logo
Potential US semiconductor manufacturing boom complicated by Trump's economic policies

Potential US semiconductor manufacturing boom complicated by Trump's economic policies

Time of India15-05-2025
By Sarah Parvini
LOS ANGELES: Before "America First" became the Trump administration's mandate for foreign policy and trade, one sector was already working to bring business back to the United States: the semiconductor industry.
Aided by government incentives, American and foreign tech companies alike have invested hundreds of billions of dollars to bolstering semiconductor operations - research and development, manufacturing and facility modernization - across the country in recent years.
In few places is the growth of the U.S. semiconductor industry clearer than in the Greater Sacramento region, where tech leaders and lawmakers have, for years, sought to grow California's role in producing the chips that power everyday necessities like cars, refrigerators and smartphones. Semiconductor giants clustered in cities just outside Silicon Valley -
Intel
, AMD, Bosch,
Samsung
and Micron - are building on a tech foothold Intel first established when it opened its Sacramento-County campus in 1984.
But President
Donald Trump
's economic policies have complicated that growth as the administration takes its next steps toward imposing more tariffs on key imports and launching investigations into imports of computer chips and chip-making equipment - all at a time when deeper semiconductor investments were just starting to have a positive impact on changing supply chains. New tariffs, paired with the administration's threats against the CHIPS and Science Act, could dramatically slow its goal of ensuring the U.S. maintains a competitive edge in artificial intelligence development.
"You're starting to see some of it now. Samsung announced a delay in the fabs in Texas," said Mario Morales, an analyst with the
International
Data Corp. "That facility was supposed to come online in 2024 now it's being delayed to 2028. I think some of these companies are delaying it because they now know that they're not going to likely get funding, or because of the uncertainty around the acts that we're seeing around the new trade policy."
Although the U.S. is a major producer of certain types of semiconductor chips, the nation's share of global chip production - measured by volume and not dollar value - fell from 37% in 1990 to just 10% in 2022, according to the Semiconductor Industry Association. As a result, the country relies heavily on imports from Taiwan and South Korea for advanced chips.
Major manufacturers like Taiwan
Semiconductor Manufacturing
Corp. are investing to build up U.S. facilities, partly due to incentives put in place during former President
Joe Biden
's time in office. The CHIPS Act, a law passed in 2022 with bipartisan support, was designed to revive U.S. semiconductor manufacturing while sharpening the U.S. edge in military technology and minimizing future supply chain disruptions.
Because of the CHIPS Act, the U.S. is projected to more than triple its semiconductor manufacturing capacity - the highest rate of growth in the world during that period, according to a May 2024 report from the Semiconductor Industry Association and the Boston Consulting Group.
Barry Broome, president of the Greater Sacramento Economic Council, said weaknesses in the semiconductor supply chain became evident during the pandemic, when the U.S. experienced a shortage in supply. It was "abundantly clear that having these chip products offshore in Vietnam, Taiwan, China for cost savings had serious implications."
Those pandemic-era challenges, paired with looming tensions between China and Taiwan, have helped drive the industry to the Sacramento area, he said. Northern California's wealth of tech knowledge and established roots in the semiconductor industry are also attractive traits that have brought investment to the Sacramento region as federal subsidies begin to bolster domestic growth.
German tech company Bosch, for example, announced a $1.9 billion investment in the Greater Sacramento area in 2023 to manufacture chips for electric vehicles, converting its facility in Roseville into a silicon carbide semiconductor production site.
That investment, Bosch said, would create as many as 1,700 jobs in construction, manufacturing, engineering, and research and development. The project marks the largest semiconductor investment in California in three decades, according to Broome.
Tech workers who started out at companies like Intel have spun out companies of their own, including Sacramento-area AI startup Blaize and data storage manufacturer Solidigm.
Dinakar Munagala, cofounder of Blaize, said the company's AI chips are among the few built domestically. Their chips are made in a Samsung foundry in Texas, he said. The company's products, Munagala added, help to power systems that analyze traffic patterns and detect suspicious behavior in airports.
"We're built here," he said. "That's one of the reasons we're actually getting quite a bit of interest from defense, border security, these classes of use cases."
Lane Bess, board chair of Blaize, pointed to Munagala - who worked at Intel - as an example of the talent the Sacramento region can provide to tech companies. The area is primed to be a main corridor for the semiconductor industry because a lot of skilled workers are looking to develop their own companies, Bess said.
The Trump administration has viewed chip production as a national security issue because it would reduce U.S. reliance on importing chips that are also used by the military. It also intends to study the risks of having computer chip production concentrated in other places and the impact on U.S. competitiveness from foreign government subsidies, "foreign unfair trade practices and state-sponsored overcapacity."
Alvin Nguyen, senior analyst at Forrester, said the fluidity of the state of administration's tariffs will cause confusion about the impact on the supply chain "due to the complexity of tracking where materials and manufactured goods are produced and assembled."
Video game companies, for example, have started to raise prices amid a backdrop of ongoing tariff uncertainty.
"For semiconductors, we may see certain goods no longer making sense to produce due to the cost - see Nintendo Switch 2 - and the value seen from IT purchases diminishing," he said in an email.
Preorders for Nintendo's highly anticipated Switch 2 were delayed in April as retailers assessed the potential impact of tariffs. Nintendo later confirmed that some Switch 2 accessories would see price adjustments, but maintained that its baseline price for the console - $449.99 - would remain the same.
Nguyen said that in the medium term, the growth of foundries around the world will be beneficial to easing dependence on Taiwan for chip production. Down the road, "we should see a healthier global ecosystem for semiconductor manufacturing and more supply chain options in where chips are produced and can be procured," he said.
Broome, of the economic council, said he believes the Trump administration's tariffs are aimed at restructuring global relationships. He said he hopes that "concludes quickly" because uncertainty over trade policy doesn't favor the markets.
"If the tariffs are used for leverage to get better agreements in the next two or three months, then we'll come back quickly, and will benefit from it," Broome said. "If they're considered long-term policy, I think it'll really ice the capital markets from putting real money on the table."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Intel in talks with large investors for equity boost at discount: Report
Intel in talks with large investors for equity boost at discount: Report

The Hindu

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Intel in talks with large investors for equity boost at discount: Report

Intel is in talks with other large investors to receive an equity infusion at a discounted price, CNBC reported on Wednesday, just days after the chipmaker got a $2 billion capital injection from SoftBank Group. The report, which cited people familiar with the matter, did not name the potential investors. Intel, whose shares fell 7%, did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. As part of a plan to revive U.S. manufacturing, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick had said on Tuesday the government wants an equity stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants approved by the administration of former President Joe Biden. Lutnick was also exploring government stakes in other chipmakers in exchange for CHIPS Act grants, which aims to spur factory-building in the U.S., Reuters later reported. SoftBank's investment was at $23 per Intel share, a slight discount to Monday's closing price of $23.66. This investment will come through issuance of common stock. Based on Intel's market capitalization at the close of trading on Monday, it would have represented a stake of just under 2%. Intel has struggled to compete after years of management blunders left it with virtually no foothold in the booming artificial intelligence chip industry dominated by Nvidia .

Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the U.S. Here's what to know
Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the U.S. Here's what to know

The Hindu

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the U.S. Here's what to know

U.S. President Donald Trump wants the U.S. government to own a piece of Intel, less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping chipmaker. If the goal is realised, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more U.S. companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas suppliers. The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10% stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under U.S. President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the U.S. government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest economy. In his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogramme the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15% commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export licenses. Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the U.S., which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world. By lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the U.S. will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial intelligence. That's what the U.S. president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired him. The demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the U.S. in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an 'amazing story.' The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the U.S. government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of weakness. After enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 debut. Intel has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly $19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting spree. By the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last year. Although rare, it's not unprecedented for the U.S. government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in GM. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the company. But some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favor with the president to increase their orders for the company's chips. Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the programme. The company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve U.S. taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.'

Losing India a ‘strategic disaster' for US: Nikki Haley urges Trump to mend rift with PM Modi to counter China
Losing India a ‘strategic disaster' for US: Nikki Haley urges Trump to mend rift with PM Modi to counter China

New Indian Express

time20 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Losing India a ‘strategic disaster' for US: Nikki Haley urges Trump to mend rift with PM Modi to counter China

Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley has issued a sharp warning to President Donald Trump over what she calls a dangerously deteriorating relationship with India, America's most critical democratic ally in Asia. Calling Trump administration's recent moves a 'strategic disaster in the making,' Haley urged Trump to rethink his stance on India amid escalating tariff threats and growing diplomatic tensions. In an opinion piece published in Newsweek, Haley argued that India's rise does not threaten the free world, 'unlike Communist-controlled China.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store