logo
Stopping the boats is only half the battle. We must also restore British values

Stopping the boats is only half the battle. We must also restore British values

Yahoo2 days ago

At church on Sunday, we were asked to pray for refugees. I admit that, for the first time, I hesitated. Over the weekend, we have watched helplessly as hundreds of illegal migrants crossed the Channel with impunity. Even John Healey, the Defence Secretary, found these scenes 'pretty shocking'. The monthly Universal Credit bill for households with at least one immigrant is now almost £1 billion. Our streets are disfigured by imported crime and conflict. It isn't easy to be a Good Samaritan when you feel that your country is no longer your beloved home, but a fairly insalubrious hotel.
Indeed, the anger engendered by what I call border anxiety puts at risk everything that fills us with patriotic pride – our ancient laws and liberties, our tolerance and sense of fair play and, yes, our kindness to strangers. Successive governments have been elected to control migration, but have proceeded to do the opposite.
Simultaneously, we have dismantled or denigrated our own culture, our values and our traditions. The result is that we cannot integrate those who are already here, because we are losing the sense of what it means to be British. Unless we believe in ourselves, all we have is anarchy in public and parallel societies in private.
The rage provoked by feelings of betrayal over uncontrolled migration is shattering the British political system, which the rest of the world used to envy and imitate. Yet it is fatal to our civility to give in to that rage: 'Whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad.' Instead of the fabled stability of our two-party parliamentary democracy, we seem now to be succumbing to a Continental-style chaos of four, five or more factions. A forest fire of fury has annihilated the old parties in France, Italy and other European nations. Why should Britain be immune?
Fissiparous parties held together only by hostility are, ironically, prey to foreign powers. In Poland, the presidential election was overshadowed by the fact that the nationalist Law and Justice candidate, Karol Nawrocki, went to the Oval Office mid-campaign to pay homage to Donald Trump. Her master's voice, the US Homeland Security secretary Kristi Noem, flew to Warsaw to insist that 'Karol… needs to be the next president of Poland', while denouncing his liberal rival, Rafal Trzaskowski, as 'a train wreck of a leader'.
Trump's emissaries had already intervened in the German election earlier this year: both Elon Musk and J D Vance endorsed Alice Weidel, leader of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party. When the German authorities accused the nationalist AfD of extremism, Washington protested again in the name of 'free speech'. Meanwhile, the AfD has made no secret of its pro-Putin sympathies – and the feeling is mutual, especially since the new conservative chancellor, Friedrich Merz, has emerged as a staunch ally of Ukraine.
We don't want to see British politics dominated by the White House or the Kremlin. Nor do we want every other urgent issue – from defence to the deficit – to be subordinated indefinitely to migration. We need to reach a new consensus on how to deter or deal with illegal migrants as soon as possible. Undesirables who come here to commit crimes or exploit our generosity must be deported. Likewise, legal migration must be curtailed, citizenship earned and rules strictly enforced.
Above all, we must rediscover the world we have lost: in which our history is not a tale told by ideological idiots, but the stirring narrative of a nation of pioneers, entrepreneurs and saviours. We worry about immigrants, but forget about the half a million emigrants we lose a year, many of them young families despairing of a society that has lost its own plot.
Three of my four grandchildren are growing up in Poland, a land that has endured an incomparably harsher past than our own, but which celebrates its culture and inculcates old-fashioned good manners. No wonder it is predicted that the Poles will overtaken Japan in GDP per capita next year and will one day surpass Germany and the UK too.
Given the polarisation of British opinion on immigration ever since the 1960s, achieving a robust consensus may seem a remote prospect. Yet it is actually well within our grasp. As I wrote here recently, Denmark has done exactly that with its Social Democrat-led coalition under the formidable Mette Frederiksen. She has demonstrated beyond doubt that banishing border anxiety, while restoring confidence in cultural identity and the nation state, do not need to be demonised as a 'far-Right' crusade.
Ms Frederiksen is indubitably a woman of the centre-Left, but she is first and foremost a Danish patriot.
There are many grounds for doubting that Sir Keir Starmer is about to follow Ms Frederiksen's example, but one of the strongest is the electoral calculus. Labour's elites are wedded to the notion that their voters, who include millions of migrants and their descendants, would desert them if they adopted the Danish model. They are not entirely wrong – many Labour MPs do face threats from Lib Dems, Greens and especially Islamists – but this is a test of the Prime Minister's statesmanship. Ms Frederiksen's predecessor, Helle Thorning-Schmidt (the wife of Stephen Kinnock MP), failed that test and lost. She is a historical footnote, while Ms Frederiksen is widely emulated.
Equally, Reform UK is guilty of throwing out the baby with the bathwater. We must beware of belittling the huge contribution that those from overseas have made to this country. It is no accident that the last two Conservative leaders have had migrant backgrounds. There are many like them who are intensely proud of this country and have no time for those who claim asylum but are really gaming the system. It was Rishi Sunak, not Sir Keir, whose measures, passed before he left office, have halved the net migration numbers.
Hence Kemi Badenoch is the politician who most deserves to be trusted to achieve a new settlement on migration. Her formula is the right one: to end the automatic path to British citizenship and introduce a legally binding cap on annual immigration. If any leader can lay the spectre of border anxiety to rest, it's Kemi.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Healey insists defence funding will rise to 3% target to meet review aims
Healey insists defence funding will rise to 3% target to meet review aims

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Healey insists defence funding will rise to 3% target to meet review aims

Defence Secretary John Healey insisted he was '100% confident' that military funding would increase as promised to prepare the armed forces for the future. The Strategic Defence Review recommended sweeping changes, including a greater focus on new technology including drones and artificial intelligence based on rising budgets. The Government has committed to increase spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product from April 2027 but only has an 'ambition' to reach 3% during the next parliament, which is due to end by around 2034. The authors of the review have suggested reaching that 3% target is vital to delivering their recommendations while US President Donald Trump has pushed for Nato allies to spend 5%. Mr Healey denied he was gambling on economic growth to meet his target, telling BBC Breakfast: 'I'm 100% confident that we'll hit that 3%. 'The important thing for now is what we can do, and we can do now more than we've been able to do before, because of an extra £5 billion the Chancellor has put in to the defence budget this year and the 2.5% that we will deliver three years earlier than anyone expected. 'It means that a £60 billion budget this year will rise throughout this parliament and beyond.' The Ministry of Defence announced a £5 billion investment in the 'kit of the future' following the publication of the review on Monday. The funding includes £4 billion for drones and autonomous systems, and an extra £1 billion for lasers to protect British ships and soldiers. A new era of threat requires a new era for defence. The Strategic Defence Review marks a landmark shift in our deterrence and defence ⬇️ — Ministry of Defence 🇬🇧 (@DefenceHQ) June 2, 2025 Mr Healey said the investment would provide 'the most significant advance in UK defence technology in decades' and 'ensure our armed forces have the cutting-edge capabilities they need to meet the challenges of a rapidly changing world'. Part of the investment will see the establishment of a new 'drone centre' to accelerate the deployment of the technology by all three branches of the armed forces. The focus on drones comes as the technology has proved increasingly lethal on the battlefield in Ukraine, where it now kills more people than traditional artillery. At a meeting of allied defence ministers in April, Mr Healey said the UK estimated drones were inflicting 70-80% of battlefield casualties, while on Sunday Ukraine launched a major attack on Russian airfields deep behind the front line using a fleet of small drones. In addition to investment in drones and AI, the Government has announced an additional £1 billion for the development of 'directed energy weapons' (DEWs) during the current parliament. This includes the DragonFire laser scheduled to be fitted to the Royal Navy's Type 45 destroyers from 2027, with a similar system provided for the Army by the end of the decade. DragonFire and other DEWs are intended to provide a lower-cost form of air defence against targets including drones, costing just £10 per shot compared with the thousands of pounds it costs to fire existing weapons.

Albuquerque community helps band recover stolen trailer
Albuquerque community helps band recover stolen trailer

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Albuquerque community helps band recover stolen trailer

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) – The show will go on for a band traveling through Albuquerque who had their trailer, full of equipment and merchandise, stolen. But the power of social media and the Albuquerque community helped them get it back. Story continues below News: UNM researchers make new discovery about Yellowstone National Park supervolcano New Mexico Strange: A dive into the Painted Lady's violent past, haunted present Community: Major renovation' planned for ABQ BioPark Children's Fantasy Garden New Mexico Crime Files: A deputy tazing a high school student goes too far British-American trio Raynes made their 18th stop on tour in Albuquerque this past weekend. After a successful show at Revel on Saturday night, things hit a sour note. 'The next morning, I went out to the vehicle and noticed the trailer was just missing, vanished,' said Joe Berger, a member of Raynes. He let his bandmates know the trailer was stolen from their hotel parking lot in the University area. 'Our whole livelihood is in the back of this trailer. All of our instruments, all of our merch that we sell at our shows, literally everything that we have is contained in that trailer,' said Mark Race, the lead singer of Raynes. The band searched around town and also put out a call on social media. They posted a video letting the public know what happened and asking for the community's help. The video spread fast and led to a Facebook message from a local saying the trailer had been spotted. 'I said send me photo, and sure as heck that was it,' said Berger. The band met police at the location of the trailer and got even better news. All that was taken was a mandolin, banjo, and what must've been a good pair of snakeskin boots. 'We opened it and by golly, everything, almost everything, was still in the trailer. We did not expect the trailer, much less anything in it,' said Berger. While some locals were in the comments bashing Albuquerque for the theft, some calling it 'typical Albuquerque' and an 'embarrassment,' for the band Raynes, the Land of Enchantment still lives up to its name. 'Every band this happens to at least once. It's not just in Albuquerque, it's all over the place,' said Mat Charley, band member of Raynes. 'We had a really phenomenal show, like the night before, one of our favorite of the tour and met a bunch of great people.' And it was those people in the Duke City that helped Raynes get back on the road with their trailer and ready for their next show. 'A massive thank you to everyone that did help. Because without their help we would've never have found this and we would've found ourselves in a much, much worse situation,' said Race. KRQE News 13 reached out to the Albuquerque Police Department to see if any arrest was made, but did not hear back. The band said they are going to stay somewhere safer next time they come to Albuquerque and are looking into getting AirTags for their trailer. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Net zero jobs plans are fundamentally flawed, Miliband warned
Net zero jobs plans are fundamentally flawed, Miliband warned

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Net zero jobs plans are fundamentally flawed, Miliband warned

Ed Miliband has been urged to slash taxes on the North Sea to prevent the loss of tens of thousands of jobs. Researchers at Robert Gordon University (RGU) said oil and gas jobs were disappearing faster than new clean energy roles were being created as a result of the slower-than-expected deployment of wind farms. It threatens the loss of tens of thousands of skilled British jobs by the end of the decade. The RGU report warned that the offshore wind sector may only generate 29,000 jobs by 2030, while some 58,000 disappear from oil and gas – the equivalent of 200 jobs lost every week for the next five years. Paul de Leeuw, director of RGU's Energy Transition Institute, said: 'You have to wait pretty well to the back end of this decade before there's enough capacity in the renewables sector to take all the people coming out of oil and gas. 'So there is a very valid, very real concern in oil and gas, in the world-class supply chain and the absolutely fantastic workforce, and they're saying 'actually, we're quite happy to work on the renewable agenda, but the jobs are simply not there'. 'It's a timing issue.' To avoid heavy job losses, RGU said Mr Miliband, the Energy Secretary, needed to either attract a larger share of turbine manufacturing to the UK or reverse his ban on new North Sea drilling licences to temporarily boost oil and gas production. Mr Miliband has promised a 'just transition' in the North Sea, saying offshore wind jobs will replace those lost on oil and gas rigs. He is targeting between 43 and 50 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind capacity by 2030 as part of his clean power plans. The Government argues this will not only deliver energy security but also provide lasting employment for North Sea workers. However, based on the industry's current trajectory, new jobs will not be created fast enough to match the decline in oil and gas. In a worst-case scenario, researchers said the overall number of people working in offshore energy could fall by one fifth to 125,000. It comes after energy consultancy BloombergNEF warned the Government was on course to miss its offshore wind deployment target by 10GW. RGU said Mr Miliband could miss his wind power targets and still avoid job losses, but only if he attracted a larger share of turbine manufacturing to the UK or reopened the North Sea. Prof De Leeuw said: 'Getting to the Government's target for offshore wind capacity would be an absolutely heroic achievement, especially in just the next five years. 'So if you might not get there, you want to keep your options open. We think you need to keep oil and gas going for just a bit longer, to buy more time for the cavalry to arrive in the form of renewable energy jobs.' The RGU report predicted demand for between 125,000 and 212,000 offshore energy workers – including both those in oil and gas and those in renewables – by 2030. This depends on various factors, including the amount of offshore wind capacity that is built, the share of turbine manufacturing that is done domestically, and the level of oil and gas production. In nearly every scenario where Mr Miliband hits his upper target for offshore wind generation, or 50GW of capacity, the number of North Sea jobs either increases or stays more or less the same. But in most scenarios where only 40GW or 30GW are delivered, large numbers of jobs are lost. BloombergNEF recently warned that Mr Miliband was on course to deliver just 33GW by 2030, with Ørsted's decision to cancel the massive Hornsea 4 project also viewed as a sign of industry turbulence. Significant job losses are less likely if more money is spent on building wind farm equipment in Britain, RGU said. However, this may be beyond the Government's control. Another way to ensure jobs are not lost in almost every scenario is to ensure oil and gas production stays at 700,000 barrels per day or more, compared to a current forecast of between 500,000 to 600,000 barrels per day. This would only be possible if controversial developments such as the Rosebank and Jackdaw fields went ahead, as well as other schemes. Prof De Leeuw suggested ministers could try to grow domestic turbine manufacturing by making supporting investments in factories, perhaps through the National Wealth Fund and state-owned Great British Energy. But he warned the Government 'doesn't have all the levers' to ensure that happens, whereas the windfall tax on oil and gas producers and the ban on new licences were within its control. While stressing the North Sea was still in 'managed decline', he added: 'It is very hard for the Government to make the renewables agenda go faster. 'But what they do have is all the levers on how to manage the decline in oil and gas, and particularly around what they do with the tax regime and the fiscal levers.' Asked whether Mr Miliband should reverse the ban on new drilling licences, a key pledge in Labour's election manifesto, he replied: 'You have to get investor confidence to the highest point. 'What was in the [Labour] manifesto ... the world has moved on, but the policy has not. I do think there is room for selective licensing to keep activity going.' The Government has been consulting on its plans for the North Sea, which include boosting employment through a variety of new sectors such as carbon capture and storage, hydrogen production and offshore wind. It has also set up the Office for Clean Energy Jobs to ensure new roles are 'high-quality and paid fairly', and launched the so-called clean industry bonus to attract factory investments to coastal communities. On Friday, a spokesman for Mr Miliband's department said: 'We have taken rapid steps to deliver the next generation of good jobs for North Sea workers in a fair and orderly transition as part of our plan for change, including by making the biggest investment in offshore wind and two first-of-a-kind carbon capture storage clusters. 'This comes alongside Great British Energy, headquartered in Aberdeen, which has already announced a £300m investment into British supply chains, unlocking significant investment and helping to create thousands of skilled jobs.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store