Fraudster mum stole £166k from firm and gorged on Greggs and Deliveroo takeaways
A personal assistant stole more than £166,000 from a former business director while living in a £1million home.
Hemalatha Jayaprakash, 44, joined the Birmingham-based Northwood estate agents in 2012 as a personal assistant to director Nin Rehal, 57.
Jayaprakash stole more than £6,000 knowing he was out of the office because his mother had passed away 24 hours earlier.
The officer manager splurged on lottery tickets, Greggs and Deliveroo takeaways.
When he decided to sell in 2023, Jayaprakash's fraud was exposed when the accounts were examined.
In court, Jayaprakash said she sent money to pay her child's school fees and help relatives in India who lost their homes in floods.
Jayaprakash wailed in anguish when she was jailed for two years and three months at Birmingham Crown Court on May 21 after pleading guilty to fraud and abuse of position.
Rehal said he was 'devastated' that he had been betrayed by his trusted personal assistant.
He said: 'This fraud was not opportunistic; it was calculated, premeditated and a sustained scheme executed over multiple years.
'I used to confide in Jayaprakash in daily meetings, sometimes in tears, but she would tell me not to worry about the office, all is in control with the team.'
Jayaprakash turned up at Rehal's mother's funeral with her husband. Rehal said: 'This is the level of greed, deception and betrayal we are dealing with.'
He told the court he had to release equity from his family home to make ends meet, including supporting his two children at university.
Rehal added: 'Meanwhile, Mrs Jayaprakash resides in a £1million property, purchased outright in 2018, and benefits from income generated by a portfolio of at least eight rental properties.'
Jayaprakash's husband said his family had no idea about her deception and were planning a family trip to India.
She told him she was driving off in the family Land Rover to view offices for a new job but was instead appearing in court.
The family only found out she had been jailed 12 hours later, following their own search and getting in contact with police.
Jayaprakash told MailOnline: 'We weren't aware of any of this, it is such a difficult time for the family. We had absolutely no idea.
'My wife didn't need the money and we are trying to find out what really happened, and maybe she was coerced by someone. More Trending
'We don't have any money issues, we are not struggling financially, so why would she do this?
'We cannot comprehend this, it is beyond belief and we are totally shattered and devastated. It is such a shock.'
Recorder Amy Jackson said: 'Everything I have read about this lady takes me to the belief she is from an affluent background where she ought not to need to steal to fund a lifestyle and effectively does lead a lavish lifestyle. This was pure greed.'
A Proceeds of Crime Act hearing will be held on August 26 to determine issues around confiscation, costs and compensation.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Benefits cheat mum said she had severe MS while posting about running 10k races
MORE: Man who burned Koran outside embassy says verdict is 'assault on free speech'
MORE: Moment Scottish gangster chased through his Spanish pub and shot dead
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Coin Geek
30 minutes ago
- Coin Geek
Coinbase was hacked by snarky teens; Circle upsizes IPO
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... Coinbase (NASDAQ: COIN) was aware of its customer data leak far earlier than the digital asset exchange previously acknowledged, while its stablecoin partner Circle is supersizing its initial public offering (IPO) plans. On June 3, Reuters reported that the recently disclosed hack of Coinbase's customer data by customer support staff in India involved the local operation of a Texas-based business process outsourcing firm called TaskUs. In January, at least one TaskUs employee was caught using their phone to photograph Coinbase customer information from a computer screen. Four sources, including three TaskUs staffers, told Reuters that Coinbase was notified immediately of the security breach, and TaskUs promptly fired two staffers involved in the incident. Coinbase responded by cutting ties with TaskUs, resulting in over 200 staff in the city of Indore losing their jobs. The mass layoff was reported in Indian media at the time. And yet, it wasn't until May 15 that Coinbase acknowledged the breach in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Coinbase said at the time that it knew the contractors had improperly accessed customer data in 'previous months' but didn't realize the extent of the breach until May 11, when it received a ransom demand from individuals to whom the data had been forwarded. Coinbase estimated that nearly 70,000 of its customers have been impacted. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong later claimed that the exchange began notifying impacted users on April 11 but failed to explain why the SEC wasn't notified until a month later. Crypto journalist Molly White noted that Coinbase revised its user agreement on April 12 to limit customers' ability to participate in class action suits against the exchange. TaskUs has since been hit with a class action suit by Coinbase customers alleging negligence. TaskUs said it 'believes these claims are without merit' and will defend itself in court. Coinbase's customer support is notoriously glacial in its response to complaints, a bad reputation that shows little sign of improvement. Some U.S. customers have resorted to filing complaints with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) based on its requirements for companies to respond within 15 days. That could explain CEO Armstrong's (incorrect) view that the CFPB is an 'unconstitutional' body that should be 'deleted' because it has 'done enormous harm to the country.' Coinbase has been the subject of over 8,000 complaints with the CFPB, a body that the current federal administration is in the process of dismantling. Insult to injury Fortune reported that Coinbase has used TaskUs services since 2017, but the latter firm's reliance on poorly paid staff in India opens up the potential for staff to supplement their wages with bribes. A TaskUs spokesperson told Fortune that its research suggests the Indore staff who leaked the Coinbase data 'were recruited by a much broader, coordinated criminal campaign against [Coinbase] that also impacted a number of other service providers servicing [Coinbase].' Fortune reported communicating with one of the alleged hackers, who went by the name 'puffy party' on Telegram. This individual claimed to be part of a loosely affiliated group of teenagers and twenty-somethings calling itself 'the Comm' or 'Com' (short for 'community'). This group has been linked to other notable exploits, including the blackmailing of some Las Vegas casino operators in 2023. 'Puffy party' also claimed that members of the Comm/Com perform specific aspects of a heist based on their individual skillsets. One team bribed the TaskUs staff, another performed the social engineering scams, with the spoils divided amongst the teams. In a reflection of this team's juvenile status, 'puffy party' shared screenshots of messages they'd exchanged with what they claimed was a member of Coinbase's security team. The messages show the hackers mocking Armstrong, saying they would use some of the proceeds of their blackmail efforts to 'sponsor a hair transplant so that he may graciously traverse the world with a fresh set of hair.' Back to the top ↑ No KYC, no hacks, no problem Incredibly, the crypto sector's collective response to Coinbase's data hacking scandal is not that the exchange needs to beef up its digital defenses and be more upfront with its customers. Instead, calls are mounting to lift 'know your customer' (KYC) requirements on digital asset operators based on the view that hackers can't steal data that companies don't possess. As some online critics have observed, traditional banks haven't been as supportive as they might of the digital asset legislation currently kicking around Congress because banks 'think it is unfair for a non-bank to do banking without any of the laws and regulations applicable to banks. And they kind of have a point.' Back to the top ↑ Coinbase v Oregon Coinbase responded at the time by claiming that Oregon was 'trying to revive regulation by enforcement,' the catchphrase popularized by digital asset firms that reject nearly all aspects of regulatory oversight with which they disagree. On June 2, Coinbase filed a petition in federal court asking for the suit to be moved out of Oregon and under federal jurisdiction. The petition calls the suit a 'regulatory land grab' and notes that Oregon's Division of Financial Regulation generally takes point on securities transactions, not the AG, calling into question Rayfield's authority to file the suit in the first place. Coinbase VP of legal Ryan VanGrack tweeted Tuesday that the petition was filed because 'the case is fundamentally about federal law.' VanGrack claimed Rayfield's suit 'would undermine recent bipartisan progress towards crypto clarity by creating a patchwork of state regulations that harms consumers, innovation, and economic freedom.' Coinbase's chief legal officer Paul Grewal added that '[b]ecause Oregon's claims raise fundamentally federal issues like the meaning of 'investment contract,' [as defined by the Howey Test] they should be resolved by federal courts.' Back to the top ↑ Circle supersizes IPO Coinbase's share price has ridden a roller coaster so far in 2025, hitting peaks of over $300 in January and troughs of less than half that sum by mid-April. But the company's inclusion in the S&P 500 index last month and the expectation of a major payday from its stablecoin partner Circle currently have Coinbase shares hovering just under $260. USDC-issuer Circle filed its IPO paperwork in early April, and the company has been dotting its i's and crossing its t's in anticipation of that magical Nasdaq debut later this week. On May 27, Circle announced plans to offer 24 million shares of its Class A common stock at an expected range of $24-$26, with Circle offering up 9.6 million of that total and selling stockholders accounting for the other 14.4 million. On June 2, Circle upsized that offer to 32 million shares at a range of $27-$28, allegedly reflecting 'strong investor appetite' for all things crypto under President Donald Trump's second go-round. The IPO is now expected to raise nearly $900 million, while assigning Circle a valuation of up to $7.2 billion. Coinbase holds 8.4 million shares in Circle after converting its equity in the now defunct Centre consortium that originally oversaw USDC's business. Should the IPO go off at the upper end of its expected price range, Coinbase's Circle stock would be worth over $235 million, ~$25 million more than Coinbase's equity in Circle at the time of the conversion. Coinbase is unlikely to be selling much of its Circle stake in order to preserve the sweetheart revenue-sharing deal it worked out when it negotiated its exit from Centre. With both companies now required to issue financial report cards, it seems Coinbase actually makes more money off USDC activity than Circle does, while Circle shoulders most USDC expenses. Last month, reports emerged that Circle was a potential acquisition target of both Coinbase and Ripple Labs, the issuer of the XRP token (as well as its own stablecoin RLUSD). Ripple's offer was said to be in the $4-$5 billion range, which Circle rejected as too low, a view now apparently confirmed by its IPO valuation. (Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse recently denied that his company had pursued a Circle deal.) A distinctly contrary view of Circle's prospects was presented in the Financial Times last month. The article called into question Circle's whole business model, as '98 per cent of Circle's revenue is interest on the securities holdings which back its stablecoins … although it issues USDC and holds the offsetting assets, it's not generating revenue from trading or staking transactions involving the stablecoins in either the cryptoverse or the real world.' 'Financially, Circle is a highly levered, uninsured narrow bank with nearly all of its revenue coming from a big bucket of short-term cash investments. It makes money when rates are higher, up to a point, and makes less or loses money when rates are low. That makes Circle a market play on—or a plaything of—volatile short-term interest rates … This then brings us to the unanswerable question at the heart of Circle's business: Does anyone know where short-term interest rates will be in the future?' Back to the top ↑ Coinbase left its keys in San Francisco Coinbase must indeed be feeling flush, as it just announced a deal to lease 150,000 square-feet of new office space in San Franciso. The new space will automatically become the company's single largest geographical footprint and marks a homecoming of sorts for Coinbase, albeit one that's a little hard to fathom. In 2021, as the pandemic forced offices to temporarily close and many tech-firms switched to a remote-first staffing model, Coinbase paid $25 million to break the lease on its former San Francisco office space. At the time, the move was pitched as the company embracing a 'no headquarters' philosophy but it seems times (and philosophies) have changed. CEO Armstrong tweeted that Coinbase was 'excited to reopen an office in SF,' adding that the company 'never left California' as many of its employees live in the state and '[w]e go to where the talent is.' Addressing San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie, who was elected last year, Armstrong said the city was 'so badly run for many years, but your excellent work has not gone unnoticed.' Rival exchange Kraken also shut its SF headquarters in 2022 because founder/then-CEO Jesse Powell believed the city was 'not safe.' Efforts to reduce the city's crime rate got a potential boost from Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen, whose nonprofit group San Francisco Police Community Foundation has offered the SF Police Department a $9.4 million donation to improve the SFPD's Real Time Investigation Center. The gift comprises a $2.15 million retroactive lease of office space and $7.25 million worth of new toys, including nearly $5.3 million in drone surveillance gear. Larsen, a San Francisco native, previously donated millions to expand the city's security camera network, but controversies surround how some of these funds were allocated. Mayor Lurie has indicated he's in favor of allowing the police to accept the donation. We suspect Coinbase's Armstrong is, as well. After all, there's some dangerous teenagers out there who've put a target on his head. Back to the top ↑ Watch: Teranode is the digital backbone of Bitcoin title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Boy starved to death in Birmingham ‘was invisible to child services'
A toddler who was starved by his parents and buried in their garden was 'invisible and lost' to child services, a review has said. Three-year-old Abiyah Yasharahyalah, who lived with his parents in Birmingham, died in early 2020 from a respiratory illness. He was severely malnourished when he died and suffered from anaemia, rickets and stunted growth which, as well as the illness, were exacerbated by the 'restricted' vegan diet he was given at home. A local child safeguarding practice review, published on Wednesday, into Abiyah's death found that a lack of questions asked about how the family's lifestyle and culture could have had an effect on his health, stating 'the safeguarding of children being affected by harmful cultural practice is paramount'. The review also found that while the family were subject to visits, they were sporadic and short, noting that Abiyah 'was only ever seen by a small number of professionals during his lifetime, and for a limited time only'. At the parents' trial at Coventry crown court in December last year, the court was told that following Abiyah's death, his mother and father, Tai and Naiyahmi Yasharahyalah aged 42 and 43, performed an 'eight-day ritual' in the hopes that their son would 'come back' to life, before burying his body in the garden of their home in Handsworth in the centre of the city. The court also heard that police had visited the families residence three times, including in February 2018 when Abiyah was still alive, but that 'no details were recorded' about Abiyah, with his presence 'almost invisible on review of records'. The home was also visited by social workers on at least five occasions, but these visits were described as 'very limited, reinforcing that there was very little insight into (Abiyah's) existence, health or welfare'. The review found that authorities coming into contact with the child's family showed a 'general lack of knowledge or assessment of the parents' belief systems', leading to an 'insufficient understanding about the impact on his care.'. It added that his parents' behaviour 'often distracted or diverted professional attention' away from Abiyah's safety and welfare and that 'parental resistance of advice, support or authority ultimately resulted in (Abiyah) becoming invisible and lost from professional view.' Annie Hudson, chair of the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel, said that the report strongly evidenced 'the paramount importance of understanding what life is like for children, and not being distracted or diverted away by parental behaviour when considering children's safety and welfare. 'It is important to respect parents' faith and beliefs,' she added. 'However, as this review highlights, professionals must always be mindful of whether their views about parents, including their faith, race and culture, is inhibiting their capacity to be questioning and act together in a timely way to safeguard and protect children.' Tai, a medical genetics graduate and Naiyami, a former shop worker, left the body buried in the garden when they were evicted from the house in 2022. The couple adopted their own belief and legal system dubbed 'slick law' which incorporated elements of Igbo culture. They were described as shunning society, putting a sign on the door of their home which warned 'all governmental and non-governmental bodies' not to ring the doorbell or make 'any contact with any member of this house'. Tai and Naiyami, who were arrested in December 2022 whilst living in shipping container in Somerset, were sentenced to 24 years and 6 months and 19 years and 6 months for multiple charges including child cruelty, causing or allowing the death of a child, and attempting to pervert the course of justice.
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
TUI, easyJet and other airline travellers could be owed '£520' for delayed flights
There are several ways to seek compensation for flight delays and compensation - here's everything you should know A travel enthusiast has revealed a tool that could help you claim compensation after facing flight delays. The Travel Mum took to TikTok to share her insights, claiming travellers with TUI, easyJet and any other airline could be owed as much as £520 in certain scenarios. "Is there anything worse than getting to the airport and finding out your flight has been delayed?" she asked her 417,000 followers. "Well, here is a little hack to make sure you get the compensation you are owed. "Most families don't realise they could be owed up to £520 per person after a delay. A huge 52% of valid claims get wrongly rejected by the airlines for all sorts of reasons." The Travel Mum pointed to AirHelp, an online platform that allows airline passengers to claim compensation for delays, cancellations, and overbookings effortlessly. The service is rated 4.6 stars on Trustpilot and claims to have already assisted 2.7 million travellers in successfully receiving compensation. While it offers a free compensation checker, allowing customers to easily view what they are owed online, claiming the money with AirHelp's assistance does have a cost. One payment model offered is a 'no win, no fee' deal, meaning a standard cost equal to 35% is typically deducted from any winnings. Conversely, you can also pay for an AirHelp+ annual membership from £34.99 per year, which means no fees are deducted from your winnings. But, regardless of your fee option, AirHelp will handle all the paperwork and negotiations for you, while paying for all legal costs. These can amount to £1,000 in the worst of cases. The Travel Mum continued: "AirHelp is great because they know what they are talking about, and they will handle the whole claims process for you. "They will even take the airline to court if they are denying you what you are owed." Despite this, note that travellers can make a compensation claim independently for free, and AirHelp is not required as part of that process. You can generally do this by contacting an airline directly - each airline will have a different compensation process. Martin Lewis' MoneySavingExpert also offers a wealth of advice and its own free online tool to help you make a complaint and keep track of it. However, before choosing this option, it's important to assess your eligibility. Travellers are only entitled to compensation in certain situations. For instance, if a flight was cancelled less than two weeks before take-off, if staff strikes occur, or if disruptions are the airline's fault, you may have a case on your hands. Yet, stormy weather, political issues, volcanic eruptions and security concerns aren't grounds for compensation. If you're flying from a UK or EU airport or onboard a UK or EU-based airline arriving in these zones, your flight should be covered by EU and UK compensation regulations, too. This is also true if you've booked through a travel agency or tour operator.
