Hearing of prosecution's review bid vacated
PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court here on Friday (April 25) vacated the hearing of the prosecution's review application challenging the top court's earlier 2-1 majority ruling that it (the Federal Court) has the jurisdiction to review death sentences that had been imposed on four prisoners whose sentences have been commuted by the Pardons Boards.
Lawyer Datuk N.Sivananthan, representing two of the four prisoners, told the media that the hearing did not proceed on Friday to allow the parties to explore the possibility of applying the Federal Court's ruling to 123 other prisoners who are in the same situation as the four.
He said a case management has been fixed for June 3 for parties to update the court on any development.
On Aug 27, last year, the Federal Court ruled in a split decision that it had the jurisdiction under the Revision of Sentence of Death and Imprisonment for Natural Life (Temporary Jurisdiction of The Federal Court) Act 2023 (Act 847), to review the death sentences that were imposed on the four for drug trafficking offences.
The majority decision, made by Justices Tan Sri Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal and Datuk Hanipah Farikullah, held that the 30-year prison sentences imposed on the four prisoners should take effect from the date of their arrest, and not from the date their pardons were granted. Justice Datuk Nordin Hassan dissented.
Following this, the prosecution filed a review application under Rule 137 of the Rules of the Federal Court 1995, contending that the judges who decided the majority ruling had acted beyond their jurisdiction.
Meanwhile, lawyer Abdul Rashid Ismail, representing Zambian national Mailesi Phiri, told the media that the jail terms of 123 other prisoners were calculated from the date of their respective Pardons Board's clemency decision, rather than from the date of their arrest.
"This means that the time they spent in custody prior to the granting of the pardon has not been taken into account, resulting in longer prison terms beyond the 30-year jail term set under Section 39B (2) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952,' he explained.
The Federal Court had in August last year allowed the four individuals - G. Jiva, 55; P. Balakrishnan, 48; Thai national Phrueksa Thaemchim, 41; and Phiri, 47 - to commence their 30-year jail terms from the date of their arrest.
Sivananthan is representing Jiva and Balakrishnan, while lawyer K. Simon Murali is representing Phrueksa. Deputy Public Prosecutors Datin Asmah Musa, Tetralina Ahmed Fauzi, Ng Siew Wee, and Solehah Noratikah Ismail are appearing for the prosecution.- Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
11 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Appeals court to hear Anwar's interim stay to suspend trial on Tuesday
On Wednesday, Justice Roz Mawar Rozain dismissed Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's application to refer eight questions to the Federal Court as they failed to cross the threshold set out in Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. (Bernama pic) PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal will hear Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's application for an interim stay of the trial of a civil suit filed by a former research assistant on Tuesday, pending the outcome of an appeal. Lawyer K Rajasegaran, who appeared for Anwar, said the date was fixed following case management before a court deputy registrar this afternoon. Rajasegaran said the court also fixed July 21 to hear a permanent stay application of the trial until the outcome of Anwar's appeal to set aside the High Court's refusal to refer eight legal questions arising from the suit. Anwar had wanted the Federal Court to determine whether a sitting prime minister could be given protection from 'frivolous and politically motivated' suits while holding office. In the stay application filed yesterday by Messrs Zain Megat & Murad, the solicitors said there existed special circumstances to suspend the assault suit scheduled to begin in the High Court on June 16. They said the appeal to refer the legal questions to the Federal Court would be nugatory if the trial proceeded. 'The adjournment in the High Court is of utmost importance and is necessary to preserve the principles of justice, equality and constitutional integrity,' they said. They said the postponement would allow for complex and high-impact constitutional questions to be properly determined and interpreted. On Wednesday, Justice Roz Mawar Rozain dismissed Anwar's reference application, when it ruled that all eight questions posed failed to cross the threshold set out in Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. She said none of the articles cited in the Federal Constitution, as argued by Anwar's lawyers, gave rise to any real, substantial and justiciable questions of law that require a determination by the apex court. Roz Mawar had ordered for the trial of Yusoff Rawther's suit to begin at 9am on June 16 as scheduled. The prime minister wanted the apex court to rule whether Articles 5(1), 8(1), 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution grant him qualified immunity from a suit filed by Yusoff four years ago. The suit relates to events which allegedly took place before Anwar took office on Nov 24, 2022. Yusoff, a grandson of the late Penang consumer advocate SM Mohamed Idris, claims he was assaulted at Anwar's home in Segambut in October 2018. He is seeking general, special, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as interest, costs and other relief deemed fit by the court. Anwar denies the claim and has filed a countersuit.
New Straits Times
13 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: When commuting is a walk in the park
UNLESS people live off the grid, they would want homes near basic conveniences. With access to government services, supermarkets, schools and clinics, people also prefer living near bus or taxi terminals or commuter train stations for easy travel to the city. Residential areas near such transportation hubs have been fortunate to have infrastructure built around them. In the future, the plan is to reverse this: the National Transport Policy 2019–2030 (NTP) states that new housing projects will be developed on or near public transport stations. This concept, exemplified by the Kota Madani housing project, offers residences for low-income groups seeking a sustainable and organised urban lifestyle. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, in introducing the concept, said it might require changes to existing regulations, as such housing projects promote broader use of the public transport system. Anwar's announcement is timely, as public transport usage stands at only 20 per cent nationwide, significantly below the 40 per cent target set in the NTP. The challenge, said Transport Minister Anthony Loke, is ensuring that the NTP achieves its goals. Anwar's initiative marks a significant step toward addressing low public transport usage. Building homes near transit stations could help resolve this issue. Still, as Loke said, the challenges are entrenched. Low public transport usage stems from inconvenient routes, unreliable service, frequent delays, poor last-mile connectivity, and the social perception of car ownership as a status symbol. Since the mid-1980s, Malaysia's push into industrialisation spurred domestic car production, making private vehicle ownership easy, affordable and widespread. The obsession with cars is exemplified by the six million vehicles entering Kuala Lumpur daily, 2.2 million during peak hours. For public transport to succeed — like Hong Kong's MTR or Singapore's MRT — the government must make tough policy decisions to reduce driving and incentivise bus and train usage. One approach would be to impose a congestion charge for city entry to encourage greater use of buses and trains. Other than limited parking, the measure most hated by motorists is paying to enter the city. Inconsistent schedules, Delays and overcrowding — though frustrating — are issues of management and efficiency, not infrastructure failure. The same applies to poor last-mile connectivity, inadequate waiting areas, and substandard bus infrastructure. In short, there must be a competent system — or artificial intelligence (AI)-driven solutions — to manage scheduling and operations. As for those living off-grid or in remote areas, an AI-enabled e-hailing service could offer a practical mobility solution. Balancing these complex factors — improving public transport while managing urban traffic congestion — remains the ultimate challenge.
New Straits Times
13 hours ago
- New Straits Times
When commuting is a walk in the park
UNLESS people live off the grid, they would want homes near basic conveniences. With access to government services, supermarkets, schools and clinics, people also prefer living near bus or taxi terminals or commuter train stations for easy travel to the city. Residential areas near such transportation hubs have been fortunate to have infrastructure built around them. In the future, the plan is to reverse this: the National Transport Policy 2019–2030 (NTP) states that new housing projects will be developed on or near public transport stations. This concept, exemplified by the Kota Madani housing project, offers residences for low-income groups seeking a sustainable and organised urban lifestyle. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, in introducing the concept, said it might require changes to existing regulations, as such housing projects promote broader use of the public transport system. Anwar's announcement is timely, as public transport usage stands at only 20 per cent nationwide, significantly below the 40 per cent target set in the NTP. The challenge, said Transport Minister Anthony Loke, is ensuring that the NTP achieves its goals. Anwar's initiative marks a significant step toward addressing low public transport usage. Building homes near transit stations could help resolve this issue. Still, as Loke said, the challenges are entrenched. Low public transport usage stems from inconvenient routes, unreliable service, frequent delays, poor last-mile connectivity, and the social perception of car ownership as a status symbol. Since the mid-1980s, Malaysia's push into industrialisation spurred domestic car production, making private vehicle ownership easy, affordable and widespread. The obsession with cars is exemplified by the six million vehicles entering Kuala Lumpur daily, 2.2 million during peak hours. For public transport to succeed — like Hong Kong's MTR or Singapore's MRT — the government must make tough policy decisions to reduce driving and incentivise bus and train usage. One approach would be to impose a congestion charge for city entry to encourage greater use of buses and trains. Other than limited parking, the measure most hated by motorists is paying to enter the city. Inconsistent schedules, Delays and overcrowding — though frustrating — are issues of management and efficiency, not infrastructure failure. The same applies to poor last-mile connectivity, inadequate waiting areas, and substandard bus infrastructure. In short, there must be a competent system — or artificial intelligence (AI)-driven solutions — to manage scheduling and operations. As for those living off-grid or in remote areas, an AI-enabled e-hailing service could offer a practical mobility solution. Balancing these complex factors — improving public transport while managing urban traffic congestion — remains the ultimate challenge.
