Is the GNU losing rhythm on climate action? A reflection of the strategic development plan
Image: Supplied
The 2025 -2030 Medium-Term Development Plan (MTDP), which was published earlier this year, should for all intents and purpose serve as last-mile five-year implementation blueprint towards the realisation of National Development Plan (NDP) Vison 2030.
Though a nobly thought-out expression of legislative and policy priorities for the Government of National Unity (GNU), the MTDP remains a rebrand of its forebearer, the Mid-Term Strategic Framework (MTSF) but equally a useful platform for the state machinery to deliver a common programme of nation building, economic growth and societal development. Most importantly it's a tool to guide short and medium-term plans and the allocation of public resources.
A perfunctory review of the MTDP shows that there is cognisance of the need for urgent need for climate action and also a need for a just transition, whilst maintaining socioeconomic development.
The MTDP deals with the just transition under Strategic Priority One, which aims to drive inclusive growth and job creation, articulated through the lens of energy security and an energy transition. The MTDP supports the just transition principles, economic diversification and skills development.
The MTDP makes specific mention of the just transition as part the country's sustainable development commitments. Its states that the application of the Just Transition Framework, Just Energy Transition Investment Plan and Implementation Plan 'will be prioritised and accelerated,' noting that 'climate change is a shared global challenge with significant short–, medium-, and long-term socio-economic implications.'
But in prioritising the country's response to climate change, the MTDP misses the mark on the need for integration of the just transition into all aspects of the country's development – noting that climate change is not just an energy problem and that decarbonisation will not only impact the energy sector, but the whole society. It appears like the coordination of the transition will remain fragmented unless it is seen as a priority itself with unifying goals and targets that incorporate various departments and sectors.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Coordination and collaboration to achieve just transition outcomes remains minimal.
In October 2024, the Presidential Climate Commission examined the strategic plans (SPs) and annual performance plans (APPs) of 16 government departments to assess if they had embedded goals, targets, and measurable outputs to achieve just transition outcomes. At a broad level, the analysis noted that climate change is a challenge that will impact departments and sectors. While climate change was better integrated into APPs, this integration was limited to specific outcomes and not streamlined across various relevant outcomes or plans, as would be required for a holistic, coordinated response to climate change and achievement of a just transition.
Our climate and just transition goals and efforts remain neglected and underfunded, with the consequences painfully evident as our municipalities, which are now regularly battered by floods, and drought – with little support towards recovery or resilience. Supporting the institutional integrity, capacity, and resources of local government for adaptation and disaster response should be prioritised and remain a key focus of the Presidential Climate Commission (PCC) going forward.
Government departments that deal with socio-economic development must make space for the inclusion of climate-related goals, funding, policies, outputs and more. While several departments such as Environment, Forestry and Fisheries; Mineral Resources and Energy; Science and Innovation highlighted environmental programmes in their budget votes, these were often siloed and did not go far enough in advancing the just transition. More worrying is that departments whose mandates are central to delivering a just transition such as Employment and Labour, Social Development, etc. have not framed their programmes through a climate or just transition lens.
Our development pathway should transcend medieval economic growth philosophies.
The lived experiences of our people, and lessons from first movers in decarbonisation, have demonstrated that that a just transition will make our economy more resilient and strengthen our global competitiveness, and create opportunities to reduce poverty, inequality, and unemployment.
South Africa passed the Climate Change Act and a comprehensive Just Transition Framework that acts as a blueprint for the just transition to companies, the State and civil society. However, unless just transition outcomes, are integrated meaningfully into the work of government and the private sector, it is unlikely that South Africa will achieve its emissions reductions targets through just means.
As the current five-year term of the Commission draws to a close later this year, the PCC reaffirms its commitment to a just transition that leaves nobody behind. In the face of growing geopolitical uncertainty, widening inequality, and global poverty, we must remain steadfast in advancing our mission: to guide South Africa's transition to a low-carbon, climate-resilient future with integrity, inclusivity, and scientific rigor. Now more than ever, our collective efforts must ensure that the transition is not only ambitious but fundamentally just—placing people, especially the most vulnerable, at the heart of climate action to ensure sustainable socio-economic development.
Yuri Ramkissoon, Senior Manager Monitoring and Evaluation at the Presidential Climate Commission.
*** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL.
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
12 hours ago
- IOL News
Enoch Godongwana challenges SARB's inflation target proposals
Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana firmly opposes the South African Reserve Bank's proposed inflation target, asserting that any changes must follow established protocols Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana has publicly pushed back against the South African Reserve Bank's warning that the central bank cannot independently decide to lower the country's inflation target. This comes after SARB Governor Lesetja Kganyago said last week that the Monetary Policy Committee would now use 3%, the bottom of the 3% to 6% target range, as the anchor for its forecasts. Markets took that as a signal that Treasury would soon follow suit. Godongwana, however, has made it crystal clear that this is not happening. 'It is well established that policy-making responsibility in this area resides with the Minister of Finance, working with the President and Cabinet,' he said. 'Any adjustments to our inflation-targeting framework will follow the established consultation process… not unilateral announcements that pre-empt legitimate policy deliberation.' He added, in a statement, that he has 'no plans' to announce a move to a 3% target in October's Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement.
Eyewitness News
a day ago
- Eyewitness News
‘GNU must take full responsibility for Trump's tariffs' – Mmusi Maimane, BOSA
As of 7 August, the US will implement a 30% trade tariff on South African goods. Maimane argues that the Government of National Unity (GNU) must take the blame for not acting to avert the imposition of these tariffs. He adds that conversations around AGOA started late in the Biden administration, and we did not spend enough time as a country improving ties with the US. RELATED: South African automotive industry faces difficult future amid US tariffs
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Black Sash urges government to tackle corruption for better social grants
Free Market Foundation President Eustace Davie fears that social grants might discourage young people from making efforts to be self-reliant. Image: Supplied The government can still afford to pay social grants for the unemployed despite the US's 30% tariffs on local exports, which could result in the country shedding 300,000 jobs and losing billions of rand in tax revenue. Black Sash, a human rights advocacy group, said the government should stop corruption to afford social grants that are above the poverty line. The group commented after the Free Market Foundation lashed out at the government for what it described as making the grants a permanent income generation for the unemployed instead of providing skills and creating job opportunities for young people. Black Sash said the country does have a lot of money, which has been spent irresponsibly. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'We just need to tighten where we think we are losing money, such as corruption, so that we can redirect the money to the basic services rather than to say there is no money because of the tariffs,' said Black Sash's communications and media manager, Oliver Meth. Meth said the government should focus on creating job opportunities for young people. He said it was unjustifiable to say the country would run into bankruptcy if there was no money coming from another country. 'There is a lot of money in this country, but it's just that it's not directed to the right responsibility,' said Meth. He said every year, the country was facing an increase in unemployment. The Black Sash welcomed the government's move on June 1 to replace the Social Relief Grant (SRG), which paid each unemployed recipient R350 per month, with the Universal Basic Income Grant (UBIG), which increased the payment to R720. Black Sash had, in its May statement, described the introduction of UBIG as the reaffirmation of the Government of National Unity's commitment to ensuring long-term income support for those living in poverty and unemployed. The group had felt that R370 was far below the food poverty line and was insufficient to restore dignity or break the cycle of poverty. 'Black Sash stands ready to engage with policymakers and civil society to ensure that the Basic Income Grant becomes a transformative tool for building a more just, equitable society — one where everyone has the means to live in dignity,' read its May statement. However, Free Market Foundation President Eustace Davies released a statement on Thursday expressing fear that the grant would subject the unemployed to permanent dependency on government handouts. It was estimated in 2024 that there would be 9.24 million grant recipients in 2024/25, and the government had set aside R33.7 billion for this. Davies said the grant was defeating the government's purpose of making young people self-sustainable. He said that unemployed persons who attempt to earn even a modest income through part-time work, informal trading, or entry-level employment risk being immediately disqualified from the grant. 'The reward for productive effort becomes the loss of support,' said Davies. He said grants do not help recipients to progress in their lives, but instead, they remain idle. 'When the state creates a condition in which individuals are penalised for trying to lift themselves out of poverty, it arrests their development and saps their self-respect. A population so becomes compliant but not empowered,' he said. He said the state where grants were in a permanent arrangement could be an indication of economic failure. 'Unemployment remains structurally high, especially among the youth, and entrepreneurship continues to be stifled under layers of bureaucracy,' he said. Davies said South Africa should look at the model of Singapore and Switzerland, which he said were economically successful. 'In Singapore, the emphasis is on education, skills, and enterprise, not permanent grants. 'Switzerland keeps welfare limited and locally administered, with strong expectations of personal responsibility. 'For decades, Hong Kong allowed markets to allocate labour and capital with minimal interference. The result in each case was widespread prosperity,' he said. To keep financing the grants, Davies said, the Treasury will have to introduce taxes, which would mean punishing those who are already carrying the burden of employment creation, capital formation, and tax compliance. 'A policy that extracts more from the productive to fund inactivity cannot produce long-term stability or growth,' he said.
