CoreWeave Rules the Unusual Options Activity. But Should It Be in Your Portfolio?
The president threatened Canada with 35% tariffs on imports into the U.S. and blanket tariffs of 15%-20% on those countries that have yet to receive a letter from the White House with a specified rate.
Creating a 38% 'Dividend' on SOFI Stock Using Options
Wednesday's Unusual Options Activity Reveals 3 Standout Long Straddle Plays
Teva Pharmaceutical (TEVA) Just Flashed a Statistically Viable Signal for Bullish Traders
Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now!
It continues to amaze me how little regard investors are paying to tariffs at the moment. It's as if the early April swan dive — from April 2's close to the April 8th close (4 trading days), the S&P 500 lost 12% — was decades ago.
I'm not a technical analyst, so I'm not going to spend any more time questioning the sanity of investors. Still, I have to say, the mere fact that CoreWeave (CRWV) had 10 of the top 20 unusually active options--defined as Volume-to-Open-Interest ratios of 1.24 or higher and expiring in seven days or longer--speaks volumes about where investors' heads are at.
The AI-focused company may be ideally situated for the boom in artificial intelligence, so I get the heightened options volume--711,765 on Thursday, about 75% higher than the 30-day average--I'm not sure the average retail investor should be buying CRWV for the long haul.
Have an excellent weekend.
As the S&P 500 P/E multiple moves higher in 2025, it gets closer to hitting a 10-year high. Right now, it's around 30x, the same level as March 2021, down from the 10-year high of 38.20x in December 2020.
Source: Macrotrends.net
While I understand that investors are willing to pay more for AI-related businesses, it seems that they're eager to do so for almost every company in every industry. How long can this carry on? That is the million-dollar question.
At present, CoreWeave loses an exceptional amount of money, so I'll focus on its EV/TTM revenue multiple instead. It's currently 28.9x, up from 14.7x when it went public at $40 in March. It's up 246% in the three months since its IPO.
CoreWeave generates over 70% of its revenue from Microsoft (MSFT). The tech giant's enterprise value of $3.75 trillion is 13.9x its trailing 12-month revenue. Back in March, it was 10.8x, much cheaper than CoreWeave.
Which begs the question? Why not buy MSFT stock for the long term, significantly reducing your risk exposure, while likely delivering above-average returns over the long haul?
In Microsoft's Q3 2025 quarter, its operating income was $32.o billion. CoreWeave's operating loss was $ 27.0 million, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence. In 2024, CoreWeave's net loss was $937.8 million, up from $593.7 million a year earlier. Its adjusted net loss was a more palatable $64.9 million, with an adjusted operating profit of $355.8 million, up substantially from $703,000 in 2023.
You could make the case that the adjusted numbers show that it can make money on a non-GAAP basis, which suggests its P/E multiple isn't as outrageous as it might seem.
However, the net debt should be something to watch closely.
At the end of December, it was $10.62 billion, or 16% of its $67.49 billion market cap. That would be a reasonable percentage for a typical industrial business, but for a tech company? Microsoft's net debt of $25.4 billion is 0.7% of its $3.73 trillion market cap.
Again, why not invest in MSFT stock and call it a day?
One more thing.
In the 12 months ended March 31, the company's interest expense was $584.0 million. That's $4.64 of sales for every $1 in interest. At the end of December, it was $5.31 in sales for every $1 in interest.
I doubt that's sustainable. I guess we'll find out soon enough.
When you examine the company's financials, it's easy to see why options are popular for CoreWeave stock. It's a lower-risk way to play the fast-growing business without losing your shirt.
As mentioned, there were 10 unusually active options in the top 20 yesterday (see below).
Not surprisingly, they're all calls. CoreWeave's P/C (Put/Call) volume ratio yesterday was 0.26, which means there were 3.85 calls for every put. That's very bullish. Meanwhile, the P/C OI ratio was 1.46, which means there are 1.46 puts open for every call, a bearish long-term indicator.
Now, there are plenty of esoteric options strategies you could play here, but I'm going to assume you're relatively risk-neutral and do like the long-term potential of its stock.
With that being the case, I'd probably go with the Jan. 16/2026 $100 call with an ask price of $40.15, or 29% of its share price. With a DTE (days to expiration) of 191, it gives you a decent amount of time for the shares to appreciate further.
About 28% ITM (in the money) and a breakeven of $140.15, if you believe it will move higher over the next 191 days, your profit probability is high.
If you're a little more adventurous, you could sell a Jan. 16/2026 $100 put for an annual return of $43.9%. Of course, if the share price falls below $100, you could be asked to buy the shares at expiration at $100, above where the shares trade for a paper loss.
CoreWeave is a stock that I would neither own nor use options for, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't.
On the date of publication, Will Ashworth did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Barchart.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures slide as tariff concerns mount ahead of key inflation data
US stock futures pulled back on Monday as Wall Street braced for a turbulent week, with renewed trade tensions and a wave of second-quarter earnings set to test investor sentiment. Futures tied to the S&P 500 (ES=F) and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) dropped 0.5%. Dow Jones Industrial Average futures (YM=F) also fell around 0.5%, or over 200 points, setting stocks up to add to Friday's losses. The moves follow President Donald Trump's announcement on Saturday that the US will impose 30% tariffs on goods from the European Union and Mexico starting August 1. The new duties raise the stakes for global trade relations and add to existing inflationary pressures. Officials from the EU and Mexico have signaled a willingness to continue negotiations in hopes of securing a reduced rate. Sunday night's declines come on the heels of a losing week for stocks, even as indexes remain near record highs. All three major US indexes ended three-week winning streaks on Friday. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs The timing adds to market uncertainty, with June CPI inflation data scheduled for release this week. Investors are looking for signs of how earlier rounds of tariffs are impacting prices across the US economy, with eyes watching the Federal Reserve as a decision on rate cuts is expected in just over two weeks. Tensions between the White House and the Fed continue to bubble, adding a layer of uncertainty onto the economic landscape. National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said Sunday to ABC News that President Trump could remove Fed Chair Jerome Powell "if there's cause." Meanwhile, earnings season kicks into swing this week, with all the major US banks due to report results starting on Tuesday. Investors are showing interest in IPO and M&A markets, while Wells Fargo (WFC) reports after being freed from decade of stringent regulatory restrictions. Results from Netflix (NFLX) on Thursday will kick off earnings from big US tech names, with ASML (ASML) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) set to offer key updates on the AI-related chip boom. PepsiCo (PEP), United Airlines (UAL), and American Express (AXP) are among the other notable companies due to release their quarterly results. Bloomberg reports: Read more here. Gold (GC=F) rises with tariff threats from Trump driving investors toward the safe-haven commodity. Bloomberg reports: Read more here. Bloomberg reports: Read more here. Gold (GC=F) rises with tariff threats from Trump driving investors toward the safe-haven commodity. Bloomberg reports: Read more here.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The CV90 is a great vehicle, so why doesn't the US buy it?
The U.S. military has a long history of developing vehicles it never actually fields. The Army's Future Combat Systems died on the vine. The Ground Combat Vehicle was canceled before production. The Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle program has been stopped and started more times than most troops will change duty stations in a career. And of course, the M10 Booker, the not-light-tank the Army had to have, was killed off after about 80 were delivered. It is no wonder that whenever we cover the topic of U.S. vehicles on our YouTube channel, the comments are flooded with the same question: 'Why doesn't the U.S. just buy the CV90?' That is a valid query. The CV90 is a proven infantry fighting vehicle used by several NATO allies. It is modular, combat-tested and recently underwent a significant upgrade. So why can't the Pentagon stop with the seemingly endless programs that never actually produce a viable vehicle and just buy the Swedish CV90? The answer has little to do with whether the vehicle is any good and a lot to do with how the U.S. buys weapons, what it prioritizes in doctrine, and how the military-industrial complex operates. The CV90 was developed in the 1980s by Sweden's Hägglunds, now part of BAE Systems. It was designed with fighting the Soviet Union in mind to be fast, survivable and capable in a variety of terrains. Since entering service in 1994, it's become one of the most widely adopted infantry fighting vehicles in NATO. It comes in multiple variants, ranging from the traditional infantry fighting vehicle with an autocannon on it to command and control, mortar carrier, reconnaissance models, and many more, depending on the customer's requirements. The CV90 even comes with a variety of main weapons, starting at 30mm and going all the way up to 120mm. On paper, it checks a lot of boxes on the Pentagon's wishlist for an armored vehicle. So why not just buy it and move on? The most unsexy answer: money and politics. The Pentagon doesn't just buy vehicles, it buys programs. Those multi-billion dollar contracts aren't just for tanks or jets, they are for replacement parts, depot maintenance, technical manuals, training curriculum, simulators, everything necessary to keep a weapon functioning. This translates into jobs and decades of sustainment work. Buying the CV90 off the shelf would mean outsourcing production and all those program benefits to Europe. The U.S. could license the design to be built here in the United States, like we do with the UH-72 Lakota helicopters, but that would require significant investment into a weapon we don't have control over. Doctrine must also be considered. When the Pentagon buys a new weapon, it usually builds the vehicle around current doctrine, not the other way around. For instance, U.S. armored formations are built around combined arms maneuver. Bradleys are designed to fight alongside Abrams tanks, supported by artillery, drones and airpower, all feeding into a massive command-and-control network. That network assumes certain levels of system cooperation, speed, and firepower that aren't always a perfect match with off-the-shelf foreign vehicles, no matter how good they are. This brings us to the issue of interoperability with U.S. systems. The CV90 is built around NATO standards, but the U.S. military often takes that a step further with its own encrypted communications suites, battlefield management systems, Blue Force Tracker integration, electronic warfare and signals intelligence kits, and remote weapon stations that are all custom-fitted to American platforms. Retrofitting those systems into a CV90 isn't impossible — it's just time-consuming, expensive, and requires creating a new U.S.-only variant. At that point, you might as well be developing a new vehicle from scratch. Finally, we can't forget that the Bradley does exist and its capabilities overlap heavily with the CV90. Military planners aren't going to buy a foreign system that is very similar to the domestic one they already have hundreds of. In the latest YouTube video, we go over these reasons and many more that apply not just to the CV90, but other foreign weapon platforms that we admire, but will never purchase. Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps learns an old lesson: Don't mess with Audie Murphy A breakdown of safety procedures 'directly contributed' to an 82nd Airborne paratrooper's death WWII Marine Raider who fought at Iwo Jima, Guadalcanal wants cards for 100th birthday Navy identifies special warfare sailor killed while parachuting Pentagon appears to pause renaming of Navy ships
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures slide as tariff concerns mount ahead of earnings season
US stock futures pulled back on Monday as Wall Street braced for a turbulent week, with renewed trade tensions and a wave of second-quarter earnings set to test investor sentiment. Futures tied to the S&P 500 (ES=F) and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) dropped 0.5%. Dow Jones Industrial Average futures (YM=F) also fell around 0.5% as the major gauges pointed to a slide further from Friday's losses. The moves follow President Donald Trump's announcement on Saturday that the US will impose 30% tariffs on goods from the European Union and Mexico starting August 1. The new duties raise the stakes for global trade relations and add to existing inflationary pressures. Officials from the EU and Mexico have signaled a willingness to continue negotiations in hopes of securing a reduced rate. Sunday night's declines come on the heels of a losing week for stocks, even as indexes remain near record highs. All three major US indexes ended three-week winning streaks on Friday. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs The timing adds to market uncertainty, with June CPI inflation data scheduled for release this week. Investors are looking for signs of how earlier rounds of tariffs are impacting prices across the US economy, with eyes watching the Federal Reserve as a decision on rate cuts is expected in just over two weeks. Tensions between the White House and the Fed continue to bubble, adding a layer of uncertainty onto the economic landscape. National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said Sunday to ABC News that President Trump could remove Fed Chair Jerome Powell "if there's cause." Meanwhile, earnings season kicks into swing this week, with all the major US banks due to report results starting on Tuesday. Investors are showing interest in IPO and M&A markets, while Wells Fargo (WFC) reports after being freed from decade of stringent regulatory restrictions. Results from Netflix (NFLX) on Thursday will kick off earnings from big US tech names, with ASML (ASML) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) set to offer key updates on the AI-related chip boom. PepsiCo (PEP), United Airlines (UAL), and American Express (AXP) are among the other notable companies due to release their quarterly results. Bloomberg reports: Read more here. Gold (GC=F) rises with tariff threats from Trump driving investors toward the safe-haven commodity. Bloomberg reports: Read more here. Bloomberg reports: Read more here. Gold (GC=F) rises with tariff threats from Trump driving investors toward the safe-haven commodity. Bloomberg reports: Read more here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data