UK Debuts £2.5 Billion Steel Plan After Trump's Tariff Threat
Progressive Portland Plots a Comeback
Why American Mobility Ground to a Halt
How to Build a Neurodiverse City
SpaceX Bid to Turn Texas Starbase Into City Is Set for Vote in May
A Filmmaker's Surreal Journey Into His Own Private Winnipeg
The government reiterated a commitment to invest £2.5 billion ($3.15 billion) in order to support the steel industry, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said in a statement on Sunday. The funds will partly come from Britain's newly created National Wealth Fund.
With the plan, lawmakers are hoping to reverse the decline of a sector which has been hit with rising energy costs, competition from abroad and falling investment. The money will be spent on improvements such as more efficient electric arc furnaces, designed to help British producers be better able to compete.
'We are putting the full weight of Whitehall behind the industry to build on this success,' Reynolds said in a statement.
Last week, UK officials had planned to talk to their counterparts in Trump's administration in an effort to avoid the tariffs on US imports of steel and aluminum, Bloomberg previously reported. Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves has said she believes the UK can strike an agreement with the US to avoid the measures.
'Balanced trade – and that's what the UK and the US have, there's not a surplus or deficit, our trade is pretty much balanced — there's not really a problem there that needs to be addressed through tariffs or any other sort of barriers,' Reeves said on Matt Forde's The Political Party podcast on Monday.
About 10% of steel made in Britain is exported to America and the UK also imports the metal from the US.
The UK's new steel plan comes after Reeves threw her weight behind a plan to build a third runway at Heathrow Airport, a move that would require 400,000 tons of steel — enough to build the Empire State Building.
'The deal announced by Heathrow announced this week will secure a strong industry pipeline for years to come,' Reynolds said.
The new plan will look for areas to expand UK steelmaking, protect it from unfair trading practices abroad and improve scrap processing facilities. It will also encourage use of UK-made steel in public projects.
'As the world becomes more volatile, primary domestic steel making capacity is vital for both our economy and domestic security,' Andy Prendergast, national secretary for the GMB Union, said in the statement.
The Undocumented Workers Who Helped Build Elon Musk's Texas Gigafactory
The Unicorn Boom Is Over, and Startups Are Getting Desperate
The NBA Has Fallen Into an Efficiency Trap
Japan Perfected 7-Eleven. Why Can't the US Get It Right?
How Silicon Valley Swung From Obama to Trump
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Intel stock surges on report Trump administration mulls taking stake in company
Shares of Intel (INTC) jumped more than 7% on Thursday following a report the US government is considering taking a stake in the struggling chipmaker. According to Bloomberg, the plan could see the government help Intel build out its planned chip complex in Ohio, which the company has had to delay as part of its ongoing turnaround effort. Intel announced the facility in 2022 with an initial investment of $20 billion that could grow to $100 billion over time. The report follows President Trump's meeting with Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan on Monday. The Ohio site was supposed to include two new manufacturing plants and start producing chips by 2025, but that's since been delayed into the 2030s. CEO Lip-Bu Tan, who took over when former CEO Pat Gelsinger was ousted by the company's board due to the slow turnaround in 2024, has since delayed the plant even further. The Trump administration is making a major push to reshore American chip manufacturing. Intel and rivals TSMC (TSM), Samsung, and others, have been working to build more chip fabricating plants in the US since the Biden administration signed the CHIPS Act in 2022. Part of Intel's plan under Gelsinger was to turn Intel into a contract chip manufacturer, similar to TSMC. But the gambit has run into trouble. So far, the foundry's main customer is still Intel, and the company is reportedly facing headwinds in getting its 18A chip technology up to the level needed to statisfy clients. Intel has signed agreements to build chips for Amazon (AMZN) and Microsoft (MSFT) using its chip designs. Trump initially called for Tan to resign as CEO of Intel due to his investments in Chinese tech firms, but backed away from the stance after meeting with him on Monday. Intel is still far away from making any meaningful headway in the AI space, ceding the market to both Nvidia and rival AMD. Earlier this week, the White House announced the US government will take a 15% cut of the sale of Nvidia and AMD chips shipped to China, an unconventional arrangement that highlights the government's increased focus on the semiconductor industry. Email Daniel Howley at dhowley@ Follow him on X/Twitter at @DanielHowley. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Newsom calls for special November election to block Trump from 'rigging' 2026 midterms
Gov. Gavin Newsom, Democratic lawmakers and their allies on Thursday launched a special-election campaign to ask California voters to approve new congressional districts to decrease the size of the state's Republican delegation — a move that could determine control of Congress next year and stymie President Trump's agenda. The effort is a response to GOP-led states, notably Texas, attempting to redraw their congressional maps to decrease Democratic ranks in the narrowly-divided U.S. House of Representatives at Trump's behest. Newsom, speaking to a fired-up partisan crowd at the Japanese American National Museum in downtown Los Angeles, said the effort by Republicans represented a desperate effort by a failed president to hold on to power by keeping Congress under Republican control. "He doesn't play by a different set of rules. He doesn't believe in the rules," Newsom said. "And as a consequence, we need to disabuse ourselves of the way things have been done. It's not good enough to just hold hands, have a candlelight vigil and talk about the way the world should be. We have got to recognize the cards that have been dealt, and we have got to meet fire with fire." The governor was joined by Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff; Rep. Pete Aguilar, (D-San Bernardino), the chair of the House Democratic Caucus, and union leaders essential to providing the funding and volunteers to convince Californians to vote for the "Election Rigging Response Act." The proposed California ballot measure would temporarily toss out the congressional districts enacted by the state's voter-approved, independent redistricting commission. "Our union stands in full support of this ballot initiative. We are ready to do whatever it takes to stop this power grab and fight back against any and all attacks on our democracy, on our students and on public education," said Erica Jones, the secretary treasurer of the California Teachers Assn., which represents 310,000 public school teachers. She said school children have suffered because of the Trump administration's immigration raids, as well as cuts to healthcare funding, after school programs and teacher trainings. "Our students deserve better," she said. "The majority of Americans are not with him on these vicious attacks. So what does Trump want to do? Rig the next election and steal our right to fair representation? He wants to stack the deck to keep slashing public services to pad the pockets of his billionaire donors." Outside the political rally, Border Patrol agents gathered and arrested at least one person. Newsom told the crowd inside that he doubted it was a coincidence. Supporters of the independent commission that currently draws California's congressional maps criticized Democrats' efforts to conduct a highly unusual mid-decade redistricting plan. For Newsom's plant to work, the Democratic-led state Legislature must vote in favor of placing the measure on the ballot in a special election in November, and then the final decision will be up to California voters. "Two wrongs do not make a right, and California shouldn't stoop to the same tactics as Texas. Instead, we should push other states to adopt our independent, non-partisan commission model across the country," said Amy Thoma, spokesperson for the Voters First Coalition, which includes Charles Munger Jr., the son of a billionaire who bankrolled the ballot measure that created the independent commission. Munger will vigorously oppose any proposal to circumvent the independent commission, she said. Since voters approved independent congressional redistricting in 2010, California's districts have been drawn once per decade, following the U.S. Census, by a panel split between registered Democrats, registered Republicans and voters without a party preference. The commission is not allowed to consider the partisan makeup of the districts, nor protecting incumbents, but instead looks at "communities of interest," logical geographical boundaries and the Voting Rights Act. The current map was drawn in 2021 and went into effect for the 2022 election. Newsom is pushing to suspend those district lines and put a new map tailored to favor Democrats in front of voters on Nov. 4. That plan, he has said, would have a "trigger," meaning a redrawn map would not take effect unless Texas or another GOP-led state moved forward with its own. Sara Sadhwani, who served on the redistricting commission that approved the current congressional district boundaries, said that while she is deeply proud of the work she and her colleagues completed, she approved of Newsom's effort to temporarily put the commission's work aside because of the unprecedented threats to American democracy. "These are extraordinary times, and extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures," said Sadhwani, citing the immigration raids, the encouragement of political violence and the use of National Guard troops in American cities. "And if that wasn't enough, we are watching executive overreach that no doubt is making our founding fathers turn in their graves, and we have to take action. These are the hallmarks of a democracy in peril." If voters approved the ballot measure, the new maps would be in effect until the independent commission redraws the congressional boundaries in 2031. To meet Newsom's ambitious deadline, the state Legislature would need to pass the ballot language by a two-thirds majority and send it to Newsom's desk by Aug. 22. The governor's office and legislative leaders are confident in their ability to meet this threshold in the state Assembly and state Senate, where Democrats have a supermajority. Newsom first mentioned the idea in mid July, meaning the whole process could be done in about five weeks. Generally, redrawing the state's electoral lines and certifying a measure to appear before voters on the ballot are processes that take months, if not more than a year. Trump's prodding of Texas Republicans to redraw their congressional maps to create five new GOP seats has kicked off redistricting battles across the nation. That includes Florida, Ohio, Indiana and Missouri, where Republicans control the statehouse, and New York, Maryland, Illinois, New Jersey, Oregon and Washington, where Democrats are in power. Democratic lawmakers in Texas fled the state to block the Republican-led legislature from approving a new map that would gerrymander congressional districts to favor of the GOP. The Democrats maneuver worked, since it prevented the legislature from have a quorum necessary to approve the measure. A second special session is expected to begin Friday. The absent lawmakers are facing threats of fines, civil arrest warrants and calls for being removed from office; Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has vowed to call repeated special sessions until the map is approved. In California, the gerrymandering plan taking shape behind closed doors would increase the Democratic Party's dominance in the state by making five House districts more favorable to Democrats, according to a draft map reviewed by The Times. Those changes could reduce by more than half the number of Republicans representing California in Congress. The state has the nation's largest congressional delegation, with 52 members. Nine are Republicans. A Northern California district represented by Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-Richvale) could shift to the south, shedding rural, conservative voters near the Oregon border and picking up left-leaning cities in Sonoma County. Sacramento-area Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Rocklin) would see his district shift toward the bluer center of the city. The plan would also add more Democrats to the Central Valley district represented by Rep. David Valadao (R-Hanford), who has been a perennial target for Democrats. Southern California would see some of the biggest changes: Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Bonsall) would see his safely Republican district in San Diego County become more purple through the addition of liberal Palm Springs. And Reps. Young Kim (R-Anaheim Hills) and Ken Calvert (R-Corona) would be drawn into the same district, which could force the lawmakers to run against each other. The plan would also shore up Democrats who represent swing districts, such as Reps. Dave Min (D-Irvine) and Derek Tran (D-Orange). It could also add another district in southeast Los Angeles County, in the area that elected the first Latino member of Congress from California in modern history. A similar seat was eliminated during the 2021 redistricting. Times staff writer Taryn Luna contributed to this report from Sacramento. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. government is reportedly in discussions to take stake in Intel
The Trump administration continues to meddle with semiconductor giant Intel. The U.S. government is reportedly in discussions to take a a stake in Intel, according to reporting from Bloomberg. This deal would be structured to help the company expand its U.S. manufacturing efforts, including its much-delayed Ohio chip factory. This news comes less than a week after President Donald Trump insisted that Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan resign because of perceived conflicts of interest. While Trump didn't provide a reason, this came after Republican U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton wrote to Intel's board asking about Tan's alleged ties to China. Tan met with the Trump administration on August 11 to quell the administration's fears and figure out ways for the company to work with the government. This meeting is what sparked discussions of the U.S. government taking a direct stake in the company, according to Bloomberg. TechCrunch reached out to Intel for more information. Sign in to access your portfolio
