Thailand and Cambodia Say They Will Return to Agreed Border Positions after Fatal Clash
A royalist activist holds a Thai flag as he protests in front of the Royal Embassy of Cambodia, following a recent clash at the Thailand-Cambodia border on May 28, 2025, in Bangkok, Thailand, June 6, 2025.
BANGKOK/PHNOM PENH, June 8 (Reuters) – Cambodia's Defence Ministry confirmed on Sunday that Thailand and Cambodia had agreed to return their troops to previous border positions after a clash in which a Cambodian soldier was killed prompted both to reinforce their military presence.
The Cambodian statement, which said both sides wished to ease tensions following the incident in an undemarcated area on May 28, came after Thai Defence Minister Phumtham Wechayachai said both countries were in talks to defuse the situation and would revert to positions agreed in 2024.
For days, the two governments have exchanged statements, saying they were committed to finding a peaceful resolution. Neither gave details about where or to what extent their military forces had been reinforced at the weekend.
Thailand operates 17 official border crossings with Cambodia, spanning seven provinces along their shared 817 km (508 miles) frontier, Thai government data shows. Both countries have for more than a century contested sovereignty at undemarcated points along their shared border, which was mapped by France in 1907 when Cambodia was its colony.
Thailand's Phumtham said both sides hoped the border issue could be fully resolved through bilateral talks, including a meeting of the Joint Boundary Committee on June 14.
Cambodia's Foreign Ministry reiterated a request to bring the border disputes to the International Court of Justice in a letter to Thai officials on June 6.
'Given the complexity, historical nature, and sensitivity of these disputes, it is increasingly evident that bilateral dialogue alone may no longer suffice to bring about a comprehensive and lasting solution,' Foreign Minister Prak Sokhonn said in the note shared with reporters on Sunday.
'A decision rendered by the ICJ, grounded in international law, would offer a fair, impartial, and durable resolution,' he said.
The Thai government has said it does not recognise the court's jurisdiction and proposed that all boundary-related issues be resolved through bilateral negotiations.
Tensions between the countries escalated in 2008 over an 11th-century Hindu temple, leading to skirmishes over several years and at least a dozen deaths, including during a week-long exchange of artillery in 2011.
In the latest flare up, Thailand cut operating hours at 10 border crossings with Cambodia, citing security concerns.
Checkpoints, including the busiest in Thailand's eastern province of Sa Kaeo, halved operating hours on Sunday to 8 a.m. (0100 GMT) to 4 p.m. local time, from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., previously, Thai Foreign Ministry spokesperson Nikorndej Balankura told reporters.
The governments of Thailand and Cambodia previously enjoyed warmer ties, owing to a friendship between former leaders, Thaksin Shinawatra from Thailand and Cambodia's Hun Sen. Thaksin's daughter, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, and Hun Sen's son, Hun Manet, are now the incumbent prime ministers of their countries and the conflict has raised questions over their relationship.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
an hour ago
- Nikkei Asia
'Trump Route' in Armenia-Azerbaijan deal could reshape Eurasian trade
From left, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, U.S. President Donald Trump and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan at a signing ceremony for a peace agreement in Washington on Aug. 8. © Reuters TAKAYUKI TANAKA August 12, 2025 01:22 JST TOKYO -- The planned transport route included in the peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia has the potential to bring big changes to transportation on the Eurasian continent, benefiting U.S. economic interests while also serving as a check on Iran.
The Diplomat
4 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Advancing Australia's Trilateral Partnership With Two ASEAN Neighbors
Fruitful relations between Australia, Indonesia, and Timor-Leste should be consolidated through the establishment of new trilateral mechanisms. In October, Timor-Leste is set to become the 11th member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the most consequential regional grouping to Australia's north. For the first time ever, Canberra will have two ASEAN neighbors. Within the bloc, Indonesia has been the biggest supporter of Timor-Leste's application to join ASEAN. Australia too has been an important supporter of Dili's desire to join the grouping. Good relations with both Timor-Leste and Indonesia are both a strategic and diplomatic imperative for Australia. This is especially the case since regional cohesion falters under the weight of U.S.-China strategic competition and security challenges such as the Myanmar civil war and the Thailand-Cambodia border conflict. Closer communication, consultation and cooperation between Australia and its Southeast Asian neighbors is an investment in our shared future Timor-Leste's accession is an ideal moment for the Albanese government to build momentum for the elevation of the Australia-Indonesia-Timor-Leste trilateral partnership, from the foreign minister to the leadership level. As part of such an arrangement, annual trilateral leaders' and ministerial-level summits should be held, in line with the Indonesia-Australia Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (CSP), which aims to increase and strengthen trilateral meetings between Indonesia, Australia, and Timor-Leste. The trilateral meetings could focus on areas of shared interests and challenges like border security, defense infrastructure and maritime security. For instance, they could together increase their maritime security capabilities by running regular maritime patrols, holding annual joint military exercises, training, and naval port visits. Joint maritime training and patrols would be particularly beneficial for Timor-Leste's tiny navy, which continues to struggle combating illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing in its maritime waters. The country losses approximately $300 million per year due to illegal fishing in the Timor Sea. The 2022 Australia-Timor-Leste Reciprocal Defense Cooperation Agreement tries to address these security challenges, by increasing bilateral security cooperation, especially in the maritime domain. As part of the deal, Timorese defense personnel operating or training in Australia will receive the same protections, responsibilities, and privileges as Australian personnel will receive in Timor-Leste. In 2023, Australia committed to donating two Guardian-class patrol boats to Timor-Leste by 2024. Nonetheless, the Timor-Leste navy is yet to receive the vessels due to the inadequate condition of the Port Hera Naval base. Ironically, Timor-Leste was the central factor in the significant decline of Australia-Indonesia bilateral relations in the second half of the 1990s. The 1995 Australia-Indonesia security agreement was torn up by Indonesia in 1999 after the Australian-led multinational invention in East Timor, which had been an Indonesian province since its forcible incorporation in 1976. This marked an all-time low in the bilateral relationship, but in the years since it has been able to recover from this setback and has matured over time. In the 2006 Lombok treaty, Jakarta and Canberra recognized each other's territorial integrity, and they upgraded their strategic ties to a CSP in 2018. Under the new Australia-Indonesia Defense Cooperation Agreement, the two neighbors have pledged to ramp up joint military exercises and training to unprecedented levels and allow both nations to operate from each other's countries for mutually determined cooperative activities. Since its independence in 2002, Timor-Leste has taken a realist foreign policy approach. The key priorities of Timorese foreign policy have included campaigning for full ASEAN membership and ensuring strong ties with its two large neighbors, Australia and Indonesia. Today, Timor-Leste enjoys cordial relations with Indonesia, its largest trading partner. Citizens of Timor-Leste also have visa-free access in Indonesia. No doubt, without the crucial support of Indonesia, Dili's aspiration of becoming an ASEAN member would have been virtually impossible. The Indonesian National Armed Forces also provide military education and training to personnel from the Timor-Leste Defense Force. The neighbors maintain a joint border security task force, which often conducts joint border patrols along the Indonesia-Timor-Leste border. They've also resolved and determined most of their land boundaries. While the region of Naktuka remains a disputed border area, Timor-Leste's Prime Minister Xanana Gusmao recently stated that the two nations are 'working together to resolve the dispute in accordance with international law.' Subsequently, the deepening of bilateral ties between the three neighbors sets solid foundations for a high-level trilateral. It would also realize the full potential in existing trilateral ties. The trilateral partnership should also reaffirm ASEAN's 'centrality 'in the Indo-Pacific. Australian foreign policy sees ASEAN at the center of a peaceful, stable and prosperous region, where sovereignty is respected, and all countries benefit from strategic balance. In 1974, Australia became the grouping's first dialogue partner. Since its humble beginnings over 50 years ago, the ASEAN-Australia partnership has gained in strength. In 2010, the ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement came into effect. And, in 2021, the ASEAN-Australia relationship was elevated to a Strategic Comprehensive Partnership. Overall, Australia prioritizes a strong relationship with Southeast Asia and its northern neighbors. In Indonesia and Timor-Leste, Australia will very soon have two ASEAN countries right on its doorstep. Amid growing unpredictability in the region, now is the time for Australia to seek a high-level trilateral with its two important neighbors.
Nikkei Asia
4 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Nvidia, AMD to pay 15% of China chip sale revenue to US, official says
(Reuters) -- Nvidia and AMD have agreed to give the U.S. government 15% of revenue from sales to China of advanced computer chips, a U.S. official said on Sunday, in an unusual move likely to faze American companies. U.S. President Donald Trump's administration halted sales of H20 chips to China in April, but Nvidia announced last month Washington had said it would allow the company to resume sales and it hoped to start deliveries soon. Another U.S. official said on Friday the Commerce Department had begun issuing licenses for the sale of H20 artificial intelligence chips to China. Both the U.S. officials declined to be named because details have not been made public. The new levy could also hurt margins for the two companies, analysts warned. Shares of Nvidia and AMD fell about 1% and nearly 2%, respectively, in premarket trade on Monday. The deal to pay the U.S. government from sales in China is unusual for a president and marks Trump's latest intervention in corporate decision-making. Trump harangues company executives to invest in America to shore up domestic jobs and manufacturing, and last week, he demanded new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan immediately resign, calling him "highly conflicted" due to his ties to Chinese firms. The U.S. official said the Trump administration did not feel the sale of H20 and equivalent chips was compromising national security. "It's wild," said Geoff Gertz, a senior fellow at Center for New American Security, an independent think tank in Washington, D.C. "Either selling H20 chips to China is a national security risk, in which case we shouldn't be doing it to begin with, or it's not a national security risk, in which case, why are we putting this extra penalty on the sale?" When asked if Nvidia had agreed to pay 15% of revenues to the United States, an Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement: "We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets." "While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide." Nvidia has warned that being unable to supply H20 chips to China could slice $8 billion off sales from its July quarter, while AMD had forecast a $1.5 billion hit to revenue this year owing to the curbs. AMD did not respond to a request for comment on the news that was first reported by the Financial Times earlier on Sunday. "The Chinese market is significant for both these companies so even if they have to give up a bit of the money, they would otherwise make it looks like a logical move on paper," AJ Bell investment director Russ Mould said. "That said, it is unprecedented and there is always the risk the revenue take could be upped or that the Trump administration changes its mind and reimposes export controls." The U.S. Department of Commerce did not immediately respond to a request for comment. China's Foreign Ministry, approached for comment on Monday, said the country had repeatedly expressed its position on the issue of U.S. chip exports. The ministry in the past has accused the U.S. of using technology and trade issues to "maliciously contain and suppress China." The Financial Times said the chipmakers agreed to the arrangement as a condition for obtaining the export licenses for their semiconductors, including AMD's MI308 chips. The report said the Trump administration had yet to determine how to use the money. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last month the planned resumption of sales of the AI chips was part of U.S. negotiations with China to get rare earths and described the H20 as Nvidia's "fourth-best chip" in an interview with CNBC. Lutnick said it was in U.S. interests to have Chinese companies using American technology, even if the most advanced was prohibited from export, so they continued to use an American "tech stack." The U.S. official who spoke about the 15% levy said they did not know when the agreement would be implemented nor exactly how, but said the administration would be in compliance with the law. Alasdair Phillips-Robins, who served as an adviser at the Commerce Department during former President Joe Biden's administration, criticized the move. "If this reporting is accurate, it suggests the administration is trading away national security protections for revenue for the Treasury," Phillips-Robins said. Nvidia generated $17 billion in revenue from China in the fiscal year ending Jan. 26, representing 13% of total sales. AMD reported $6.2 billion in China revenue for 2024, accounting for 24% of total revenue. Giving away some revenue from these chips to the U.S. government would bring the gross margins for these processors down by 5 to 15 percentage points, resulting in an impact of "a point or so" to their overall gross margins, Bernstein analysts said in a note.
