
As electric bills rise, evidence mounts that data centers share blame
It's not clear that any state has a solution and the actual effect of data centers on electricity bills is difficult to pin down. Some critics question whether states have the spine to take a hard line against tech behemoths like Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Meta.
But more than a dozen states have begun taking steps as data centers drive a rapid build-out of power plants and transmission lines.
That has meant pressuring the nation's biggest power grid operator to clamp down on price increases, studying the effect of data centers on electricity bills or pushing data center owners to pay a larger share of local transmission costs.
Rising power bills are 'something legislators have been hearing a lot about. It's something we've been hearing a lot about. More people are speaking out at the public utility commission in the past year than I've ever seen before,' said Charlotte Shuff of the Oregon Citizens' Utility Board, a consumer advocacy group. 'There's a massive outcry.'
Some ComEd customers seeing triple-digit bill increases as supply rate hike, heat wave convergeSome data centers could require more electricity than cities the size of Pittsburgh, Cleveland or New Orleans, and make huge factories look tiny by comparison. That's pushing policymakers to rethink a system that, historically, has spread transmission costs among classes of consumers that are proportional to electricity use.
'A lot of this infrastructure, billions of dollars of it, is being built just for a few customers and a few facilities and these happen to be the wealthiest companies in the world,' said Ari Peskoe, who directs the Electricity Law Initiative at Harvard University. 'I think some of the fundamental assumptions behind all this just kind of breaks down.'
A fix, Peskoe said, is a 'can of worms' that pits ratepayer classes against one another.
Some officials downplay the role of data centers in pushing up electric bills.
Tricia Pridemore, who sits on Georgia's Public Service Commission and is president of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, pointed to an already tightened electricity supply and increasing costs for power lines, utility poles, transformers and generators as utilities replace aging equipment or harden it against extreme weather.
The data centers needed to accommodate the artificial intelligence boom are still in the regulatory planning stages, Pridemore said, and the Data Center Coalition, which represents Big Tech firms and data center developers, has said its members are committed to paying their fair share.
But growing evidence suggests that the electricity bills of some Americans are rising to subsidize the massive energy needs of Big Tech as the U.S. competes in a race against China for artificial intelligence superiority.
Data and analytics firm Wood Mackenzie published a report in recent weeks that suggested 20 proposed or effective specialized rates for data centers in 16 states it studied aren't nearly enough to cover the cost of a new natural gas power plant.
In other words, unless utilities negotiate higher specialized rates, other ratepayer classes — residential, commercial and industrial — are likely paying for data center power needs.
Meanwhile, Monitoring Analytics, the independent market watchdog for the mid-Atlantic grid, produced research in June showing that 70% — or $9.3 billion — of last year's increased electricity cost was the result of data center demand.
ComEd CEO seeks rules to prevent AI from boosting energy billsLast year, five governors led by Pennsylvania's Josh Shapiro began pushing back against power prices set by the mid-Atlantic grid operator, PJM Interconnection, after that amount spiked nearly sevenfold. They warned of customers 'paying billions more than is necessary.'
PJM has yet to propose ways to guarantee that data centers pay their freight, but Monitoring Analytics is floating the idea that data centers should be required to procure their own power.
In a filing last month, it said that would avoid a 'massive wealth transfer' from average people to tech companies.
At least a dozen states are eyeing ways to make data centers pay higher local transmission costs.
In Oregon, a data center hot spot, lawmakers passed legislation in June ordering state utility regulators to develop new — presumably higher — power rates for data centers.
The Oregon Citizens' Utility Board says there is clear evidence that costs to serve data centers are being spread across all customers — at a time when some electric bills there are up 50% over the past four years and utilities are disconnecting more people than ever.
New Jersey's governor signed legislation last month commissioning state utility regulators to study whether ratepayers are being hit with 'unreasonable rate increases' to connect data centers and to develop a specialized rate to charge data centers.
In some other states, like Texas and Utah, governors and lawmakers are trying to avoid a supply-and-demand crisis that leaves ratepayers on the hook — or in the dark.
ComEd closes $10M customer relief fund after 70,000 applicationsIn Indiana, state utility regulators approved a settlement between Indiana Michigan Power Co., Amazon, Google, Microsoft and consumer advocates that set parameters for data center payments for service.
Kerwin Olsen, of the Citizens Action Council of Indiana, a consumer advocacy group, signed the settlement and called it a 'pretty good deal' that contained more consumer protections than what state lawmakers passed.
But, he said, state law doesn't force large power users like data centers to publicly reveal their electric usage, so pinning down whether they're paying their fair share of transmission costs 'will be a challenge.'
In a March report, the Environmental and Energy Law Program at Harvard University questioned the motivation of utilities and regulators to shield ratepayers from footing the cost of electricity for data centers.
Both utilities and states have incentives to attract big customers like data centers, it said.
To do it, utilities — which must get their rates approved by regulators — can offer 'special deals to favored customers' like a data center and effectively shift the costs of those discounts to regular ratepayers, the authors wrote. Many state laws can shield disclosure of those rates, they said.
In Pennsylvania, an emerging data center hot spot, the state utility commission is drafting a model rate structure for utilities to consider adopting. An overarching goal is to get data center developers to put their money where their mouth is.
'We're talking about real transmission upgrades, potentially hundreds of millions of dollars,' commission chairman Stephen DeFrank said. 'And that's what you don't want the ratepayer to get stuck paying for.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
16 minutes ago
- Forbes
How Google's Pixel 10 Pro Can Defeat Apple's New iPhone 17
Google will launch the new Pixel 10 and Pixel 10 Pro smartphones this month, and the new family of Pixels has an opportunity within reach that no other Pixel has had so far... the chance to take on and claim victory against Apple's iPhone. The latter will launch early in September and will no doubt be seen as 'the best iPhone ever' by the faithful. The Pixel 10 family is not going after that market; they belong to Apple in much the same way that Google has a tranche of users dedicated to the Pixel brand. Sales to these loyal crowds are locked in. The challenge is the group in the middle, the group that will happily swap manufacturers, proficient in living in multiple clouds, and always looking for the best balance. The Pixel 10 family, especially the Pixel 10 Pro, will speak to all of that market. Pixel 10 Pro Wins The Price Discussion First up is the price. Google appears to be keeping the prices of the Pixel 10, Pixel 10 Pro, and Pixel 10 Pro XL in line with the Pixel 9 family launched last year. On the other hand, Apple is set to add a $50 premium across the board for the iPhone 17 handsets. Apple is mitigating this by increasing the base level of storage on these entry-level models, so a like-for-like comparison with the second-tier models of the iPhone 16 will show an effective $50 saving year-on-year. That needs a close reading of the specifications to become clear. A quick comparison online or in-store of the prices will show (as much like-for-like as you can get between Android and iOS) that the Pixel is the more cost-effective option. Pixel 10 Pro Wins This Round Of AI It can't have escaped anyone's notice that artificial intelligence is the latest buzzword in computing. This isn't restricted to mobile; everywhere you turn, you can see AI being used in countless ways. The smartphone is the key computing device for many, and the AI revolution is incredibly visible on the smartphone. At least on Android smartphones. Apple's efforts in artificial intelligence have fallen short of the publicly announced goals at its Worldwide Developer Conference in June 2024. Features that were going to debut on the iPhone 16, then would be coming by the end of the year, may turn up ahead of the iPhone 17 launch. That delay, of more than a year, hands Google a visible win for those expecting modern artificial intelligence on their smartphone. Pixel 10 Pro Has More To Show In 2025 That's just the state of play of AI right now. When the Pixel 10 smartphones are launched, they will have all the added AI benefits from Android 16, as well as the new tools and updates in Google's first-party apps. AI will continue to be one of the buzzwords of 2025. Google will have demonstrated its lead and then extended it as consumers get ready to buy their new smartphones. Apple's AI efforts are still trying to match the promises of June 2024. Those who have purchased the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Pro smartphones Add to that the leap forward that Google will make with the launch of Android 16 on the Pixel 10 phones, as well as the new AI features in Google's first-party apps, and you can see how Pixel will have an AI advantage with consumers. Apple's AI promises from WWDC 2025 are less than grand. Advantage Pixel 10 Pro A better price on retail shelves, a better acknowledgement of artificial intelligence, and more new features that will extend its lead in mobile AI. The Pixel 10 and Pixel 10 Pro smartphones have more advantages over the iPhone than the Pixel range has had to date. Now read the latest Pixel 10 Pro headlines in Forbes' weekly Android news digest...
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's America Party is nowhere to be seen 1 month later
Elon Musk said he would be forming a new political party on July 5. One month later, he hasn't taken the formal steps to do so. He's also remained a major GOP donor, even amid his feud with Trump. Elon Musk hasn't gone "founder mode" on building the America Party just yet. On July 5, enraged by the passage of the "Big Beautiful Bill" and encouraged by the results of an online poll, Musk said he would form a new political party in the United States. Over a month later, he hasn't taken any of the formal steps necessary to do so, and he hasn't publicly mentioned the idea in weeks. That's despite praise from Mark Cuban and a warning from the head of the Democratic Party that Musk's effort should be "taken seriously." In the meantime, several polls have indicated that while many Americans are hungry for a third party, far fewer are interested in one founded by Musk. This week, one of his top aides at both DOGE and xAI announced that she was breaking off to start her own podcast. Musk has also remained a major GOP donor as he's toyed with the idea of starting a third party and feuded with President Donald Trump, according to campaign finance records made public at the end of July. The tech titan gave a total of $15 million to several GOP super PACs on June 27, including: $5 million to MAGA Inc, which supports Trump; $5 million to the Senate Leadership Fund, which supports GOP senators and Senate candidates; $5 million to the Congressional Leadership Fund, which supports Republican House members and candidates. Those donations came just days before Musk said he'd form the America Party — and weeks after he first floated the idea at the beginning of his feud with Trump. "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" Musk asked his followers on June 5. All of this isn't to say that Musk couldn't pivot back to the project at some point. And if he did, he'd be joining a club of businessmen who've tried to take on the two-party system over the years. It takes a lot to stand up a new political party, including filing paperwork with the Federal Election Commission, collecting signatures to get on the ballot in various states, and recruiting candidates to run in House and Senate races next year. In other words, it's a resource-intensive and time-consuming process, and there's little indication that Musk has undertaken it. Musk did not respond to BI's request for comment for this story. Musk, the world's richest man, is known to go "founder mode" on things that he cares deeply about, devoting extraordinary amounts of energy and time to projects and even sleeping at the office. He did it when he took over Twitter, now known as X. He's done it at Tesla. He did it when he went all-in on supporting Trump in 2024. And he brought that same approach to DOGE, until he began winding down his involvement in late April. If Musk is serious about standing up a new party, we might expect him to bring that same "founder mode" approach to this venture. But so far, it hasn't happened. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Report of Trump's $500 billion Fannie, Freddie decision turns heads on Wall Street
Report of Trump's $500 billion Fannie, Freddie decision turns heads on Wall Street originally appeared on TheStreet. After months of murmurs, the Trump administration is reportedly prepping to take mortgage giants Fannie Mae () and Freddie Mac () public, per the Wall Street Journal. The report adds that officials believe the offering could raise $30 billion in such a debut, valuing the two at "roughly $500 billion." The two firms are operated by the federal government, which receives its profits and manages its day-to-day business through a conservatorship. The two firms were taken into government control after they faced significant losses on mortgage securities during the Great Financial Crisis in 2008. In particular, the firms were heavily exposed to subprime mortgages. The government's takeover of the firms at the time helped stabilize the market. However, after 17 years under government management, officials in the White House believe that the firms have replenished their reserves and should be privatized. One big incentive to doing so? A multi-billion dollar windfall for the federal IPO Freddie and Fannie? An IPO of the two firms might read as perplexing for the unacquainted, seeing as though the two firms have traded on the OTC markets for nearly two decades despite being government-supported enterprises (GSEs). However, while the firms are run by the government, it is not a majority owner (at least, not directly.) Instead, as part of the 2008 agreement, the U.S. government received warrants which entitled it to acquire the vast majority of the two businesses. Aside from that, the companies maintain their current private ownership. Among their largest shareholders is Pershing Square's Bill Ackman, a vocal proponent of their privatization. Ackman, who has owned a sizable stake in the two for over a decade, has been banking on their privatization. In January, Ackman claimed that ending that conservatorship could boost the two stocks and help the government realize billions in profits from an IPO. Since the start of the year, when Ackman began boosting his investment case, Fannie and Freddie are up 183% and 132%, respectively. What Happens After Privatization? The GSEs currently serve a public mission: expanding housing access and increasing mortgage market stability. They do this by effectively guaranteeing the mortgages and lowering the risk of borrowing. However, analysts warn that if Fannie and Freddie were privatized, doing away with this guarantee and public mission could affect housing access and affordability. Fair housing advocates say that those impacts would be most dramatic for lower income Americans and minorities. However, privatization of the two firms would almost certainly lead to higher rates, as the firms focus on shareholder value. This story is part of Stock Market Today for Aug. 8, 2025. You can read all of the day's market coverage as it happens here. Report of Trump's $500 billion Fannie, Freddie decision turns heads on Wall Street first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 8, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 8, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio