Blake Lively made ‘super shady' legal move months before accusing Justin Baldoni of sexual harassment: report
Blake Lively reportedly filed a 'super shady' lawsuit before publicly accusing her 'It Ends With Us' co-star Justin Baldoni of sexual harassment in her complaint.
The lawsuit was filed in September with the 'Gossip Girl' alum's company Vanzan as the plaintiff in an attempt to subpoena allegedly incriminating text messages from Baldoni's now-ex-PR team without Lively's name being attached, according to the Daily Mail.
The 'Jane the Virgin' alum's former publicist Stephanie Jones and her company, Jonesworks, received a subpoena requesting all documents and communications regarding Baldoni, Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds.
Jones reportedly turned over private messages between former staffer Jennifer Abel, who continued working with Baldoni, and PR crisis manager Melissa Nathan.
The messages have since been used by Lively's legal team as the basis for claims that Baldoni, Nathan and Abel orchestrated a smear campaign against the 'Another Simple Favor' actress, 37, while promoting 'It Ends With Us' in August 2024.
An alleged text from Nathan read, 'We can bury anyone.'
The lawsuit, however, was withdrawn on Dec. 19, 2024, a few days before Lively accused Baldoni of sexual harassment in a complaint filed with the California Civil Rights Department.
A legal expert referred to the tactic as 'super shady' while speaking to the Daily Mail. 'They intentionally did this to really work in a very surreptitious and clandestine way,' attorney Ron Zambrano, who has no relation to the case, claimed to the outlet.
Baldoni's attorney Bryan Freedman also slammed the lawsuit as a 'sham' in a statement to Page Six.
'Ms. Lively's and Mr. Reynolds' company Vanzan had nothing to do with this case and they knew it,' Freedman said.
'This sham lawsuit was designed to obtain subpoena power without oversight or scrutiny, and in doing so denied my clients the ability to contest the propriety, nature, and scope of the subpoena.
'There is nothing normal about this. Officers of the court have a duty of candor to the court and an obligation not to file fictitious lawsuits that have no basis in fact or law. … This was done in bad faith and constitutes a flagrant abuse of process.'
Lively's legal team, however, denied any wrongdoing.
'There is nothing untoward here — just conscientious and thorough investigation,' her attorneys Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb said in a statement to Deadline.
'The Lively parties acted upon reliable information, and employed common tools such as Doe lawsuits and civil subpoenas that are entirely lawful and appropriate for pursuing claims and uncovering the identity of unknown perpetrators of unlawful activities,' they continued.
'This lawsuit unearthed the Wayfarer Parties' documented plan — in their own words, in their own text messages — to 'destroy' Blake Lively, a plan which they executed without transparency, disclosure, or notice to Ms. Lively or the public, instead acting in a way they thought would be 'untraceable.'
'We have absolutely nothing to hide — Ms. Lively voluntarily disclosed the subpoena in her first filing knowing that it would ultimately be produced to the Wayfarer Parties in discovery, and that is precisely what will happen as Ms. Lively's claims move forward in the proper litigation process.'
Reps for Lively and Baldoni weren't immediately available to Page Six for comment.
The 'Age of Adaline' star filed her complaint on Dec. 21, 2024, accusing the actor/director of sexual harassment and attempting to ruin her career after their work on the adaptation of Colleen Hoover's novel based on domestic violence.
Lively filed a formal lawsuit on Dec. 31. Baldoni denied all the allegations against him.
In January, he filed a $400 million lawsuit against Lively and Reynolds, 48, which the couple has attempted to get dismissed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Justin Baldoni continuing legal fight against Blake Lively after dismissal
(NewsNation) — Justin Baldoni's team says it isn't finished after a judge dismissed its case against Blake Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds. In a statement, Baldoni's attorney, Bryan Freedman, said that Lively and her team's 'predictable declaration of victory is false.' Freedman also said the court is allowing Baldoni and his team to amend four of the seven claims it made against his former 'It Ends With Us' co-star. Judge Lewis J. Liman also dropped Baldoni's $250 million lawsuit against The New York Times. The deadline for Baldoni's team to make those amendments is June 23. What is Simone Biles' net worth? Baldoni's attorney's full statement reads: 'Ms. Liveley and her team's predictable declaration of victory is false, so let us be clear about the latest ruling. While the Court dismissed the defamation related claims, the Court has invited us to amend four out of the seven claims against Ms. Lively, which will showcase additional evidence and refined allegations.' 'This case is about false accusations of sexual harassment and retaliation and a nonexistent smear campaign, which Ms. Lively's team conveniently describes as 'untraceable' because they cannot prove what never happened. Most importantly, Ms. Lively's own claims are no truer today than they were yesterday, and with the facts on our side, we march forward with the same confidence that we had when Ms. Lively and her cohorts initiated this battle and look forward to her forthcoming deposition, which I will be taking.' 'We are grateful for the organic show of support from the public and for the dedication of the internet sleuth community who continue to cover the case with discernment and integrity.' After the judge dismissed Baldoni's suits, Lively's legal team said it was 'a total victory and a complete vindication.' Lively's lawyers, Mike Gottlieb and Esra Hudson, told Us Weekly: 'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it. We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation.' Lively also made a statement, saying that she would continue to defend women's rights. In an Instagram story, she said, 'Like so many others, I've felt the pain of a retaliatory lawsuit, including the manufactured shame that tries to break us.' She also said the suit against her 'was defeated,' and there are some 'incredible organizations' that can help women in a situation similar to hers. 'With love and gratitude for the many who stood by me, many of you I know. Many of you I don't. But I will never stop appreciating or advocating for you,' she ended the post. Lively originally brought a lawsuit against Baldoni for alleged sexual harassment. One insider told NewsNation's Paula Froelich in February that Lively and Reynolds 'have no idea what's coming down the pike.' Lively claimed in her lawsuit that sales of her haircare brand, Blake Brown, plummeted by nearly 78% after what she calls a 'social manipulation campaign.' Billie Eilish's brother Finneas says he was tear-gassed during LA ICE protest A person close to Target, which sells Lively's haircare brand, told Puck that the brand is set to do 'less than $15 million' in sales in 2025. The source claimed that Blake Brown was previously a $100 million brand. Another source told Froelich that no one has wanted to work with Lively since the lawsuits. A trial for Lively's suit against Baldoni has been scheduled for March 2026. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Blake Lively Turns Heads in a Sheer Lace Dress Following Lawsuit Dismissal
Blake Lively made an appearance at the 18th Annual Tribeca Artists Dinner hosted by Chanel during Tribeca Film Festival on June 9. She wore a white lace dress for the occasion. The appearance came only a few hours after Justin Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit against Lively was dismissed by a Lively stepped out in New York City for the 18th Annual Tribeca Artists Dinner hosted by Chanel during Tribeca Film Festival on June 9—the appearance came just a few hours after a judge dismissed Justin Baldwin's lawsuit against her. Lively donned a summery white lace dress for the occasion. The semi-sheer maxi dress was made of a floral white lace material and featured an extra layer of fabric around the bust. She paired the summery dress with matching white heels, a pair of bold mismatched statement earrings, and an assortment of chunky rings. At one point in the evening, she threw a denim jacket around her shoulders. She wore her signature blonde curls down in a side part. Lively's appearance came just hours after Judge Lewis J. Liman dismissed Justin Baldwin's $400 million defamation and extortion lawsuit against Livel, Lively's husband, Ryan Reynolds, and their publicist Leslie Sloane. Lively took to Instagram to share a long message after the decision. 'Like so many others, I've felt the pain of a retaliatory lawsuit, including the manufactured shame that tries to break us," she shared on her Instagram Stories. "While the suit against me was defeated, so many don't have the resources to fight back." She added that she was "more resolved than ever to continue to stand for every woman's right to have a voice in protecting themselves, including their safety, their integrity, their dignity and their story." A source told People that Lively "cried with relief" after learning of the dismissal of the lawsuit. Lively added she is now "more resolved than ever to continue to stand for every woman's right to have a voice in protecting themselves, including their safety, their integrity, their dignity and their story." Her legal team also issued a statement. 'Today's opinion is a total victory and a complete vindication for Blake Lively, along with those that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties dragged into their retaliatory lawsuit, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane and The New York Times," the statement read. "As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it. We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan, and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation." Baldwin's lawsuit was filed last December in response to Lively issued her own lawsuit against Baldoni, alleging sexual harassment during the filming of It Ends With Us. Lively was a producer, while Baldoni served as director, and both also starred in film. Read the original article on InStyle
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why a judge dismissed Justin Baldoni's lawsuit against Blake Lively and The New York Times
A federal judge dismissed actor Justin Baldoni's extortion and defamation claims he brought against actress Blake Lively, The New York Times and others, while still giving Baldoni a chance to pursue limited contract-related claims in the legal feud between the 'It Ends With Us' co-stars. Baldoni's legal complaint came in January after Lively brought her own in December alleging sexual harassment, retaliation, breach of contract and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Her suit is still pending. Dismissing Baldoni's claims in a 132-page opinion Monday, U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman in New York summarized them in two broad categories: First, that Lively, helped by actor Ryan Reynolds (Lively's husband) and publicist Leslie Sloane, threatened to refuse to promote the film, which Baldoni directed, and to attack him in the press if she didn't get control and credit. And second, that Lively, Sloane, Reynolds and the Times spread a false narrative that Baldoni committed sexual misconduct against Lively and engaged in a smear campaign against her. Rejecting the first category, Liman said Baldoni failed to adequately allege that Lively's threats were extortion rather than just bargaining over working conditions. Rejecting the second category, Liman said Baldoni failed to adequately allege any false statements made to the Times, other than statements made by Lively in a complaint she filed with the California Civil Rights Department, which Liman said were legally privileged. The Times published a December story headlined, ''We Can Bury Anyone': Inside a Hollywood Smear Machine,' citing Lively's complaint. Liman said Baldoni has until June 23 to file an amended complaint limited to certain contract-related claims. Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in the Trump administration's legal cases. This article was originally published on