logo
How Labour is bribing landlords to house migrants and OUTBID Brits trying to rent – and YOU are paying for it

How Labour is bribing landlords to house migrants and OUTBID Brits trying to rent – and YOU are paying for it

The Sun11-05-2025

IF you want an example of the shocking sense of unfairness that now defines Keir Starmer's Britain, look no further than the housing market.
Ordinarily, you might expect a civilised country like ours to have a housing market that treats its own people fairly, that treats those who have paid into the collective pot for generations with the respect and decency they deserve.
4
4
But that is not what is happening today. Far from it.
Only last month it was revealed that the British state and the ruling class are using the British people's own money — taxpayers' money — to outbid British people in the housing market to favour the rising numbers of illegal migrants who are breaking our laws.
Yes, you read that right. You could not make it up.
The ­British state, financed by the taxpayer, is enabling private ­ companies such as Serco to offer more favourable ­contracts to private landlords who rent their homes to illegal migrants and ­asylum seekers instead of renting out these properties to the many ­British families, workers and young people who need them and whose relatives have been paying into the system for decades.
Under these shocking contracts, landlords are being offered far more favourable five-year deals that remove the risk of tenants not paying their rent, funding for property repairs, and even money to cover spiralling council tax bills.
Simply outrageous
In other words, they are being given big incentives to house people who are breaking our laws which, in turn, will almost certainly encourage hundreds of thousands more migrants to cross the Channel in search of homes and welfare.
You might as well put a big ­flashing neon sign on the White Cliffs of Dover that reads: 'Free Homes for Illegal Migrants'.
Let me ask some questions that nobody in Westminster seems to be asking.
How is this right? How is this fair? And how is this just?
It's not. It's simply outrageous and, once again, it makes a total mockery of the long-standing sense of fair play in this country.
Dinghy migrants filmed boasting about life in hotels YOU pay for as bills rocket for millions of Brits
I ask these questions not just because of the underlying political decision to prioritise foreigners over Brits, which truly stinks, but also because of the staggering cost of all this to British taxpayers.
It is, put simply, absolutely ­enormous. Only this week, we learn from a new government report about the truly mind-boggling numbers.
In the past year alone, because of the total failure of our leaders to do whatever necessary to fix our borders, the British people were forced to pay an eye-watering £1.67BILLION housing illegal migrants and asylum seekers, which is equivalent to £4.6million every day or £3,177 every minute.
How many winter fuel payments could that provide? How many nurses?
And how many police ­officers to stop the shoplifting and violent crime that is now going mainstream in this country?
Would Brits rather have 15 new hospitals or keep going with Keir Starmer's insane, failing and extreme policy, which is making the chaos at our borders even worse
Unless something changes soon — such as fixing our broken borders and sending all those illegal migrants to processing centres offshore — then these already enormous costs will only spiral to new, dizzying heights.
In fact, that same report estimates that over the decade to come, amid an ongoing cost-of-living crisis, the British people will have to pay somewhere in the region of £10BILLION for these housing costs, which is equivalent to about 15 brand new hospitals for the British people.
I wonder: would Brits rather have 15 new hospitals or keep going with Keir Starmer's insane, failing and extreme policy, which is just making the chaos at our borders even worse?
And when it comes to the palpable sense of unfairness that is now running through our housing market, it is not just about the spiralling ­number of illegal migrants.
Completely ­misleading
It's also about how mass ­uncontrolled immigration more widely is driving up the cost of rent and house prices across Britain, pushing the prospect of having a place to call home — one of the most basic things in life — further and further away from the hard-working, tax-paying, law-abiding who deserve this right.
In the past couple of years alone, record levels of net migration added more than 1.2million people to the UK population, which is equivalent to another city the size of Birmingham.
And so, while Keir Starmer and Labour MPs claim they are solving the housing crisis by ­easing planning reforms and building more homes, this is completely ­misleading.
As the reputable think-tank the Centre For Policy Studies has recently shown, over the past decade — and because of mass immigration — the ­ruling class in this country built 1.3million fewer homes than are needed to keep up with the current record rates of population growth.
In recent years, we have only been building around 178,000 homes in England when, in reality, because of record immigration, we need to build around 515,000 new homes every year.
What this means is that even Keir Starmer's and Labour's target of building some 370,000 homes every year is simply nowhere enough to deal with the enormous pressure that is now being imposed on the housing market and the country by mass uncontrolled immigration.
4
Woefully short
In fact, according to those policy wonks, migrants now account for more than half — 56 per cent — of the total housebuilding need in this ­country and, shockingly, nearly 90 per cent of that historic deficit of 1.3million homes.
The fact we are falling woefully short of what we need also helps to explain why house prices and rents are soaring, especially in London and the South East, where migrants tend to live — and the pressure for housing is now unbearable.
In the two years to June 2023, for example, which is the most recent data available, rents climbed 11 per cent higher than they would otherwise have done because of immigration.
The increased pressure because of the mass influx, highlighted by Capital Economics, created an additional 430,000 households, which helps to explain why, for example, rents in London recently surged by nearly 12 per cent, which is the ­fastest annual pace since records began in 2006.
Driving up rents
Such is the competition now that in London, on average 15 people are looking to rent the same flat or house, a figure that has more than doubled since before the pandemic.
As even the typically pro-immigration academics at the ­University of Oxford's Migration Observatory admit, there is now considerable evidence to support the claim that mass immigration is pushing up UK house prices — a fact that most people in the fanatically pro-immigration Labour Party still refuse to accept.
The key point in all this — even if it's routinely ignored by our hapless ­politicians in Westminster — is that you can have available and affordable housing for British people in this country or you can have the ongoing policy of mass, uncontrolled immigration, which is driving up rents and house prices.
You simply cannot have both.
The British people and their ­children deserve to live in a society where those who have paid tax, who have paid into the collective pot for ­generations, who play by the rules, and who respect our laws are ­prioritised above ­everybody else.
This common-sense suggestion, to embed a principle of 'national preference' into our housing market, whereby Brits are prioritised over everybody else, will inevitably lead to the woke politicians who are reading this ­spitting out their morning croissant.
But it is, ultimately, what the hardworking and tax-paying majority in this country deserve.
And I make no apologies for saying it.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Danes Moss: Campaigners say peatland plan withdrawal 'step to victory'
Danes Moss: Campaigners say peatland plan withdrawal 'step to victory'

BBC News

time12 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Danes Moss: Campaigners say peatland plan withdrawal 'step to victory'

Campaigners have welcomed a council's decision to scrap its plans for close to 1,000 homes on a peatland site in Cheshire as the "first step to victory".Cheshire East Council has rowed back on the proposal and asked officers to look at alternative uses for Danes Moss in Macclesfield, which could include restoring the Eccles, the chair of the Danes Moss Trust, said he felt pressure from the campaign group had led to the decision and there was "no justification to build there". Cheshire East opposition councillor, Conservative Chris O'Leary, told a meeting of the authority it was right to "reset the council's plan". The original proposals for the site, known as the South Macclesfield Development Area, included 950 homes, a supermarket and a link East Council owns 55% of the site, while Barratt Homes owns approximately 41%.Campaigners had been calling for no building there because of the amount of peatland, although it has been earmarked for development since 1997.A report ahead of the council meeting said the proposals to build on the land "cannot be fully reconciled" with the council's peat and carbon on Cheshire East Council's economy and growth committee voted on Tuesday to withdraw the homes application and approved plans to review include selling the land rethinking the development plans, or allowing for a "nature-led" recovery, an option added after a cross-party amendment. During the debate, O'Leary said: "Anyone who's visited Dane's Moss will know what an incredibly special place it is and it's quite right we reset the council's plans".The withdrawal was needed to "consider all the available options and make the right decisions for the right reasons for the future of this incredible site," he Labour's Anna Burton said that doing nothing was "not an option"."The wetland peat is drying out, so whatever decisions are made long term doing nothing is not an option," she councillors voted in favour of the withdrawing the application, with two Eccles told BBC Politics North West that he hoped councillors had "seen sense that there's no justification on earth to damage or build on peatlands".He said: "It's good news that the original plans are not going to go ahead but we still feel there should be zero development on this site because of the huge global importance of peatlands."James Melling of the Cheshire Wildlife Trust, which has a nature reserve on the border of the site, said he was "delighted" with the said: "I think it's testament to the hard work of all the campaigners involved and Save Danes Moss have been fantastic." See more Cheshire stories from the BBC and follow BBC North West on X. For more local politics coverage, BBC Politics North West is on BBC One on Sunday at 10:00am and on BBC iPlayer.

Leicester woman vows to fight 'political' camping table fine
Leicester woman vows to fight 'political' camping table fine

BBC News

time17 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Leicester woman vows to fight 'political' camping table fine

A woman has vowed to fight a fine she was given for setting up a table in Leicester city centre while campaigning against city council Rawling was given a £100 penalty under new rules to prevent anti-social behaviour on Saturday 31 72-year-old, from Leicester, said she believed the fine had been issued to prevent political campaigning and she would rather go to court than council said its new public spaces protection order (PSPO) introduced in April does not restrict free speech and that Mrs Rawling had been fined for putting an unauthorised structure on the highway. Mrs Rawling, a member of the Socialist Party, said she was not causing a nuisance or blocking the highway. "I accept the PSPO can be needed to deal with people on e-bikes, noisy speakers or street drinkers," she said."But this was a small camping table which we had for leaflets and so people could sign a petition."I don't think we were in anybody's way. There's plenty of space. We weren't being a nuisance."I think this was political - we were asked to take it down because we were campaigning about council cuts."It was all very amicable. The warden asked me to take it down. I said I would not and he issued a fine."I'm not going to pay it on principle, and if I have to go to court, I will."Mrs Rawling said she was opposing cuts to public services at the city council, including potential closures of community centres, and public sector job council said the penalty for breaching a PSPO could rise to £1,000 if the matter goes to court for prosecution. 'Noticeably improved' Campaigners previously wrote to Leicester's mayor Sir Peter Soulsby seeking assurances they are exempt from the PSPO.A number of groups including unions and political parties said they feared the order could "constitute an unjustified limit on their democratic rights" as the ban also includes "unauthorised structures" such as banners, stalls and told the BBC: "There's absolutely nothing in the PSPO that prevents people from going out and trying to persuade people on political matters - if they do it without a table or gazebo or loud speaker."A council spokesperson said: "The PSPO does not restrict freedom of speech, but it does restrict the nuisance of amplifiers, gazebos and other structures that more than 1,100 respondents to our consultation told us negatively impacted their experience of Leicester city centre."Many groups have been respectful of this so far and, as a result, the environment in the city centre is noticeably improved.""This group had put up a table, in breach of the public spaces protection order (PSPO) that covers the city centre. "One of our wardens asked them to take down the table and advised that if they didn't, they would be issued with a fixed penalty notice. "They refused to take it down and so a fine was issued."The council said three fixed penalty notices were issued in May under the new PSPO rules - all relating to unauthorised use of unauthorised structures on the highway.

'Change is really happening', says Portsmouth Pride organiser
'Change is really happening', says Portsmouth Pride organiser

BBC News

time22 minutes ago

  • BBC News

'Change is really happening', says Portsmouth Pride organiser

"My dad is Muslim and he's always championed and supported me. Me being out and a lesbian has never been an issue."Tally Aslam is co-chair of Portsmouth Pride, a volunteer-run local charity hosting UK Pride 2025 this told the BBC how she came out in 2000 at the age of 15, after she was accused of being "disruptive" in school when she asked about gay relationships in a sex education her dad is her biggest supporter, Ms Aslam said "culturally, there is still a lot of homophobia in non-white communities". "It's not all smooth sailing, other members of my family are not as open-minded as my dad – but then my dad married a white woman so, he's not really one for conforming all the time," she the time Ms Aslam was at school in the Hampshire city, a law called Section 28 was in place that affected the LGBT+ in May 1988, Section 28 of the Local Government Act banned places like schools and libraries from "promoting homosexuality". It was repealed in England and Wales in meant that school teachers were effectively banned from talking or educating people about homosexuality."I didn't even know it [Section 28] existed until I was in my 30s, which is shocking," said Ms Aslam."When I was in school and doing sex education, I asked about gay relationships and was sent to the headmistress's office for being disruptive."But Ms Aslam said she felt "lucky", adding: "All I can do is look at how my dad interprets the Quran and his faith and lead from that. "When it comes to religion, I think a lot of it is interpretation and opinion – you can either use that interpretation to embrace and love people for their differences or you can use it alienate and marginalise communities."On both sides of the coin, the Muslim community is seen through one lens when actually there are so many Muslim people who are LGBTQ+ and have supportive families." Growing up in Portsmouth, Ms Aslam said "homophobia was really rife". "You look on Facebook today and the comments are still there," she said. "People are emboldened by things that happen in the world and legislation emboldens people to embrace their bigotry."However, she said in the eight years she has been involved with Portsmouth Pride, she has seen "huge steps forward from local organisations and individuals"."My favourite bit of Pride is those tiny moments that no-one else sees that show that change is really happening," she said."For me, it is about making Portsmouth a more inclusive city and a better place to grow up LGBTQ+ than it was when I grew up here." You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store