Child protection worker reveals what Erin Patterson told her in wake of fatal mushroom lunch
A child protection worker said that Erin Patterson described her estranged husband Simon as 'nasty', 'controlling' and 'emotionally abusive', and believed he was isolating her from his parents, a Victorian court has heard.
The worker also said Patterson did not answer her the following day when she asked whether she had picked the mushrooms used in the lunch.
Patterson, 50, has pleaded not guilty to three charges of murder and one charge of attempted murder relating to the lunch she served at her house in Leongatha, Victoria on 29 July 2023.
Patterson is accused of murdering her estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, his aunt Heather Wilkinson, and attempting to murder Ian Wilkinson, Simon's uncle and Heather's husband.
Erin Patterson hosts lunch for estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and his aunt and uncle Heather and Ian Wilkinson. Patterson serves beef wellington.
All four lunch guests are admitted to hospital with gastro-like symptoms.
Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson die in hospital.
Don Patterson dies in hospital. Victoria police search Erin Patterson's home and interview her.
Ian Wilkinson is discharged from hospital after weeks in intensive care.
Police again search Erin Patterson's home, and she is arrested and interviewed. She is charged with three counts of murder relating to the deaths of Don and Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson, and the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson.
Jury is sworn in.
Murder trial begins. Jury hears that charges of attempting to murder her estranged husband Simon are dropped.
The Victorian supreme court sitting in Morwell has previously heard the guests died after being poisoned with death cap mushrooms that were in a paste used by Patterson to make individual beef wellingtons.
The prosecution alleges Patterson deliberately poisoned her lunch guests with 'murderous intent', but her lawyers say the poisoning was a tragedy and terrible accident.
Katrina Cripps told the court on Thursday that she received a notification on 1 August 2023 regarding a referral to child protection about Erin and Simon Patterson's two children.
She said that her and a colleague spoke with Simon, Patterson, and the children while the group were at the Monash medical centre.
Cripps said her colleague took notes of their conversation with Patterson. She told the court that the conversation touched upon an application Patterson filed for child support the previous year, and her relationship with Simon and his parents.
Of the period when Patterson applied for child support, Cripps told the court she told the child protection workers 'as a husband he'd been mean but he'd never been nasty, and she felt that was the time that he'd become nasty'.
Patterson said 'Don and Gail had been like the parents she never had, her parents had died some time ago … but that relationship had changed recently as well' as 'she felt that he was isolating her from his family', Cripps told the court.
Cripps said Patterson told her 'about feeling like [Simon] was controlling and emotionally abusive, in that he would say things to her that would make her doubt herself as a parent and as a mother, and it would impact her self-esteem'.
Patterson also told Cripps about hosting her parents-in-law for lunch with her children earlier in 2023, and that she had invited them because 'she just wanted to reconnect with them and see them'.
Cripps said Patterson told her that she decided to cook beef wellington for the 29 July 2023 lunch as she 'wanted to do something new and special' after finding the recipe in a RecipeTin Eats cookbook.
She said she had invited the Pattersons and Wilkinsons as she had something she wanted to discuss with them, and get their advice.
Notes from the conversation also show Patterson told Cripps she had eaten half of the beef wellington, Cripps told the court.
Patterson and her children were discharged from hospital later that day, but Cripps paid a visit her home the following day, which she said was standard in child protection cases.
She said that Patterson showed her around the home during this 2 August 2023 visit, and she believed it had been specifically set up to cater to her children and their interests.
Patterson took a call from Sallyann Atkinson, from the department of health, during Cripps' visit, and Cripps said she heard the phone call as it was on speaker. Atkinson was attempting to establish which Asian grocer Patterson had purchased dried mushrooms from for the beef wellingtons. The court has heard evidence from multiple people who say they were told by Patterson she used dried mushrooms from an Asian grocer in the lunch.
Cripps said she told Patterson to check her bank statements prior to the call, and she had seen her scrolling through her phone but had not seen what was on her screen. Patterson later explained that she could find no record of the transaction, but that she may have paid cash if it was only a small amount.
Cripps said that after the phone call she asked Patterson whether she had picked the mushrooms used in the meal, but she did not answer and continued looking at her phone.
Under cross examination from Sophie Stafford, a barrister for Patterson, Cripps agreed that after this conversation with Atkinson she also asked Patterson whether she had a support network outside Simon and his family.
Cripps also agreed that Patterson became upset and distressed at the prospect she may lose the support network of the Pattersons.
On 4 August, Cripps said she again spoke with Patterson, this time on the phone. She agreed she asked Patterson whether she had an update on the condition of the lunch guests, but she said she hadn't, and expressed that she was finding this distressing.
Cripps agreed that she knew at the time of the call that Heather Wilkinson had died, but that she did not tell Patterson that because of welfare concerns.
'Yes, and it wasn't my place to,' Cripps told the court.
Patterson also told her during the phone call that she was concerned about her security and privacy, and she was planning on changing her phone number, Cripps agreed.
The trial continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Sydney Muslim cleric tells court Jewish people can't be offended by him calling them ‘vile' as lectures were private
A Sydney Muslim cleric being sued for alleged racial discrimination has told the federal court no Jewish person could be offended over a series of lectures in which he described Jewish people in the seventh century as 'mischievous', 'treacherous' and 'vile' because the lectures were delivered to a private Muslim audience. Wissam Haddad – whose legal name is William but who is also known as Abu Ousayd – is being sued by two senior members of Australia's peak Jewish body, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ), over a series of lectures he gave in Bankstown in November 2023 and subsequently broadcast online, in which he is alleged to have maligned Jewish people. Haddad allegedly breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibits offensive behaviour based on race or ethnic origin. Haddad's defence argues the speeches were delivered to a known Muslim audience, in a private place, and fail the clause in 18C that the offensive act is unlawful when it is committed 'otherwise than in private'. In submissions filed before the federal court, Haddad argues four of the five speeches were delivered at his prayer centre, Al Madina Dawah Centre in Bankstown. 'The centre is a stand-alone building which is manifestly a private property – it is surrounded by high black fencing and its entrance carries a sign that says 'Private Property No Trespassing'.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Haddad's submissions to the court said there was no standing invitation for any non-Muslims to attend the centre. 'There will be no evidence that any of the speeches was attended or heard by anyone who was not a regular congregant of the centre and a practising Muslim.' The remaining speech was a conversation in a room between three people. Haddad was called as a witness late on Wednesday morning. He told the court uploading his speeches to social media was not part of his responsibilities. 'I'm not involved,' he told the court. But under repeated questioning from one of the applicant's barristers, Peter Braham SC, he told the court he knew his speeches would be posted online. 'Yes I did.' Haddad said the speeches were posted online by 'someone from the community'. Asked who it was, Haddad said: 'I'm not at liberty to give his name because I don't think it's relevant.' Peter Wertheim, one of the applicants in the case and ECAJ's co-chief executive, told the federal court on Tuesday that he was first alerted to the presence of Haddad's speeches online by coverage of them in mainstream media. He said Haddad's speeches used 'overtly dehumanising' language. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'Making derogatory generalisations, calling Jews a vile and treacherous people, calling them rats and cowards … are things which I think would be experienced by most Jews as dehumanising,' Wertheim said. His barrister, Braham, told the court Haddad's speeches repeated a range of offensive tropes and were designed to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish people. The court heard Haddad had sound recording and camera equipment installed to record his speeches, which Wertheim's barrister argued was for the purpose of disseminating his message far beyond his congregants. He would speak before a backdrop branded with the Al Madina Dawah Centre logo, but which also included logos of YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and other social media platforms. The applicants are seeking an injunction that Haddad's five offending sermons be removed from the internet, and an order that he refrain from publishing similar speeches in future. Wertheim and his co-applicant, Robert Goot, are also seeking publication of a 'corrective notice' on Haddad's prayer centre's social media pages, and to be awarded the legal costs of bringing their action. They have not sought damages or compensation. Haddad's barrister, Andrew Boe, argued the cleric's speeches were addressed to, and intended only for, a private Muslim congregation and that Haddad was not responsible for them being published online. Boe said it was unlikely a Jewish person would have discovered the speeches, to then be offended by them, if the recordings had not been covered and thus amplified by mainstream media. 'It would be analogous to a person of a prudish sensitivity seeking out pornography on the web and then complaining about being offended by it,' Boe told the court. Boe argued there must be room, in a democratic society, for 'the confronting, the challenging, even the shocking'. The hearing, before Justice Angus Stewart, is expected to run until the end of the week.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
NAB Bank issues urgent warning after woman loses nearly $50,000 in alarming new scam
A quick-thinking bank team saved a widow from losing $50,000 by stepping in just in time to stop a scammer trying to trick her. The 84-year-old widow, who is named as Stella, walked into her local NAB branch in East Maitland, New South Wales, in late February while on the phone. She appeared visibly nervous and asked staff to raise her daily transfer limit from $5,000 to $50,000, claiming she needed to send money to her son. Hunter Valley customer advisor Tiffany Bailey said she immediately became suspicious when the person on the phon hung up as soon as she spoke. 'Alarm bells started ringing for me straight away,' she said on Wednesday, adding that she knew something wasn't right. Ms Bailey searched the phone number and the results suggested it was linked to a known scam. 'That's when we were able to sit down with Stella and ask what was really going on,' she said. 'Stella burst into tears, telling us she was being threatened by a man claiming to be from a major tech company.' 'He'd been pressuring her for days into making a $50,000 transfer to settle an outstanding debt,' Ms Bailey said. The NAB advisor said Stella's adult son, who was waiting at the front of the branch, had no idea she was being scammed. The bank also said the alleged criminal had remote access to the widow's computer and created images that convinced her she owed money to the scammer. Branch manager Vanessa Kruger said the unknown perpetrator had coached Stella on what to say to bank staff. When the unknown man started calling Stella again, Branch manager Vanessa Kruger answered the phone. 'I told him that we were from NAB and we were on to him,' she said. 'I told him to stop calling Stella and leave her alone. We'd also be reporting him to police. 'He hung up straight away like a spineless coward.' No money was taken and NAB put a temporary block on Stella's accounts. The bank's fraud operations team also told Stella her computer should be cleaned. Consumer watchdog ACCC has issued a warning to Australians after the incident to be aware of schemes. 'A remote access scam will begin with a contact out of the blue from someone who sounds pretty professional, telling you that there's something wrong with one of your accounts,' deputy chair Catriona Lowe said. 'They are going to ask you to download software that will enable them to take control of your computer.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Number of Australian journalists hit by US law enforcement during LA protests climbs to four
The number of Australian journalists hit by law enforcement while covering ongoing immigration protests in Los Angeles has climbed to four, with reporters for Nine, the ABC and the New York Times affected. One incident involved Australian journalist Livia Albeck-Ripka, who works for The New York Times. Albeck-Ripka, now based in LA, said she was hit in the torso by a munition fired by law enforcement while covering the protests. 'Officers began firing crowd-control munitions in our direction, and I was hit below my ribcage. It was a pretty intense, instant pain, I felt winded,' she said in a video for the New York Times. 'I was really lucky because I was not seriously injured, I just have a nasty bruise.' Albeck-Ripka, originally from Melbourne, was hit on Sunday night US time. She noted that less-lethal rounds could kill people if they were struck in the head. Lauren Day, the North American correspondent for the ABC, has said she and her crew were teargassed when the protests escalated following a long stand-off with police on Monday night local time. The experience was 'extremely unpleasant', she said. 'All of a sudden, we heard large bangs and the crowd started running. I then felt the unmistakable burn of tear gas — first in my eyes, then in my nose, lips and throat,' Day reported for the ABC. 'It really stings your entire face and makes it difficult to breathe until the point you almost want to throw up.' Later in the night, the cameraman working with Day was shot in the chest with a less-than-lethal round while filming protesters. Day said the cameraman had been wearing a Kevlar vest and had not sustained injuries. He described the pain to the ABC as 'like being punched in the chest'. In response to a question from the Guardian about Day's report of being hit with teargas, the LAPD said it was 'aware of less-lethal deployment use during the protests'. On Friday, a series of immigration raids across the city prompted several mostly peaceful protests around the city. On Saturday, Donald Trump sent in the national guard, in a move condemned by the California governor, Gavin Newsom, as 'purposefully inflammatory'. Since the deployment of the national guard, tensions have escalated with large crowds gathering in downtown centres. There have been reports of protesters throwing rocks, garbage and other objects at police and of police deploying tear gas and firing less-than-lethal munitions. A curfew has been declared. The Australian prime minister, Anthony Albanese, has condemned the actions of an officer who shot Nine journalist Lauren Tomasi with what the network said was a rubber bullet live on air. Sign up to Morning Mail Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Tomasi was describing the situation in LA on Sunday, when an LAPD officer turned and took aim in her direction before firing his weapon. Albanese has said the footage of Tomasi being shot was 'horrific' and he had raised his concerns with the US government. The LAPD said it was investigating the use of excessive force by officers – in an apparent reference to Tomasi. The Los Angeles police chief, Jim McDonnell, said the LAPD was aware and 'very concerned' about media being hit with crowd-control munitions. 'I know that situation you're referring to, with the member of the media. We saw that, we're very concerned about it and we're looking into that,' he said this week. Also on the weekend, British news photographer Nick Stern was injured while covering the protests near Paramount. He believes he was likely hit by a less-than-lethal round shot by deputies. 'I'm walking around taking photos … when I felt a mighty pain in my leg. I put my hand down and felt a lump kind of sticking out the back of my leg,' he told the Guardian. He underwent emergency surgery.
