Latest news with #Revision
Indian Express
5 days ago
- Politics
- Indian Express
After controversy regarding his EPIC number, Tejashwi Yadav says Bihar Deputy CM has 2 voter cards
Days after the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) for Digha Assembly constituency issued a fresh notice to RJD leader Tejashwi Prasad Yadav, asking him to surrender an allegedly fake Electors Photo Identity Card (EPIC), Yadav on Sunday alleged that Bihar Deputy CM Vijay Kumar Sinha possesses two voter cards and asked if the poll panel would issue a notice 'even after the Special Intensive Revision'. Alleging that Sinha's case suggested that the entire electoral roll revision exercise was a 'farjiwada (forged process)', Yadav questioned how the EC could complete the process when several riverine belts of Sonepur and Raghopur had been threatened by floods because of heavy rain and rising water levels of Ganga. After the SIR draft rolls were published on August 1, Yadav claimed during a press conference that his name had been 'deleted' and that his voter ID card was no longer valid. A notice was issued to him. The EC, however, had told Yadav that he had mentioned a wrong EPIC, which was not issued by the poll panel. Commenting on the EC asking him to respond to allegations that he holds two EPIC numbers, the Leader of Opposition in Bihar said he has responded to the poll panel's queries through speed post, the mode through which he had received the notice. Yadav told reporters Sunday, 'Vijay Kumar Sinha is a voter from two different Assembly constituencies in two different districts. His name is there in Lakhisarai Assembly constituency in the same district and also in Bankipur Assembly constituency in Patna district.' 'We assume the Booth Level Officers (BLOs) had visited Vijay Kumar Sinha at Patna and Lakhisarai and he would have signed two enumeration forms for the ongoing SIR. After the draft roll is published, Sinha is shown a voter at both places. While in Lakhisarai EPIC, his age is shown as 57, and in Bankipur EPIC it is 60. Besides having two voter cards, this is also age fraud…' he said. He asked if the poll panel would show the 'same urgency in issuing notice to Sinha as it did in his case'. Responding to Yadav's allegations, Deputy CM Sinha said, 'After I got my name added to the voter list of Lakhisarai, I had applied to the EC online to remove my name from the voter list in Bankipur. But this application was somehow rejected. After I learnt that my name was still there in Bankipur after the SIR draft rolls were published, I applied afresh on August 5 to delete my name from the Bankipur voter list. Tejashwi Prasad Yadav should know that it is draft rolls and not the final one.' Though Sinha did not respond to the 'age fraud' allegation and how his name was on the Bankipur voter list without signing the enumeration form, Sinha asserted that he has documents and evidence to show that he has taken steps to remove his name from the Bankipur voter list, and added that he has voted from only one of the places. 'I vote from only one place. Last time too, I voted from only one place. The prince of Jungle Raj (Tejashwi) is simply trying to mislead people by giving wrong facts. The entire Bihar knows that he (Tejashwi) plays the game of tarnishing the image of others. He should apologise for making false allegations against me,' Sinha said. Santosh Singh is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express since June 2008. He covers Bihar with main focus on politics, society and governance. Investigative and explanatory stories are also his forte. Singh has 25 years of experience in print journalism covering Bihar, Delhi, Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka. ... Read More
Time Business News
12-07-2025
- Health
- Time Business News
Degenerative Joint Disease DJD ICD 10: Complete Guide
Degenerative Joint Disease DJD ICD 10 (DJD), commonly referred to as osteoarthritis, is the most prevalent chronic joint condition, especially among the aging population. It leads to the progressive breakdown of cartilage in joints, causing pain, stiffness, and decreased mobility. In healthcare documentation and billing, DJD is classified using the ICD-10 system, which provides a standardized way to code and track medical diagnoses across healthcare systems. This blog explains what DJD is, how it's categorized under ICD-10 codes, and what patients and healthcare providers need to know for proper diagnosis and documentation. DJD ICD 10 is a chronic condition characterized by the wearing away of cartilage—the flexible, protective tissue at the ends of bones in joints. As the cartilage deteriorates, bones begin to rub against each other, leading to: Joint pain and stiffness Swelling or inflammation Decreased range of motion Bone spurs Knees Hips Spine (Cervical, Thoracic, Lumbar) Hands and fingers The International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) is a globally used coding system maintained by the World Health Organization (WHO) and adapted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in the U.S. It allows for standardized documentation, billing, and statistical tracking of health conditions. Each ICD-10 code provides specific information about: The type of disease of disease The location of the disease of the disease The laterality (right, left, bilateral) (right, left, bilateral) The severity (if applicable) In ICD-10, Degenerative Joint Disease is primarily coded under M15–M19, depending on the location and nature of the arthritis. ICD-10 Code Description M15.0 Primary generalized osteoarthritis M15.4 Secondary multiple osteoarthritis M16.0 – M16.9 Osteoarthritis of the knee M17.0 – M17.9 Osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint (thumb base) M18.0 – M18.9 Osteoarthritis of first carpometacarpal joint (thumb base) M19.0 – M19.9 Other and unspecified osteoarthritis DJD of Right Knee: ICD-10 Code: M17.11 Description: Unilateral primary osteoarthritis, right knee DJD of Bilateral Hips: ICD-10 Code: M16.0 Description: Primary osteoarthritis of the bilateral hips Generalized DJD: ICD-10 Code: M15.0 Description: Primary generalized osteoarthritis affecting multiple joints DJD of Lumbar Spine: ICD-10 Code: M47.816 Description: Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, lumbar region Healthcare providers use ICD-10 codes to: Document clinical diagnoses in patient records in patient records Facilitate insurance claims and reimbursement and reimbursement Track epidemiological data Coordinate treatment plans Accurate ICD-10 coding ensures that the severity and location of DJD are well-documented, helping improve care and billing compliance. To select the correct DJD ICD-10 code, the provider must: Specify the joint(s) affected affected Note the laterality (left, right, or bilateral) (left, right, or bilateral) Clarify if the DJD is primary, secondary, or post-traumatic Mention if there's an associated condition (e.g., spondylosis or joint deformity) Type Description ICD-10 Implication Primary DJD Age-related wear and tear with no known cause M15.0, M16.0, M17.0 Secondary DJD Result of another condition or injury (e.g., trauma, obesity, gout) M15.4, M19.x Aging Joint overuse or repetitive motion (e.g., athletes, laborers) Obesity Previous joint injuries or surgeries Genetics Poor posture or spinal alignment Understanding risk factors helps with prevention and early diagnosis, which can delay progression and improve quality of life. Patients often report: Aching pain that worsens with activity Morning stiffness lasting < 30 minutes Clicking or popping in the joint Swelling or warmth around the joint Limited range of motion In the spine, DJD may also lead to nerve compression, causing numbness or tingling in the arms or legs. Physicians use: X-rays : To detect bone spurs and cartilage loss : To detect bone spurs and cartilage loss MRI or CT scans : For detailed soft tissue views : For detailed soft tissue views Physical exams : To assess mobility and tenderness : To assess mobility and tenderness Patient history: Essential for understanding progression Once diagnosed, ICD-10 codes are selected based on findings and included in the patient's record and claims. Although there's no cure for DJD, many treatments can manage symptoms and improve function: Physical therapy Weight loss programs NSAIDs and pain relievers Joint injections (steroids or hyaluronic acid) Assistive devices (braces, canes) Joint replacement (hip/knee) Arthroscopy Osteotomy (bone realignment) The ICD-10 code remains relevant through all stages of care for tracking diagnosis, treatment progress, and outcome. DJD ICD 10 is a chronic, progressive disorder that affects millions globally. Whether you're a healthcare provider documenting a diagnosis or a patient trying to understand your condition, knowing the correct ICD-10 code is essential for treatment, communication, and insurance. From M15.0 (generalized osteoarthritis) to M17.11 (right knee OA), each code tells a story about the location, severity, and origin of the disease. Proper coding ensures better care, faster claims, and more accurate data collection, benefiting both patients and practitioners. ICD-10 DJD Range: M15–M19 M15–M19 Most Common Locations: Hips, knees, spine, hands Hips, knees, spine, hands Important ICD Codes: M15.0 (generalized) M17.0–M17.9 (knee) M16.0–M16.9 (hip) Primary vs. Secondary DJD: Age-related vs. trauma/disease-related TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Hans India
30-04-2025
- Health
- Hans India
Raising Awareness and Prevention of Head and Neck Cancer
Cancer is a debilitating illness that remains a persistent threat to humanity and is one of the leading causes of death globally. It is imperative to recognize the prevalence of head and neck cancers, the seventh most common cancer in the world. Head and neck cancers exhibit a continuous rising trend of prevalence and incidence rates across the globe and more prevalent in developing nations like India where it is responsible for significant cancer-related mortality rate. In India, Head neck cancers cause over 1,25,000 deaths annually, accounting for a significant 30 percent of all cancer cases as per the latest Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) estimates produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and disseminated as Cancer Today on GLOBOCAN website database. The GLOBOCAN 2024 database includes seven types of head and neck cancers, including the lip and oral cavity, hypopharynx, nasopharynx, oropharynx, salivary gland, larynx, and thyroid cancer. These categories are made according to the International Classification of Diseases Related Health Problems; 10th Revision (ICD-10) based on anatomical location of tumor. The estimated rise in the incidence rate was predicted until 2050. The highest prevalence was reported for lip and oral cavity cancer which was 26.31, 17.07, and 6.4 for the 5 years, 3 years, and 1 year per 100,000 individuals respectively. The percent risk of rise of new cancer cases by the year 2050 is maximum for oropharynx cancer (103.9%). In India, the number of cancer cases is rising and it is estimated that there will be approximately 2.1 million new cancer cases in India by 2040, an increase of 57.5% from the year 2020. Tobacco addiction is one of the most important and significant risk factors for head neck cancers, especially oral cancers. Tobacco use has been identified as a risk factor in 80 to 90% of patients with oral cancer. Tobacco use in India is characterized by a high prevalence of combustible (in the form of smoking) and smokeless tobacco use, with dual use also contributing a noticeable proportion. Tobacco and alcohol consumption synergistically increase the likelihood of cancer by 500 times. Head neck cancers can manifest with various symptoms depending on the location and stage of the cancer. Some common signs and symptoms include swelling or lumps, pain, difficulty swallowing, changes in Voice, persistent sore throat, ear pain, difficulty breathing, unexplained weight loss, bleeding, and numbness One of the significant challenges in combating Head neck cancers in India is the late presentation of cases. Due to a lack of awareness, limited access to healthcare facilities in remote regions, and sociocultural beliefs, patients often seek medical help at advanced stages of the disease, reducing treatment options and chances of successful outcomes. Treatment for head and neck cancer typically involves a multidisciplinary approach, including surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy and in recent years, advancements in medical technology have led to targeted therapies and immunotherapy Prevention is better than cure. Head neck cancers can be prevented by Avoiding consumption of tobacco (in any form) and alcohol is the best strategy for oral and head & neck cancer prevention. Maintenance of good oral hygiene HPV vaccine is now available that helps in the prevention of HPV-associate oropharyngeal cancer. Regular screening As the healthcare stand poised on the edge of discovery, crucial innovations entail developing patient-focused and patient-friendly treatment modalities for head neck cancers. April which is a Head neck cancer awareness month, let us all take a pledge to unite together in our fight against head neck cancers. (The writer is a Consultant -Head & Neck Surgical Oncology & Robotic Surgery Apollo Cancer Centre, Visakhapatnam)
The Star
25-04-2025
- Politics
- The Star
Hearing of prosecution's review bid vacated
PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court here on Friday (April 25) vacated the hearing of the prosecution's review application challenging the top court's earlier 2-1 majority ruling that it (the Federal Court) has the jurisdiction to review death sentences that had been imposed on four prisoners whose sentences have been commuted by the Pardons Boards. Lawyer Datuk representing two of the four prisoners, told the media that the hearing did not proceed on Friday to allow the parties to explore the possibility of applying the Federal Court's ruling to 123 other prisoners who are in the same situation as the four. He said a case management has been fixed for June 3 for parties to update the court on any development. On Aug 27, last year, the Federal Court ruled in a split decision that it had the jurisdiction under the Revision of Sentence of Death and Imprisonment for Natural Life (Temporary Jurisdiction of The Federal Court) Act 2023 (Act 847), to review the death sentences that were imposed on the four for drug trafficking offences. The majority decision, made by Justices Tan Sri Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal and Datuk Hanipah Farikullah, held that the 30-year prison sentences imposed on the four prisoners should take effect from the date of their arrest, and not from the date their pardons were granted. Justice Datuk Nordin Hassan dissented. Following this, the prosecution filed a review application under Rule 137 of the Rules of the Federal Court 1995, contending that the judges who decided the majority ruling had acted beyond their jurisdiction. Meanwhile, lawyer Abdul Rashid Ismail, representing Zambian national Mailesi Phiri, told the media that the jail terms of 123 other prisoners were calculated from the date of their respective Pardons Board's clemency decision, rather than from the date of their arrest. "This means that the time they spent in custody prior to the granting of the pardon has not been taken into account, resulting in longer prison terms beyond the 30-year jail term set under Section 39B (2) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952,' he explained. The Federal Court had in August last year allowed the four individuals - G. Jiva, 55; P. Balakrishnan, 48; Thai national Phrueksa Thaemchim, 41; and Phiri, 47 - to commence their 30-year jail terms from the date of their arrest. Sivananthan is representing Jiva and Balakrishnan, while lawyer K. Simon Murali is representing Phrueksa. Deputy Public Prosecutors Datin Asmah Musa, Tetralina Ahmed Fauzi, Ng Siew Wee, and Solehah Noratikah Ismail are appearing for the prosecution.- Bernama
