This New Zealand Artist Sculpts Animals From Layers Of Paint
Hannah Jensen Fox, Unbroken - Camargue Horses, 2018, 51 layers (24 liters) of carved acrylic paint, 2600 x 1800 mm
Hannah Jensen Fox has carved a niche for herself – literally – by transforming layers of acrylic paint into breathtaking works of art. Drawing from her background in printmaking, she applies up to 80 layers of paint onto custom-made boards and canvases, then meticulously carves through them to reveal intricate images inspired by flora and fauna. This unique technique, developed during her time at Auckland University of Technology, results in textured, topographical pieces that celebrate the beauty of the natural world. From life-size animal portraits to delicate botanical studies, her work captures the essence of wildlife with remarkable depth and detail, as she pushes the boundaries of her medium. She shares the intricacies of her work process.
What are the greatest challenges you face when creating your artworks?
Self-doubt. I may be a positive person who is often viewed with endless energy, but I too have times when it all feels too much and I'm overloaded with work, trying to be the one-woman band running a business and keeping up with life. Allowing myself to be honest with my clients about what is going on and asking for more time, if needed, is the best way I can manage my workload. I am human after all.
Hannah Jensen Fox, Kowhai, 2020, 43 layers of carved acrylic paint, 200-mm diameter board
How many projects you work on at any one time and how many artworks do you make per year?
Over three years, I can do a total of 200 commissioned works for clients all around the world. I also take a break from commissioned work to concentrate on my own works. It is an ebb and flow of concentrating on my own ideas and then opening up for commissioned works. When I am open for commissions, there is often an influx so I ride that wave. But while I finish the last few commissions, I am layering up the next boards for my ideas to follow.
When did you move to Christchurch, why do you choose to live and work there, and what have you been able to achieve there that you wouldn't have been able to anywhere else?
I moved to Christchurch in November 2018. I moved to be with the love of my life. My divine soulmate was born and bred in Christchurch, and I joined him there to adventure the beautiful South Island of New Zealand, after spending the previous 32 years in the North Island. It's a bit cooler down here, but mainly it's a quieter life that I surely prefer from the busy city of Auckland.
Hannah Jensen Fox, Adaptation - Polar Bear, 2018, 43 layers (12 liters) of carved acrylic paint, 1900 x 1400 mm board
What was a memorable project you worked on?
One of my passion projects were two huge carvings: one of a rhino carved with blue-and-white china patterns, bringing into conversation the heartbreaking trade of rhino horn to China, and a whale work carved of flowers, a memorial to our dying oceans. 62 liters of paint were layered for these two works. The rhino is 3.3 meters long with 28 liters of paint layered and the whale is 3.6 meters long with 34 liters of paint layered. They are both made up of smaller panels so I could easily handle each piece, and then they are hung altogether.
What do you feel is the role of the artist in society?
To bring joy, to share stories, to challenge, stretch and push boundaries. A visual voice of history unfolding.
What do you hope to achieve or what message do you hope to convey through your art at the end of the day?
Mostly I want to bring a sense of joy through my work and how I share it. Sometimes my works have a sad story to go with them. I can only hope they spark some inspiration for the viewer to make changes in their day-to-day lives for more sustainable and healthier choices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
7 hours ago
- Washington Post
‘Andy Warhol in Iran' searches for drama in a quirk of history
In a 2013 article for the Atlantic, Interview magazine editor Bob Colacello remembered traveling to Mexico with the publication's co-founder, pop artist Andy Warhol. The visit included a day trip to the pyramids of Teotihuacan, where Warhol refused to get out of the car, declaring the monumental pre-Columbian archaeological site 'just a pile of old rocks.'
Geek Tyrant
9 hours ago
- Geek Tyrant
First Reactions Drop for PREDATOR: KILLER OF KILLERS and It Sounds Like a Winner! — GeekTyrant
There was recently an early screening of director Dan Trachtenberg's new animated Predator anthology series Predator: Killer of Killers , and those who attended loved what it delivered! The animated series was described as 'Compelling,' 'Violent,' 'Full of vicious kills,' 'Badass incarnate,' and it's said to be 'made by Predator fans for Predator fans.' I can't wait to see the series for myself! I'm excited about this thing! Predator: Killer of Killers is a three-part anthology that puts the focus in Yautja warriors hunting human prey across world history. The anthology story follows 'three of the fiercest warriors in human history: a Viking raider guiding her young son on a bloody quest for revenge, a ninja in feudal Japan who turns against his Samurai brother in a brutal battle for succession, and a WWII pilot who takes to the sky to investigate an otherworldly threat to the Allied cause. 'But while all these warriors are killers in their own right, they are merely prey for their new opponent – the ultimate killer of killers.' The voice cast includes Lindsay LaVanchy, Louis Ozawa, Rick Gonzalez, and Michael Biehn. Trachtenberg co-directed this project alongside Josh Wassung while on location for Predator: Badlands . He said: 'We were writing the script for [ Killer of Killers ] while we were prevising stuff on [ Badlands ], and then [once on location] in New Zealand, on the way to shoot [ Badlands ], we would remote with everyone back here and [watch footage] thanks to Starlink.' It's set to premiere as a Hulu exclusive on June 6th, 2025. Check out the reactions below!
Fast Company
17 hours ago
- Fast Company
Why the Met brought a 200-foot-long window back to life in its renovated wing
After a years-long renovation, The Metropolitan Museum of Art has just reopened its 40,000-square-foot Michael C. Rockefeller Wing. At the heart of the project is a stunning feature that's gone largely unrecognized since the '80s. The wing redesign was spearheaded by architect Kulapat Yantrasast and his team at the firm WHY architecture, whose clients include the Musée du Louvre, The Getty, and Harvard Libraries. The Met tasked WHY with fully reimagining a wing that contains three gallery collections focusing on the arts of Africa, the ancient Americas, and Oceania—around 1,800 total works of art. The Michael C. Rockefeller Wing was originally built in 1982 and is home to an architectural feature that's a piece of art in itself: an approximately 200-foot-long, 80-foot-tall sloped glass wall with expansive views into Central Park. But for more than 20 years, the shades on the wall have been drawn to protect artwork from light damage, leaving the space shrouded in darkness. Through WHY's redesign, the glass wall has been uncovered and the three collections have a brand new layout, showcasing the building's beauty and flooding its galleries with natural light. 'No architect today would put a giant glass facade on the south side of a museum' According to Brian Butterfield, design director at WHY, the gigantic sloped glass wall is especially striking because it's a feature that 'no architect today' would ever put on the south side of a museum. When dealing with valuable artwork, anything that's rendered with pigment, made of wood, or fashioned from another delicate material can be photosensitive, meaning sun exposure can lead to damage over time. What's worse, the former layout of the Michael C. Rockefeller Wing placed wooden and pigmented works from the Oceania collection close to the glass wall, making it potentially even more hazardous to raise the wall's shades. Still, when WHY took on the project, nearly everyone involved ultimately agreed that the glass wall was an essential part of the space. 'The Met sits in Central Park, and the Landmarks Preservation Commission as well as the Central Park Conservancy were in agreement that the sloped glass wall should be replaced, if not directly in kind, then in a way that didn't change the architectural expression too much,' Butterfield says. Pulling back the shades Alongside the design and engineering firm Arup Group, WHY set about experimenting with ways to not only preserve the wall, but also make it a truly functional feature of the wing. One advantage that today's designers have over those of the '80s, Butterfield says, is advances in glass technology. 'The glass of 40 years ago is not the glass of today,' Butterfield says. 'Today, you can have double or triple glazing, and you can have inner layers with different films and frits and gas fills, all of which protect art by reducing visible daylight, eliminating all infrared light, and eliminating all ultraviolet light.' Glazing, films, frits (a kind of glass powder), and gas fills are all various ways to alter the properties of glass to give a more filtering effect—and all of them have been employed on the new custom sloped wall. To maximize the space's natural light while keeping its artwork safe, the wall is now formatted in a gradient that's not apparent to the naked eye. At floor level, where no art is displayed, the glass is fully translucent. As the panels move upward, though, they become increasingly filtered to block any harsh rays. The wall is designed to keep the window fully exposed throughout the day; shades only deploy if light levels exceed a safe maximum. 'Instead of them just being 100% down for the last 20 years, maybe they'll only be deployed 20% of the time throughout the calendar year, so that the majority of time visitors are in the gallery, they can experience that connection to Central Park,' Butterfield says. To further safeguard the wing's art, the WHY team reconfigured its layout so that light-sensitive works, like those in the Oceania collection, are arranged in carefully placed alcoves hidden from the sun, while hardier metal and stone pieces are closer to the glass wall. This shift is just one of several changes that the designers made to transform the gallery space from a cramped, easy-to-miss area of the Met into a bright, well-paced wing that would encourage viewers to slow down and appreciate its works. From drab to 'airy and light' The Michael C. Rockefeller Wing's three galleries include the Arts of Africa, which surveys visual traditions across sub-Saharan Africa; the Arts of Oceania, which includes monumental works from New Guinea and surrounding island archipelagoes; and the Arts of the Ancient Americas, which focuses on arts of Latin American prior to American invasions after 1492. The rightful ownership of some works in the wing, including several Indigenous works donated to the American gallery, remains a subject of debate. Several elements of the wing's former design were due for an update. In its previous configuration, the three galleries were arranged in distinct parallel bars, making each feel separate from the others. Walkways that cut directly through the African and Oceanic spaces allowed viewers to walk straight through the wing without taking a closer look at its work. Combined with the relative lack of natural light from the shaded glass wall, Butterfield says there was a bit of a 'dated '80s feel' to some of the galleries. 'It felt dark, it felt drab,' Butterfield says. 'The African galleries were designated in yellows and browns, the Oceania galleries were in blues—it felt very reductive in its presentation.' To address those concerns, WHY completely shifted the flow of the space. Now, a central walkway moves diagonally through the wing, taking viewers on a path that brings them in close contact with each of the three gallery spaces. The walkway itself is the Oceanic collection, imagined as a kind of connective 'ocean' between the adjacent Africa and the Ancient Americas collections. Each of the three sections has a toned-down color story, with warm white and plaster accents in the African collection, limestone in the Americas, and frosted glass in the Oceanic area. 'It was both a poetic move to have the diagonal cut through, to separate the three galleries, but to also allow for meaningful overlap and cross-cultural dialogue between them,' Butterfield says. 'There's a lot of visual transparency between the three collections, but the diagonal allows us to really control the actual pedestrian connections between the three collections.' Overhead, a series of arched baffles give the wing a striking vault shape. Everywhere viewers look, there's a sightline into Central Park. Butterfield says the details, taken together, give an 'airy, light, contemporary feel.' 'We were doing everything we could to really push forward the practice of lighting in a museum, so these objects really sing,' Butterfield says.
