logo
‘As a Security Partner, China Is Not There' for Iran

‘As a Security Partner, China Is Not There' for Iran

The Atlantic6 days ago
China isn't ready to be the world's next superpower: That's one thing the exchange of fire between Israel and Iran in June made abundantly clear.
The country that was perhaps Tehran's most important diplomatic and economic partner wound up playing virtually no role when Iran and Israel came to blows. This, despite the fact that Beijing has actively sought stronger relations with many countries in the Middle East—not just Iran, but also Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates—and despite China's evident stake in promoting stability in a region that supplies more than half of its oil imports.
So why didn't China step up?
Beijing did make some effort to assert its influence. In mid-June, Chinese leader Xi Jinping proposed a four-point plan, calling for a cease-fire and negotiations to contend with Iran's nuclear program, and offering to play a 'constructive role' in restoring peace. But Xi's proposal went nowhere. He couldn't bring the belligerents to the table—especially not Israel.
The two countries have never been particularly close, and Beijing deeply offended the Israeli leadership by taking a pro-Hamas position after the group's October 7, 2023, terror attack on Israeli civilians. But amid Israel's recent military successes, Beijing has tried to soften its approach. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi has opened a dialogue with his Israeli counterparts and in a phone call in October stated that China 'is ready to resume exchanges in all aspects as soon as possible,' according to an official summary of his comments.
But Israel's leaders are likely to remain cautious, given China's relationship with Tehran. In the recent past, Beijing has helped the Iranians circumvent Washington-led sanctions and diplomatic pressure. Alongside Russia and India, China has welcomed Iran into two important forums: the BRICS group of emerging economies and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, an association of countries connected to Central Asia. And China purchases nearly all of Iran's oil exports, providing vital resources to its moribund economy.
Given these links, Chinese leaders might be expected to wield influence over Tehran. They've done so in the past: In 2015, China encouraged Iran's leadership to join the Obama administration's nuclear deal, and in 2023, it brokered a détente between Tehran and its regional rival, Saudi Arabia. But if China and Iran are too close for Israel's comfort, they are still not as close as they appear to be.
Iran certainly has reason to question whether China is fully committed to the relationship. In 2021, China promised to invest $400 billion in Iran over 25 years as part of an enhanced strategic partnership, but progress toward that goal has been slow. Chinese cumulative direct investment in Iran reached only $3.9 billion at the end of 2023. And Chinese companies have been wary of doing business with Iran due to U.S. sanctions—a risk made clear when Meng Wanzhou, now deputy chair of the telecom giant Huawei, was detained in Canada in 2018 at Washington's request on sanctions-related charges. China also takes advantage of Iran's vulnerability by purchasing its oil at steep discounts. As a result, Tehran has tried to balance Chinese influence by maintaining strong ties to India, Beijing's chief rival within the developing world.
The Iranians also undoubtedly know that China can't ultimately protect them from the United States and Israel. Trade with China cannot fully substitute for real relief from Western sanctions. Beijing isn't likely to pressure Washington into lifting them, either. And although China has been steadily upgrading its armed forces, it still can't project military power all the way to the Middle East. Beijing probably wouldn't want to do so anyway: It tends to eschew the sorts of close alliances and mutual-defense arrangements that Washington routinely forges with other governments. 'China is not trying to be the security provider in the Middle East, and honestly, no one has asked China to,' Yun Sun, a senior fellow at the Stimson Center who specializes in Chinese foreign policy, told me.
Beijing's response to the Israel-Iran conflict reflected all of these limitations. Foreign Minister Wang Yi has offered his Iranian counterpart little beyond diplomatic support. 'As a security partner, China is not there' for Iran, Mohammed Baharoon, the director general of the Dubai Public Policy Research Center, told me. 'If we are talking about a security situation, like the war, Russia has a closer relationship with Iran than China.'
For many in the Middle East, China's standoffishness doesn't seem like the worst thing: Beijing isn't doing anything to escalate the Israel-Iran conflict, either. But then, China is also in no position to challenge or provide a counterweight to the United States in the region. The Gulf states have cultivated ever more trade and investment with China—but they still crave close diplomatic and economic relations with Washington above all. President Donald Trump's May visit, during which the Gulf royals lavishly feted him,'is proof that the U.S. is the most important partner for these countries,' Jonathan Fulton, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council who monitors Chinese policy in the Middle East from Abu Dhabi, told me. Within the region, China is not seen as 'leading political, strategic, diplomatic, and economic issues. Right now, there is really only one country that does all of that, and that's the U.S.'
The same is true on a global scale. Xi attempted to mediate between Russia and Ukraine, and to promote his own peace proposal, after Moscow's invasion in 2022. But his all-too-obvious favor for Russia undercut his credibility as a broker. Efforts to intervene in the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza in 2023 fell flat due to Beijing's overt pro-Palestinian bias. Wang Yi repeatedly called for a cease-fire, but the U.S. engaged in the consistent diplomacy that eventually produced one. In both cases, Xi exploited the crises to further Chinese interests—deepening ties to a desperate and isolated Russian President Vladimir Putin, and scoring propaganda points in the global South by criticizing Washington's support for Israel.
China's actions in these crises are indicative of its true role in global affairs. The so-called axis of authoritarianism—China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea—is not a tightly coordinated cabal. And China's economic heft is not translating into political and military power as quickly as it could be. Chinese leaders just haven't marshaled the diplomatic and military muscle—still less the political will—to usurp America's position as the world's premier power. To get there, Chinese leaders will need not just more resources and experience, but also a new vision for their role in the world.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside Dan Bongino's tense meeting with White House officials over Jeffrey Epstein fallout
Inside Dan Bongino's tense meeting with White House officials over Jeffrey Epstein fallout

Fox News

time33 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Inside Dan Bongino's tense meeting with White House officials over Jeffrey Epstein fallout

FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino was outraged this week during a closed-door White House meeting about the Department of Justice's review of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case files, according to multiple sources. Bongino raised his voice during a discussion with White House chief of staff Susie Wiles before storming out of the meeting, according to two sources close to DOJ leadership. Bongino also exchanged heated words with Attorney General Pam Bondi during the meeting, and the whole ordeal has led him to consider resigning from the FBI, another source said. Another person with knowledge of the meeting disputed the characterization that Bongino yelled at Wiles or Bondi during the sitdown. However, that person agreed that Bongino was "enraged." The source said the deputy director was angry about the Epstein memo rollout and what he viewed as Bondi's "lack of transparency from the start." The memo, a joint product of the DOJ and FBI, said the two agencies had no further information to share with the public about Epstein's case, a revelation that sparked fury among the MAGA base. The memo first appeared in Axios over the weekend, and then the DOJ and FBI published it Monday. Asked about the claim that Bongino yelled at Wiles, a White House official said it was "100% false." Wiles is a veteran of Florida politics who led Trump's campaign, and the president has described her as "universally admired." The fracture in DOJ and FBI leadership spilled into the public on Friday amid fallout from the memo. The memo stated that the DOJ and FBI concluded their review of Epstein's files and did not find any information that could lead to charges against anyone new. Despite Bongino reportedly now breaking with leadership over the memo and weighing resignation, people familiar with the matter said as of Friday that FBI Director Kash Patel and Bondi remained in communication and that Patel is happy with his job. A DOJ spokesman and an FBI spokesman did not respond to requests for comment. Bongino, a former Secret Service agent with no prior FBI experience, hosted a popular podcast before Trump tapped him to serve in the No. 2 role at the bureau. On his show, Bongino repeatedly raised alarm over Epstein's "client list," saying "there's a reason they're hiding it" and that its release would "rock the political world." But in the memo released on Monday, the FBI and DOJ said they uncovered no such list. Bongino, Bondi and Patel are all facing blowback over the Epstein files from a faction of their supporters, who say they reneged on repeated vows to open the curtain on details of Epstein's case. Epstein, a financier who was known to engage with wealthy, well-known figures, was indicted in 2019 over allegations he recruited dozens of women, including minors as young as 14, and had sexual relations with them or sexually abused them. His associate Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of conspiring to sexually abuse minors and is serving a 20-year prison sentence. She has an appeal pending. The DOJ and FBI said in their memo that much of the nonpublic information related to Epstein's case is under court-ordered seals or contains child pornography and private information about victims. Before joining the bureau, Patel and Bongino both advanced theories that the government was hiding information about the case, including a supposed "list" of unindicted sexual predators. The DOJ and FBI's memo poured cold water on that idea by noting that the agencies found "no incriminating 'client list.'" Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement on X that DOJ and FBI leadership, including Bongino, were in lockstep during the compilation and release of the memo. The idea that "there was any daylight" between the FBI and DOJ was "patently false," Blanche said. Bongino was not at work on Friday because he was so upset by the fallout from the Epstein memo, sources said. One said Bongino had not anticipated the backlash from his supporters.

Dan Rather denounces Paramount's settlement as "a sell-out to extortion"
Dan Rather denounces Paramount's settlement as "a sell-out to extortion"

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dan Rather denounces Paramount's settlement as "a sell-out to extortion"

Dan Rather is adding himself to the chorus of people who are furious and concerned about Paramount's decision to settle with Trump for $16 million—a growing ensemble that also counts Elizabeth Warren and pretty much anyone who isn't on the board of Paramount Global among its ranks. Donald Trump initially sued the broadcaster for an amount that eventually grew to $20 billion last year over a 60 Minutes pre-election interview with Kamala Harris he says was edited in her favor. Variety reports that 'most legal experts' agreed the suit was frivolous and would have been thrown out of court, but the company also happened to need White House approval for a merger with Skydance that it's trying to push through its final stages. In the former CBS News anchor's view, this decision was a 'sad day for journalism' and a 'sad day for 60 Minutes and CBS News.' In a statement to Variety, Rather continued, 'I hope people will read the details of this and understand what it was. It was distortion by the President and a kneeling down and saying, 'yes, sir,' by billionaire corporate owners.' 'What really gets me about this is that Paramount didn't have to settle,' he said. 'You settle a lawsuit when you've done something wrong. 60 Minutes did nothing wrong. It followed accepted journalistic practices. Lawyers almost unanimously said the case wouldn't stand up in court.' Heightened internal oversight and pressure around the merger also led to the departure of top producer Bill Owens, who cited a decrease in journalistic independence as a reason for his resignation. Another major executive, Wendy McMahon, soon followed. Rather reiterated that his support for his former colleagues who remain at 60 Minutes is 'total, absolute. I do really think they fought a good fight on this, and they'll continue to fight. The people on 60 Minutes and at CBS News didn't just take it lying down. They did their best to stop it.' Of the settlement, he said he 'was disappointed, but I wasn't surprised. Big billionaire business people make decisions about money. We could always hope that they will make an exception when it comes to freedom of the press, but it wasn't to be.' 'Trump knew if he put the pressure on and threatened and just held that they would fold, because there's too much money on the table,' he continued. 'Trump is now forcing a whole news organization to pay millions of dollars for doing something protected by the Constitution—which is, of course, free and independent reporting. Now, you take today's sell-out. And that's what it was: It was a sell-out to extortion by the President. Who can now say where all this ends?' It doesn't seem like Rather thinks it will end any time soon. 'It has to do with not just journalism, but more importantly, with the country as a whole,' he said. 'What kind of country we're going to have, what kind of country we're going to be. If major news organizations continue to kneel before power and stop trying to hold the powerful accountable, then we all lose.' While he said that in his more than six decades as a journalist he's never seen the profession face challenges like this, he did close with some words of encouragement for anyone down in the trenches. 'Journalism has had its trials and tribulations before, and it takes courage to just soldier on,' he said. 'Keep trying, keep fighting. It takes guts to do that. And I know the people at CBS News, and particularly those at 60 Minutes, they'll do their dead level best under these circumstances. But the question is what this development and the message it sends to us. And that's what I'm trying to concentrate on.' More from A.V. Club Duster's LaToya Morgan and Rachel Hilson on rooting a very '70s story in the here and now Spoiler Space: Jurassic World Rebirth once again makes dinosaurs everyone's problem Sinners got a bunch of its costumes from Marvel's abandoned Blade period movie

Elizabeth Warren calls for bribery investigation into Paramount-Trump settlement
Elizabeth Warren calls for bribery investigation into Paramount-Trump settlement

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elizabeth Warren calls for bribery investigation into Paramount-Trump settlement

Overnight, Paramount came to an agreement with Donald Trump in the $20 billion suit he launched last October over a 60 Minutes interview he claims was deceptively edited. Now, Elizabeth Warren is calling for an investigation into 'whether or not any anti-bribery laws were broken' by the company's $16 million payout to settle what she characterized as the president's 'meritless' dispute, Variety reports. 'With Paramount folding to Donald Trump at the same time the company needs his administration's approval for its billion-dollar merger, this could be bribery in plain sight,' the Massachusetts senator said in a statement. 'Paramount has refused to provide answers to a congressional inquiry, so I'm calling for a full investigation into whether or not any anti-bribery laws were broken.' Warren previously raised these concerns in May in a letter she wrote with Bernie Sanders and Ron Wyden to Shari Redstone, Paramount Global's controlling shareholder. In the letter, the senators suggested that Paramount may be 'engaging in improper conduct involving the Trump Administration in exchange for approval of its megamerger with Skydance Media.' Wyden also chimed in on social media, writing, 'Paramount just paid Trump a bribe for merger approval. When Democrats retake power, I'll be first in line calling for federal charges. In the meantime, state prosecutors should make the corporate execs who sold out our democracy answer in court, today.' Paramount's own employees have also linked capitulation with Trump to the pending merger. 'Our parent company, Paramount, is trying to complete a merger. The Trump administration must approve it. Paramount began to supervise our content in new ways,' 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley said on-air shortly after executive producer Bill Owens resigned for this exact reason. Paramount Global, on the other hand, has claimed that Trump's $20 billion suit is 'completely separate from, and unrelated to, the Skydance transaction and the FCC approval process,' per Variety. The White House also denied this assertion in a statement responding to the senators' letter in May. 'Democrats on Capitol Hill are growing increasingly desperate and unhinged by the day, and this latest act of faux outrage reveals the depth of their despair,' a spokesperson said. 'Anyone who seriously believes the President could be bribed by anyone, especially a liberal and notoriously unreliable institution like Paramount, lacks the intelligence to hold public office.' The money from Paramount's settlement will go directly to Trump's presidential library, a decision Warren also took issue with. 'This settlement exposes a glaring need for rules to restrict donations to sitting presidents' libraries,' she said. 'I will soon introduce new legislation to rein in corruption through presidential library donations. The Trump administration's level of sheer corruption is appalling and Paramount should be ashamed of putting its profits over independent journalism.' More from A.V. Club 3 new songs and 3 new albums to check out this weekend Spoiler Space: Jurassic World Rebirth once again makes dinosaurs everyone's problem Alicia Silverstone screws the wrong boy toy in the terrible erotic thriller Pretty Thing

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store