
Councillor Nigel Dix on Welsh Government's 'abject failure'
Labour's terminal decline with working class voters isn't surprising given that Labour have let down, talked down to, betrayed and ignored working people.
County Durham a Labour stronghold since 1925, a post-industrial area very similar to the south Wales Valleys, voted to remove Labour from power.
In 2026, Wales will go to the polls, where Ms Morgan Labour's second leader to be appointed by Labour Assembly members with no public vote, will face the electorate trying to defend Labour's 26 years of abject failure.
26 years of waste, where millions of pounds of public money has been squandered, a government intent on interfering in people's everyday lives, higher taxes and ever-increasing levels of bureaucracy.
A health service that is falling apart, with people waiting in hospital corridors for treatment, a dysfunctional ambulance service, with people driving themselves to hospital, an economy that hasn't grown in 26 years, an education system ranked the worst in the UK. The Welsh people have been betrayed, let down and taken for granted by Labour, change is on the way.
Cllr Nigel Dix,
Blackwood

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
17 minutes ago
- Spectator
Phillipson visits zero private schools in 11 months
It's been quite the year for Bridget Phillipson. The under fire Education Secretary is now regularly tipped as one of the ministers most likely to be moved at the next reshuffle. Her Schools Bill has been lambasted for its impact on academies while her private school tax raid is hitting the state school sector too. Yet despite dire warnings about the impact of putting VAT on independent school fees, Phillipson seems indifferent to their fate. For a Freedom of Information request by Steerpike has confirmed that she is yet to visit a single one in nearly a year in office. According to the Department for Education: Minister Morgan and Minister McKinnell have visited a private school in their ministerial capacities since 5 July 2024. Minister Morgan visited the Cavendish School. Minister McKinnell visited the Royal Ballet School. The Secretary of State for Education has not visited a private school in her ministerial capacity since 5 July 2024. Ministers also regularly engage with independent school bodies. So that's two visits by seven ministers in almost 12 months. The next reshuffle can't come soon enough…

The National
32 minutes ago
- The National
Why Israel bombed Iran in its biggest attack since the 1980s
Israeli leaders cast the attack as necessary to head off an imminent threat that Iran would build nuclear bombs, though it remains unclear how close the country is to achieving that or whether Iran had actually been planning a strike. Iran maintains its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes only. READ MORE: Israel warns 'Tehran will burn' if Iran continues firing missiles in retaliation 'This is a clear and present danger to Israel's very survival,' Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed as he vowed to pursue the attack for as long as necessary to 'remove this threat'. Israel is widely believed to be the only nuclear-armed state in the Middle East but has never acknowledged having such weapons. Why did Israel bomb Iran? Israel's seemingly well-planned attack comes as tensions have escalated over Iran's rapidly advancing nuclear programme, which Israel sees as a threat to its existence. Israel said it targeted nuclear and military facilities, killing Iran's top military and nuclear scientists, adding that the barrage was necessary before its adversary got any closer to building an atomic weapon. The strikes took place despite negotiations between Iran and the United States over the future of Tehran's nuclear programme. READ MORE: I'm an Iranian in the UK. Labour have emboldened Israel to launch attacks on my hom Iran had been censured by the UN's atomic watchdog a day earlier for not complying with obligations meant to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon. Israel had long threatened such a strike, and successive US administrations had sought to prevent it, fearing it would ignite a wider conflict across the Middle East and possibly be ineffective at destroying Iran's dispersed and hardened nuclear programme. What did the IAEA, the UN's atomic watchdog, say about Iran? On Thursday, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that Iran had failed to uphold the obligations it had signed on to as part of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Iran rejected the accusation while the IAEA believed was a long history of non-cooperation between Iran and inspectors. However, it did not say that Iran had developed nuclear weapons. Experts and the US government have also assessed that Tehran was not actively working on such a weapon. Has Israel again broken international law by attacking Iran? The short answer is: According to some, yes. Israel has breached dozens of international laws in its onslaught of Gaza. Michael Becker, a professor of international human rights law at Trinity College in Dublin, said: 'Based on publicly available information, Israel's use of force against Iran does not fit within the inherent right of self-defence enshrined in the UN Charter." Protesters hold posters of Mohammad Mahdi Tehranchi (left) and Major-General Hossein Salami of the IRGC (right), who were reported killed earlier today, on June 13 (Image: Getty) 'Self-defence requires Israel's actions to be directed at an ongoing or imminent armed attack by Iran,' added Becker, who has previously worked at the International Court of Justice in The Hague. 'There is no indication that an attack by Iran against Israel was imminent, nor is it sufficient under international law for Israel to justify the attack based on its assessment that Iran will soon have a nuclear capability, especially given the ongoing negotiations between the US and Iran.' Here is a timeline of some significant events between Israel and Iran:

South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Monmouthshire and Torfaen could use AI Welsh translations
Councils, and other public bodies, are legally required to produce documents and provide services in Welsh. Monmouthshire County Council looked at alternatives to its current use of external translators as part of its budget setting process due to increased demand which has seen spending on translations exceed the allocated budget. Its performance and overview scrutiny committee was told total costs, to the council of providing Welsh language services, was £226,940 last year. But it wasn't clear if that figure only covered translations or also the cost of two officers after equalities and Welsh language manager Pennie Walker described the 'major costs' as translations and her salary and that of the Welsh language officer while ensuring compliance with Welsh language standards is the 'day to day responsibility of all officers'. Nia Roberts, the Welsh language officer, said closer working with neighbouring Torfaen Borough Council is currently 'the most desired option' to save on translation costs and it is already using AI, also known as artificial intelligence. Ms Roberts said Monmouthshire currently uses external translators, who may already be using AI systems, but that wouldn't produce a saving for the council as it currently pays by the word. She said AI would 'never produce 100 per cent accurate translations' and added: 'It will need to have some kind of proof reading to make sure the translation is accurate.' Rogiet Labour member Peter Strong had asked if a favoured option had emerged from the ongoing review that has also considered continuing with external translators and setting up its own in-house translation team. Ms Roberts said joining with Torfaen 'looks the more desirable' and said: 'Torfaen is similar to Monmouthshire in the type of documents to be translated.' She also said Torfaen uses technology that memorises words it has previously translated which would help with the consistency of documents. Torfaen councillors, who were presented with their annual report on how their council is complying with Welsh language standards at their June meeting, were told AI, has helped with increasing translations by 24 per cent on the previous year. Torfaen's Welsh language officer Alan Vernon-Jones cautioned: 'Everything needs to be proof read by a competent Welsh speaker.' Monmouthshire's review of translations has also given 'careful consideration' to the potential impact on small Welsh businesses, quality and timeliness, and the need to maintain full compliance with the Welsh language standards. Conservative councillor for Gobion Fawr Alistair Neill asked Ms Roberts if consideration had been given to working with other public services such as the police and NHS. The officer said Welsh language officers in public services across South East Wales have a working group to share best practice which was 'more broad than just translations.' On AI Cllr Neill, who chairs the committee, said: 'It sounds like AI doesn't speak Welsh very well. The 'tech bros' are going to have to do some more work on it.'