US man uses ChatGPT as a lawyer to get ₹2 lakh refund from airline, hotel
A man turned to ChatGPT for help when he was denied a refund for his flight and hotel accommodations after he had to cancel his planned trip to Colombia at the last minute. Taking to Reddit, he shared his experience of seeking help from the AI chatbot and expressed his surprise at the results.
In a Reddit post, the man said that he was planning to travel to Medellín, Colombia, but due to a last-minute medical emergency, he had to cancel his journey. He was immediately hit with a 'no' from both the airline and the hotel.
"The hotel had a no-cancellation policy. They absolutely said no," he explained. The airline's "response was that there was no cancellation policy.'
Faced with losing $2,500 ( ₹2 lakh), he turned to an unlikely ally: ChatGPT. 'I asked ChatGPT to act as my lawyer and advocate for me,' he said. He shared with the AI assistant that he had Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and had obtained a doctor's note to prove it. Using this information, he asked ChatGPT to write a letter advocating for a refund on medical grounds.
'ChatGPT researched Expedia policies, the hotel's policies, and the airline policies. It then wrote a letter for me advocating," he said.
After some effort, he secured partial success as the hotel granted him a refund. However, the airline rejected his request and stated that 'a refund is only possible due to death or terminal illness.'
But he refused to give up, and he fed this response back to ChatGPT, asking it to draft another letter.
The chatbot got to work and wrote a second letter, aimed at the airline's policy language and the implications of dismissing mental health conditions. 'It described reasons why and how my medical condition can affect the flight, and that they were being biased based on a mental illness. This thing wrote this letter to the core,' he said.
An hour later, the airline changed its stance: 'The airline responded that my refund will be honoured.'
'Had I not used ChatGPT, I would have had to hire a paralegal. And that would've cost me more money. Don't take no for an answer… ChatGPT-4.0 saved me from losing $2,500," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Unnoticed, UAE may have curated workable concept for AI regulation
On a recent trip (no secret, to attend the keynote and briefings at Google I/O a few weeks ago), my ears caught the sound of a rather interesting podcast aboard an Emirates A380. Usually these tend to be about food or lifestyle — though the one with Kilian Hennessy is exceptional too — but to have one in which United Arab Emirates' Minister of State for AI, Omar Al Olama talks about his vision of artificial intelligence (AI) regulation, is quite extraordinary. Also because he is the world's first minister for all things AI, appointed in October 2017. His vision is a bit different from everything I've heard from regulators in many countries, including India. Instead of regulation being structured as a restriction, Al Olama's approach lies in a philosophy that hopes to balance innovation with responsibility. Rather than rushing to implement what may prove to be restrictive regulations, since its still early days considering the contours of the AI space evolve almost every other day, the UAE has positioned itself as what Al Olama calls 'a responsible AI nation.' There are five key tenets to UAE's approach to AI, a working blueprint that many other countries could do well to look closely at. First, the UAE aims to become a global leader in AI by 2031. Secondly, there is belief that AI will be a 'new lifeblood' for both governments and the private sector, transforming various industries. Third, the country envisions a future where individuals have multiple digital assistants, potentially reaching PhD-level capabilities. Fourth, UAE is actively seeking international partnerships and investments to strengthen its position as a global technology hub. And lastly, there is a willingness to play a key role in the framing of internationally applicable rules to ensure AI security and safety, as well as build frameworks for protection of personal data and privacy. The fact is simple, Al Olama knows what he is talking about. As far back as in 2019, during a keynote speech at Orchestrating Winning Performance in Dubai, he noted, 'Everyone is talking about AI. Whoever is going to lead in the Artificial Intelligence race will lead the future. This technology will change the world.' Fast forward to 2025, and we have AI which undoubtedly is part of many a workflow for businesses and enterprises, and individuals are learning to trust AI tools more slowly but steadily (whether being careful enough is a debate for another day). In the past few years, UAE has silently gone about meaning business. But there is a demographic change that needs to happen, sooner rather than later, if the country has to achieve its mission. According to the latest UNESCO data, 0.19% of the UAE's population are working as full time researchers in science, technology, and innovation. In contrast, Korea, which leads this metric, clocks in with 0.69%, followed by Singapore (0.66%) and Norway (0.59%). The US finds 0.42% of its population in these roles, while India clocks in with 0.02% (important to note — this percentage is looking worse than it may be, owing to a much higher comparative baseline population number). A few days ago, the UAE released a new Arabic-language AI model, called Falcon Arabic, in an effort to make AI locally relevant and accessible. This is something experts too have talked about. India is working on its own LLM, or large language model. As is Singapore. These are just some examples, in the search of an AI that understands local context and sensitivities more than a global model perhaps might. Falcon Arabic has been trained on a dataset spanning Modern Standard Arabic and regional dialects, and Abu Dhabi's Technology Innovation Institute (TII) claims this model matches the performance of models up to 10 times its size. This model may still find it difficult to match up to the likes of Google Gemini, China's DeepSeek and OpenAI as well as Anthropic's fast evolving GPT and Claude models respectively, but it is a start nonetheless. There is an understanding that isolation, and go-it-alone doesn't work. OpenAI and the UAE are working together for something called the Stargate UAE, a 1-gigawatt AI supercomputing cluster in Abu Dhabi, as part of the AI company's 'OpenAI for Countries' initiative. American tech companies like Oracle, Nvidia, Cisco, and SoftBank, as well as G42, an Emirati artificial intelligence firm, are all part of various AI projects. But it's likely you may have seen excitable headlines about all UAE residents being given free subscriptions to ChatGPT Plus — because that gets the citizens involved. The US sees this as an opportunity too. Tech companies in the US, presently develop the world's most advanced semiconductor chips. The other side of that coin has the UAE that can offer abundant, low-cost energy that is needed to power enormous AI data centres. Back to the regulation approach for a moment. The European Union has pursued comprehensive legislation through the AI Act, which categorises AI systems by risk levels and imposes strict requirements on high-risk applications. They have the GDPR as an example that their regulation methods are thorough, as it is the case here too. But then again, it can also be overly complex for tech companies to navigate, and could stifle innovation particularly for companies with limited resources. The United States has thus far taken a more fragmented approach, with a lack of comprehensive federal legislation, but that could change once the Trump administration gets down to regulating AI. India currently doesn't have rules that regulate AI just yet, but the country is in the process of formulating and implementing policy frameworks to govern various aspects of AI. The blueprint is there for other countries to look closely at, but the UAE has an advantage of geographical size, its political structure and economic positioning that may be difficult for larger countries to work with — getting a consensus may not be as easy there, as would geographic, economic and human limitations that may come into play. But AI regulation is around the bend, just that we may have differing approaches for the time being. (Vishal Mathur is the Technology Editor for HT. Tech Tonic is a weekly column that looks at the impact of personal technology on the way we live, and vice-versa. The views expressed are personal.)
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Artificial Intelligence: Human advantage, not replacement
Like many of you, when I first heard the whispers about Artificial Intelligence (AI) and job displacement, a knot formed in my stomach. The headlines were alarming, filled with dystopian predictions of machines taking over. As someone building a company at the forefront of AI, even I had moments of quiet concern. But the deeper I delved, the more I realised something profound: AI isn't the antagonist in this story. It's a powerful new tool, and our relationship with it will define the next chapter of work. My conviction now is this: AI won't take your job. A person who knows how to leverage AI might. It's a subtle but crucial distinction that I believe we're not discussing enough. Cast your mind back a few decades. The introduction of personal computers, then the internet, and later smartphones – each sparked similar anxieties. Yet, what happened? New industries bloomed, new job titles emerged, and human productivity soared. We adapted, integrated these technologies, and ultimately, reshaped the world of work for the better. AI stands at a similar inflection point. Think of AI not as a competitor, but as an advanced collaborator. It's like the most sophisticated spreadsheet you've ever seen, or a super-efficient research assistant. A hammer doesn't build a house; a builder uses a hammer to build a house. Similarly, AI won't write a novel; a writer will use AI to brainstorm, research, or refine. Its strength lies in handling repetitive tasks, processing vast amounts of data, and identifying patterns – freeing us to focus on what humans do best: creativity, critical thinking, emotional intelligence, and complex problem-solving. The real challenge, then, isn't about AI replacing us, but about our collective willingness to learn, adapt, and grow alongside these technologies. The future workforce won't be defined by those who fear AI, but by those who understand it and can harness its power. This isn't solely about learning to code or understanding algorithms, though those skills are certainly valuable. It's equally, if not more, about refining our uniquely human aptitudes. Creativity, empathy, ethical reasoning, strategic foresight – these are areas where human intelligence remains unparalleled. AI can analyse data trends, but it takes a human to interpret those trends, understand their ethical implications, and chart a compassionate course for the future. One of the most exciting aspects of AI, particularly in a diverse country like India, is its potential to foster greater inclusivity in hiring. Traditional recruitment often carries inherent biases, inadvertently limiting opportunities for talented individuals from underrepresented backgrounds or Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities. When deployed thoughtfully, AI can strip away these biases, focusing purely on skills and merit. This is why VolkAI emphasises ATS-friendly resume building and skill-based job matching. It allows talent to shine regardless of their postcode or network, truly democratising access to global opportunities. However, this opportunity hinges on familiarity. If you don't understand how AI is shaping the hiring process, or how to leverage AI-powered tools to present your best self, you risk being left behind. Just as we learned to navigate the internet or use a smartphone, we must now engage with the AI revolution. So, here's my stand: AI isn't the enemy; ignorance is. If we let fear paralyse us, if we refuse to engage with this transformative technology, then we are indeed our own biggest obstacle. The future of work isn't about competing against machines. It's about learning to collaborate with them. The question isn't, "Will AI take my job?" It's, 'How can I make AI amplify my job, my skills, and my career?' The answer is surprisingly straightforward: learn it, embrace it, and make it work for you. The individuals who will truly thrive in this next wave of innovation are those who actively seek to understand and leverage AI. If you're willing to learn and adapt, AI won't just keep your job safe – it will help you forge a more fulfilling and impactful career. As we journey further into this AI era, let's shift our perspective from apprehension to aspiration. AI won't take your job; a smarter you, empowered by AI, will simply create a better one. This article is authored by Santosh Kushwaha, Founder & CEO, VolkAI.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Why ChatGPT essays still fail to fool experts despite good structure, although they are clear and well structured
The advent of AI has marked the rise of many tools, and ChatGPT is one of the most popular ones. Often used for research and writing, this tool has often been the centre of discussion for its ability to fetch interesting content. However, A new study from the University of East Anglia (UEA) in the UK shows that essays written by real students are still better than those produced by ChatGPT, a popular AI writing tool. Researchers compared 145 essays written by university students with 145 essays generated by ChatGPT to see how well the AI can mimic human writing. The study found that although ChatGPT's essays are clear, well structured, and grammatically correct, they lack something important. The AI essays do not show personal insight or deep critical thinking, which are common in student writing. These missing elements make the AI-generated essays feel less engaging and less convincing. However, the researchers do not see AI only as a threat. They believe tools like ChatGPT can be helpful in education if used properly. Instead of shortcuts to finish assignments, AI should be a tool that supports learning and improves writing skills. After all, education is about teaching students how to think clearly and express ideas. These are things no AI can truly replace. One key difference the researchers looked at was how the writers engage readers. Real student essays often include questions, personal comments, and direct appeals to the reader. These techniques help make the writing feel more interactive and persuasive. On the other hand, ChatGPT's essays tend to avoid questions and personal opinions. They follow academic rules but do not show a clear viewpoint or emotional connection. Professor Ken Hyland from UEA explained that the AI focuses on creating text that is logical and smooth but misses conversational details that humans use to connect with readers. This shows that AI writing still struggles with capturing the personal style and strong arguments that real people naturally use.
