gopinath's warning that cryptocurrencies may pose a risk to the currencies and financial institutions of developing and emerging economies. Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies whose value is pegged to an asset such as a currency or commodity such as gold. Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin have rallied since Donald Trump took over as US President owing to the reversal of his earlier skeptical stance on digital coins. He appointed David Sacks as the White House crypto czar while also naming crypto backer Paul S Atkins as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) chair. Flagship cryptocurrency Bitcoin's price stood at $104,512.82 apiece, down 0.07 per cent, at 7:30 pm on Thursday. Last month, Bitcoin breached the $110,00 mark for the first time after the passage of the GENIUS Act Bill in the US Senate owing to bipartisan support. If passed the GENIUS Act is also expected to allow crypto companies to produce more stablecoins. Issuers must be in compliance with anti-money laundering provisions and anti-terrorism regulations, according to the Bill's fine print. Further, stablecoins issuers must back the digital currency with fiat currency or highly liquid assets in a 1:1 ratio. They must also maintain separate reserves to backstop the stablecoins, according to the GENIUS Act Bill. Democratic Senator Mark R Wright, who backed the bill, stated that while there were concerns about the Trump family's involvement in cryptocurrencies to 'evade oversight, hide shady financial dealings, and personally profit at the expense of everyday Americans… blockchain technology is here to stay.' He said it was in America's interest to take the lead on shaping crypto policies. Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren warned that the GENIUS Act Bill did not meet the minimum standards such as guaranteeing consumer protection and preventing the illicit use of stablecoins. Passage of the GENIUS Act may pose a risk since the illicit use of stablecoins already make up 60 per cent of unlawful crypto transactions. If passed, the GENIUS Act is expected to boost the stablecoin market's growth by 10X to $2 trillion, Warren said citing industry estimates. Developing countries and their dalliance with cryptocurrencies Pakistan recently announced a collaboration between the Pakistan Crypto Council and the WLFI, which envisages the use of blockchain technology to promote financial inclusion. It also aims to monetise national assets such as rare earths besides using stablecoins in trade and remittance. Pakistan eyes the status of a regional crypto hub as a result of this agreement. Experts warn of the inherent instability of the crypto asset system. To elaborate on Gopinath's warning, a paper titled 'Crypto assets as a threat to financial market stability' states that currencies of emerging and developing economies may lose their importance as store of value owing to higher inflation rates, leading to a rising degree of substitution of the domestic currency by a foreign currency. According to an UNCTAD study, this may result in the 'cryptoisation' of emerging and developing economy currencies relative to their GDP and backed by factors such as a younger population as well as macroeconomic stability. In Central America, El Salvador, which approved Bitcoin as official tender in 2021, the cryptocurrency has seldom found use as a means for buying goods and services. Stablecoins may also pose a risk similar to that seen during a bank run — when depositors and investors rush to cash their assets after a bank is unable to honour its financial commitments owing to a shortage of assets. According to the paper cited above, the linkage of stablecoins to a currency creates arbitrage opportunities leading to speculation. Former US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen during a US Congressional hearing said fears of inadequate asset backing for stablecoins may also lead to a sell off triggering a situation similar to a bank run. In March this year, Trump announced the creation of a strategic crypto reserve — a basket comprising Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Solana and Cardano. While flagging 'corrupt attacks (on cryptocurrencies) by the Biden administration' Trump in a Truth Social post said the US Crypto Reserve, part of his executive order on digital assets will 'elevate this critical industry'. 'I will make sure the US is the Crypto Capital of the World,' Trump said. Under Trump, the US has dropped probes and legal lawsuits related to alleged securities violations against cryptocurrency firms and exchanges. The US government holds an estimated 200,000 Bitcoin pending an audit, according to a fact sheet shared by the White House. To be sure, the US crypto reserve will only store digital tokens obtained through forfeiture proceedings — it will not purchase additional reserves at the cost of the American taxpayer's money, according to the White House fact sheet.
