
Zscaler to acquire MDR specialist Red Canary to bolster zero-trust capabilities
NEW DELHI:
Cloud security solutions
provider
Zscaler
has signed an agreement to acquire
managed detection and response
(MDR) specialist,
Red Canary
, to bolster in-house zero-trust solutions.
The deal, whose financial terms were not disclosed, is expected to close in August 2025.
Founded in 2014, the privately-held startup has raised $135 million in multiple rounds from investors including Summit Partners, Noro-Moseley Partners and Kyrus Tech, according to data from market intelligence firm Tracxn. Its competitors include Carbon Black, Cyberhaven and Absolute Software.
According to its website, Red Canary works with nearly 1,000 organisations, and provides MDR across its customers' cloud workloads, identities, SaaS applications, networks, and endpoints.
'With our innovative AI-powered risk management services like Risk360 and the acquired data fabric technology from Avalor, we are disrupting legacy security operations just like we did with our Zero Trust Exchange platform,' said Jay Chaudhry, CEO, chairman, and founder of Zscaler.
'By integrating Red Canary with Zscaler, we will deliver to our customers the power of a fully integrated Zero Trust platform and AI-powered security operations,' Chaudhry added.
The San Jose, US-headquartered cybersecurity giant offers solutions to nearly 45% of the
Fortune 500 companies
.
The companies said the integration of their solutions will enable security teams to detect, triage, investigate, and respond to threats with better speed and efficiency, helping organisations precisely tackle modern security challenges.
'Zscaler's global scale and reach provide the resources and granular data needed to fuel advanced AI,
threat intelligence
, and detection engineering, giving us a broader view of adversary behavior while enabling faster innovation across the board,' said Brian Beyer, CEO of Red Canary.
Forrester
analysts, however, expressed apprehensions about the foundation of the deal.
'While MDR is taking a turn towards more proactive capabilities and zero-trust can reduce the impact of breaches, zero-trust and MDR do not amplify one another. Therefore, bundling SSE with MDR is not a natural or compelling consumption model,' the analysts said in a blog article, analysing the deal.
According to Forrester, the managed network security and the managed SIEM segments have failed to create synergies beyond bundling via a single catalog of services. 'In fact, the challenges created by this disconnect helped create MDR as a standalone market,' they said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Standard
34 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump's trade tantrum, and stock market: The ABCD strategy of investing
For Indian retail investors, this is not a moment for fear but a moment for foresight, says Sandeep Walunj of Motilal Oswal Financial Services. premium Sandeep Walunj Mumbai Listen to This Article Trump's unpredictable and transactional approach to trade—especially with partners like India—could trigger short-term market volatility. But structural geopolitical trends, such as the potential US-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA), the India-EU FTA, the China+1 strategy, and evolving BRICS dynamics, are tilting the balance in India's favour. Even if Trump's return stirs disruption, Indian investors are better positioned today. Global resistance to US hegemony, rising inflation concerns in the US, and India's growing strategic autonomy act as counterweights. Navigating this terrain requires smart thinking across three horizons: short, medium, and long-term. SHORT TERM (0–6 months): Defensive, yet opportunistic
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
US remittance tax to revive hawala, hand cartels a financial lifeline
Hidden on page 1,054 of President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is a threat to impose a 3.5 per cent tax on all remittance transfers made by non-citizens to accounts outside the country. This is a dangerous, backward-looking provision, and will make Americans less safe without raising much revenue. It is easy to understand why a measure like this would appeal to the current administration. It makes migrants' lives harder, and that's enough for it to be worth passing into law. And it certainly will create difficulties for millions of legal and illegal immigrants in the US, as well as for their families outside. Mexico's president, Claudia Sheinbaum, has been a vocal opponent, saying — correctly — that this is unjustifiable double taxation. Her country, the largest destination for such transfers, has a lot to lose. But other countries are also worried. India is the third-largest destination for remittances from the US, receiving about $18 billion in 2024; the Philippines and China aren't far behind, at $14 billion each. According to Capital Economics, US-based remittances support 3 per cent of the Philippines' GDP. The impact on migration-dependent areas of the world will be severe. For some countries in Central America, national income might fall by almost 1 per cent if this proposal is implemented. Meanwhile, some estimates suggest that even a higher 5 per cent rate would only increase the US' takings by 0.1 per cent. For the remittance tax's backers, that's beside the point. Vice President JD Vance, when he was still a senator, introduced a similar bill. At that time, he said that 'this legislation is a common-sense solution to disincentivise illegal immigration and reduce the cartels' financial power.' That argument is exactly backward. What common sense actually tells you is that if less money is available in some of the poorest parts of Central America, it increases the incentives for people there to try and move to the US to join their family members already there. As for the impact on criminal networks — well, history suggests that they'll welcome this. The world has spent decades trying to make legal transfers cheap and efficient. An additional levy might increase the cost of transferring even small sums four fold. This would reverse all our efforts to force this trade above ground. If legal transfers are made too expensive, illegal and informal networks take their place. Some people have happily assumed that Bitcoin will fill the gap. But, more likely, there will be a renaissance in simpler, older mechanisms for international transfers. In South and West Asia, we call these methods 'hawala.' But other parts of the world derived equivalents independently. In China, for example, such mechanisms are called 'fei-ch'ien.' From a customer's point of view, they're simple to use. All you need to do is find a well-networked trader and give them the cash to be transferred. That person then calls somebody in their clan or village back home, who gives the same amount of cash to the chosen recipient. The two members of the hawala network settle accounts between each other once or twice a year, through smuggling or perhaps through false invoices and shell companies. Naturally, such informal mechanisms to transfer value can be used not just to evade the remittance excise, but taxes in general. Worse, they are frequently used as conduits for terrorism and drug financing — which is why governments have spent decades trying to stamp them out. This was hard because, if enough people use these systems, they can be more efficient and cheaper than formal finance. The exchange rates that hawala traders offer are often more attractive, and their fees take less of a bite out of small transactions than many banks do. In spite of the best efforts of regulators and cops, hawala networks only really shrank when other routes became more competitive. Informal currency traders need a large volume of transactions to be efficient and offer the best rates to their customers, so when their custom shrank, they became less attractive. It's this self-reinforcing loop that the remittance tax threatens to break. Suddenly, hawala networks — and their equivalents in South and Central America — will become appealing again. And when this method returns to its former prominence, it will become easier to pay those who smuggle opiates or people. And, of course, criminal syndicates of various types will once again step in to run these systems, and profit accordingly. The vice president is, not for the first time, wrong: His administration's remittance tax doesn't attack the cartels, it empowers them.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
India and China are promising alternatives for investment, says Mirae Asset VC
Mirae Asset suggests India and China as promising investment alternatives amid concerns over US economic dominance and policy shifts. Mirae Asset suggests India and China as investment alternatives. This comes amid concerns about over-reliance on the US economy. Weakening global confidence and rising nationalism are factors. India's digital infrastructure and population growth are attractive. China's policy shifts are also creating opportunities. Foxconn plans a significant investment in its India unit. South Korean exports to the US have declined recently. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads India and China emerge as promising alternatives for investments, said Mirae Asset Securities Vice Chairman Heo Sun-ho while speaking at a global asset allocation forum in Seoul on Thursday, reports Korea the return of US President Donald Trump to the Oval Office, crack seems to emerge 'in the US-centered investment landscape'. Speaking at the summit hosted by Mirae Asset, Heo-Sin-ho said the over-dependence on the US as its primary growth engine needs to be re-examined."The recent depreciation of the US dollar reflects weakening global confidence, spurred by growing nationalism and ballooning fiscal deficits," Heo said, urging investors to pivot from a US-centric strategy and realign their portfolios with the shifting global innovation vice chairman mentioned that India is emerging as a vast consumer market, driven by robust digital infrastructure and a rapidly expanding to Heo Sun-ho, "Innovative technology that once fuelled US growth is no longer its exclusive domain."He also cited how Chinese AI Startup, DeepSeek positioning itself as a challenger to OpenAI, alongside Chinese automobile company BYD which in April overtook Tesla in the European electric vehicle market for the first to the director and head of Asia Pacific Research at Mirae Asset Hong Kong, policy shifts in China are also creating a more favourable environment for foreign investors. He also echoed the call for a diversified investment South Korean exports to US were down 8.1 per cent for the month of May, as compared to same month last year, weighed down by the US President Donald Trump's tariff, as it took a toll on automobile supplier Foxconn is set to invest USD 1.5 billion in its India unit, Reuters reported, citing a company filing. (ANI)