logo
Trump says he is about to raise tariffs as high as 70% on some countries

Trump says he is about to raise tariffs as high as 70% on some countries

CNN9 hours ago
On April 9, President Donald Trump gave the world a three-month window to negotiate trade deals with the United States or face higher 'reciprocal' tariffs. With just five days remaining in that tariff moratorium, the White House is expected to begin delivering a message to a dozen or so countries: Time is up, and here's your new tariff rate.
Trump early Friday at Joint Base Andrews told reporters that he would notify 10 to 12 nations a day over the course of the next five days, detailing their new tariffs in letters that the White House would begin sending on Friday. In most cases, the new rates would go into effect August 1, Trump said.
'They'll range in value from maybe 60% or 70% tariffs to 10% and 20% tariffs, but they're going to be starting to go out sometime tomorrow,' Trump said. 'We've done the final form, and it's basically going to explain what the countries are going to be paying in tariffs.'
In April, Trump imposed 'reciprocal' tariffs as high as 50% on most of America's trading partners. So tariffs of 60% or 70% would exceed those rates, which sent stocks crumbling into bear-market territory, while bonds and the US dollar sold off sharply. US stocks and bonds markets were closed for Independence Day Friday, but stock markets and futures fell around the world.
It's not clear yet which countries would receive the letters, but Trump has called out certain trading partners for driving too hard of a bargain, including the European Union and Japan. Trump this week threatened to send a letter to 'spoiled' Japan setting its tariff rate as high as 35%. Still, that may have been a negotiating tactic, and it's not known whether those partners will be among the countries for whom the White House will set new tariffs.
Trump said he expected the letters to be delivered by the administration's self-imposed July 9 deadline to draft deals. The administration has said at times that its timeframe was flexible for countries that make a good-faith effort to negotiate with the United States.
For countries that are continuing to negotiate with the United States but have not yet reached a deal, including India, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said last week that 'the deadline is not critical.' That's a point that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent emphasized to Fox Business last week, too, saying he thinks trade negotiations could be 'wrapped up' by Labor Day, providing a more relaxed framework for inking deals than the previously prescribed July 9 deadline.
But Trump appeared to adjust that timeframe on Friday. Asked if countries would be afforded any flexibility with the tariff deadline, Trump said, 'not really.'
'They'll start to pay on August 1. The money will start to come into the United States on August 1, in pretty much all cases,' Trump said.
Still, Bessent on Thursday told Bloomberg TV that he predicted a 'flurry' of deals before July 9. And for those who couldn't reach an agreement with the United States, 'about 100 countries' could continue to face only the 10% minimum tariff rates that the United States imposed during Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcement on April 2.
Trump appeared to confirm that this week, saying, 'We have a couple of other deals,' and, 'As we get to the smaller countries, we're pretty much going to keep the tariffs the same.'
So far, the administration has signed narrow frameworks for trade deal negotiations with just two partners: the United Kingdom and China. Trump this week said his administration has also reached an agreement with Vietnam, though the status of that arrangement remains unknown, and a framework does not appear to have been signed. The White House has not provided terms of the Vietnam agreement beyond a social media post from Trump.
For months, the Trump administration has said deals are imminent, working with 18 key partners to lower trade barriers while hundreds of other countries wait in line to get out from under the burden of higher tariffs.
At one point, Trump said 200 deals were possible and nearly done.
'I've made all the deals,' Trump said in a Time interview in late April, saying trade negotiations with foreign partners were nearly complete. 'I've made 200 deals.'
More than two weeks later, Trump acknowledged that hundreds or even dozens of deals aren't possible on such a short timeframe — a point he reiterated last Friday at a press briefing at the White House.
'You know, we have 200 countries,' Trump said. 'We can't do that. So at a certain point, over the next week and a half or so, or maybe before, we're going to send out a letter. We talked to many of the countries, and we're just going to tell them what they have to pay to do business in the United States. And it's going to go very quickly.'
That idea of establishing new tariffs for countries that can't or won't reach a deal with the United States has been floating around for over two months, but the timeline keeps getting pushed back. On April 23, Trump said his administration would 'set the tariff' for countries that fail to negotiate new terms in the following few weeks. On May 16, Trump said that 'at a certain point, over the next two to three weeks … we'll be telling people what they'll be paying to do business in the United States.'
On Thursday, Trump said those letters are a day away.
'It's just much easier,' Trump said. 'We have far more than 170 countries, and how many deals could you make?'
CNN's Elisabeth Buchwald and Sam Delouya contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'The World Is Set Up Against Families With Two Working Parents' – A Couple Earning $260,000 Per Year Shares Their Struggle With Summer Camps
'The World Is Set Up Against Families With Two Working Parents' – A Couple Earning $260,000 Per Year Shares Their Struggle With Summer Camps

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'The World Is Set Up Against Families With Two Working Parents' – A Couple Earning $260,000 Per Year Shares Their Struggle With Summer Camps

Many children look forward to summer getting started. After nine months of sitting at desks, writing notes, and taking exams, they're ready for a more flexible schedule. However, these summer vacations are stressful for many parents. They have to plan camp trips and keep their children busy while juggling full-time work. This concern recently made its way into the HENRY Finance Reddit community. This group is filled with high earners who aren't rich yet, and many of them explained how challenging it is to take care of the kids during summer. "The world is set up against families with two working parents," the original poster mentioned. Don't Miss: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: Invest early in CancerVax's breakthrough tech aiming to disrupt a $231B market. The couple, with one of the spouses being the original poster, earns a combined $260,000 per year. They have a 3-year-old in daycare and a 6-year-old in a summer program that has been disappointing so far. Other Redditors shared their experiences with raising children during the summer and how they are navigating the current environment. One of the top comments came from a Redditor who encouraged the community to give gyms a try. Many gyms have activities for children and offer structured activities. The commenter specifically mentioned two gyms that offer a wide range of activities. "Both the YMCA and Lifetime Fitness do full summer camps with drop-off and pick-up flexibility. All day programming, but time by the pool, weekly fieldtrips, etc." If you work out at the gym each day, you may want to take your kids with you during some of those days. That way, they're getting in good exercise, which will let them use their energy early in the day. Trending: GoSun's Breakthrough Rooftop EV Charger Already Has 2,000+ Units Reserved — Many Redditors emphasized the value of creating structure in your children's schedules. Some parents were stay-at-home moms until they saw it was too hard for them to commit to structured schedules for their children at a consistent rate. It's also an uphill battle since many parents in the neighborhood may also have their kids in a summer camp. This trend plays out in many areas, and it gives parents fewer options for their kids if they don't want to embark on a summer program. "We would all be miserable with an extended period of no structure," one Redditor stated. Another person commented right under that post in you have to work to put food on the table, you don't want to overdo it either. It makes more sense to work extra hours and pursue every good opportunity when you are single, but the dynamic shifts for many people when they become adults. One Redditor summed this trend up nicely. "Make sure you are spending time wisely at work and not just working for work's sake. Cut back rigorously on [stuff] that doesn't matter. When I had no kids, I put in 60 hours regularly; as a parent, I put in 35-45, depending on the situation. My performance reviews never got worse." The original poster responded to the comments with some thoughts and a career journey that encapsulates many individuals who are grappling between their work and being present for their children. "My current work is actually closing in the middle of July. And I've already lined something else up, but it's gonna take a little [time] to be credentialed, and so I am going to pull the kids from everything and spend some nice weeks with them at home. But the new job is definitely gonna be longer hours at first. But, it's also good for the career. But, I don't want to forget what's important for sure." Read Next: The average American couple has saved this much money for retirement —?Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article 'The World Is Set Up Against Families With Two Working Parents' – A Couple Earning $260,000 Per Year Shares Their Struggle With Summer Camps originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Insurance Can Be Disastrous
Insurance Can Be Disastrous

Wall Street Journal

time16 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Insurance Can Be Disastrous

Regarding 'When Towns Rebuild From Disaster, Prices Go Up' (Page One, June 21): It is clear that the rebuilding process negatively affected low-income residents. But the deeper issue I see is that existing government systems had long set them up for instability with policies that made it easy for 'improvement' to come at the cost of affordability and inclusion. Disproportionate climate resilience levels increase the social and economic burden of natural disasters for vulnerable groups. Home insurance is central to climate resilience, and inequitable public insurance programs such as the National Flood Insurance Program, or NFIP, contribute heavily to skewed government disaster response. The NFIP functions as a housing subsidy for wealthy homeowners in desirable but vulnerable areas such as Panama City, Fla., and Paradise, Calif. Using taxpayer dollars, the program can offer artificially low premiums that aren't fully risk-based and are instead designed so that the government assumes most of the risk. NFIP premiums tend to decrease as property values rise, so wealthy homeowners end up with cheaper, better coverage than their low-income counterparts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store