How tax rules our politics (and lives)
Tax lawyer and journalist Dan Neidle opened his series Untaxing (Radio 4) with two extraordinary statements. One, that he was going to show how tax is one of the most significant and consequential forces in our lives. Two, that Albert Einstein was wrong about tax when he said it was the most difficult thing in the world to understand.
Far be it from me to argue about tax with a man who founded a think tank called Tax Policy Associates and who advises the Scottish Government (among others) on tax issues, but his first point hardly needs proving to anyone. Ever since we learnt the story of Robin Hood, we've known tax as a fifth element in our lives.
As for Einstein, well, having listened ahead to all five episodes of Untaxing, I am tempted to agree with the physicist. Neidle's series makes our tax systems seem arcane, opaque, fantastical, occasionally deranged, often frustrating and always baffling. Despite that – or perhaps because of it – it's a terrific series, filled with anecdote and insight, that will leave you with the feeling you should pay far more attention to tax beyond your payslip, the Budget and the adventures of Little John et al.
Monday's opener was all about a napkin – 'the napkin that changed the world' – and revealed both Neidle's ability to zero in on quirks of history that prove to be seismic and how ideology and politicking give tax a bad name. The napkin was on a restaurant table in Washington DC in 1974, and scribbling on it was a young economist named Arthur Laffer. Watching him doodle a graph, with ever-widening eyes, were White House officials Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld. What the doodle 'proved' was that if you raise taxes too much, revenues will actually go down.
Though disputed, the 'Laffer Curve' is still popular today – it is regularly cited by, among others, Liz Truss, while in 2019 Donald Trump awarded Laffer the Presidential Medal of Freedom, referencing the famous napkin. The napkin is a Shroud of Turin for those who seek low taxation, but tax ideology works both ways.
Recently, the Scottish Government raised the top rate of income tax to 48 per cent, which some believe will scare off higher earners and lead to less revenue. And what did Neidle and his colleagues at the Scottish Government's Tax Advisory Group have to say about this? 'Nothing,' said Neidle. 'Because they didn't ask us. It was pure politics.' More tax theory drawn up on the back of napkins.
Yesterday delved into the murky story of the Beatles' inventive but ultimately flawed efforts to avoid income tax (surely Eleanor Rigby would have benefited from some of their revenues?), a tale that ultimately ended in Michael Jackson selling the rights to Lennon & McCartney's songs to pay his own tax bill.
Today's episode is on Jaffa Cakes, tomorrow's on a porn-star lawyer who played a part in the downfall of Rangers Football Club. Neidle cherrypicks the minutiae expertly. The overall impression is of the British tax system as a towering, teetering, rickety old building, with extension built upon extension, and all sorts of oddities lurking in the basement. Five 15-minute episodes isn't nearly enough – I hope Radio 4 have Neidle back soon.
Also managing to be riveting on an ostensibly dry economic subject was Invisible Hands (Radio 4), which is looking at the birth of the free market. That it's so compelling is no surprise, given that the man behind it is David Dimbleby, who shares Neidle's ability to extrapolate world-changing ideas from the smallest of moments. This first episode, for instance, found the origins of the free market in the downing of a Hurricane fighter plane in August 1940, the Egg Marketing Board and a copy of the Reader's Digest.
Jo Barratt's production had the swing and sway (and the background music) of a juicy true-crime podcast, with Dimbleby gamely showing he could mix it with the young pups of podcasting. Here, it's all about storytelling. 'It turns out it's a much stranger story than you can imagine,' began Dimbleby, as the music grew more insistent. It's shameless, but I was hooked.
And when that Reader's Digest came along, Dimbleby introduced it like this: 'A magazine that would change the course of Antony Fisher's life… and the history of this country – forever.' He even gave us the little details – in that edition, alongside the all-important article The Road to Serfdom by Friedrich Hayek, were pieces on 'strange animal friendships, the beard of Joseph Palmer and shepherds of the underground', a list of subjects that would fit quite pleasingly into Radio 4's schedules.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Want to retire with $100k? Here's how to plan your income
One of the most popular questions to ask during retirement planning is 'How much money do I need to retire?' The question is an understandable one, but it may be easier to think about the income you'll need to generate during retirement in order to meet your spending goals. Answering this question can help you determine the total amount you'll need. Retirement can look different from one person to the next, but many people aim to generate $100,000 in annual income. Here's how to think about the amount of money you'll need to generate $100,000, or other amounts, during retirement. Retiring with a $100,000 income starts with financial planning that includes considering your retirement budget and your other sources of income. These questions can get you started. How much will you spend? One of the first steps in determining how much money you need to retire is to figure out your monthly or annual expenses. Keep in mind that once you're retired, you won't need to save for retirement anymore, which is often a big 'expense' that goes away. Many people also spend less in general once they're retired than they did when they were working. How much will you get from Social Security? You'll also want to factor in the income you'll receive from Social Security. Figuring out how much you'll receive may lower the income you'll need to generate from other sources. The average monthly Social Security benefit for retired workers was about $2,000 in May 2025, which translates to about $24,000 a year. How much do you need to save? Once you've determined the amount of income you'll need in retirement, you can figure out how much you'll need in savings to generate that income. Here are a couple of approaches. One common way to determine a safe withdrawal rate during retirement is called the 4 percent rule. According to the rule, you can withdraw 4 percent of your retirement savings in your first year of retirement and adjust that amount each year for inflation. The approach generally translates to your savings lasting about 30 years. If you want to generate $100,000 in annual income from your savings, the 4 percent rule means you'd need $2.5 million in savings, which could be in accounts such as an IRA or 401(k). However, if you factor in the average Social Security income for retired workers, the amount you need to generate from your own savings falls to $76,000. In this case, you'd need $1.9 million using the 4 percent rule. The 4 percent rule isn't perfect, and some financial advisors think it's too aggressive. Meeting with a financial advisor can be a great way to understand your unique situation and determine the best retirement plan for you. Get started: Match with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals Another way to generate a stream of income from your retirement savings is by purchasing an annuity. Annuities are insurance products that pay out income and are sometimes used as part of a retirement strategy. You can purchase annuities by contributing money over time or through a lump sum payment. To be sure, annuities can be complex and may come with high fees, so you want to be careful before making a purchase. Make sure you understand the contract really well and pay attention to the fees you're paying. Using Schwab's Income Annuity Estimator, a 65-year-old man looking to generate monthly income of $8,333 (~$100,000 per year) would need about $1.2 million to $1.4 million as of June 2025, depending on the type of annuity purchased. Deciding how much money you'll need to retire is one of the biggest questions you face when making a retirement plan. Think through what your monthly expenses will be and consider all sources of income you'll have, including Social Security. Once you know how much money you'll need to generate from your own savings, you can consider different strategies, such as the 4 percent rule or purchasing an annuity. A financial advisor can be a great resource to help you find the best options for you. Learn more: These strategies can help you generate income in retirement Editorial Disclaimer: All investors are advised to conduct their own independent research into investment strategies before making an investment decision. In addition, investors are advised that past investment product performance is no guarantee of future price appreciation. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Winter fuel payment in Scotland to match UK benefit
The Scottish Government's devolved version of the winter fuel payment will match the value of the UK benefit, John Swinney has announced. Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed last week that the payment would be reinstated to the majority of pensioners. Following the initial decision to cut the universal benefit, the Scottish Government was forced to delay its plans for the pension age winter heating payment, but in December it announced pensioners north of the border would receive at least £100 every year. Speaking in Glasgow on Monday, the First Minister confirmed the Scottish Government's benefit would at least match that proposed by the UK Government. Pensioners south of the border who earn under £35,000 will receive either £200 or £300. 'I'm very happy to confirm today that no pensioner in Scotland will receive less than they would under the new UK scheme,' he said. 'Details will be set out in due course by my Government, but the Scottish Government will always seek to do what is best for Scotland's pensioners.' The changes announced last week will result in further increases in funding for the Scottish Government, which the First Minister later told journalists is expected to be around £120 million. Speaking at an event on public sector reform on Monday, the First Minister hit out at the initial decision to cut the benefit. 'To be quite blunt about it, I don't believe cutting this winter lifeline was ever going to save a penny,' he said. 'Making millions of pensioners poorer makes them also colder and makes them also sicker, and that in turn puts up the bill for our social services and our NHS.' He added: 'It's one of the reasons we were so quick to step in to protect pensioners in Scotland as best as we could from that wrong decision by the UK Government. 'But now that they've seen the error of their ways, my Government will once again to the right thing by Scotland's pensioners.' The power over the payment was devolved to Social Security Scotland in time for it to be paid out last winter. When asked if he regretted not offering it to older Scots, the First Minister said: 'I might have had the power, but I didn't have the money and I can't spend money I don't have. 'If the UK Government cuts a budget, I can't spend it, and what we've done is we've taken a series of hard decisions to allow us, before the Labour Government came anywhere near doing a U-turn on this, to restore winter fuel payments to pensioners because of other hard decisions that I've made. 'So the SNP has kept faith with pensioners in Scotland when the Labour Party has deserted them.'


Bloomberg
12 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Ireland Signals Budget Caution on Rising Global Trade Risks
Irish government ministers have warned public finances will need to be more carefully managed, signaling a shift in approach ahead of the next budget as global trade turmoil is expected to slow growth in the small, open economy. Ireland 's headline surplus 'arises from a handful of large multinationals,' Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe warned Monday at an event to consult business groups on the upcoming budget. 'The mood-music is changing. It is not appropriate – indeed it could be dangerous – to plan on the basis of these receipts being permanent.'